Biomedical subjects

M B Gorbet

Publications and source records attributed to M B Gorbet.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Complement inhibition reduces material-induced leukocyte activation with PEG modified polystyrene beads (Tentagel) but not polystyrene beads.

With isolated leukocytes, inhibiting complement reduced material-induced leukocyte activation (CD11b) with polyethylene glycol modified polystyrene beads (PS-PEG), but not with polystyrene beads (PS). The PS-PEG beads (TentaGel) were complement activating as measured by SC5b-9 levels consistent with the sensitivity of these beads to leukocyte inhibition with complement inhibitors. Following contact with PS and PS-PEG beads, isolated leukocytes in plasma and in the absence in platelets were found to significantly upregulate CD11b, while TF expression and exposure of phosphatidylserine remained at background levels. Complement inhibition by means of sCR1 partially reduced CD11b upregulation on PS-PEG beads, but had no effect with PS beads. Pyridoxal-5-phosphate (P5P) was able to significantly reduce both CD11b upregulation and exposure of phosphatidylserine with PS-PEG beads, although it did not appear to inhibit SC5b-9 production. Pentamidine and NAAGA inhibited complement and were effective in reducing CD11b upregulation with both PS and PS-PEG. However, they also had an inhibitory effect on leukocyte signaling mechanisms, precluding their utility for further study in this context. Leukocyte adhesion occurred to similar extents on both PS and PS-PEG beads. While sCR1 and P5P blocked adhesion and activation (for adherent leukocytes) on PS-PEG beads, they had no effect on leukocytes adherent to PS beads. The role of complement in leukocyte activation and adhesion was found to be material-dependent. Thus, leukocyte-material compatibility may be resolved by complement inhibition in some but not all cases. For these other materials (example here was PS), other mechanisms, such as fibrinogen adsorption and direct leukocyte release, may need exploitation to minimize leukocyte activation and adhesion.

Biocompatible Materials↗

PubMed2003

Material-induced tissue factor expression but not CD11b upregulation depends on the presence of platelets.

Biomaterials activate leukocytes as well as platelets when exposed to blood. One feature of leukocyte activation at least at times beyond a few hours is tissue factor expression, contributing to a procoagulant state. We show here that platelet activation and specifically platelet-monocyte aggregate formation appears to be a precondition for tissue factor expression. Material-induced Tissue Factor (TF) expression by isolated leukocytes (6 x 10(6) cells/mL) resuspended in increasing concentrations of platelets in plasma was elevated when the platelet concentration was 50 x 10(6) platelets/mL or more; at lower platelet concentrations (1-25 x 10(6). cells/mL) the TF expression remained at background levels. On the other hand, significant CD11b upregulation was observed on leukocytes, in bulk and adherent to beads, at all platelet concentrations. This platelet effect on material-induced TF expression appeared to be mediated by the formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates. Anti-P-selectin, which blocked the association between platelets and leukocytes, reduced monocyte adhesion and material-induced TF expression for bulk monocytes. Anti-GPIIb/IIIa, a GPIIb/IIIa platelet antagonist, also reduced monocyte adhesion and material-induced TF expression in the bulk, most likely due to its inhibiting effect on the formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates, secondary to platelet activation. However, the antibody-associated reductions for bulk leukocytes (mainly neutrophils) were small and incomplete. Similar levels of TF expression, in the bulk, were observed with both polystyrene (PS), a strong platelet activator, and polyethylene glycol-modified PEG (PS-PEG), a mild platelet activator. The role of platelets in material-induced TF expression appears to be mediated in part via the formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates, although other mechanisms are likely also involved.

Biocompatible Materials↗

PubMed2001

Leukocyte activation and leukocyte procoagulant activities after blood contact with polystyrene and polyethylene glycol-immobilized polystyrene beads.

Beads (45 microm) of polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene glycol modified PS (TentaGel) with an amino or hydroxyl terminal group were incubated with blood to assess the effect of surface area and material chemistry on leukocyte activation. After a 2-hour incubation, blood contact with beads activated leukocytes in the bulk (tissue factor expression, CD11b up-regulation, and association with platelets) independently of material surface chemistry. On the other hand, activation of adherent leukocytes was material dependent. After blood contact with PS, polyethylene glycol-immobilized PS (PS-PEG) and PS-PEG-NH2 beads, CD11b up-regulation in the bulk, platelet-leukocyte aggregates, and leukocyte adhesion were all dependent on surface area, whereas tissue factor (TF) expression was not. Material-induced leukocyte activation in the bulk was also independent of the beads' capacity to activate platelets. However, monocyte adhesion and TF expression on beads appeared to be related to the presence of platelets on the surface. Material-induced TF expression was able to initiate the extrinsic pathway of coagulation, resulting in significant fibrin formation. Although not all of our markers of leukocyte activation varied with material area or chemistry, it was clear that these materials activated leukocytes in a way that resulted in increased procoagulant activity. During blood-material interactions, material-induced leukocyte activation may then contribute to thrombogenesis.

Blood Coagulation↗

PubMed2000

What really is blood compatibility?

The criteria for nonthrombogenicity are classically defined as long clotting times and minimal platelet deposition. The inability to point to unequivocal progress in the development of truly nonthrombogenic materials, highlights the inadequacy if not actually invalidity of these criteria. Our approach is to define nonthrombogenicity in terms of: (1) a thrombin production rate constant, kp < 10(-4) cm s(-1); (2) low platelet consumption and low degree of platelet activation (e.g., microparticle formation); (3) perhaps some platelet spreading; and (4) low complement and leukocyte activation. Only when the target becomes clear, will it be possible to identify clear strategies for producing the materials we need.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Flow cytometric study of in vitro neutrophil activation by biomaterials.

Neutrophil activation for adherent and nonadherent cells, as measured by flow cytometry, was not strongly dependent on material surface chemistry. We had hypothesized that material-induced neutrophil activation was an important parameter associated with material failure. All materials tested [cellophane, an acrylonitrile copolymer (AN69), Pellethane, nylon, polyethylene terephthalate, low density polyethylene, and polydimethylsiloxane] activated isolated human neutrophils, which were resuspended in plasma or serum, to similar extents based on L-selectin shedding, CD11b upregulation, and stimulation of the oxidative burst after 30-min exposure. Inhibition of complement activation by sCR1 unexpectedly had little effect if any on nonadherent neutrophils. However, neutrophil adhesion, but not the level of activation of the adherent cells, was strongly dependent on complement activation. Pretreatment with albumin did not inhibit adhesion or reduce neutrophil activation, but plasma pretreatment resulted in increased activation for nonadherent and adherent cells. More adhesion and a higher level of activation of adherent cells was observed following pretreatment with fibrinogen, a ligand of CD11b. Taken together these results suggest that upon contact with a material, neutrophil activation may occur though mechanisms that are not mediated by complement. For example, the presence of plasma proteins such as fibrinogen at the interface may trigger activation and the release of other activating agents. Although the material differences are small, the extent of activation may be significant and warrant further study of the mechanism and consequences of that activation.

Acrylic Resins↗