PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M G Kris

Publications and source records attributed to M G Kris.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Phase II trial of chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide (CQS) in patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide (CQS) was one of the first agents identified by the human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCFA) as possessing antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prior phase I studies had suggested that plasma concentrations equivalent to those showing efficacy in the HTCFA could be reliably attained in humans. This phase II study assessed the antitumor activity of CQS while using an adaptive control pharmacokinetic modelling system to attain targeted plasma levels of this novel compound. METHODS: A group of 20 patients with stage III or IV NSCLC received CQS as a 1-h weekly infusion at an initial dose of 2 g/m2. In all patients, 24-h plasma concentrations of CQS were measured. Patients with levels < 100 micrograms/ml had dose increases determined by their 24-h levels and pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from two prior phase I trials of this agent. These individuals had 24-h CQS levels repeated after their second weeks' treatment and doses were readjusted if the target concentration was not reached. Antitumor response assessment was made every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 18 attained the target plasma concentration, and 16 of these achieved this initially or with just one dose adjustment. No major objective antitumor responses were observed (major response rate 0%, 95% CI 0-17%). CQS was well tolerated with hypoglycemia being the most clinically significant toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: When given on this schedule CQS is inactive in NSCLC despite the fact that the target concentration was achieved in 90% of patients. The ability of the HTCFA to identify active agents remains unproved.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A dilemma in analysis: issues in the serial measurement of quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Despite the availability of several instruments to evaluate quality of life (QL) over time in patients with lung cancer, barriers in measurement remain. This methodological study used LCSS data (Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, a disease- and site-specific QL measure) to examine analysis methods to quantify QL where data needed for serial evaluation may be missing. Data from two large randomized trials, conducted at 30 centers, of a new combination chemotherapy regimen incorporating a new agent for patients (n = 673) with Stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer were obtained for this study. QL had been prospectively measured at baseline, day 29, and every six weeks thereafter using the LCSS. For the slope analysis (SA) and area under the curve (AUC) analyses, an adjustment score of zero was used to indicate QL on the day of death (mortality adjustment) and each subsequent day until the end of the assessment period. Significant differences in QL, symptom scores and known prognostic factors at baseline were found in the attrition group. SA and AUC analysis allowed inclusion of 581 patients, giving an adequacy rate of 86%. By using a mortality adjustment, an additional 45 patients were included, increasing the inclusion rate to 93%. With the use of the mortality adjustment, QL was shown to decline over the interval, as opposed to rise if the adjustment had not been performed. The conclusions of the study were: (1) analysis for serial data using SA and AUC provides useful, but differing information; (2) when attrition (caused by death) is a factor, a mortality adjustment presented a more accurate assessment of QL as an endpoint; (3) more frequent evaluations of QL will capture rapid changes in patient status and reduce the attrition bias; (4) all patients should be followed until they die; and (5) QL should be given full consideration as a primary endpoint separate from survival.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Phase II study of the combination of the novel bioreductive agent, tirapazamine, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Tirapazamine is a bioreductive compound synergistic with cisplatin in preclinical testing. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of tirapazamine with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with unresectable stage III-B and IV non-small-cell lung cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy were given tirapazamine (390 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) over two hours followed one hour later by cisplatin (75 mg/m2) i.v. over one hour every 21 days. RESULTS: Five of 20 patients (25%) had major objective responses (95% confidence interval, 11%-50%). Median duration of response was eight months with a one-year survival of 40%. Toxicities included temporary hearing loss (25%), muscle cramping, diarrhea, skin rash and nausea/vomiting. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic or renal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tirapazamine plus cisplatin appears to be safe and active in the treatment of advanced non-small lung cancer without a substantial increase in toxicity compared to cisplatin alone. A phase III randomized study compared the combination to cisplatin alone has completed accrual. Further evaluation of tirapazamine with other active agents and in multi-modality therapy is warranted.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To propose a classification of the acute emetogenicity of antineoplastic chemotherapy agents, and to develop an algorithm to define the emetogenicity of combination chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: A Medline search was conducted to identify (1) clinical trials that used chemotherapy as single-agent therapy, and (2) major reviews of antiemetic therapy. The search was limited to patients who received commonly used doses of chemotherapy agents, primarily by short (< 3 hours) intravenous infusions. Based on review of this information and our collective clinical experience, we assigned chemotherapy agents to one of five emetogenic levels by consensus. A preliminary algorithm to determine the emetogenicity of combination chemotherapy regimens was then designed by consensus. A final algorithm was developed after we analyzed a data base composed of patients treated on the placebo arms of four randomized antiemetic trials. RESULTS: Chemotherapy agents were divided into five levels: level 1 (< 10% of patients experience acute [< or = 24 hours after chemotherapy] emesis without antiemetic prophylaxis); level 2 (10% to 30%); level 3 (30% to 60%); level 4 (60% to 90%); and level 5 (> 90%). For combinations, the emetogenic level was determined by identifying the most emetogenic agent in the combination and then assessing the relative contribution of the other agents. The following rules apply: (1) level 1 agents do not contribute to the emetogenic level of a combination; (2) adding > or = one level 2 agent increases the emetogenicity of the combination by one level greater than the most emetogenic agent in the combination; and (3) adding level 3 or 4 agents increases the emetogenicity of the combination by one level per agent. CONCLUSION: The proposed classification schema provides a practical means to determine the emetogenic potential of individual chemotherapy agents and combination regimens during the 24 hours after administration. This system can serve as a framework for the development of antiemetic guidelines.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Initial clinical trial of a selective retinoid X receptor ligand, LGD1069.

PURPOSE: The retinoid response is mediated by nuclear receptors, including retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid "X" receptors (RXRs). All-trans retinoic acid (RA) binds only RARs, while 9-cis RA is an agonist for both RARs and RXRs. Recently, LGD1069 was identified as a highly selective RXR agonist with low affinity for RARs. We undertook a dose-ranging study to examine the safety, clinical tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of LGD1069 in patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients received. LGD1069 administered orally once daily at doses that ranged from 5 to 500 mg/m2 for 1 to 41 weeks. Treatment proceeded from a starting dose of 5 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on selected patients on days 1, 15, and 29. RESULTS: Reversible, asymptomatic increases in liver biochemical tests were the most common dose-limiting adverse effect. Less prominent reactions included leukopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercalcemia. Characteristic retinoid toxicities, such as cheilitis, headache, and myalgias/arthralgias, were mild or absent. Two patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma experienced major antitumor responses. Pharmacokinetic studies obtained in 27 patients at eight dose levels showed that the day 1 area under the plasma concentration-times-time curves (AUCs) were proportional to dose. At all doses studied, the day 1 AUCs were similar to those on days 15 and 29, indicating a lack of induced metabolism. CONCLUSION: LGD1069 is a unique compound that exploits a newly identified pathway of retinoid receptor biology that may be relevant to tumor-cell proliferation and apoptosis. Further investigation of this drug is warranted. Based on the results of this study, a dose of 300 mg/m2 is recommended for single-agent trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prevention of acute emesis in cancer patients following high-dose cisplatin with the combination of oral dolasetron and dexamethasone.

PURPOSE: Dolasetron is a 5-HT3 antagonist antiemetic with active oral and intravenous formulations. The effects of this class are enhanced when combined with dexamethasone. This study tested the ability of the combination of oral dolasetron 200 mg and oral dexamethasone 20 mg to prevent acute emesis in cancer patients receiving initial cisplatin at doses > or = 70 mg/m2. Additionally, patients were randomly assigned to receive a second dosage of the regimen 16 hours later to improve control of acute symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 75 patients were entered, with 38 randomized to the two-dose regimen. Thirty-five percent were women and 77% had lung cancer. RESULTS: Overall, the regimen prevented acute vomiting in 76% (95% confidence interval, 65% to 85%), including 74% of 35 patients who received cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2. There was no observed difference in emesis prevention between the one-dose (76%) and two-dose (76%) regimens (95% confidence interval for the difference, -20% to 19%). The median time to the onset of emesis was 19 hours for the one-dose regimen and 17 hours for the two-dose regimen in those patients with emesis. Headache occurred in 11% who received one dose and 16% who received two doses. CONCLUSION: The combination of oral dolasetron 200 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg given only once prevented acute emesis in 76% of patients who received cisplatin > or = 70 mg/m2. Administration of a second dose of the regimen did not improve the observed prevention rate or delay the time to emesis. This one-dose oral regimen has comparable or better effectiveness than reported results of intravenous combination regimens in preventing cisplatin-induced vomiting and merits further study and use.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

The role of multimodality therapy in locoregional non-small cell lung cancer.

Surgical treatment is offered to all patients with stage I or II disease and to specific groups of patients with stage III or IV disease. Cisplatin based on regimens of induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy have proven to be valuable in stage IIIA (N2) disease. We now recommend induction therapy on an investigational basis to most patients with stage I or II tumors and to all those with stage IIIA tumors, when the 5 year survival is anticipated to be less than 50% with conventional therapy. Many new chemotherapy agents effective in advanced stage lung cancer are currently integrated into this multimodality approach in hopes of further improvement in tumor control and survival.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

Induction paclitaxel/carboplatin in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Bimodality Lung Oncology Team.

In this feasibility study, a 3-hour infusion of 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) was combined with carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 to treat patients with stage T2N0, T1-2N1, or T3N0-1 (excluding superior sulcus tumors) non-small cell lung cancer. Nineteen of a planned 80 patients have been enrolled. To assure that patients meet the study's criteria for inclusion, rigorous physical and laboratory investigations are performed before, during, and after the preoperative chemotherapy and again before the postsurgical chemotherapy. Treatment includes two cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, followed within 3 to 6 weeks with thoracotomy. Up to three cycles of postoperative chemotherapy are planned, commencing 3 to 8 weeks after surgery, as tolerated. To date, 14 patients have completed induction chemotherapy, nine of whom have undergone surgical resection. Three patients have completed postoperative chemotherapy. The study treatment has been well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Very preliminary results suggest that perioperative paclitaxel/carboplatin appears to be a feasible and tolerable regimen in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer and warrants further investigation. More mature results may provide the basis for an intergroup randomized trial comparing this regimen with surgery alone for patients with early stage disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Are more antiemetic trials with a placebo necessary? Report of patient data from randomized trials of placebo antiemetics with cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Because of the predictability of significant emesis after its use, cisplatin serves as the standard emetic stimulus for trials of antiemetic drugs. To define better the incidence, severity, and pattern of emesis that follows cisplatin, facilitate the testing of new agents, and obviate the need for further placebo-controlled trials for this indication, individual patient data were compiled from completed studies with placebo antiemetics and cisplatin. METHODS: The time and number of emetic episodes during the 24 hours after cisplatin were obtained for 48 patients given a placebo antiemetic. Each was treated as part of a randomized, double-blind trial reported between 1981 and 1990. Emesis after antiemetic "rescue" therapy was also assessed. RESULTS: Emesis occurred in 47 of 48 patients (98% observed rate, 95% confidence interval, 89-99%). The median number of emetic episodes during the 24 hours after cisplatin was 6. Emesis continued after rescue in 77% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin caused severe emesis that persisted despite rescue in placebo-treated patients. Using the data presented, any therapy preventing acute emesis in 8 or more of the 48 individuals receiving cisplatin > 50 mg/m2 was an active antiemetic (P = 0.05). The four trials discussed here documented the antiemetic effectiveness of granisetron, metoclopramide, and ondansetron. The placebo-treated patients studied can serve as a control group for testing new therapies. Because of the certainty of severe emesis after cisplatin, and the availability both of these data and several proven drugs for this condition, prospective comparisons of antiemetics should employ active control medications.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Metabolic phenotypes of retinoic acid and the risk of lung cancer.

The metabolic activity of cytochrome P-450 enzymes has been associated with an increased risk of developing lung cancer. We found previously that all-trans retinoic acid is catabolized by these oxidative enzymes, and that an inhibitor of this system discriminated between two populations of lung cancer patients. We examined the association between this metabolic phenotype and the risk of lung cancer in 85 subjects. The area under the plasma concentration x time curve (AUC) was calculated after a single oral dose of all-trans retinoic acid (45 mg/m2). The mean AUC for patients who had either squamous or large cell carcinomas was significantly lower than that of patients with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.0001) or control subjects (P = 0.01). Individuals with an AUC < 250 ng x h/ml had a greater likelihood of having squamous or large cell carcinoma (odds ratio = 5.93). This study suggests that the "rapid" catabolism of all-trans retinoic acid is linked to an increased risk of squamous or large cell cancers of the lung.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Targeting of small-cell lung cancer using the anti-GD2 ganglioside monoclonal antibody 3F8: a pilot trial.

The present study evaluated the ability of the anti-GD2 ganglioside monoclonal antibody 3F8 to target tumor sites in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Of 12 patients entered into the trial, ten received intravenous 3F8 labeled with 2 or 10 mCi iodine-131. The first five patients had recurrent or progressive disease after chemotherapy. Subsequent patients were studied before starting chemotherapy. Radionuclide scans were performed on days 1, 2, and 3 post-infusion and once between day 5 and day 7. Four patients underwent single-photon emission tomography (SPET) imaging. Radionuclide scans demonstrated localization to all known sites of disease, other than small brain metastases in one patient. SPET/CT scan fusion images confirmed precise localization. No significant toxicity was observed. Mean serum half-life was 64.2 h. Analysis of specimens from one patient who died of unrelated causes 6 days post-infusion confirmed the scan results. The present study demonstrates that 3F8 targets SCLC sites in patients. Further studies of anti-GD2 antibodies with higher doses of antibody and radionuclide are warranted to evaluate their role in SCLC.

Carcinoma, Small Cell↗
PubMed1996

High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of i.v. edatrexate with p.o. leucovorin. Thirty-one adults with advanced solid tumors received edatrexate as a 2-h infusion, once a week for 3 weeks, recycled every 28 days. p.o. leucovorin (10 mg/m2, every 6 h for 10 doses) began 24 h later. All had urinary alkalinization and p.o. hydration. Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored. Fatigue, epistaxis, nausea/emesis, mucositis, rash, myalgias, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transient elevations of serum aspartate transferase were observed. Leukoencephalopathy with clinical manifestations occurred in two patients (one had prior cranial irradiation). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 120- and 1080-mg/m2 dose levels revealed no significant difference in the elimination half-life at the two dose levels studied and no significant intrapatient variability between day 1 and day 8 edatrexate administration. Serum edatrexate levels measured using a dihydrofolate reductase inhibition assay correlated with those by high-performance liquid chromatography. Three major and two minor antitumor responses occurred. The maximum tolerated dose was 3750 mg/m2, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (one patient), stomatitis (one patient), and leukoencephalopathy (one patient). Because of the occurrence of leukoencephalopathy, further study of high-dose edatrexate with leucovorin rescue is not recommended.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Initial clinical trial of the retinoid receptor pan agonist 9-cis retinoic acid.

The retinoid response is mediated by families of nuclear receptors, the retinoic acid receptors (RARs), and the retinoid X receptors. All-trans retinoic acid (RA) binds only RARs and induces its own metabolism. In contrast, 9-cis RA is a newly identified agonist for both RARs and retinoid X receptors. We undertook a dose-ranging study to examine the safety, clinical tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of 9-cis RA in patients with advanced cancer. Thirty-four patients received once daily p.o. doses of 9-cis RA (administered as LGD1057) ranging from 5 to 230 mg/m2 for 4 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on 28 patients at seven dose levels. 9-cis RA was generally well tolerated. Headache was the most common dose-limiting adverse effect. Other prominent reactions included facial flushing, myalgia, dyspnea, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercalcemia. Relative to other retinoids, mucocutaneous reactions were mild. No major antitumor responses were observed. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the day 1 area under the plasma concentration x time curves (AUCs) were proportional to the dose. Up through doses of 140 mg/m2, the day 1 AUCs were similar to those on days 15 and 29. At higher doses, however, AUCs tended to decline with repeat dosing. 9-cis RA is a novel compound that exploits a newly identified pathway of retinoid receptor biology that may be relevant to tumor cell proliferation and differentiation. We recommend a dose of 140 mg/m2 for single-agent trials utilizing a once-daily schedule of administration.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Oral combination antiemetics in patients with small cell lung cancer receiving cisplatin or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous antiemetic combinations containing a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (like metoclopramide, ondansetron, or granisetron) with dexamethasone have become the standard therapy for the treatment of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Intravenous antiemetics, however, can be more costly and take more time to prepare and deliver, and therefore are not preferred for home, outpatient, or office use. The objective of this study was to determine the antiemetic activity and safety of the oral combination antiemetic regimen of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine in patients with small cell lung cancer receiving standard outpatient chemotherapy programs. METHODS: Fifty-two patients receiving initial cisplatin (60 mg/m2) or cyclophosphamide (600-1500 mg/m2) plus doxorubicin (30-45 mg/m2) received an oral regimen of metoclopramide (3 mg/kg x 2 then 2 mg/kg x 2 or 4 doses), dexamethasone (20 mg) and diphenhydramine (50 mg x 2 or 3 doses) (oral MDD), beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. RESULTS: Vomiting was prevented in 15 of 21 (76%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%-92%) receiving cisplatin and 21 of 31 (71%) individuals (95% CI, 52%-86%) given cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin. Adverse effects were mild and transient and included sedation, loose stools, akathisia, and hiccoughs. CONCLUSIONS: The oral MDD antiemetic regimen prevented acute emesis in 73% of the patients entered and was well tolerated in this population of patients with small cell lung cancer.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Phase II trial of a 75-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel with prednisone premedication for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prior Phase II study of a 100-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel conducted at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) demonstrated a 38% response rate with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 76% of the patients and a grade 2 or greater rash or infusion-related reaction in 41% and 34% of the patients, respectively. The current Phase II study sought to determine the activity of a 75-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel to establish whether this lower dose, combined with prednisone, ameliorates toxicity. METHODS: Twenty untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received a 1-hour 75-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel every 21 days. Fifty milligrams of prednisone were administered twice the day before chemotherapy and once each of the next 3 days. Patients' disease-related symptoms were assessed prospectively using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS). RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Five patients had a major objective response (25%; 95% confidence interval, 11-50%). The median duration of response was 9.1 months. The projected 1-year survival was 71%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 70% of the patients. Grade 2 or greater rash and infusion-related reactions decreased to 25% each. Analysis of the LCSS measurements found that six of nine component symptoms improved on Day 22, and all improved when baseline measurements were compared with the best value for each patient during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 21 days shows significant antitumor activity in untreated patients with NSCLC: Neutropenia is comparable with that observed at a 100-mg/m2 dose. The number of infusional reactions and rash decreased when docetaxel at this dose was administered with prednisone. Based on response rates observed in trials using a 100-mg/m2 dose with similar degrees of neutropenia, a 100-mg/m2 dose with steroid pretreatment is recommended future trials.

Adult↗