Viral viability markers of SARS-CoV-2: a comparison of cell culture, genomic RNA RT-PCR, and subgenomic RNA RT-PCR.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Accurate methods to assess viral viability are crucial for determining isolation duration and antiviral therapy in immunocompromised patients. Although cell culture (CC) is the gold standard, it has limitations. Cycle threshold (Ct) values from genomic RNA (gRNA) RT-PCR and subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) RT-PCR have been proposed as markers of active viral replication. This study evaluated the correlation between CC, gRNA Ct values, and sgRNA to identify the best viral viability marker. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between CC, gRNA Ct values, and sgRNA to identify the best viral viability marker. We conducted a prospective study on immunocompromised patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection at a tertiary hospital (May 2021 to May 2023). Nasopharyngeal swabs were inoculated into Vero E6 cells and tested for gRNA using RT-PCR (Cobas 6800, Roche) and for sgRNA (non-commercial RT-PCR). The sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated using CC as the gold standard. Among 285 samples from 108 patients, gRNA RT-PCR had high S and NPV (1.0) but low SP (0.24) and moderate PPV (0.63). Ct analysis improved performance in extreme but not intermediate values. A Ct ≤ 30 maximized S but had low SP; Ct ≤ 25 yielded S (0.88), SP (0.89), PPV (0.92), NPV (0.84), and accuracy (0.88); sgRNA showed the highest S (0.99), SP (0.96), PPV (0.97), NPV (0.99), and accuracy (0.98). sgRNA detection is the best marker for identifying viable SARS-CoV-2, aiding decisions on isolation, antiviral treatment, or delaying chemotherapy in immunocompromised patients. IMPORTANCE: Identifying whether a patient still has contagious SARS-CoV-2 is essential for managing isolation, antiviral treatment, and other clinical decisions-especially in immunocompromised individuals. While viral culture is the gold standard for confirming viral viability, it is slow, expensive, and not widely available. Many hospitals rely on RT-PCR tests, but these detect viral genetic material whether or not the virus is still active. This study shows that detecting subgenomic RNA (sgRNA), a molecule only present when the virus is actively replicating, is a highly accurate way, a molecule only present when the virus is actively replicating, is a highly accurate way to determine whether the virus is still viable. Compared to standard PCR or viral culture, sgRNA testing better predicts who is truly infectious. These findings support sgRNA as a useful tool to guide clinical management and infection control in vulnerable patients.