PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 8664509

Does re-exposure to mismatched HLA antigens decrease renal re-transplant allograft survival?

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We analyzed 420 kidney retransplants at the University of Minnesota, 87 of which did and 333 which did not share HLA mismatches with the previous transplant. There was no difference in outcome. We conclude that exceptions to routine HLA matching policies do not have to be made for kidney retransplants. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the kidney graft functional survival rate for retransplants is influenced by presence of HLA mismatches in common with the previous (failed) transplant. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Kidney retransplants have a lower function rate than primary grafts. An anamnestic response to HLA antigens shared with the previous donor could be one factor responsible, but reports in the literature are conflicting. METHODS: Of 420 kidney retransplants with HLA information done at the University of Minnesota, 87 shared > or = 1 HLA antigens specifically mismatched with the previous donor (63 cadaver and 24 living donor retransplants), while 333 did not (247 cadaver, 86 living donor). Patient and graft survival rates were calculated by life-table analysis for recipients with vs. without repeat mismatches, with the significance of differences determined by the Lee-Desu statistic. RESULTS: Patient and kidney graft retransplant survival rate curves were not significantly different (p > or = 0.41) for those exposed or not exposed to the same HLA mismatches as before. At 2 years, 70% vs. 61%, respectively, of cadaver grafts and 71% vs. 78%, respectively, of living donor grafts were functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of a successful outcome with a kidney retransplant is no different for patients who do than for those who do not receive an organ sharing HLA mismatches with the previous donor. Exceptions to routine HLA matching policies do not need to be made for kidney retransplants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A C Farney, A J Matas, H J Noreen, N Reinsmoen, M Segall, W J Schmidt, K Gillingham, J S Najarian, D E Sutherland. 1996. Does re-exposure to mismatched HLA antigens decrease renal re-transplant allograft survival?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8664509/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Structural integrity of implanted WMT infinity hip and Osteonics Omnifit hip in fresh cadaveric femurs.

Five matched pairs of fresh human femurs were used to quantitatively assess the structural integrity of the implanted Wright Medical Technology modular Infinity hip and the Osteonics single-piece Omnifit hip. The results showed that neither bone implant system was able to recreate the femoral anteversion of the intact femur (p < 0.05). Although the micromotion at the bone-implant interface was well within the limits of achieving bone ingrowth, the axial micromotion was greater for the Infinity hip than for the Omnifit hip (p < 0.05), but the rotational micromotion did not show a significant difference between the two bone implant systems (p > 0.5). The anterior proximal femur deformation patterns were similar for both the two bone implant systems and intact femurs. However, the medial proximal femur deformation patterns showed that the Infinity hip-implanted femur was more similar to the intact femur than the Osteonics Omnifit hip-implanted femur.

Cadaver

Effects of changes in the criteria for nationally shared kidney transplants for HLA-matched patients.

BACKGROUND: Nine years ago, a prospective trial began in all U.S. transplant centers to determine whether the results of renal transplantation would improve with the nationwide shipment of kidneys from cadaveric donors to HLA-matched patients. Since then, the stringency of criteria for HLA matching have been liberalized twice, from sharing only those kidneys that matched at all six HLA-A, -B, -DR antigens, to sharing phenotypically HLA-matched kidneys, and most recently to sharing zero HLA-mismatched kidneys. METHODS: Data reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific Renal Transplant Registry from October 1987 to December 1996 were analyzed to examine the transplant results of nationally shared HLA-matched kidneys and the effects of changes to the HLA matching criteria on graft survival and the distribution of HLA-matched kidneys. RESULTS: The overall 1-year graft survival rate of 5102 HLA-matched transplants was 88% compared with 81% for 58,207 recipients of kidneys with at least one HLA mismatch (P < 0.001). HLA-matched kidneys had a projected 12-year graft half-life, 50% higher than the 8-year half-life of mismatched grafts (P < 0.01). After the first change in the match criteria in August 1990, 1365 phenotypically matched kidneys with fewer than six HLA antigens identified had an 89% 1-year graft survival rate compared with 84% for 466 six antigen-matched kidneys transplanted before the change. After March 1995, 1067 zero HLA-mismatched kidneys that were not phenotypically identical nor six antigen matched, had a 1-year graft survival rate of 88%. Graft survival has not decreased as a result of these changes in the criteria for national sharing, despite an increase in the percentage of matched transplants from 2.5% during the six antigen-match era to 15.5% during the zero antigen-mismatch era. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to the United Network for Organ Sharing policy for national sharing of HLA-matched kidneys have increased the number of patients, and especially minority patients, who can benefit by receiving a well-matched graft without compromising the high graft survival rates provided by an HLA-matched kidney.

Cadaver

Spinal cord localization in the treatment of lung cancer: use of radiographic landmarks.

PURPOSE: In the treatment of thoracic malignancies with radiotherapy, the critical dose-limiting structure is the spinal cord. Oblique fields typically are designed to exclude the spinal cord, and by convention, the field edge that shields the spinal cord is placed at the anterior border of the vertebral pedicles. Thus, the purpose of our study was to estimate the distance between the field edge and spinal cord in oblique fields that were designed by using the vertebral pedicle as a radiographic landmark. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The spinal cord of a cadaver was wrapped in wire, and oblique fields were simulated at 15 degree intervals. The distance from the spinal cord to a field edge placed at the anterior border of the pedicle was measured. In the second investigation, a three-dimensional treatment planning system was used to simulate hypothetical fields using actual patient data from computed tomography (n = 10), and measurements identical to those in the anatomical model were made (n = 1,100). RESULTS: The results of the anatomical and computed tomographic models were in close agreement (mean difference, 0.6 mm). The computed tomographic model predicted a mean field edge to spinal cord distance of 8.7 mm (95% confidence interval, 5.6-11.8 mm) for 30 degree/150 degree oblique fields and 8.0 mm (95% confidence interval, 4.7-11.7 mm) for 45 degree/135 degree oblique fields. This distance was greatest at levels T-1, T-2, and T-11 (8 to 20% greater). CONCLUSIONS: The mean distance from a field edge placed at the anterior border of a vertebral pedicle to the spinal cord for commonly used oblique angles constitutes a sufficient margin to account for expected differences in daily positional variations and mechanical uncertainties.

Cadaver