PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jens Oliver Funk

Publications and source records attributed to Jens Oliver Funk.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Multiple disseminated large-cell acanthomas of the skin associated with human papillomavirus type 6.

Cutaneous acanthomas encompass many clinically distinct types. We describe a patient with multiple nodules on the skin of the upper limbs which were histologically diagnosed as large-cell acanthomas. Further analysis revealed, surprisingly, the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 6 within these lesions. HPV type 6 should therefore be considered an important cofactor in the pathogenesis of large-cell acanthomas.

Acanthoma↗

Elevated expression of a regulator of the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, neuronal CIP-1-associated regulator of cyclin B, in Alzheimer's disease.

Adult neurons are generally accepted to be in a quiescent, nonproliferative state. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that, in Alzheimer's disease (AD), alterations in cell cycle machinery, suggesting an attempt to reenter cell cycle, relate temporally and topographically to degenerating neurons. These findings, together with the fact that neurons lack the necessary components for completion of mitosis, have led to the notion that an ill-regulated attempt to reenter the cell cycle is associated with disease pathogenesis and, ultimately, neuronal degeneration. To understand better the role of such cell cycle abnormalities in AD, we undertook a study of CIP-1-associated regulator of cyclin B (CARB), a protein that associates with two key proteins, p21 and cyclin B, involved in cellular checkpoints in the cell cycle. Our results show that there are increases in CARB localized to intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles and granulovacuolar degeneration in susceptible hippocampal and cortical neurons in AD. By marked contrast, CARB is found only at background levels in these neuronal populations in nondiseased age-matched controls. Our data not only provide another line of evidence indicative of cell cycle abnormalities in neurons in AD but also lend further credence to the hypothesis that susceptible neurons may be arrested at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle before they die. Therefore, therapeutics targeted toward initiators of the cell cycle are likely to prove of great efficacy for the treatment of AD.

Aged↗

The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27Kip1 and p21Cip1 are not essential in T cell anergy.

Recent evidence suggests that the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors p27Kip1 and p21Cip1 are important factors in T cell anergy, but it has remained unclear whether anergy can be induced in their absence. We therefore induced anergy by stimulation of purified T cells from wild-type, p21Cip1-/-, and p27Kip1-/- mice with anti-CD3 antibodies. Anergic wild-type T cells were arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle with a high p27Kip1 protein level and low Cdk2 activity. In p27-/- and p21-/- T cells, the pattern of protein expression was preserved, but Cdk2 activity was increased. To confirm the in vivo relevance of these data, anergy was induced by repeated injection of mice with staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), which leads to partial deletion of the responsive Vbeta8+ T cell population and anergy in the remaining T cells. p21-/- mice and wild-type mice reacted similarly to this treatment. p27-/- mice showed reduced deletion of SEB-responsive T cells, but persisting T cells were anergic. These data indicate that other cell cycle regulators contribute to the cell cycle arrest of anergic T cells, as neither Cdk inhibitor is required for the induction of anergy.

Animals↗

Molecular modes of action of artesunate in tumor cell lines.

A profound cytotoxic action of the antimalarial, artesunate (ART), was identified against 55 cancer cell lines of the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI). The 50% inhibition concentrations (IC50 values) for ART correlated significantly to the cell doubling times (P = 0.00132) and the portion of cells in the G0/G1 (P = 0.02244) or S cell cycle phases (P = 0.03567). We selected mRNA expression data of 465 genes obtained by microarray hybridization from the NCI data base. These genes belong to different biological categories (drug resistance genes, DNA damage response and repair genes, oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, apoptosis-regulating genes, proliferation-associated genes, and cytokines and cytokine-associated genes). The constitutive expression of 54 of 465 (=12%) genes correlated significantly to the IC50 values for ART. Hierarchical cluster analysis of these 12 genes allowed the differentiation of clusters with ART-sensitive or ART-resistant cell lines (P = 0.00017). For exemplary validation, cell lines transduced with 3 of the 12 genes were used to prove a causative relationship. The cDNAs for a deletion-mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and for gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase increased resistance to ART. The conditional expression of the CDC25A gene using a tetracycline repressor expression vector increased sensitivity toward ART. Multidrug-resistant cells differentially expressing the MDR1, MRP1, or BCRP genes were not cross-resistant to ART. ART acts via p53-dependent and- independent pathways in isogenic p53+/+ p21WAF1/CIP1+/+, p53-/- p21WAF1/CIP1+/+, and p53+/+ p21WAF1/CIP1-/- colon carcinoma cells.

Animals↗

Human p14(ARF)-mediated cell cycle arrest strictly depends on intact p53 signaling pathways.

The tumor suppressor ARF is transcribed from the INK4a/ARF locus in partly overlapping reading frames with the CDK inhibitor p16(Ink4a). ARF is able to antagonize the MDM2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of p53, leading to either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis, depending on the cellular context. However, recent data point to additional p53-independent functions of mouse p19(ARF). Little is known about the dependency of human p14(ARF) function on p53 and its downstream genes. Therefore, we analysed the mechanism of p14(ARF)-induced cell cycle arrest in several human cell types. Wild-type HCT116 colon carcinoma cells (p53(+/+)p21(CIP1+/+) 14-3-3sigma(+/+)), but not p53(-/-) counterparts, underwent G(1) and G(2) cell cycle arrest following infection with a p14(ARF)-adenovirus. In p21(CIP1-/-) cells, p14(ARF) did not induce G(1) or G(2) arrest, while 14-3-3sigma(-/-) counterparts were mainly arrested in G(1), pointing to essential roles of p21(CIP1) in G(1) and G(2) arrest and cooperative roles of p21 and 14-3-3sigma in ARF-mediated G(2) arrest. Our data demonstrate a strict p53 and p21(CIP1) dependency of p14(ARF)-induced cell cycle arrest in human cells.

14-3-3 Proteins↗

Inactivation of both the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor and p21 by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein is necessary to inhibit cell cycle arrest in human epithelial cells.

The human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E7 oncoprotein must inactivate the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (Rb) pathway to bypass G(1) arrest. However, E7 C-terminal mutants that were able to inactivate Rb were unable to bypass DNA damage-induced G(1) arrest and keratinocyte senescence, suggesting that the E7 C terminus may target additional G(1) regulators. The E7 C-terminal mutant proteins E7 CVQ68-70AAA and E7 Delta79-83 (deletion of positions 79 through 83) were further tested in several models of cell cycle arrest associated with elevated levels of p21. C-terminal mutations rendered E7 unable to induce S phase and endoreduplication in differentiated keratinocytes and rendered it less efficient in delaying senescence of human mammary epithelial cells. Interestingly, when cell cycle arrest was induced with a peptide form of p21, the E7 C-terminal mutants were deficient in overcoming arrest, whereas a mutant defective in Rb binding was competent in inhibiting G(1) arrest. These results suggest that the inactivation of both p21 and Rb by E7 contributes to subversion of cell cycle control in normal human epithelia but that neither p21 nor Rb inactivation alone is sufficient.

CDC2-CDC28 Kinases↗

Linking DNA damage to cell cycle checkpoints.

Cell cycle checkpoints constitute a network of signal transduction mechanisms to monitor DNA damage and replication and thereby regulate progression through the cell cycle. A series of events is triggered in cells upon DNA damage. Here we describe a framework for the understanding of the functions of the core components involved in the cell cycle response to DNA damage and the relevance to the origin of cancer.

Cell Cycle↗