PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J M Maitland

Publications and source records attributed to J M Maitland.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Two stage audit of cerebrovascular and coronary heart disease risk factor recording: the effect of case finding and screening programmes.

The level of recording of risk factors for cardiovascular disease by general practitioners in north east Scotland has been audited. The effect of the audit on recording levels has also been determined by means of a second audit one year later. Twenty four practices in Grampian took part in the study, each auditing a random selection of 100 records of male patients aged 35-64 years. The risk factors chosen were blood pressure, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, weight and height. Blood pressure was recorded in the majority of the records (68.0%) and the mean level of recording of all of the risk factors increased between the two audits. The increase in the recording of smoking habit, alcohol consumption and weight was statistically significant. Practices with organized systems of data collection had higher levels of risk factor recording than those without. The levels of recording achieved were thus dependent on factors that existed in the practices prior to the study. This suggests that to increase recording levels, future educational intervention should be aimed at changes of motivation.

Adult↗

Grampian Health Board's joint drug formulary.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for creating a joint general practice-hospital formulary, using the example of ulcer healing drugs. DESIGN: A joint formulary development group produced draft guidelines based on an earlier hospital formulary, which were sent to interested local general practitioners for consultation. Revised guidelines were then drawn up and forwarded to the health board's medicines committee for approval and distribution. SETTING: Grampian Health Board. SUBJECTS: Nine members of joint formulary development group plus local general practitioners who were invited to comment on a list of 11 ulcer healing drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Degree of coincidence of drugs selected by hospital doctors and general practitioners. RESULTS: The ulcer healing drugs selected by the panel of general practitioners and by hospital doctors were highly coincident. The cost of one day's treatment with drugs varied considerably between hospital and general practice--for example, one drug cost 46p in hospital and 1 pounds in general practice and another cost 1.26 pounds in hospital and 1.01 pounds in general practice. Overall, six drugs cost more in hospital and five cost more in general practice. CONCLUSIONS: A joint formulary for use in hospitals and general practice in a health board can be devised fairly simply by consultation as virtually the same drugs are used in both types of practice. It should influence the health board's expenditure on drugs and affect the choice of drugs when a patient is discharged from hospital or is referred to any hospital in the region.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

Standardization of core data for practice annual reports: a pilot study.

To investigate the feasibility of a standardized practice annual report, nine general medical practices in Grampian region collected data over a four month trial period. The definitions for core data used were arrived at after considerable consultation and discussion. They were found to be workable indicators of practice activity enabling comparisons to be made between practices. Three practices reported that they were completing forms more accurately and that this had led to increased item of service income. The results from this study show smaller variations than have been previously reported and there is a case to be made for the pooling and collation of such defined core data. Analysis of this practice activity would provide the stimulus for further research.

Annual Reports as Topic↗