PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

K Gillingham

Publications and source records attributed to K Gillingham.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Kidney transplants from living donors: how donation affects family dynamics.

Living donors continue to provide the optimum outcome for kidney transplant recipients, yet information is limited on how donation can affect the donor and his or her family. Questionnaires returned by 524 donors whose donor nephrectomies took place between August 1, 1985 and December 31, 1996 at the University of Minnesota were analyzed to determine if perioperative complications influence their quality of life, among other emotional and lifestyle areas. Results showed that donors have a higher quality of life than the general population, confirming they have an increased self-worth and positive self-esteem. An overwhelming 96% would donate again. However, donation was self-reported as more stressful when complications were experienced (P = .003) and when donors were female (P = .041). Relatives other than immediate family members (extended relatives) were more likely to be among the 4% who said they would not donate again. Available support, financial impact, and relationship changes as a result of donation also were revealed. Relevant results from this larger study are discussed as they relate to how the renal donor and transplant family are affected.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Employment patterns after successful kidney transplantation.

We studied 822 kidney transplant recipients followed 1-9 years to determine the dynamics of their entering and leaving the work force. Multivariate analysis revealed that not being diabetic and that being employed pretransplant were associated with a higher rate of posttransplant employment. Some recipients in all pretransplant employment categories, including those receiving disability benefits pretransplant, returned to full-time work posttransplant. The most rapid return to work was in those who had been working full-time or attending school pretransplant. After returning to work, a higher percentage of diabetic recipients stopped working; of those who stopped working, 50% received disability benefits. In contrast, nondiabetic recipients who stopped working full-time were more likely to be retired or working part-time; only 22% received disability benefits.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Impact of age on renal graft survival in children after the first rejection episode.

Infants are thought to be more immunoreactive and at a greater risk for developing irreversible rejection compared with older children. We investigated this by analyzing patient and graft survival rates, incidence of acute rejection, reversibility of acute rejection, development of a subsequent acute rejection, and incidence of graft loss due to rejection in 154 children (< 18 years of age) after primary renal transplantation. Most patients (n = 139) were treated with quadruple immunosuppression (antibody, azathioprine, prednisone, cyclosporine). Treatment of the first acute rejection episode (ARE) consisted of antibody and increased prednisone (68%) or increased prednisone alone (30%), and was not significantly different between the age groups. Transplants were from living donors (LRD) in 80% of cases. Patients were followed for at least 1 year (mean 58 +/- 30 months); 68% (105/154) of recipients experienced 1 or more ARE. The incidence of ARE was significantly lower in patients < 2 years of age (45%) compared with patients 2-5 (76%, P = 0.01), 6-12 (78%, P = 0.005), and 13-17 (76%, P = 0.009) years of age. There was no significant difference in the 1-, 2- and 5-year patient or graft survival rates, the development of a subsequent acute rejection, or the incidence of graft loss due to acute rejection when analyzed by age group. These data suggest that the impact of an ARE is similar for younger and older children in our population receiving predominantly LRD transplants and quadruple immuno-suppression.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

Does re-exposure to mismatched HLA antigens decrease renal re-transplant allograft survival?

UNLABELLED: We analyzed 420 kidney retransplants at the University of Minnesota, 87 of which did and 333 which did not share HLA mismatches with the previous transplant. There was no difference in outcome. We conclude that exceptions to routine HLA matching policies do not have to be made for kidney retransplants. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the kidney graft functional survival rate for retransplants is influenced by presence of HLA mismatches in common with the previous (failed) transplant. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Kidney retransplants have a lower function rate than primary grafts. An anamnestic response to HLA antigens shared with the previous donor could be one factor responsible, but reports in the literature are conflicting. METHODS: Of 420 kidney retransplants with HLA information done at the University of Minnesota, 87 shared > or = 1 HLA antigens specifically mismatched with the previous donor (63 cadaver and 24 living donor retransplants), while 333 did not (247 cadaver, 86 living donor). Patient and graft survival rates were calculated by life-table analysis for recipients with vs. without repeat mismatches, with the significance of differences determined by the Lee-Desu statistic. RESULTS: Patient and kidney graft retransplant survival rate curves were not significantly different (p > or = 0.41) for those exposed or not exposed to the same HLA mismatches as before. At 2 years, 70% vs. 61%, respectively, of cadaver grafts and 71% vs. 78%, respectively, of living donor grafts were functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of a successful outcome with a kidney retransplant is no different for patients who do than for those who do not receive an organ sharing HLA mismatches with the previous donor. Exceptions to routine HLA matching policies do not need to be made for kidney retransplants.

Cadaver↗
PubMed1995

Short- and long-term outcomes of kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries.

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined whether the use of kidney allografts with multiple renal arteries adversely effects post-transplant graft and patient outcome or increases the incidence of vascular and urologic complications. BACKGROUND: Kidney grafts with multiple renal arteries have been associated with an increased incidence of early vascular and urologic complications. Kidney transplants with single versus multiple renal arteries have not been compared in regard to long-term graft and patient outcome or post-transplant incidence of hypertension, acute tubular necrosis, rejection, and late vascular and urologic complications. METHODS: We analyzed 998 adult kidney transplants done from December 1, 1985 through June 30, 1993, in which only the recipient's external or internal iliac artery was used for anastomosis. We divided the study population into 3 groups: Group A-1 renal artery, 1 arterial anastomosis (n = 835), Group B-->1 renal artery, 1 arterial anastomosis (n = 112), Group C-->1 renal artery, > 1 arterial anastomosis (n = 51). We compared the incidence of post-transplant hypertension, acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection, and vascular and urologic complications; mean creatinine levels at 1, 3, and 5 years post-transplant; and patient and graft survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to identify risk factors for vascular complications. RESULTS: We found no significant differences among the three groups for the following variables: post-transplant hypertension, acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection, creatinine levels, early vascular and urologic complications, and graft and patient survival. In kidneys with single arteries, the presence (vs. absence) of an aortic patch and the type of the arterial anastomosis (end-to-end to the hypogastric vs. end-to-side to the external iliac artery) did not have an impact on the incidence of early or late vascular complications. In kidneys with multiple arteries, only the rate of late renal artery stenosis was higher, the rate of early vascular and urologic complications was not different. Our multivariate analysis identified acute tubular necrosis as a risk factor for renal artery and vein thrombosis; graft placement on the left side for arterial thrombosis; and preservation time > or = 24 hours and multiple renal arteries for renal artery stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Results of kidney transplants using allografts with multiple versus single arteries are similar.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Renal transplantation for patients 60 years of older. A single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed renal transplant outcomes in recipients 60 years of age or older. BACKGROUND: Before cyclosporine, patients older than 45 years of age were considered to be at high risk for transplantation. With cyclosporine, the age limits for transplantation have expanded. METHODS: The authors compared patient and graft survival, hospital stay, the incidence of rejection and rehospitalization, and the cause of graft loss for primary kidney recipients 60 years of age or older versus those 18 to 59 years of age. For those patients > or = 60 years transplanted since 1985, the authors analyzed pretransplant extrarenal disease and its impact on post-transplant outcome. In addition, all surviving recipients > or = 60 years completed a medical outcome survey (SF-36). RESULTS: Patient and graft survival for those > or = 60 years of age versus those 18 to 59 years of age were similar 3 years after transplant. Subsequently, mortality increased for the older recipients. Death-censored graft survival was identical in the two groups. There were no differences in the cause of graft loss. Those 60 years of age or older had a longer initial hospitalization, but had fewer rejection episodes and fewer rehospitalizations. Quality of life for recipients 60 years of age or older was similar to the age-matched U.S. population. CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation is successful for recipients 60 years of age or older. Most of them had extrarenal disease at the time of transplantation; however, extrarenal disease was not an important predictor of outcome and should not be used as an exclusion criterion. Post-transplant quality of life is excellent.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

De novo cancer in cyclosporine-treated and non-cyclosporine-treated adult primary renal allograft recipients.

We compared the incidence of de novo tumors developing in 1165 primary adult renal allograft recipients treated with azathioprine (AZA)-prednisone (Pred)-antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) (CONV group) with that in 722 patients receiving cyclosporine (CSA) as part of double (CSA-Pred), triple (CSA-Pred-AZA), or quadruple-therapy (CSA-Pred-AZA-ALG) protocols. Mean +/- SD follow-up was 9.5 +/- 6.4 years for the CONV group and 6.2 +/- 2.7 years for the CSA group. Overall, 124 patients (10.6%) in the CONV group and 34 patients (4.7%) in the CSA group developed malignancies, with nonmelanoma skin cancers and lymphomas comprising 55% and 13% of cancers in the CONV group and 65% and 3% of cancers in the CSA group, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall cancer (p = 0.41) or skin cancer (p = 0.97) incidence between non-CSA-treated and CSA-treated patients by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis; however, CONV-treated patients demonstrated a higher incidence of lymphoma (p = 0.05). The mean (+/- SD) time to overall and skin cancer occurrence was significantly shorter in the CSA group: 37 +/- 22 versus 90 +/- 52 months (p < 0.001) and 40 +/- 24 versus 92 +/- 52 months, respectively. When the Cox Proportional Hazard Model was utilized to assess the relative importance of age, diabetic status, donor source, sex, and immunosuppressive regimen in determining cancer development, age > or = 50 years and nondiabetic status were significant independent prognostic indicators, while immunosuppressive regimen was not. Graft and patient survival were significantly greater in CONV-treated patients developing cancer than in those who did not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Steroid-related complications in the cyclosporine era.

Steroid withdrawal has potential risks (rejection) and benefits (fewer complications). Most data on steroid-related complications predates cyclosporine (CsA). We tabulated the incidence of posttransplant complications considered to be steroid-related in 748 adult kidney transplant recipients (with at least 1 year of follow-up) on CsA and prednisone. Using logistic regression analysis, we considered the effects of pre- and postoperative variables for these complications: cataracts; new-onset post-transplant diabetes; bone/joint complications; avascular necrosis; and posttransplant hypertension. Variables included pretransplant steroid therapy; initial steroid dose; prednisone dose at 1 month and 1 year; steroid-treated rejection episodes; cumulative time on steroids; sex; age; race; pretransplant hypertension; pretransplant diabetes; donor source; nonsteroid treated rejection episodes; other immunosuppressive therapy; cumulative time on dialysis; and previous renal or extrarenal transplants. Cataracts occurred in 21.1%, new-onset posttransplant diabetes in 7.6%, bone/joint complications in 49.9%, avascular necrosis in 5.5%, and post-transplant hypertension in 74.9% of recipients. Significant variables for cataract development were prednisone dose at 1 year (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32; p < 0.05), cumulative time on steroids (OR = 1.65; p < 0.001), age > 50 years (OR = 1.85; p < 0.0001), and pretransplant diabetes (OR = 1.63; p < 0.0001). For new-onset posttransplant diabetes, age > 50 years (OR = 1.63; p < 0.05) and nonwhite race (OR = 2.12; p < 0.001) were significant. For bone/joint complications, cumulative time on steroids was significant (OR = 1.45; p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Risk factors for chronic rejection in renal allograft recipients.

Chronic rejection is a major barrier to long-term renal allograft survival. Cyclosporine, though effective at reducing graft loss to acute rejection, has had little impact on the incidence of chronic rejection. Between June 2, 1986 and January 22, 1991, 587 kidney-alone transplants (566 patients) were performed, and had been entered into our renal transplant database and had at least 1 year of follow-up: 103 with biopsy-proven chronic rejection (37 living-related donor, 66 cadaver) and 484 without chronic rejection (236 LRD 248 CAD). The 5-year patient survival was 84% for recipients with biopsy-proven chronic rejection vs. 89% without (P = .08). The 5-year graft survival was 31% for recipients with biopsy-proven chronic rejection vs. 81% without (P < .0001). Using multivariate analysis, we determined the impact on the incidence of chronic rejection of these variables: transplant number, age at transplant (< 18 years, 18 to 50 years, > 50 years), gender, human leukocyte antigen matching, peak and transplant panel-reactive antibody, acute rejection episodes, infections (including cytomegalovirus, viral, and bacterial), donor age, and CsA dosage at 1 year (< 5 mg/kg vs. > or = 5 mg/kg). Logistic regression models were fit to the data using a forward stepwise selection procedure. In this analysis, risk factors included an acute rejection episode (P < .001), CsA dosage < 5 mg/kg/day at 1 year (P = .007), infection (P = .023), female gender (P = .042), and retransplant (P = .103). Individual analyses were done for CAD and LRD recipients. For both groups, important variables were acute rejection, infection, CsA dosage at 1 year, and age at transplant. In conclusion, acute rejection, CsA dosage < 5 mg/kg/day at 1 year, and infection are the major risk factors for the development of chronic rejection, suggesting that chronic rejection may be the result of inadequate immunosuppression (acute rejection episodes and low CsA dosage) or the production of inflammatory cytokines (infections).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Pediatric renal transplants--results with sequential immunosuppression.

Cyclosporine has improved the results of renal transplantation. In 1984, we began using it as part of a sequential immunosuppression protocol (MALG, AZA, P, and delayed administration of CsA) in our pediatric renal transplant recipients. We studied the outcome of the 131 pediatric renal transplants (less than or equal to 18 years of age at transplant) performed at our institution between June 1984 and March 1991. We compared these results with the 144 similar transplants performed since January 1980 that did not involve CsA immunosuppression. In the sequential immunosuppression group, there were 97 primary (74%) (26 [27%] cadaver, 71 [73%] living donor [LD]) and 34 (26%) retransplant (23 [68%] CAD, 11 [32%]) recipients. Age at transplant (mean +/- SD) was 7.4 +/- 5.5. Overall, 1-year actuarial graft survival was 93%; 1-year patient survival was 100%. The mean number of hospital readmissions was 3.0 +/- 3.5; 26 (20%) were readmission-free. The mean number of rejection episodes was .87 +/- 1.3 per patient; 73 (56%) were rejection-free. Importantly, LD (vs. CAD) recipients had fewer rejection episodes (P = 0.06). In the first post-transplant year, the serum creatinine level was significantly lower in primary (vs. retransplant) recipients and in LD (vs. CAD) recipients (P less than 0.05). In the 144 patients not receiving CsA, there were 129 (90%) primary (27 CAD, 102 LD) and 15 (10%) retransplant (7 CAD, 8 LD) recipients. Age at transplant was 6.9 +/- 5.3 years. The 1-year actuarial graft survival rate was 82%; the 1-year patient survival rate was 94%. The mean number of hospital readmissions was 3.3 +/- 2.3; 5 (8%) were readmission-free. The mean number of rejection episodes was 1.2 +/- 1.5; 27 (45%) were rejection-free. There was no difference in the serum creatinine level based on donor source or transplant number. Sequential immunosuppression has significantly improved patient (P = 0.003) and graft survival (P = 0.004) rates. Comparing sequential vs. non-CsA immunosuppression, there was no difference in the number of readmissions (P = 0.47), number of rejection episodes (P = 0.17), or serum creatinine level. The number of rejection-free patients was significantly lower in LD (vs. CAD) recipients (P less than 0.05). There was no evidence of progressive deterioration in renal function in the sequential (vs. non-CsA) recipients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Kidney transplantation in patients with type I diabetes: 26-year experience at the University of Minnesota.

With current immunosuppressive protocols, 1- and 6-year graft survival is similar in diabetic and nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients. Living-donor transplant recipients have significantly better outcome. Death with function and chronic rejection remain the 2 predominant causes of graft loss for diabetic recipients. Compared with national statistics on diabetic patient survival on dialysis, our data suggest that transplantation is the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease.

Adolescent↗