PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J R Koup

Publications and source records attributed to J R Koup.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

As the primary route for elimination of clinafloxacin is renal clearance (CL(R)) of unchanged drug, studies were conducted to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of clinafloxacin following administration to young and elderly subjects, subjects with various degrees of renal function, and subjects requiring dialysis. These were open-label studies in which subjects received single oral clinafloxacin doses. Sixteen young subjects (18 to 35 years old) and 16 elderly subjects (>65 years old) were enrolled in a study comparing pharmacokinetic profiles of clinafloxacin in young and elderly subjects. Twenty subjects having various degrees of renal function were enrolled into one of three groups based on degree of renal function as measured by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)). Twelve subjects with severe renal impairment requiring dialysis enrolled in a third study. Clinafloxacin was generally well tolerated by all subjects. Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic profiles in elderly subjects were dependent only on age-related decreases in renal function. Clinafloxacin maximum concentrations in plasma, areas under the concentration-time curves, and terminal elimination half-life values increased with decreasing CL(CR) values. Total apparent body clearance of clinafloxacin from the plasma after oral administration (CL(oral)) and CL(R) were dependent on CL(CR) according to the following relationships: CL(oral) = 2.3. CL(CR) + 77 and CL(R) = 1.74. CL(CR). Hemodialysis had no significant effect on clinafloxacin clearance. Based on the relationship between CL(CR) and clinafloxacin CL(oral) and CL(R) values, the clinafloxacin dose should be halved in patients having a CL(CR) of <40 ml/min. Further dose adjustment is not warranted in patients requiring hemodialysis.

Adolescent↗

Drug interactions with clinafloxacin.

Many fluoroquinolone antibiotics are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzyme systems and may produce potentially important drug interactions when administered with other drugs. Studies were conducted to determine the effect of clinafloxacin on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, caffeine, warfarin, and phenytoin, as well as the effect of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin. Concomitant administration of 200 or 400 mg of clinafloxacin reduces mean theophylline clearance by approximately 50 and 70%, respectively, and reduces mean caffeine clearance by 84%. (R)-Warfarin concentrations in plasma during clinafloxacin administration are 32% higher and (S)-warfarin concentrations do not change during clinafloxacin treatment. An observed late pharmacodynamic effect was most likely due to gut flora changes. Phenytoin has no effect on clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics, while phenytoin clearance is 15% lower during clinafloxacin administration.

Adult↗

Impact of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis.

BACKGROUND: Continued scepticism about the benefits of population pharmacokinetics and/or population pharmacodynamics, here referred to collectively as the population approach, hampers its widespread application in drug development. At the same time the sources of this scepticism have not been clearly defined. In an attempt to capture and clearly define these concerns and to help communicate the value of the population approach in drug development at Parke-Davis we conducted a survey of customers within the company. The results of this survey are presented here. METHODS: All drug development programmes conducted over the past 10 years that included a population approach in data analysis and interpretation were identified. A brief description of the population analysis was prepared together with a brief description of how the resulting information was used in each drug development programme. These synopses were forwarded to relevant members of each drug development team together with a survey designed to solicit opinions as to the relevance and impact of these analyses. RESULTS: The most frequent use of information derived from population-based analysis was in labelling. In all cases of drugs making to New Drug Application (NDA) submission the analyses resulted in information that was included in approved or proposed labelling. In almost half of the cases summarised here (5 of 12), population-based analysis was perceived to have resulted in information that influenced the direction of individual development programmes. In many of these cases the information was serendipitous. It is also noted that most of these analyses were not the result of clearly defined objectives and prospective analysis plans. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the population approach, even when applied retrospectively, may have value in complementing or supporting interpretation of other data collected during the course of a trial. Atypical systemic exposure is quickly and easily assessed for correlation with adverse events or exceptional efficacy in retrospective or ad hoc evaluation. Although we know of no direct evidence, it is possible that such use of population pharmacokinetic data has facilitated NDA review and approval by providing insight into the role of atypical systemic drug exposure in otherwise spurious events.

Data Collection↗

Effect of troglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive agent.

Fifteen healthy women participated in a study to determine the effect of multiple doses of troglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of Ortho-Novum 1/35 (35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol [EE] and 1 mg norethindrone [NE]). Participants received three cycles (21 days each of active drug followed by 7 days without medication) of Ortho-Novum. During the third cycle, participants also received troglitazone 600 mg qd for 22 days. Pharmacokinetic profiles of EE and NE were determined on day 21 of the second and third cycles. Progesterone and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels were also measured. Troglitazone decreased EE Cmax and AUC(0-24) by 32% and 29%, respectively. Likewise, troglitazone decreased NE Cmax and AUC(0-24) by 31% and 30%, respectively. Plasma SHBG concentrations increased from 113 nmol/L during cycle 2 to 220 nmol/L during cycle 3. Troglitazone reduced plasma unbound AUC for NE by 49%. Serum progesterone levels were lower than 1.5 ng/mL on all occasions. Thus, coadministration of troglitazone and Ortho-Novum decreases the systemic exposure to EE and NE. A higher dose of oral contraceptive or an alternate method of contraception should be considered for patients treated with troglitazone.

Adult↗

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of troglitazone and its metabolites.

This study evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of troglitazone, metabolite 1 (sulfate conjugate), and metabolite 3 (quinone metabolite) following administration of daily oral doses of 200, 400, and 600 mg troglitazone for 7 days (per dosing period) to 21 subjects. During each dosing period, plasma samples were collected predose on days 1, 5, 6 and 7 and serially for 24 hours on day 7. Steady-state plasma concentrations for troglitazone, metabolite 1, and metabolite 3 were achieved by day 7. Troglitazone was rapidly absorbed with mean tmax values of 2.7 to 2.9 hours. Mean Cmax and AUC(0-24) values for troglitazone, metabolite 1, and metabolite 3 increased proportionally with increasing troglitazone doses over the clinical dose range of 200 mg to 600 mg administered once daily. Mean troglitazone CL/F, percent fluctuation, and AUC ratios of metabolite 1 and metabolite 3 to troglitazone were similar across dose groups. These data suggest that the pharmacokinetics and disposition of troglitazone and its metabolites are independent of dose over the dose range studied. Thus, troglitazone, metabolite 1, and metabolite 3 displayed linear pharmacokinetics at steady-state.

Adolescent↗

Clinical pharmacokinetics of troglitazone.

Troglitazone is a new thiazolidinedione oral antidiabetic agent approved for use to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is rapidly absorbed with an absolute bioavailability of between 40 and 50%. Food increases the absorption by 30 to 80%. The pharmacokinetics of troglitazone are linear over the clinical dosage range of 200 to 600 mg once daily. The mean elimination half-life ranges from 7.6 to 24 hours, which facilitates a once daily administration regimen. The pharmacokinetics of troglitazone are similar between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy individuals. In humans, troglitazone undergoes metabolism by sulfation, glucuronidation and oxidation to form a sulfate conjugate (M1), glucuronide conjugate (M2) and quinone metabolite (M3), respectively. M1 and M3 are the major metabolites in plasma, and M2 is a minor metabolite. Age, gender, type 2 diabetes, renal impairment, smoking and race do not appear to influence the pharmacokinetics of troglitazone and its 2 major metabolites. In patients with hepatic impairment the plasma concentrations of troglitazone, M1 and M3 increase by 30%, 4-fold, and 2-fold, respectively. Cholestyramine decreases the absorption of troglitazone by 70%. Troglitazone may enhance the activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and/or transporter(s) thereby reducing the plasma concentrations of terfenadine, cyclosporin, atorvastatin and fexofenadine. It also reduces the plasma concentrations of the oral contraceptive hormones ethinylestradiol, norethindrone and levonorgestrel. Troglitazone does not alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, glibenclamide (glyburide) or paracetamol (acetaminophen). There is no pharmacodynamic interaction between troglitazone and warfarin or alcohol (ethanol). Pharmacodynamic modelling showed that improvement in fasting glucose and triglyceride levels increased with dose from 200 to 600 mg. Knowledge of systemic troglitazone exposure within a dose group does not improve the prediction of glucose lowering response or adverse effects beyond those based on the administered dose.

Biological Availability↗

Effect of troglitazone on steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Twelve healthy subjects participated in a study to determine the effect of multiple doses of troglitazone on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. Subjects received digoxin 0.25 mg orally once daily on days 1 through 20 and 400 mg of troglitazone orally once daily on days 11 through 20. Serial plasma samples and 24-hour urine samples collected before and after the doses on days 10 and 20 were analyzed for digoxin using a radioimmunoassay method. Eleven subjects completed the study. Administration of multiple oral doses of digoxin and troglitazone was well tolerated. Mean values for maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) of digoxin on day 10 were similar to those on day 20. Mean day 10 digoxin values for minimum concentration (Cmin), apparent oral clearance (Cl/F), total urinary excretion from 0 to 24 hours (Ae0-24), and renal clearance (Clr) were also similar to corresponding values on day 20. Thus, concomitant administration of multiple-dose troglitazone does not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Administration, Oral↗

Effect of age, gender, and race on steady state procainamide pharmacokinetics after administration of procanbid sustained-release tablets.

Procainamide hydrochloride is a Class 1A antiarrhythmic agent administered intravenously or orally for treatment of symptomatic ventricular premature depolarizations (VPD), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. A new sustained-release formulation, Procanbid, which allows for twice-daily dosing was recently approved for marketing in the United States. This paper describes the population pharmacokinetics of procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), the major metabolite, in healthy volunteers and patients with VPD by combining Cmax, tmax, Cmin, and AUC(0-12) values at steady state from six multiple-dose studies in which one 1000-mg or two 500-mg Procanbid tablets were administered. Means of parameters by race and gender were inspected for trends likely to be of clinical relevance. Procainamide and NAPA pharmacokinetic parameters observed after administration of Procanbid tablets were similar in blacks and whites, and in men and women. However, differences in body size should be considered when determining the Procanbid dose for women. Participant age had significant impact on NAPA pharmacokinetics in this study population and should be considered in dose selection. Age effects on procainamide were not detected in the study population, which was heavily weighted toward younger subjects, but are anticipated in the older population of patients for which procainamide is indicated. Procanbid formulation performance was not altered by patient demographics.

Acecainide↗

Cross-reactivity of fosphenytoin in two human plasma phenytoin immunoassays.

The cross-reactivity of fosphenytoin, a phosphate ester prodrug of phenytoin, was investigated in the Abbott phenytoin TDx/TDxFLx fluorescence polarization immunoassay (TDx) and the Behring Diagnostics phenytoin Emit 2000 enzyme-multiplied immunoassay (Emit). The first part of our study investigating cross-reactivity utilized in vitro correlation of the two immunoassays with a validated and specific phenytoin HPLC method used to assay plasma samples prepared in several phenytoin and fosphenytoin concentration combinations. Fosphenytoin cross-reacted with both immunoassays, but to a greater extent with TDx. In the second part of the study, empirically-derived models that best explained the in vitro data were used to predict "immunoassay-derived" phenytoin concentrations in plasma samples collected from actual patients after intravenous (i.v.) or intramuscular (i.m.) fosphenytoin dosing. The greatest degree of phenytoin concentration overestimation occurred at times when fosphenytoin concentrations were highest: within 1 to 2 h after i.v. infusion or during the first 2 to 4 h after i.m. injection. It is recommended that phenytoin concentrations not be monitored using these or other potentially nonspecific immunoanalytical methods for at least 2 h after i.v. fosphenytoin infusion or 4 h after i.m. fosphenytoin injection.

Anticonvulsants↗

Effect of troglitazone on urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol.

Coadministration of troglitazone reduces the plasma concentrations of terfenadine and ethinyl estradiol. Because these drugs are metabolized at least in part by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), it is possible that troglitazone induces CYP3A activity, thereby reducing plasma concentrations of these agents. Known inducers of CYP3A, such as rifampin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital, increase the urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol and the ratio of 6beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol. This evaluation examined the effect of troglitazone on urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol and the ratio of 6beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol as a marker for CYP3A induction. Urine samples were collected from 11 subjects who completed a study evaluating the effect of multiple-dose administration of troglitazone 400 mg once daily (days 11-20) on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin (0.25 mg daily on days 1-20). A single urine sample was collected at baseline on day 1, and 24-hour urine samples were collected on days 10 and 20. Mean +/- standard deviation 24-hour excretion rate of cortisol was unchanged, whereas that of 6beta-hydroxycortisol increased during troglitazone administration. The ratio of 24-hour urinary 6beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol excretion increased from 7.4 +/- 2.7 on day 10 to 16.1 +/- 6.2 on day 20. The ratio observed on day 10 was similar to that obtained at baseline. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that troglitazone induces CYP3A activity.

Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases↗

Meta-analysis of steady-state pharmacokinetics of troglitazone and its metabolites.

The object of this study is to evaluate the effects of age, gender, age-by-gender interaction, Type II diabetes, body weight, race, smoking, and formulation on steady-state pharmacokinetics of troglitazone, Metabolite 1 (sulfate conjugate), and Metabolite 3 (quinone metabolite) following multiple-dose oral administration of troglitazone. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates [Cl/F (apparent oral clearance), AUC0-24 (area under plasma concentration-time curve), and ratio of AUC for troglitazone to Metabolite 1 and to Metabolite 3] obtained from 84 healthy volunteers and 171 patients with Type II diabetes in 8 studies were analyzed using a graphical method (for race and smoking) or a weighted ANCOVA model incorporating gender, health status (healthy vs Type II diabetes), and formulation as main effects; age, age-by-gender interaction, and body weight as continuous covariates. Ratio of AUC for troglitazone to metabolites was also examined by inspection of log-probit plots. Age, gender, age-by-gender, Type II diabetes, and formulation had negligible effects on troglitazone Cl/F, AUC0-24 (all analytes), and AUC ratio of troglitazone to metabolites. Race and smoking did not appear to influence steady-state pharmacokinetics of troglitazone and its metabolites. Although body weight was a significant covariate for AUC0-24 and Cl/F, the explanatory power of the overall model was weak (R2 < 0.2). Log-probit plots did not reveal a polymorphic distribution in AUC ratio of troglitazone to Metabolite 1 or Metabolite 3. Based on pharmacokinetics, dose adjustment for troglitazone in relation to the demographic factors examined is not required due to their poor predictive ability on steady-state pharmacokinetics of troglitazone and its metabolites.

Age Factors↗

Lack of effect of type II diabetes on the pharmacokinetics of troglitazone in a multiple-dose study.

Twelve patients with type II diabetes and 12 age-, weight-, and gender-matched healthy subjects participated in a study comparing the pharmacokinetics of troglitazone, metabolite 1 (sulfate conjugate), and metabolite 3 (quinone) after oral administration of 400 mg of troglitazone every morning for 15 days. Serial plasma samples collected after the dose on days 1 and 15 were analyzed for troglitazone, metabolite 1, and metabolite 3 using a validated HPLC method. Steady state plasma concentrations of troglitazone and its metabolites were achieved by the fifth day of troglitazone administration in both groups. Mean day 15 Cmax, tmax, AUC0-24, and Cl/F values of troglitazone were 1.54 micrograms/mL, 3.25 hours, 15.6 micrograms.hr/mL, and 461 mL/min, respectively, in patients with type II diabetes. Corresponding parameter values were 1.42 micrograms/mL, 2.63 hours, 12.5 micrograms.hr/mL, and 558 mL/min, respectively, in healthy subjects. Elimination t1/2 was approximately 24 hours in both groups. Mean day 15 pharmacokinetic parameter values for metabolite 1 and metabolite 3 were similar in the two groups. Ratio of AUC of metabolite 1 to troglitazone was 6.2 and 6.7, respectively, in patients and in healthy subjects. Ratio of AUC of metabolite 3 to troglitazone was 1.1 in both groups. Thus, steady-state pharmacokinetics and disposition of troglitazone and its metabolites in patients with type II diabetes were similar to those in healthy subjects.

Adult↗

Sensitivity analysis of the effect of bioavailability or dosage form content on mean steady state phenytoin concentration.

Stochastic simulations were used to examine the sensitivity of mean phenytoin steady state concentrations (Css) to changes in the effective dosing rate produced by differences in average product content or bioavailability. Changes of +/- 4%, +/- 6%, +/- 8% and +/- 10% in the effective dosing rate (based on a starting dose yielding a Css of 15 mg/L) were examined. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for each change in dosing rate assuming a one-compartment open model with parallel Michaelis-Menten and first-order elimination. Parameter sets were comprised of a combination of values for maximal rate of saturable elimination (410 or 510 mg/day), the concentration at which the rate of saturable elimination is half maximum (Km, 4.4 or 5.7 mg/L), and linear clearance (CL, 0.15 or 1.5 L/day). These parameters were assumed to be log-normally distributed with coefficients of variation of 30%, 50%, and 15%. The percentages of "individuals" who would be predicted to have Css of less than 10 mg/L following a reduction in the effective dosing rate increased with decreasing Km and CL values. For a Km of 5.7 mg/L and CL of 1.5 L/day, 5% of the "individuals" had Css values of less than 10 mg/L with an 8% decrease in the dosing rate. If the dosing rate was reduced by 10%, then 14-16% of the "individuals" were predicted to have concentrations of less than 10 mg/L. All other combinations of Km and CL values yielded higher percentages of "individuals" with Css of less than 10 mg/L.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Biological Availability↗

Theophylline dosage adjustment during enoxacin coadministration.

Based on the results of a previous study which demonstrated a 50% reduction in theophylline clearance during coadministration of 400 mg of enoxacin twice a day (b.i.d.), a sequential-design study was completed with seven nonsmoking, healthy adult female human volunteers. The subjects were given 200 mg of theophylline (Theo-Dur) orally every 12 h for 4 days. On day 5, the subjects began receiving 400 mg of enoxacin with each theophylline dose, and the dosage of theophylline was reduced to 100 mg b.i.d. This regimen was continued through day 8, after which enoxacin was discontinued. The theophylline dosage was increased to 200 mg b.i.d. on day 9, and theophylline monotherapy continued through day 12. The mean apparent theophylline clearance decreased by approximately 50% during enoxacin coadministration. No significant differences in mean theophylline maximum concentration in serum, time to maximum concentration in serum, lowest concentration observed, or area under the concentration-time curve during the steady-state dosing were observed before, during, or after enoxacin coadministration when the theophylline dosage was reduced to 100 mg b.i.d. Reduction of the theophylline dose by 50% at the onset of enoxacin dosing maintained constant theophylline concentrations in plasma. A return to the original theophylline dose immediately upon cessation of enoxacin therapy resulted in a transient 35% increase in theophylline concentrations in plasma which lasted 24 to 48 h before returning to preenoxacin values. Although a 50% reduction in the theophylline dose maintained constant mean theophylline concentrations when enoxacin was administered concomitantly, it appears that larger dose reductions (up to 75%) could be required in patients with high theophylline clearances. In addition, larger transient increases in the theophylline concentration in plasma may be observed in these patients upon cessation of enoxacin therapy if the theophylline dose is immediately returned to normal. Thus, it is recommended that theophylline concentrations in plasma be monitored when concurrent enoxacin therapy is required.

Adult↗

Dicloxacillin absorption and elimination in children.

We determined the apparent bioavailability of dicloxacillin in 26 children between the ages of 0.24 and 143 months by comparing the area under the serum concentration versus time curve following intravenous and oral administration of 25 mg/kg. With intravenous infusion the overall mean half-life of elimination was 0.53 +/- 0.20 h, the AUC was 70.15 +/- 32.18 mg.min/l and the apparent volume of distribution was 0.29 +/- 0.09 l/kg. The overall average bioavailability was 59.89%. Children less than 6 months old had a shorter time to peak concentration (1.39 +/- 0.49 h) and the lowest oral bioavailability (64.35 +/- 13.62%) in comparison to children more than 60 months old. In children older than 60 months the time to peak was 1.79 +/- 1.16 h and the average oral bioavailability was 79.38 +/- 32.87%. However, children less than 6 months old had the least variability in absorption, the coefficient of variation (CV) of oral bioavailability was 13.62%, while in children between 6 and 40 months old the CV was 60.4%: children older than 60 months had the most variability in absorption, a CV of 32.87%. This variability was not dependent on the formulation administered. After 5 years of age the bioavailability increased with increasing age.

Administration, Oral↗

The theophylline-enoxacin interaction: II. Changes in the disposition of theophylline and its metabolites during intermittent administration of enoxacin.

The pharmacokinetics of theophylline and its three major metabolites, 3-methylxanthine, 1-methylurate, and 1,3-dimethylurate, were studied during intermittent administration of enoxacin. The addition of enoxacin (400 mg, twice daily) to a theophylline dosing regimen (150 mg, twice daily) resulted in an immediate fall in plasma theophylline metabolite concentrations. Mean steady-state theophylline concentration in plasma during the dosing interval increased from 3.17 to 8.23 micrograms/ml. The mean 12-hour recovery of total theophylline metabolite decrease from 76.3 to 38.6 mg. After the discontinuation of enoxacin, but not theophylline, the plasma theophylline metabolite levels immediately increased to near or above the concentrations observed before enoxacin coadministration. Concurrently, theophylline concentrations decreased to levels equivalent to those observed before enoxacin coadministration. In general, the changes in plasma theophylline concentrations observed after the addition of discontinuation of enoxacin were complete within 3 days.

Adult↗

Plasma and synovial fluid meclofenamic acid concentrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the knee.

We have measured plasma and synovial fluid concentrations of meclofenamic acid at 2, 4, 8, and 12 h during steady-state administration (100 mg three times daily for 4-7 days). Paired plasma and synovial samples were obtained pre-treatment and at one of the above times in twelve patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, the extent of protein binding of meclofenamic acid was assessed in vitro in the pre-treatment plasma and synovial fluid specimens. Peak total concentrations of 1.73 and 0.86 micrograms.ml-1 were observed in plasma (at 2 h) and synovial fluid (at 4 h) respectively. The extent of protein binding was 99.7 and 99.6% (not significantly different) in plasma and synovial fluid respectively. The results of this study are compared to those from similar reported studies of other nonsteroidal anti-inflamatory compounds.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗