Biomedical subjects

Idoia Jarauta

Publications and source records attributed to Idoia Jarauta.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Physicochemical model to interpret the kinetics of aroma extraction during wine aging in wood. Model limitations suggest the necessary existence of biochemical processes.

A model based on physicochemical parameters has been developed and applied to the study of the kinetics of extraction of aroma compounds from oak casks having been used a variable number of times. Two major deviations from the model can be observed: a strong seasonal dependence of extraction (unexpected in a thermostated cellar); and higher yields with a smaller number of longer extractions. 4-Propylguaiacol follows both behaviors, and its levels have been found to be closely related to those of 4-ethylguaiacol and to the number of uses of the barrel, which suggests that this compound may be formed by the same microorganisms forming ethylphenols from a precursor found in wood. Although the extraction kinetics of all aroma compounds appear to be more or less mediated by the action of microorganisms, those of whiskeylactones, eugenol, and 4-allyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol are more in accordance with the physicochemical model, whereas those of vanillin, syringaldehyde, furfuryl alcohol, and, of course, 4-propylguaiacol are much more coherent with a microbiological extraction/formation.

Chemical Phenomena↗

PubMed2005

Concurrent phenomena contributing to the formation of the aroma of wine during aging in oak wood: an analytical study.

Red wine was stored in different oak barrels or in stainless steel, and samples were taken for two years to determine 79 aroma compounds. Aging in oak affects 41 compounds. The type of wood affects 11 compounds. At least seven different processes seem to take place concurrently in aroma evolution, and five such processes, affecting 37 compounds, are linked to the oak cask. These are extraction from the wood, oxidation of wine alcohols and amino acids, microbiological formation of ethyl phenols, sorption processes, and condensation of acetaldehyde with polyphenols. The wood can release linear gamma- and delta-lactones, beta-damascenone, and ionones. Some compounds are released very fast from wood, which suggests they lie in the external part of the wood. Some extraction profiles are too complex to be explained by physical processes. Finally, the levels of 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone and 2-ethyl-5-methyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone increase even in the reference wine, which suggests the presence of a precursor.

Food Handling↗

PubMed2004

Simple strategy for the optimization of solid-phase extraction procedures through the use of solid-liquid distribution coefficients application to the determination of aliphatic lactones in wine.

A practical strategy for the optimization of solid-phase extraction (SPE) systems is presented. Critical SPE volumes (sample loaded, rinsing and elution solvent) are calculated from solid-liquid extraction coefficients and from basic bed parameters determined in simple experiments, using the Lövkist Jonsson model and other expressions derived from the general theory of chromatography. The agreement between calculated and measured volumes is satisfactory, which makes it possible to consider different sorbents and rinsing and elution solvents in the SPE optimization with a relatively low experimental effort. The strategy has been successfully applied to the optimization of a SPE method directed to the selective extraction of aliphatic lactones from wine. Six different reversed-phase sorbents were studied and the one showing maximum extraction selectivity was selected. Wine (50 ml) is extracted in a 200 mg cartridge filled with Bond Elut-ENV resins. Interferences are removed with 20 ml of methanol-water (40:60) with 1% NaHCO3. Elution is carried out with 1.8 ml of dichloromethane. The extract is concentrated to 0.15 ml and analyzed by GC-ion trap MS. Eight odor-active aliphatic gamma and delta lactones (with 8-12 C atoms) from wine are recovered (R > 75%) in an extract free from wine major volatiles. Detection limits are in the 40-300 ng/l range, well below the odor detection threshold of these compounds. Linearity (r2 > 0.996) and precision (average R.S.D. 3.5%) are satisfactory in all cases. The levels in wine of some of these lactones (gamma-octa, undeca and dodecalactones) are reported by first time and results demonstrate that can be present at concentrations above or close to their corresponding odor thresholds.

Chromatography, Liquid↗

PubMed2003

Quantitative determination of sotolon, maltol and free furaneol in wine by solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-ion-trap mass spectrometry.

A method for the analytical determination of sotolon [4,5-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone], maltol [3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4H-pyran-4-one] and free furaneol [2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone] in wine has been developed. The analytes are extracted from 50 ml of wine in a solid-phase extraction cartridge filled with 800 mg of LiChrolut EN resins. Interferences are removed with 15 ml of a pentane-dichloromethane (20:1) solution, and analytes are recovered with 6 ml of dichloromethane. The extract is concentrated up to 0.1 ml and analyzed by GC-ion trap MS. Maltol and sotolon were determined by selected ion storage of ions in the m/z ranges 120-153 and 79-95, using the ions m/z 126 and 83 for quantitation, respectively. Furaneol was determined by non-resonant fragmentation of the m/z 128 mother ion and subsequent analysis of the m/z 81 ion. The detection limits of the method are in all cases between 0.5 and 1 microg l(-1), well below the olfactory thresholds of the compounds. The precision of the method is in the 4-5% range for levels in wine around 20 microg l(-1). Linearity holds at least up to 400 microg l(-1), and is satisfactory in all cases. The recoveries of maltol and sotolon are constant (70 and 64%, respectively) and do not depend on the type of wine. On the contrary, in the case of furaneol, red wines show constant and high recoveries (97%), while the recoveries on white wines range between 30 and 80%. Different experiments showed that this behavior is probably due to the existence of complexes formed between furaneol and sulphur dioxide or catechols. Sensory experiments confirmed that the complexed forms found in white wines are not perceived by orthonasal olfaction, and that the furaneol determined by the method can be considered as the free and odor-active fraction.

Furans↗