[Surgical attempts of correction of experimentally induced complete atrioventricular block].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to L Moggi.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
AIM: Considering that laparoscopic procedure is associated with increased resistance to lower-limb venous return and subsequent stasis, with possible implications in terms of thromboembolic complications, the aim of our study was to investigate prospectively the coagulative-fibrinolytic profile, in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy, in patients randomly alloted to receive or not preoperative heparin. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 36 patients (20 laparoscopic and 16 open) and we randomly divided the patients in two groups: Group-A (28 patients--16 laparoscopic and 12 open) didn't take any preoperative thromboprophylaxis, Group-B (8 patients--4 laparoscopic and 4 open) took preoperative subcutaneous heparin. We took blood venous samples before surgery, at time 0 and + 30 min., at the end and 1 and 24 hours postoperatively. The following parameters were assessed: prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen and D-dimer. We statistically analyzed the differences by ANOVA test. RESULTS: In Group A, fibrinogen and D-dimer were significantly higher (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0266) in open group as compared with laparoscopic one and we observed significant time-depending changes of fibrinogen's concentration (p = 0.0168). In Group B we obtained a higher fibrinogen's value in laparoscopic group than in conventional one, with a significant difference (p = 0.0283); also, the sampling-time affected the result in a very significant meaning (p = 0.0041). Comparing fibrinogen levels between Groups A and B, we observed lower values in heparin-treated group than in the other one (p < 0.0001), while in laparoscopic surgery there was not a significant difference between two groups of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that, perioperatively (besides a smaller laparoscopic acute-phase response) the coagulative-fibrinolytic changes are lower in laparoscopic cholecystectomy than in open one and heparin treatment significantly reduces these changes in open surgery but doesn't seem to affect laparoscopic group. Our results seem to show another possible advantage of the laparoscopic surgical procedures over the traditional ones.
Anal fistulas are frequent events which often recur after an inadequate surgical treatment. Nevertheless their evolution into malignant diseases is infrequently observed. The authors report one case of mucinous adenocarcinoma arising out of a recurrent, long-lasting fistula-in-ano. As reported, abdomino-perineal resection combined with radiotherapy can be the choice treatment. The difficulty is to obtain a reliable differential diagnosis. No imaging technique nor histologic examination can establish a definitive reliable diagnosis; nevertheless, as the risk of adenocarcinoma developing from a long-lasting recurrent fistula-in-ano, although small, is real, authors believe that operative exploration and biopsy of recurrent abscesses and fistulas should be recommended.
The aim of this randomized study was to determine the effects of octreotide therapy on the growth and development of experimental liver metastases from a human colonic cancer cell line (HT 29) in nude mice model. No important and significant difference could be found between mice, lungs and liver weights of both groups as well as lung metastatization; indeed, significant was the difference between groups concerning liver, metastases (the majority of them were in treated group): in spite of the small number of data collected, which does not allow to draw any conclusion on the efficacy of this drug on liver metastases, we believe that octreotide therapy does not affect dramatically the growth and development of liver metastases from a human colon cancer.
From a surgeon's point of view, the management of biliary tract calculi can be simplified as follows: 1) In the asymptomatic patients a prophylactic surgery is not justified. 2) In the symptomatic patients the cholecystectomy is by far the best procedure as it eliminates the symptoms and it prevents the complications. 3) If performed in elective and good-risk patients, this surgical technique is without morbidity and mortality. 4) Such a statement which absolutely fits in case of laparotomic cholecystectomy, is not true in case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy which, on the contrary, presents with an higher mortality. 5) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy must be performed by surgeons with biliary tract management wide experience. 6) The management of complications is still almost surgical. 7) Common duct calculi are often treated by endoscopic techniques in association with surgery. 8) The surgeon must always be able to evaluate his patient and to suggest the best management with particular regard to the alternative not surgical procedures which sometimes are more favourable to the patient. 9) Actually, to left behind the statement "a chance to cut is a chance to cure" could sometimes involve much credit to the surgeon and more profit to the patient.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The optimal treatment of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses has not yet been defined and mortality and morbidity remain high. In this retrospective study 2.310 laparotomies were reviewed. The records of 39 patients with postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (1.6%) are reported and the results obtained in percutaneous drainage (PD, n = 27) versus surgical drainage (SD, n = 10) are compared. The choice of drainage was made after consultation with the interventional radiologist, and PD was preferred in single, well-defined abscesses. Two patients had prompt spontaneous resolution of the abscess. The two groups were homogeneous for age, sex and postoperative day of abscess diagnosis. There was no difference in severity of illness assessed by Acute Physiologic Score (APS) between PD and SD groups (7.9 vs 9.3). No significant difference was found in mortality (11% vs 20%), morbidity (11% vs 40%) and duration of drain tube (14 vs 15 days) between PD group and SD group. This study confirms the data of recent retrospective stratified series: PD and SD are equally efficacious to cure postoperative intraabdominal abscesses. However, PD should be the treatment of choice because of its lower invasiveness and cost.