PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James W Mathewson

Publications and source records attributed to James W Mathewson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Absent posteroinferior and anterosuperior atrial septal defect rims: Factors affecting nonsurgical closure of large secundum defects using the Amplatzer occluder.

Using transesophageal echocardiography, we sought to determine the anatomic characteristics of the secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) that extend into the inferior sinus venosus and have no posteroinferior (PI) rim, to determine the factors related to potential closure with an Amplatzer occluder. We also sought to understand why large secundum ASDs with a PI but without an anterosuperior (AS) rim may require special techniques to reorient the left atrial disk before deployment of the waist and right atrial disk. We measured the lengths of 5 separate rims of the circumferences of 76 secundum ASDs, including anteroinferior, AS, superior, posterosuperior, and PI rims. We also measured anteroposterior and superoinferior defect diameters, total septal lengths, and the ratios of defect diameter to total septal length. The atrial depth was measured at the axial angle of the delivery sheath in 5 defects with no AS rim for which special techniques were required to achieve successful closure. Of 76 secundum ASDs, 13 (17%) had no PI rim. Each defect extended from the fossa ovalis into the inferior sinus venosus. Compared with defects with a PI rim, the factors related to potential closure included 100% larger defect diameters, shorter posterosuperior rim lengths, larger defect to total septal length ratios, and completely flat posterior atrial walls. When the AS rim was absent the factors related to the need for special techniques included diameters >/= 22 mm, atrial depth < the calculated Amplatzer occluder left atrial disk diameter, rigid wire/disk interface, and obligatory left atrial disk orientation more or less perpendicular to the atrial septal plane.

Adolescent↗

Conversion to digital technology improves efficiency in the pediatric echocardiography laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Although the videotape method (VTM) is commonly used to record and intrepret ecocardiographic images, many pediatric echocardiographers are considering acquiring to, interpreting from, and storing their images to digital disk using the single-beat digital acquisition method (SBM). The paucity of image redundancy using SBM should translate into improved laboratory efficiency compared with VTM, but hard data are lacking. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the time to acquire images to videotape using VTM and to disk using SBM would be the same for normal hearts and corresponding congenital heart diseases, but interpretation times would be shorter using SBM. METHODS: We measured the times to acquire and interpret 403 echocardiograms using standard VTM from Children's Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio, and 352 echocardiograms acquired using SBM from Children's Hospital in San Diego, Calif. Diagnostic categories at each site included: (1) normal, (2) simple shunt or isolated valve disease, and (3) multiple-lesion disease. RESULTS: As a group, SBM echocardiograms included more hemodynamic measurements and took more time to acquire (P <.037), but less time to read (P <.001) than corresponding images acquired using VTM. Using SBM, it took more time to acquire normals and isolated valve or shunt lesions, whereas the average time to acquire multiple-lesion disease was the same using both VTM and SBM. With SBM, in contrast, interpretation times were significantly less for all corresponding diagnoses. CONCLUSION: SBM studies took longer to acquire because more hemodynamic measurements were acquired, but they were read in less time than corresponding VTM studies even though all videotapes were replayed in search fast-forward mode. Pediatric echocardiographers can increase their laboratory efficiency by converting from VTM to SBM.

Analog-Digital Conversion↗