PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2560048

Standardization of core data for practice annual reports: a pilot study.

Abstract

To investigate the feasibility of a standardized practice annual report, nine general medical practices in Grampian region collected data over a four month trial period. The definitions for core data used were arrived at after considerable consultation and discussion. They were found to be workable indicators of practice activity enabling comparisons to be made between practices. Three practices reported that they were completing forms more accurately and that this had led to increased item of service income. The results from this study show smaller variations than have been previously reported and there is a case to be made for the pooling and collation of such defined core data. Analysis of this practice activity would provide the stimulus for further research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F P Howarth, J M Maitland, P R Duffus. 1989. Standardization of core data for practice annual reports: a pilot study.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2560048/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Translating words into actions: are governments acting on the advice of the World health report?

Every year, WHO produces the World health report: the 2005 report concentrated on maternal, neonatal and child health. But what is the value of these reports? Are they ritualistic publications designed to promote WHO, or are they worthy of proper discussion and debate? One would think that given the current crises in global health, the annual report of the UN's primary agency for health would be important. However, unless there is evidence that these reports are taken seriously, discussed and debated, and shown to have an effect, a conclusion might be drawn that they are largely insignificant. And that would consign WHO to a level of insignificance that it does not warrant. In this discussion of the 2005 report, I aim to provoke a response from both WHO and the international health community to demonstrate that the annual World health reports are meaningful. Furthermore, I suggest here that WHO shows its commitment to the recommendations of the 2005 report by monitoring how well recommendations have been taken forward.

Annual Reports as Topic↗