PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Trapman

Publications and source records attributed to J Trapman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The PTEN gene in locally progressive prostate cancer is preferentially inactivated by bi-allelic gene deletion.

PTEN is frequently inactivated during the development of many cancers, including prostate cancer, and both bi-allelic and mono-allelic PTEN inactivation may contribute to tumorigenesis. PTEN mutations in clinical cancer specimens can easily be recorded but mono- or bi-allelic gene deletions are often difficult to assess. We performed a comprehensive study to detect PTEN inactivation in 40 locally progressive clinical prostate cancer specimens obtained by transurethral resection of the prostate, utilizing a variety of complementary technical approaches. The methods to detect PTEN deletion included allelotype analysis, dual-colour FISH and array-based CGH. We also applied a novel semi-quantitative approach, assessing the PTEN-WT (wild-type): PTEN-Psi (pseudogene) ratio (WPR). Structural analysis of PTEN was performed by single-strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and sequencing. PTEN protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Our data predict complete PTEN inactivation in 12 samples (30%), nine of these by bi-allelic deletion. Loss of one PTEN copy was also detected by several methodologies but the number could not be accurately assessed. Immunohistochemistry indicated the absence of PTEN protein in 15 samples, and heterogeneous expression of the protein in eight tumours. Taken together, these data show that bi-allelic deletion is a major mechanism of PTEN inactivation in locally progressive prostate cancer.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10↗

Regions of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) promoter confer androgen-independent expression of PSA in prostate cancer cells.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is expressed primarily by both normal prostate epithelium and the vast majority of prostate cancers. Increases in serum PSA during endocrine therapy are generally considered as evidence for prostate cancer recurrence or progression to androgen independence. The mechanisms by which PSA up-regulation occurs in androgen-refractory prostate cancer cells are unknown. In this study, by using LNCaP and its lineage-derived androgen-independent PSA-producing subline, C4-2, we identified two cis-elements within the 5.8-kilobase pair PSA promoter that are essential for the androgen-independent activity of PSA promoter in prostate cancer cells. First, a previously reported 440-bp androgen-responsive element enhancer core (AREc) was found to be important for the high basal PSA promoter activity in C4-2 cells. Both mutation analysis and supershift experiments demonstrated that androgen receptor (AR) binds to the AREs within the AREc and activate the basal PSA promoter activity in C4-2 cells under androgen-deprived conditions. Second, a 150-bp pN/H region was demonstrated to be a strong AR-independent positive-regulatory element of the PSA promoter in both LNCaP and C4-2 cells. Through DNase I footprinting and linker scan mutagenesis, a 17-bp RI site was identified as the key cis-element within the pN/H region. Data from electrophoretic mobility shift analysis and UV cross-linking experiments further indicated that a 45-kDa (p45) cell-specific transcription factor associates with RI in prostate cancer cells and may be responsible for driving the PSA promoter activity independent of androgen and AR. Furthermore, by juxtaposing AREc and pN/H, we produced a chimeric PSA promoter (supra-PSA) that exhibits 2-3-fold higher activity than the wild type PSA promoter in both LNCaP and C4-2 cells.

Androgens↗

Two percent of Finnish prostate cancer patients have a germ-line mutation in the hormone-binding domain of the androgen receptor gene.

Mutations of the androgen receptor (AR) gene have been reported in prostate cancer, usually from tumor tissue specimens from late-stage, androgen-independent cancer. Occasionally, germ-line mutations have been found, but a link between AR mutations and predisposition to human prostate cancer has not been firmly established. Recently, two independent studies reported the same germ-line mutation at codon 726 in exon E (CGC to CTC) in two apparently unrelated Finnish prostate cancer patients. This arginine to leucine substitution was reported to alter the transactivational specificity of the AR protein. In the present study, the R726L mutation was analyzed by allele-specific oligohybridization in DNA specimens from 418 consecutive prostate cancer patients who reported a negative family history (sporadic group) and from 106 patients with a positive family history (hereditary group). The population frequency of the R726L mutation in blood donors was 3 of 900 (0.33%). In contrast, eight (1.91%) mutations (odds ratio = 5.8; P = 0.006) were found in the sporadic group, and two (1.89%) mutations were found in the hereditary group (odds ratio = 5.8; P = 0.09). Suggestive evidence of the segregation of the mutation with prostate cancer was seen in these two families. The present study indicates that the R726L substitution in the AR may confer an up to 6-fold increased risk of prostate cancer and may contribute to cancer development in up to 2% of Finnish prostate cancer patients. These results warrant additional large-scale studies of the significance of rare mutations and polymorphisms in candidate genes along the androgen signaling pathway as risk factors for prostate cancer.

Binding Sites↗

An Sp1 binding site is essential for basal activity of the human prostate-specific transglutaminase gene (TGM4) promoter.

Human prostate-specific transglutaminase (hTG(P)) is a cross-linking enzyme encoded by the TGM4 gene. The TGM4 gene promoter was characterized by deletion mapping and mutational analysis. Promoter constructs, containing the minimal promoter requirements, could efficiently drive transcription in the prostate cancer cell lines PC346C and LNCaP and the hepatic cancer cell line Hep3B. The region between positions -113 and -61 was demonstrated to be essential for core promoter activity. Further analysis revealed the functional importance of an Sp1 binding motif, 5'-ACCCCGCCCC-3', at positions -96 to -87. This sequence is a binding site of the ubiquitous transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3.

Base Sequence↗

Down-regulation of CD44 expression in human prostatic carcinoma cell lines is correlated with DNA hypermethylation.

Down-regulation of the cell-surface adhesion molecule CD44 has been suggested to play an important role in tumor progression and metastasis of prostate cancer. CD44 is encoded by a gene that contains a CpG-rich region (CpG island) in its 5' regulatory sequence. We tried to assess whether hypermethylation of this region is the mechanism responsible for CD44 transcriptional inactivation. A panel of prostatic-carcinoma cell lines, Du145, LNCaP, PC3, PC346C and TSU, was analyzed for CD44 mRNA and protein expression. Du145, PC3 and TSU were positive for CD44, whereas in LNCaP and PC346C both CD44 mRNA and protein expression was suppressed. Methylation-sensitive restriction-enzyme analysis of genomic DNA showed that, in contrast to the CD44-positive cell lines, the CD44-negative lines were hypermethylated in the CD44 promoter CpG island. Furthermore, treatment of a PC346C culture with the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine resulted in re-expression of CD44 mRNA. It is concluded that hypermethylation of the CD44 5' promoter region is one of the mechanisms by which CD44 expression is down-regulated in prostatic-carcinoma cell lines.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

Identification of a homozygous deletion at 8p12-21 in a human prostate cancer xenograft.

One of the most frequent genetic abnormalities in prostate cancer is loss of the complete or part of the short arm of chromosome 8, indicating the localization of one or more tumor suppressor genes on this chromosomal arm. Using allelotyping, a frequently deleted region in prostate cancer in a genetic interval of approximately 17 cM between sequence tagged sites D8S87 and D8S133 at chromosome arm 8p12-21 was previously detected. A detailed physical map of this region is now available. Using known and novel polymorphic and nonpolymorphic sequence tagged sites in this interval, a search for homozygous deletions in DNAs from 14 prostate cancer-derived cell lines and xenografts was carried out. In DNA from xenograft PC133, the presence of a small homozygously deleted region of 730-1,320 kb was unambiguously established. At one site, the deletion disrupts the Werner syndrome gene. Data from allelotyping were confirmed and extended by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of PC133 chromosome spreads using centromere, YAC, and PAC chromosome 8 probes.

Animals↗

Androgen receptor gene alterations and chromosomal gains and losses in prostate carcinomas appearing during finasteride treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Finasteride is commonly used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and has been suggested to prevent prostate cancer development. To gain insight to the molecular effects of finasteride on prostate cancer development, we studied six prostate cancers diagnosed during finasteride treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Comparative genomic hybridization detected genetic alterations in four tumors (1-5 changes/tumor). Xq gains and 6q losses were the most common alterations. The recurrent Xq gains motivated us to study the involvement of the androgen receptor (AR) gene. One tumor with Xq gain had a 3-fold amplification of the AR gene, suggesting that tumor development in finasteride-treated patients may require increased AR copy number and expression, as has previously been shown for prostate cancers recurring during hormonal therapy. Furthermore, in another tumor, an Arg726Leu mutation of the AR gene was found. This mutation was also present in the germ-line DNA of the patient. Arg726Leu mutation has previously been reported to affect the transactivational properties of the AR. In summary, prostate cancers developing during finasteride therapy may have distinct biological properties, such as a low number of chromosomal alterations and frequent involvement of the AR gene. Further studies are needed to explore the role of germ-line AR mutations in these patients.

Chromosome Aberrations↗

The human prostate-specific transglutaminase gene (TGM4): genomic organization, tissue-specific expression, and promoter characterization.

Human prostate-specific transglutaminase (hTGP) is a cross-linking enzyme secreted by the prostate. In this study, we performed dot blot analysis of 50 normal human tissues to demonstrate unambiguously the prostate-specific expression of hTGP. Furthermore, we elucidated the genomic organization of the TGM4 gene, the gene encoding hTGP. The structure of this gene displays striking similarity to that of other transglutaminase (TGase) genes. The TGM4 gene spans approximately 35 kb of genomic DNA and consists of 13 exons and 12 introns. The main transcription initiation site is located 52 bp upstream of the translational start codon. A hTGP splice variant of intron 1 was detected. This splice variant contains an in-frame antisense Alu element insertion. The TGM4 promoter was analyzed by sequencing and transfection experiments. At positions -1276 to -563, the promoter harbors a cyclophilin pseudogene with 94% similarity to the cyclophilin A cDNA. Deletion mapping of the TGM4 promoter in the transiently transfected human prostate cancer cell line PC346C showed comparable activity of 2.1-, 1.5-, and 0.5-kb promoter fragments.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Frequent inactivation of PTEN in prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts.

Loss of chromosome 10q is a frequently observed genetic defect in prostate cancer. Recently, the PTEN/MMAC1 tumor suppressor gene was identified and mapped to chromosome 10q23.3. We studied PTEN structure and expression in 4 in vitro cell lines and 11 in vivo xenografts derived from six primary and nine metastatic human prostate cancers. DNA samples were allelotyped for eight polymorphic markers within and surrounding the PTEN gene. Additionally, the nine PTEN exons were tested for deletions. In five samples (PC3, PC133, PCEW, PC295, and PC324), homozygous deletions of the PTEN gene or parts of the gene were detected. PC295 contained a small homozygous deletion encompassing PTEN exon 5. In two DNAs (PC82 and PC346), nonsense mutations were found, and in two (LNCaP and PC374), frame-shift mutations were found. Missense mutations were not detected. PTEN mRNA expression was clearly observed in all cell lines and xenografts without large homozygous deletions, showing that PTEN down-regulation is not an important mechanism of PTEN inactivation. The high frequency (60%) of PTEN mutations and deletions indicates a significant role of this tumor suppressor gene in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer.

Animals↗

Chromosome region 8p11-p21: refined mapping and molecular alterations in breast cancer.

Several genes, most of them unknown, of the short arm of chromosome 8 are involved in malignant diseases. Numerous studies have implicated a portion of the 8p11-p21 region as the location of one or more tumor suppressor genes involved in a variety of human cancers, including breast cancer. We and others have reported linkage analyses suggesting the presence of a putative breast cancer susceptibility gene. Furthermore, several oncogenes of the 8p11-p12 region are involved in reciprocal translocations in myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic disorders and in amplification in breast cancer. To facilitate the analysis of the 8p11-p21 region and the cloning of candidate oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, a high-resolution physical and transcriptional map was established with 39 yeast artificial chromosomes and 94 markers, including so-called sequence-tagged sites and expressed sequence-tagged sites derived from either known genes or expressed sequence tags corresponding to unidentified transcripts. In addition, four novel transcripts were identified and localized precisely within the map. This transcription map provides a detailed description of gene order for the 8p11-p21 region and will be helpful in the identification of candidate genes for diseases. From this basis, we refined the mapping of two types of molecular alterations that occur at 8p11-p21 in sporadic breast cancers, i.e., amplification and deletion.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Substitution of Ala564 in the first zinc cluster of the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-binding domain of the androgen receptor by Asp, Asn, or Leu exerts differential effects on DNA binding.

In the androgen receptor of a patient with androgen insensitivity, the alanine residue at position 564 in the first zinc cluster of the DNA-binding domain was substituted by aspartic acid. In other members of the steroid receptor family, either valine or alanine is present at the corresponding position, suggesting the importance of a neutral amino acid residue at this site. The mutant receptor was transcriptionally inactive, which corresponded to the absence of specific DNA binding in gel retardation assays, and its inactivity in a promoter interference assay. Two other receptor mutants with a mutation at this same position were created to study the role of position 564 in the human androgen receptor on DNA binding in more detail. Introduction of asparagine at position 564 resulted in transcription activation of a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter, although at a lower level compared with the wild-type receptor. Transcription activation of an (ARE)2-TATA promoter was low, and binding to different hormone response elements could not be visualized. The receptor with a leucine residue at position 564 was as active as the wild-type receptor on a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter and an (ARE)2-TATA promoter, but interacted differentially with several hormone response elements in a gel retardation assay. The results of the transcription activation and DNA binding studies could partially be predicted from three-dimensional modeling data. The phenotype of the patient was explained by the negative charge, introduced at position 564.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Functional interactions of the AF-2 activation domain core region of the human androgen receptor with the amino-terminal domain and with the transcriptional coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor2).

Previous studies in yeast and mammalian cells showed a functional interaction between the amino-terminal domain and the carboxy-terminal, ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human androgen receptor (AR). In the present study, the AR subdomains involved in this in vivo interaction were determined in more detail. Cotransfection experiments in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and two-hybrid experiments in yeast revealed that two regions in the NH2-terminal domain are involved in the functional interaction with the LBD: an interacting domain at the very NH2 terminus, located between amino acid residues 3 and 36, and a second domain, essential for transactivation, located between residues 370 and 494. Substitution of glutamic acid by glutamine at position 888 (E888Q) in the AF-2 activation domain (AD) core region in the LBD, markedly decreased the interaction with the NH2-terminal domain. This mutation neither influenced hormone binding nor LBD homodimerization, suggesting a role of the AF-2 AD core region in the functional interaction between the NH2-terminal domain and the LBD. The AF-2 AD core region was also involved in the interaction with the coactivator TIF2 (transcriptional intermediary factor 2), as the E888Q mutation decreased the stimulatory effect of TIF2 on AR AF-2 activity. Cotransfection of TIF2 and the AR NH2-terminal domain expression vectors did not result in synergy between both factors in the induction of AR AF-2 activity. TIF2 highly induced AR AF-2 activity on a complex promoter [mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)], but it was hardly active on a minimal promoter (GRE-TATA). In contrast, the AR NH2-terminal domain induced AR AF-2 activity on both promoter constructs. These data indicate that both the AR NH2-terminal domain and the coactivator TIF2 functionally interact, either directly or indirectly, with the AF-2 AD core region in the AR-LBD, but the level of transcriptional response induced by TIF2 depends on the promoter context.

Animals↗

Development of prostate-specific antigen promoter-based gene therapy for androgen-independent human prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to develop a tissue-specific toxic gene therapy utilizing the prostate specific antigen (PSA) promoter for both androgen-dependent (AD) and androgen-independent (AI) PSA-secreting prostate cancer cells. Ideally this gene therapy would be effective without the necessity of exposing the target cells to circulating androgens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An AI subline of LNCaP, an AD PSA-secreting human prostate cancer cell line, C4-2, was used in this study. Castrated mice bearing C4-2 tumors secrete PSA. A transient expression experiment was used to analyze the activity of two PSA promoters, a 5837 bp long PSA promoter and a 642 bp short PSA promoter, in C4-2 cells. A recombinant adenovirus (Ad-PSA-TK) carrying thymidine kinase under control of the long PSA promoter was generated. The tissue-specific activity of Ad-PSA-TK was tested in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: The long PSA promoter had superior activity over short PSA promoter, and higher activity in C4-2 cells than in LNCaP cells. High activity of Ad-PSA-TK was observed in C4-2 cells in an androgen deprived condition. In vitro, Ad-PSA-TK was further demonstrated to induce marked C4-2 cell-kill by acyclovir in medium containing 5% FBS. No cell-kill was observed in control WH cells (a human bladder cancer cell line). In vivo, Ad-PSA-P-TK with acyclovir significantly inhibited subcutaneous C4-2 tumor growth and PSA production in castrated animals. CONCLUSION: The 5837 bp long PSA promoter was active in the androgen free environment and could be used to target both androgen-dependent and independent PSA-producing prostate cancer cells in vitro, and prostate tumors in castrated hosts.

Adenoviridae↗

Functional in vivo interaction between the amino-terminal, transactivation domain and the ligand binding domain of the androgen receptor.

The ligand binding domain (LBD) and the amino-terminal, transactivation domain (TAD) of the androgen receptor (AR) were separately linked to the GAL4 DNA binding domain (DBD) and to the GAL4(TAD). Resulting constructs were tested in the yeast two-hybrid system for protein-protein interactions. In the presence of androgen [methyltrienolone (R1881) or dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] a transcriptionally active complex was formed, reflecting an association between the AR(LBD) and the AR(TAD). No interactions were found in the presence of low-affinity ligands like estradiol (E2), promegestone (R5020), or progesterone (Pg). Use of the Thr-868-Ala mutated AR(LBD) in the assay resulted not only in a clear AR TAD-LBD interaction in the presence of R1881 and DHT but also in the presence of E2, Pg, and R5020, corresponding to the alteration in ligand specificity induced by the mutation. Coexpression of the fusion protein Gal4(DBD)AR(LBD) and the separate AR(TAD) also gave rise to the formation of a transcriptionally active complex. No interactions were found between two AR LBDs at the low-expression level of the two components. However, LBD-LBD interaction was detectable by application of a high-expression vector for GAL4(TAD)AR(LBD), albeit at high ligand concentrations. To substantiate the observation of the AR LBD-TAD interaction, CHO cells were cotransfected with expression plasmids for a truncated AR, which lacks the TAD [AR(DBD)(LBD)], and for the separate AR(TAD). This resulted in stimulation of a MMTV-LUC reporter gene in the presence of R1881 but not in the absence of hormone. This finding indicates that, like in the yeast system, in mammalian cells, TAD-LBD interactions are of importance for AR activation. In the mammalian system, a maximal AR TAD-LBD interaction was obtained at approximately 10-fold higher ligand concentrations than required for full-length AR activation. In the presence of low-affinity ligands, the AR TAD-LBD interaction as measured by transcriptional activation was considerably weaker than the activity of the full-length AR. From the present results a concept of hormone-dependent AR activation is proposed, which requires a functional, direct or indirect intramolecular interaction between the TAD and the LBD.

Animals↗

Androgen receptor gene amplification: a possible molecular mechanism for androgen deprivation therapy failure in prostate cancer.

Progression of prostate cancer during endocrine therapy is a major clinical problem, the molecular mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. Amplification of the androgen receptor (AR) gene was recently described in recurrent prostate carcinomas from patients who had failed androgen deprivation therapy. To evaluate the hypothesis that amplification of the AR gene is a cause for the failure of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer, we studied whether AR amplification leads to gene overexpression, whether the amplified AR gene is structurally intact, and whether tumors with AR amplification have distinct biological and clinical characteristics. Tumor specimens were collected from 54 prostate cancer patients at the time of a local recurrence following therapy failure. In 26 cases, paired primary tumor specimens from the same patients prior to therapy were also available. Fifteen (28%) of the recurrent therapy-resistant tumors, but none of the untreated primary tumors, contained AR gene amplification as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. According to single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis, the AR gene was wild type in all but one of the 13 AR amplified cases studied. In one tumor, a presumed mutation in the hormone-binding domain at codon 674 leading to a Gly --> Ala substitution was found, but functional studies indicated that this mutation did not change the transactivational properties of the receptor. AR amplification was associated with a substantially increased level of mRNA expression of the gene by in situ hybridization. Clinicopathological correlations indicated that AR amplification was most likely to occur in tumors that had initially responded well to endocrine therapy and whose response duration was more than 12 months. Tumors that recurred earlier or those that showed no initial therapy response did not contain AR amplification. The median survival time after recurrence was two times longer for patients with AR amplification in comparison to those with no amplification (P = 0.03, Willcoxon-Breslow test). In conclusion, failure of conventional androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer may be caused by a clonal expansion of tumor cells that are able to continue androgen-dependent growth despite of the low concentrations of serum androgens. Amplification and the increased expression of a wild-type AR gene may play a key role in this process.

Aged↗