PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato

Publications and source records attributed to Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Clonotypic characterization defines B-cell drivers of clonal expansion and intratumor heterogeneity in IgM monoclonal gammopathies.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) share the same cell of origin but differ in clonal size. Compared with other B-cell neoplasms, the lymphoplasmacytic clone in WM can be rather small, limiting our understanding of clonal expansion. We applied an integrative approach using single-cell RNA with B-cell receptor (BCR) sequencing, the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin, and whole-genome sequencing to characterize the tumor clone in patients with IgM MGUS, smoldering WM (SWM), and symptomatic WM (WM). IgM MGUS and low- or intermediate-risk SWM harbored multiple B-cell clones compared to WM. CD9, JCHAIN, RASSF6, and DUSP22 were the main markers of the dominant B-cell clone at gene expression and chromatin activity levels, with CD9 preferentially expressed in plasma cell-like tumor cells. POU2F2 had high activity in the tumor clone and was linked to CD9 regulatory regions. MYD88 and IGLL5 mutations, mainly associated with the mutational signature SBS5, were present in minor clones, whereas the MYD88 mutation was also detected in nonexpanded B-cells. The 6q deletion was present in tumor cells from high-risk patients, which harbored fitness advantage over copy-neutral tumor cells. Coding mutations clustered tumor and minor clones from oligoclonal patients and were associated with abnormal transcriptional programs. The B-cell clones also showed enriched predicted interactions with monocytes. Our integrative single-cell approach reveals the importance of clone size in IgM gammopathy and identifies key markers promoting clonal expansion.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2025

Viral viability markers of SARS-CoV-2: a comparison of cell culture, genomic RNA RT-PCR, and subgenomic RNA RT-PCR.

UNLABELLED: Accurate methods to assess viral viability are crucial for determining isolation duration and antiviral therapy in immunocompromised patients. Although cell culture (CC) is the gold standard, it has limitations. Cycle threshold (Ct) values from genomic RNA (gRNA) RT-PCR and subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) RT-PCR have been proposed as markers of active viral replication. This study evaluated the correlation between CC, gRNA Ct values, and sgRNA to identify the best viral viability marker. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between CC, gRNA Ct values, and sgRNA to identify the best viral viability marker. We conducted a prospective study on immunocompromised patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection at a tertiary hospital (May 2021 to May 2023). Nasopharyngeal swabs were inoculated into Vero E6 cells and tested for gRNA using RT-PCR (Cobas 6800, Roche) and for sgRNA (non-commercial RT-PCR). The sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated using CC as the gold standard. Among 285 samples from 108 patients, gRNA RT-PCR had high S and NPV (1.0) but low SP (0.24) and moderate PPV (0.63). Ct analysis improved performance in extreme but not intermediate values. A Ct ≤ 30 maximized S but had low SP; Ct ≤ 25 yielded S (0.88), SP (0.89), PPV (0.92), NPV (0.84), and accuracy (0.88); sgRNA showed the highest S (0.99), SP (0.96), PPV (0.97), NPV (0.99), and accuracy (0.98). sgRNA detection is the best marker for identifying viable SARS-CoV-2, aiding decisions on isolation, antiviral treatment, or delaying chemotherapy in immunocompromised patients. IMPORTANCE: Identifying whether a patient still has contagious SARS-CoV-2 is essential for managing isolation, antiviral treatment, and other clinical decisions-especially in immunocompromised individuals. While viral culture is the gold standard for confirming viral viability, it is slow, expensive, and not widely available. Many hospitals rely on RT-PCR tests, but these detect viral genetic material whether or not the virus is still active. This study shows that detecting subgenomic RNA (sgRNA), a molecule only present when the virus is actively replicating, is a highly accurate way, a molecule only present when the virus is actively replicating, is a highly accurate way to determine whether the virus is still viable. Compared to standard PCR or viral culture, sgRNA testing better predicts who is truly infectious. These findings support sgRNA as a useful tool to guide clinical management and infection control in vulnerable patients.

Humans↗