Biomedical subjects

J V Skrypniuk

Publications and source records attributed to J V Skrypniuk.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

UK audit of single photon emission computed tomography reconstruction software using software generated phantoms.

The purpose of this study was to undertake an audit of the quantitative characteristics of single photon emission computed tomography software using projection data from an analytically generated software phantom and a measured line source. The phantom consisted of three structures. A uniformly filled cylinder, a series of cylindrical rods of various diameters in a background activity with a rod to background ratio of 2:1 and lastly, a set of three concentric rings of activity in the ratio 1:0:1. The phantom contained no added statistical noise. No attenuation was imposed on the data. The phantom was generated analytically and projections were distributed at six different count densities. A single set of projections from a thin line source was also distributed. These data were distributed to centres throughout the UK. Centres were asked to reconstruct the data using a 'ramp only' reconstruction with no additional smoothing function applied. Data were requested for mean and standard deviation in the uniform cylinder, the maximum counts for each cylindrical rod and the mean counts in regions placed within the concentric rings. For the measured line source, centres were asked to measure the full width at half maximum and peak pixel counts for a profile through the reconstructed line. Results from 115 systems were obtained from 100 centres throughout the UK. These provided data from 12 software providers, 11 of these being commercial companies. Data were compared with the known input values and histograms of the distribution of results obtained. Significant differences in quantitative parameters were noted for the different input count densities as well as between suppliers and revisions of software from single suppliers.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2001

UK audit and analysis of quantitative parameters obtained from gamma camera renography.

The purpose of this study was to perform an audit of quantitative values obtained from gamma camera renography in the UK. Ten patient image sequences representing normal and pathological renal function were obtained from archived studies and distributed to hospitals in the UK. Hospitals were asked to measure five parameters: relative function, renogram time-to-peak (left and right), and whole kidney mean transit time (left and right). Details of methodology, software used and operator experience were requested. This allowed the influence of operational factors on variations in reported values to be examined. A total of 180 responses from 81 hospitals were received. Values reported for the parameters, together with other details supplied, were entered into Excel and SPSS for statistical analysis. Histograms representing the distribution of values were produced for each parameter. The largest variations were found for mean transit time and occasionally for time-to-peak. The effect of factors was assessed using nonparametric statistical tests applied independently to each renogram. For all the parameters, the hospital, UK region, supplier, computer and software version influenced variations in the reported values. Algorithm and site of background region were influencing factors for relative function, the background subtraction method influenced time-to-peak, and curve smoothing influenced mean transit time.

Gamma Cameras↗

PubMed1998

UK audit of relative renal function measurement using DMSA scintigraphy.

A variety of software is used to determine quantitative parameters from radionuclide imaging procedures. Knowledge of the variability of parameter values found in different hospitals is an important aspect of clinical audit of these techniques. This study investigated the variation in relative renal function measurement from static DMSA scintigraphy in the UK. Ten studies representing a range of ages and relative function values were distributed in digital form to 100 hospitals with the assistance of the gamma camera computer suppliers and regional audit coordinators. The studies were analysed at each participating hospital and details of the different techniques and computer systems used were documented. The median value of relative percentage function was assessed for each of the studies. Methods varied in terms of the view used for analysis (54% geometric mean, 46% posterior), the type of background subtraction (single region 32%, separate regions 60%, none 8%) and the definition of the renal regions of interest (73% manual, 27% semi-automatic). Eighty-eight percent of results were within two percentage points of the study median and 98% within five percentage points. There were statistically significant differences observed in the results arising from the view used for the analysis and the background subtraction protocol. The results indicate that relative renal function assessment from static DMSA scintigraphy in the UK is essentially a reliable procedure, although improvements could be made by standardizing the technique used.

Adult↗