PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M G Kris

Publications and source records attributed to M G Kris.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Induction chemotherapy employing dose-intense cisplatin with mitomycin and vinblastine (MVP400), followed by thoracic surgery or irradiation, for patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy before surgery or irradiation has improved the survival of patients with Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Encouraged by earlier results with preoperative MVP (cisplatin [120 mg/m(2) or 25 mg/m(2)/week], vinblastine, and mitomycin) for Stage IIIA patients with clinically apparent mediastinal (N2) disease, the authors conducted a Phase II trial of the safety and efficacy of induction MVP400 with the dose intensity of cisplatin doubled from 25 to 50 mg/m(2) per week. METHODS: From October 1992 to March 1996, 37 patients with Stage IIIA (26) or Stage IIIB (11) NSCLC began the MVP400 induction chemotherapy program. Four doses of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)), 7 doses of vinblastine, and 2 doses of mitomycin were given over 9 weeks. Patients received either surgery or irradiation after induction treatment. RESULTS: Overall, the response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval, 49-81%) with a complete resection rate of 67%. The median survival was 17 months, with 66% of patients alive at 1 year. Complete resection and Stage IIIA involvement were favorable prognostic indicators for survival. No Stage IIIB patients underwent a complete resection. Myelosuppression was the most common side effect. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although high response and complete resection rates were again demonstrated, results with the MVP400 regimen were not improved over those achieved with MVP regimen tested earlier with Stage IIIA (N2) patients. The authors continue to recommend MVP as an induction chemotherapy regimen for clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Reduction of cisplatin-induced emesis by a selective neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist. L-754,030 Antiemetic Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: The localization of substance P in brain-stem regions associated with vomiting, and the results of studies in ferrets, led us to postulate that a neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist would be an antiemetic in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 159 patients who had not previously received cisplatin, we evaluated the prevention of acute emesis (occurring within 24 hours) and delayed emesis (on days 2 to 5) after a single dose of cisplatin therapy (70 mg or more per square meter of body-surface area). Before receiving cisplatin, all the patients received granisetron (10 microg per kilogram of body weight intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally). The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatments in addition to granisetron and dexamethasone: 400 mg of an oral trisubstituted morpholine acetal (also known as L-754,030) before cisplatin and 300 mg on days 2 to 5 (group 1), 400 mg of L-754,030 before cisplatin and placebo on days 2 to 5 (group 2), or placebo before cisplatin and placebo on days 2 to 5 (group 3). Additional medication was available at any time to treat occurrences of vomiting or nausea. RESULTS: In the acute-emesis phase, 93 percent of the patients in groups 1 and 2 combined and 67 percent of those in group 3 had no vomiting (P<0.001). In the delayed-emesis phase, 82 percent of the patients in group 1, 78 percent of those in group 2, and 33 percent of those in group 3 had no vomiting (P<0.001 for the comparison between group 1 or 2 and group 3). The median nausea score in the delayed-emesis phase was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 3 (P=0.003). No serious adverse events were attributed to L-754,030. CONCLUSIONS: The neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist L-754,030 prevents delayed emesis after treatment with cisplatin. Moreover, combining L-754,030 with granisetron plus dexamethasone improves the prevention of acute emesis.

Acetals↗
PubMed1999

Oral cisapride for the control of delayed vomiting following high-dose cisplatin.

Although combination antiemetics prevent vomiting during the initial 24 h after high-dose (> or =100 mg/m2) cisplatin, many patients experience delayed emesis 24-120 h afterwards despite receiving prophylactic dexamethasone and metoclopramide during this time. Cisapride is a prokinetic agent, which stimulates propulsive motility throughout the gastrointestinal tract without causing extrapyramidal effects. In this phase II trial, we tested the ability of cisapride to prevent delayed emesis following cisplatin. Twenty patients receiving initial cisplatin >100 mg/m2 were entered. All patients received intravenous dexamethasone with either metoclopramide or ondansetron to prevent acute emesis 0-24 h after receiving cisplatin. Patients who had experienced two or fewer acute vomiting episodes then received cisapride 20 mg orally four times daily for 4 days (24-120 h after cisplatin). Cisapride prevented delayed emesis in 2 patients (10%) during the entire 4-day period (95% confidence interval, 1-32%). Abdominal cramping and pain occurred in 35%. At the dose and schedule tested, oral cisapride prevented delayed emesis in only 10% of patients receiving cisplatin >100 mg/m2 and caused abdominal cramping in 35%. Since in prior trials among similar patients, placebo prevented delayed emesis in 11%, further study of cisapride and dose escalation for this indication are not recommended.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1999

Normative data and trends in quality of life from the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS).

Normative data and trends for a disease- and site-specific quality of life (QL) instrument for individuals with lung cancer, the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), are presented to facilitate the user's interpretation of test scores. Data for patients enrolled in two large, identical, randomized trials of a new combination chemotherapy regimen for patients with stages III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were combined into one dataset (n = 673). For these patients with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 60-100%, QL had been prospectively measured at baseline, day 29 and every 6 weeks thereafter. Descriptive statistics for the LCSS are presented for three time points (baseline, day 29 and day 71) and for specific demographic and disease-related characteristics (age, gender, race, performance status and stage of disease) to provide expected values and their variability during chemotherapy. Data from a small dataset of 63 NSCLC inpatients with KPS scores of 20-50% are also presented for a comparison sample of supportive care for inpatients and hospice patients. For the 673 NSCLC patients at baseline there were no significant differences in QL by age, gender, or race. Major presenting lung cancer symptoms at baseline for this combined sample were dyspnea 87%, cough 86%, pain 81%, loss of appetite 75%, and hemoptysis 41%. Of these patients, 81% had three or more presenting symptoms at baseline (2% had no symptoms; 5%, one symptom; 12%, two symptoms; 18%, three symptoms; 27%, four symptoms; and 36%, five symptoms). The mean LCSS baseline score (best = 0; worst = 100) was 26.56 (SD 16.10). The mean scores for day 29 and day 71 were 25.46 (SD 16.52) and 25.30 (SD 16.93), respectively, but follow-up assessments on progressers were not obtained. Stage III patients had a mean LCSS score of 23.7 (SD 15.1), whereas stage IV patients reported a mean LCSS score of 27.3 (SD 16.3). The mean LCSS score for the group with KPS 60-70% was 34.8 (SD 15.5), and that for the group with KPS 80-100% was 23.3 (SD 15.1). The mean LCSS score for the lower performance group, with KPS scores of 20-50% at baseline, was 46.85 (SD 17.65).

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Factors influencing ten-year survival in resected stages I to IIIa non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine (in survivors of 5 years after resection of their lung cancer) whether age, sex, histologic condition, and age have any influence on furthering survival beyond 5 years. METHODS: From 1973 to 1989, 686 patients were alive and well 5 years after complete resection of their lung cancers. Survival analysis was carried out with only deaths from lung cancer treated as deaths. Deaths from other causes were treated as withdrawals. Multivariate Cox regression was used to test the relationship of survival to age, sex, histologic condition, and stage. RESULTS: The population in this study had the following characteristics at the time of operation: The male/female ratio was 1.38:1, and the median age was 61 years. The histologic condition of their lung cancer was adenocarcinoma in 412 patients, squamous cell in 244 patients, large cell carcinoma in 29 patients, and small cell carcinoma in 1 patient. The stage of the disease was stage IA in 263 patients, IB in 261 patients, IIA in 12 patients, IIB in 68 patients, and IIIA in 82 patients. The extent of resection was a lobectomy or bilobectomy in 579 patients, pneumonectomy in 55 patients, and wedge resection or segmentectomy in 52 patients. A recurrence or a new lung primary occurrence was considered as failure to remain free of lung cancer. The median follow-up on all patients was 122 months from initial treatment. Of the 686 patients, 26 patients experienced the development of late recurrence and 36 new cancers, beyond 5 years. Overall survival for 5 additional years after a 5-year check point was 92.4%. Likewise, survival by nodal status was 93% for N0 tumors, 95% for N1 tumors, and 90% for N2 tumors. Survival by stage was 93% for stage I tumors and 91% for stage II or IIIA tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with surgically treated lung cancer, neither age, sex, histologic condition, nor stage is a predictor of the risk of late recurrence or new lung cancer. The only prognostic factor appears to be the survival of the patient free of lung cancer for 5 years from the initial treatment, with a resultant favorable outlook to remain well for 10 or more years.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Phase I study of the sequential administration of edatrexate and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The antifolate edatrexate and the microtubule-stabilizing agent paclitaxel have both demonstrated single-agent activity in lung and breast cancer. In vitro, the sequential combination of edatrexate followed by paclitaxel produced synergistic antitumor effects. This trial was designed to find the maximum tolerated doses of edatrexate and paclitaxel when given every two weeks utilizing this sequential schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with solid tumors received edatrexate intravenously on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel intravenously as a three-hour infusion on days 2 and 16 of each 28-day cycle. Edatrexate was escalated from 40 to 120 mg/m2 and the paclitaxel dose fixed at 135 mg/m2. When the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, edatrexate was fixed at 120 mg/m2 and paclitaxel escalated to 175 and 210 mg/m2. RESULTS: All 34 patients were assessable. The maximum tolerated doses were 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate and 210 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Grade 3 myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, and an infusion-related reaction occurred. Eight patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and one with bladder cancer achieved major objective responses. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II doses are 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate days 1 and 15 and 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel as a three-hour infusion days 2 and 16 of a 28 day cycle. These results warrant phase II trials of the combination leading to phase III studies comparing the two drugs to a single agent to confirm the preclinical evidence of synergy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Long survival of patients with small cell lung cancer after adjuvant treatment with the anti-idiotypic antibody BEC2 plus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin.

Despite active therapies for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), most patients relapse and die of the disease. The present study evaluates immunization using the anti-idiotypic antibody BEC2, which mimics the ganglioside GD3 expressed on the surface of most SCLC tumors, combined with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) as an immune adjuvant. We hypothesized that active immunization could alter the natural history of the disease. Fifteen patients who had completed standard therapy for SCLC received a series of five intradermal immunizations consisting of 2.5 mg of BEC2 plus BCG over a 10-week period. Blood was collected for serological analysis, and outcome was monitored. All patients developed anti-BEC2 antibodies, despite having received chemotherapy with or without thoracic radiation. We detected anti-GD3 antibodies in five patients, including those with the longest relapse-free survival. The median relapse-free survival for patients with extensive stage disease is 11 months and has not been reached for patients with limited stage disease (>47 months), with only one of seven patients having relapsed after a median follow-up of 47 months. Immunization of patients with SCLC after standard therapy using BEC2 plus BCG can induce anti-GD3 antibodies and is safe. The survival and relapse-free survival in this group of patients are substantially better than those observed in a prior group of similar patients. A Phase III trial is being conducted to evaluate BEC2 plus BCG as adjuvant therapy after chemotherapy and irradiation.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1999

Immunogenicity of a fucosyl-GM1-keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugate vaccine in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly responsive to chemotherapy, relapses are common, and most patients die within 2 years of diagnosis. After initial therapy, standard treatment is observation alone. We have been investigating immunization against selected gangliosides as adjuvant therapy directed against residual and presumably resistant disease persisting after chemotherapy and irradiation. Previously, we reported that the presence of anti-GM2 ganglioside antibodies is associated with a prolonged disease-free survival in patients with melanoma, and that SCLC patients immunized with BEC2, an anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody that mimics the ganglioside GD3, had a prolonged survival compared with historical controls. In the present trial, fucosyl-alpha1-2Galbeta1-3GalNAcbeta1-4(NeuAcalpha2-3) Galbeta1-4Glcbeta1-1Cer (Fuc-GM1), a ganglioside expressed on the SCLC cell surface, was selected as a target for active immunotherapy. Fuc-GM1 is present on most SCLCs but on few normal tissues. SCLC patients achieving a major response to initial therapy were vaccinated s.c. on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 16 with Fuc-GM1 (30 microg) conjugated to the carrier protein keyhole limpet hemocyanin and mixed with the adjuvant QS-21. Ten patients received at least five vaccinations and are evaluable for response. All patients demonstrated a serological response, with induction of both IgM and IgG antibodies against Fuc-GM1, despite prior treatment with chemotherapy with or without radiation. Posttreatment flow cytometry demonstrated binding of antibodies from patients' sera to tumor cells expressing Fuc-GM1. In the majority of cases, sera were also capable of complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Mild transient erythema and induration at injection sites were the only consistent toxicities. The Fuc-GM1-KLH + QS-21 vaccine is safe and immunogenic in patients with SCLC. Continued study of this and other ganglioside vaccines is ongoing.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Strategies to eradicate minimal residual disease in small cell lung cancer: high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, and BEC2 plus BCG vaccination.

In the last 25 years, treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has improved with advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Standard chemotherapy regimens can yield 80% to 90% response rates and some cures when combined with thoracic irradiation in limited-stage patients. Nonetheless, small cell lung cancer has a high relapse rate due to drug resistance; this has resulted in poor survival for most patients. Attacking this problem requires a unique approach to eliminate resistant disease remaining after induction therapy. This review will focus on three potential strategies: high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, and BEC2 plus BCG vaccination.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1998

Delayed emesis following anticancer chemotherapy.

Delayed emesis is a distinct syndrome where vomiting begins or persists 24 or more hours after chemotherapy. It is more likely to occur when the stimulus for emesis is strong and/or acute vomiting is poorly controlled. The pathophysiology appears different than that which causes acute emesis. The literature reporting clinical trials to prevent delayed nausea and vomiting are presented. The best ways of preventing delayed emesis following anticancer chemotherapy are discussed.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1998

Consensus regarding multiple day and rescue antiemetic therapy.

Different forms of moderately and highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy that are administered over several days per cycle are discussed with reference to the most efficacious antiemetic therapy. Both preventive and rescue antiemetic therapy are considered.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1998

Rationale for the use of a single fixed intravenous dolasetron dose for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Pooled analysis of 14 clinical trials.

Dolasetron mesilate is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that prevents chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. For the majority of patients in intravenous dolasetron trials for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, dosing has been based on body weight (mg/kg). The approved weight-based dose is 1.8 mg/kg based on results of controlled clinical trials. However, trials of dolasetron evaluating oral doses for prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis, and intravenous doses for prevention and treatment of postoperative emesis have used a fixed milligram dose. To identify an appropriate intravenous fixed milligram dose for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, this analysis was performed to derive efficacy results for fixed milligram doses from pooled results obtained with dosing based on body weight. Intravenous dolasetron doses for 1,598 patients treated on a mg/kg basis (0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg) in 14 clinical trials were converted to fixed milligram doses based on weight. Fixed-dose groups were established at doses of 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, and 200 mg. Doses less than or equal to the midpoint between two dose groups were included in the lower dose group. Pooled results showed that the 100 mg intravenous dolasetron dose group (who received actual doses of 88-112 mg) produced the highest rate (53%) of complete response (0 emetic episodes and no rescue medication in the 24-h period following initiation of chemotherapy).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial of topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous infusion in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Topotecan (9-dimethylaminoethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor. Twenty-six patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated in a multicenter study with topotecan 0.6 mg/m2/day for 21 days by continuous intravenous infusion every 28 days; this starting dose was decreased to 0.5 mg/m2/day in the last 23 patients because of myelosuppression. There was one partial response, for a response rate of 4% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%-19.6%). Median survival was 9 months. One-year survival was 39%. Of the 58 lung cancer symptoms at baseline, 40% were resolved by the end of best response (all in the partial response patient, 62% in stable disease patients, 26% in progressive disease patients). Catheter-related infections complicated 19% of courses. Red-cell transfusions were given in 50% of courses. Toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (4%), grade 3-4 anemia (19%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (8%), and catheter-related infections (19% courses). Although the major objective response rate was only 4%, patients treated with topotecan given as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion experienced a decrease in cancer-related symptoms and a 1-year survival of 39%.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Assuring the optimal use of serotonin antagonist antiemetics: the process for development and implementation of institutional antiemetic guidelines at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: The need to foster the appropriate and cost-effective use of serotonin-antagonist antiemetic drugs spurred the creation of guidelines. The process by which institution-wide guidelines at Sloan-Kettering were developed, implemented, assessed, and modified is described. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group working with disease-specific management teams assigned the emetic potential of chemotherapy programs to one of five categories. Antiemetic regimens, including a specified dose and schedule of a serotonin-antagonist and dexamethasone, were assigned to each emetic category. The information was collated by disease site and chemotherapy program into hospital-wide antiemetic regimen recommendations. Quality assessment was conducted initially and repeated each time the guidelines were modified. RESULTS: Patient surveys demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with emetic control, which was similar to reported results. Data from the latest survey showed zero emetic episodes in 93% and 87% of participants given moderate and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, respectively. Compliance with the guidelines, initially in 73%, has been improved using a standardized chemotherapy order "check box" labeled, "Antiemetics as per Guidelines." Antiemetic drug expenditures decreased from a projected $2.8 million to $1.3 million annually. CONCLUSION: The guidelines became an educational tool that ensured the delivery of optimal antiemetic therapy chosen by professionals with the greatest knowledge of both the particular chemotherapy regimen and cancer site. Implementation of the guidelines resulted in substantial savings while treating more patients. The guidelines were easily modified as new chemotherapeutic agents and antiemetic drugs became available.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1998

What does chemotherapy have to offer patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Trials in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients have shown that at least 10 drugs have objective response rates of > or =15% in phase II studies. These responses are reflected both in symptomatic benefit and in improved survival relative to best supportive care. However, greater benefit occurs in stage III patients when chemotherapy precedes either surgery or irradiation, which enhances both survival duration and curability. Combination chemotherapy should be considered part of the treatment of all ambulatory patients with non-small cell lung cancer and can be a cost-effective use of health care resources. New agents and the possibility of combining chemotherapy with new treatment modalities offer opportunities for further improvement.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗