PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M G Kris

Publications and source records attributed to M G Kris.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Clinical and pharmacology study of chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide given on a weekly schedule.

The in vitro human tumor colony-forming assay identified chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide (CQS) as an active agent at human plasma concentrations of > 100 micrograms/ml. In the initial phase I trial of CQS given every 28 days, peak plasma concentrations > 500 micrograms/ml were associated with reversible dose-limiting hypoglycemia and occasional cardiac arrhythmias. Therefore, we evaluated whether a weekly schedule of treatment might minimize the drug-associated toxicity while maintaining potential therapeutic concentrations. CQS was given intravenously over 1 h once per week for 4 weeks to 12 patients, beginning at a dose of 2,000 mg/m2. All patients underwent monitoring for cardiac arrhythmias and hypoglycemia. Plasma drug levels were measured following each dose. Mild hypoglycemia was the most common adverse effect. A median nadir plasma glucose concentration of 56 mg/dl was observed at a weekly dose of 2,500 mg/m2. Two patients experienced cardiac dysrhythmia while on study. Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring failed to identify any significant infusion-related arrhythmia. The median CQS plasma concentration measured 24 h following a 2,000-mg/m2 dose of CQS was > 100 micrograms/ml, and the cumulative area under the concentration x time curve (AUC) determined at concentrations of > or = 100 micrograms/ml was similar to that observed with the every-28-day schedule. The weekly schedule described herein appears to maximize the plasma AUC with an acceptable margin of safety. The recommended phase II dose and schedule for CQS is 2,000 mg/m2 given once per week. Although severe hypoglycemia is unlikely, glucose monitoring is appropriate for 6 h following CQS administration.

Aged↗

Effectiveness and toxicity of preoperative therapy in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer including the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience with induction MVP in patients with bulky mediastinal lymph node metastases (Clinical N2).

The use of preoperative chemotherapy with mitomycin, vinblastine and cisplatin (MVP) has led to improved complete resection rates and survival in Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with bulky, ipsilateral, mediastinal lymph node metastases (Clinical N2 disease). The addition of preoperative irradiation has also been explored with results not substantially different from preoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. While preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to be feasible, the toxicity of both the chemotherapy and the subsequent resection is of concern with an overall treatment-related mortality of nearly 8%. The careful selection of patients, swift management of neutropenia, and meticulous perioperative pulmonary care has the potential to reduce the mortality from multimodality therapy. Having shown survival benefit in multiple single-institution and randomized trials, induction chemotherapy followed by surgery or irradiation is now the treatment of choice for patients with Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymph node metastases.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere): active chemotherapeutic agents in lung cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol), the prototype of a new class of plant-derived antineoplastic compounds, is a natural product isolated from the Pacific yew. Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a hemisynthetic product derived from the European yew. These agents share a unique mechanism of cytotoxic action by promoting assembly of microtubules and rendering the microtubules resistant to depolymerization. In vitro studies suggest a possible role for radiation sensitization. In Phase I trials, the dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia for both agents. Other toxicities include infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions, alopecia, neurotoxicity, mucositis, diarrhoea and myalgias. To prevent infusion-related reactions, routine premedication is recommended. Noncumulative cardiac toxicity has been observed with paclitaxel. Fluid retention and rash have been reported with docetaxel. In Phase II studies of paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, response rates of 21% and 24% were observed. In Phase II studies of docetaxel in similar patients, response rates ranging from 28-38% were reported, including patients previously treated with cisplatin. The most common toxicity in these studies was neutropenia. Combination studies with cisplatin and other agents are in progress. Paclitaxel and docetaxel are among the most active chemotherapeutic agents for non-small cell lung cancer patients. Their testing will dominate trials of new therapies in this disease for years to come.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Syndrome of acute dyspnea related to combined mitomycin plus vinca alkaloid chemotherapy.

We report the incidence, clinical features, and course of acute dyspnea following combination chemotherapy using mitomycin and vindesine or vinblastine. The courses of 387 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving combined mitomycin and vinca alkaloid chemotherapy were analyzed. Of these patients, 25 experienced acute respiratory distress. Factors contributing to the dyspnea are reported. The syndrome is characterized by the sudden onset of dyspnea without other respiratory symptoms. Acute shortness of breath always occurred on a day when a vinca alkaloid was administered. The median number of previous doses of vinca alkaloid at the time of the event was 10 and the median number of prior mitomycin doses was 3. Rechallenge with the drug in two cases led to recurrence. The incidence was 4% in a group of 378 patients on four protocols for non-small cell lung cancer. Radiographs of 87% of patients showed new focal or diffuse interstitial infiltrates. Arterial blood gases demonstrated low PO2 and increase in A-a gradient. Pulmonary function tests revealed severely impaired diffusing capacity. Substantial improvement occurred over 24 hours. Approximately 60% of the patients experienced chronic respiratory impairment that only partially responded to corticosteroid therapy. No other causes for this syndrome were identified. A syndrome of acute dyspnea occurred in 4% of patients treated with mitomycin and vinca alkaloid therapy. The syndrome has a distinctive presentation, which can lead to chronic pulmonary insufficiency. Clinicians caring for patients receiving combined therapy with mitomycin and a vinca alkaloid should be aware of this type of acute pulmonary toxicity. Further studies are necessary to clarify its etiology.

Acute Disease↗

Ifosfamide plus high-dose cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy.

This study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ifosfamide that could be given with high-dose cisplatin to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with non-platin-containing chemotherapy and to assess the efficacy of this combination. Twenty-three patients with inoperable NSCLC treated with one prior chemotherapy regimen received continuous infusion ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2 per day with MESNA for 5 days every 35 days and cisplatin 120 mg/m2. After one patient who received cisplatin as a single dose developed grade 4 nephrotoxicity and myelosuppression, cisplatin was given in four divided doses (30 mg/m2 per day) and the ifosfamide dose was lowered to 1.0 g/m2 per day, infused over 4 days. Dose-limiting grades 3 and 4 leukopenia was seen in 43%. A major objective response rate of 9% was observed. The 1-year survival was 30%, with a median survival of 6.4 months. The MTD of ifosfamide administered with cisplatin (30 mg/m2 per day for 4 consecutive days) to this population of patients is 1.0 g/m2 daily for 4 days. This combination produced limited anticancer activity and significant toxicity. Excessive toxicity was observed when cisplatin was given as a single dose with ifosfamide, and this schedule should not be used.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Adjusting the dose of intravenous ondansetron plus dexamethasone to the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy regimen.

PURPOSE: This pilot, open-label study evaluates the antiemetic efficacy and safety of a single 20-mg intravenous (IV) dose of dexamethasone combined with a single IV dose of ondansetron (32, 24, or 8 mg) in patients receiving highly emetogenic (HE), moderately high emetogenic (MHE), or moderately emetogenic (ME) chemotherapy, respectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients received a single 20-mg IV dose of dexamethasone over 15 minutes beginning 45 minutes before chemotherapy and either a single 32-, 24-, or 8-mg IV dose of ondansetron over 15 minutes beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Patients were evaluated for emetic episodes, extent of nausea, and adverse events for 24 hours after chemotherapy. RESULTS: Complete response (no emetic episodes) was noted in 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 84%), 88% (95% CI, 79% to 97%), and 77% (95% CI, 63% to 92%) of patients in the HE, MHE, and ME categories, respectively. The proportion of patients who experienced no nausea on the posttreatment assessment was 51% (95% CI, 37% to 64%), 69% (95% CI, 56% to 81%), and 47% (95% CI, 29% to 65%), respectively. The antiemetic regimens were all well tolerated. The proportion of patients with any drug-related adverse events did not vary across the three study groups despite the range of ondansetron doses and variety of chemotherapy regimens. Mild headache was noted in 28% of patients. Other adverse events, all of which were noted in fewer than 10% of patients, included lightheadedness, fatigue, dizziness, and constipation. CONCLUSION: A single IV dose of either 8, 24, or 32 mg of ondansetron combined with a single 20-mg IV dose of dexamethasone resulted in good control of acute emesis across a wide spectrum of chemotherapy regimens. Nausea control proved somewhat more difficult, with approximately 50% of patients in the HE and ME emetogenic categories experiencing some degree of nausea. The results of our pilot study suggest that adjusting the dose of ondansetron to the intrinsic emetogenicity of the chemotherapy regimen permits a more efficient use of ondansetron while maintaining good antiemetic control. Such an approach appears worthy of further investigation.

Adult↗

New chemotherapeutic agents for non-small cell lung cancer.

The identification of new chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer should proceed in a structured, logical fashion. Agents should be evaluated on the basis of multiple objective and subjective end points. A 15% or greater major objective response rate, demonstrated in multiple single-agent phase II trials, is considered the lower limit for an agent to be deemed clinically active in this disease. A number of drugs previously have been identified in this category, including cisplatin, ifosfamide, mitomycin, paclitaxel, and the vinca alkaloids vinblastine and vindesine. Most of these conventional agents have been explored alone, in a variety of doses and schedules, and in combination. In the last several years clinical development has produced new agents, including chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide, docetaxel, edatrexate, gemcitabine, irinotecan, topotecan, and vinorelbine, which hold promise for more successful treatment of this lethal disease.

Aminopterin↗

Measurement of quality of life in patients with lung cancer in multicenter trials of new therapies. Psychometric assessment of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale.

BACKGROUND: This study continued the development and psychometric testing of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), a disease- and site-specific instrument primarily measuring the physical and functional dimensions of quality of life for individuals with lung cancer. The instrument contains two scales, one for patients and a counterpart for health professionals as observers. METHODS: Feasibility, reliability, construct validity, and criterion-related validity were evaluated with 207 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from six cancer centers. Within an interview with an observer, patients completed part of a battery of instruments by self-report and were interviewed for the remaining measures. Observers also completed measures after the interview. RESULTS: Feasibility, reliability, and validity were well supported for this lung cancer population. Feasibility was demonstrated by patient and staff compliance in completion at all six cancer centers. Internal consistency was good, with coefficient alphas of 0.82 for the patient scale and 0.75 for the observer scale. Construct validity was supported by 1. contrasted groups approach: regression lines (with 95% confidence bands) were obtained between the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) and each of the two LCSS scales; 2. as a refinement, relationship testing: significant correlations between the LCSS and KPS for each item (except hemoptysis for the patient scale); and 3. multitrait-multimethod approach: good reliability (alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.93), good convergent validity for the two LCSS scales (r = 0.77), and a good discriminant validity pattern from the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Criterion-related validity with relevant gold standard measures (American Thoracic Society Questionnaire [ATS] and McGill Pain questionnaire, KPS, Profiles of Mood States [POMS], and Sickness Impact Profile [SIP]) was supported with significant correlations (0.40-0.67 for the LCSS patient scale; 0.54-0.65 for the LCSS observer scale). CONCLUSIONS: These psychometric properties demonstrate that the LCSS patient and observer scales are feasible, reliable, and valid quality of life measures that are ready for research and clinical use with lung cancer populations.

Adult↗

The addition of ondansetron to the combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam did not improve vomiting prevention in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin has been shown to be an important mediator of chemotherapy-induced vomiting. Ondansetron is a potent and highly specific antagonist of the 5-HT3 serotonin receptor. The objective of the current trial was to determine if the addition of ondansetron to the combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam (MDL) could improve the control of vomiting in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. The three-drug MDL antiemetic regimen has been shown to prevent vomiting in 67% of patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. METHODS: Thirty-two patients receiving initial cisplatin (greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2) were given intravenous lorazepam, 1.5 mg/m2 (maximum dose, 3 mg), one dose 45 minutes before cisplatin; metoclopramide, 3 mg/kg 40 minutes before and 90 minutes after cisplatin; ondansetron, 0.3 mg/kg 25 minutes before and 3.5 hours after cisplatin; and dexamethasone, 20 mg, one dose 10 minutes before cisplatin. Patients were followed for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: Vomiting was prevented in 67% of patients (95% confidence interval, 47-83%). Adverse effects were mild and transient and included sedation, headache, serum aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase elevations, akathisia, and hiccups. CONCLUSIONS: Vomiting was prevented in two thirds of patients treated with MDL plus ondansetron, a result similar to that observed in earlier trials of MDL alone. The lack of improvement in emetic control by the addition of ondansetron suggests that vomiting mediated through 5-HT3 receptors is already effectively blocked. Emesis that occurs despite pretreatment with MDL is likely mediated by other mechanisms.

Adult↗

Randomized trial comparing postoperative chemotherapy with vindesine and cisplatin plus thoracic irradiation with irradiation alone in stage III (N2) non-small cell lung cancer.

This prospective randomized trial was performed to determine whether postoperative chemotherapy with vindesine and cisplatin could lengthen time to progression and overall survival in stage III (T1-3N2M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Seventy-two patients were entered; 36 were randomized to receive chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by extent of resection (complete vs. incomplete) and histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous). All had surgery and mediastinal irradiation 6-7 weeks post-thoracotomy. Incompletely resected patients had intraoperative 125I and/or 192Ir implantation. Vindesine (3 mg/m2) weekly x 5, then every 2 weeks x 8, and cisplatin (120 mg/m2) days 1, 29, 71, 113 were planned for those randomized to chemotherapy. No difference in time to progression (median 9.2 months for radiation + chemotherapy vs. 9.0 months for radiation, P = 0.35) or overall survival (16.3 months for radiation + chemotherapy vs. 19.1 months for radiation, P = 0.42) was found. Postoperative vindesine and cisplatin did not prolong time to progression or survival in this population of stage III NSCLC.

Adult↗

Delayed emesis following anticancer chemotherapy.

As the control of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis has improved, delayed emesis (occurring 24 h or more after treatment) has become the most bothersome vomiting problem. Delayed vomiting occurs after treatment with many anticancer drugs, but has been most often studied following cisplatin or combinations of cyclophosphamide and anthracyclines. The mechanism of this phenomenon is unknown. Empirical trials of antiemetic agents effective in controlling acute emesis identified the combination of metoclopramide and dexamethasone as useful in lessening delayed emesis after displatin in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The specific serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist ondansetron yielded results equivalent to the prior placebo results in a phase II trial using identical methodology in similar patients given cisplatin. Following anthracycline and cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy, the delayed vomiting prevention observed with dexamethasone alone exceeds that of ondansetron. These observations suggest that delayed emesis is primarily mediated by neurotransmitters other than serotonin. Since delayed emesis occurs more frequently in patients who experience nausea and vomiting on the day they receive chemotherapy, tested combination antiemetic regimens, employing a 5-HT3 antagonist (either granisetron, metoclopramide, ondansetron or tropisetron), dexamethasone, and a benzodiazepine (lorazepam and alprazolam) should be routinely employed. This approach provides the best protection for acute and delayed emesis. Further research, looking beyond the specific 5-HT3 antagonists, provides the best strategy to improve the control of delayed symptoms.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

Quality of life during clinical trials: conceptual model for the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS).

To appreciate the full benefits of treatment for lung cancer, especially in trials that fail to show improvements in survival, data recording the quality of life must be captured and refined to produce meaningful information. A conceptual model for quality of life for lung cancer patients was tested to obtain information about the dimensions of the quality-of-life construct for ongoing development and testing of a subjective measure for clinical trials. Using a longitudinal study design, the stability of predictive factors of the physical and functional dimensions of quality of life were examined using regression analysis. A patient-rated quality-of-life measure, the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), was administered to 144 non-small-cell lung cancer patients at baseline, day 29, and day 71 of a chemotherapy trial. The range of explained variance for all three components of the lung cancer model over three assessment points was as follows: symptomatic distress 41%-53%, activity status 48%-52%, and overall quality of life 35%-53%. The three dimensions fluctuated slightly during intervention, but were relatively stable factors across all three times of evaluation. The LCSS model explained nearly half of the variance for quality of life experienced by lung cancer patients during therapy with a new chemotherapeutic agent. These findings provide support that the physical and functional dimensions are important predictors of quality of life for individuals with lung cancer. Meaningful subjective quality-of-life data can be obtained to evaluate an intervention by using a disease- and site-specific quality-of-life measure for individuals with lung cancer, based on a reproducible conceptual model such as the LCSS, which is suitable for serial measurement for the progressive disease of lung cancer.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Modulation of all-trans retinoic acid pharmacokinetics by liarozole.

Continuous oral dosing with all-trans retinoic acid (RA) is associated with a progressive decrease in plasma drug concentrations that has been linked to relapse and retinoid resistance in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Since oxidation by cytochrome P-450 enzymes is critical in the catabolism of this drug, we evaluated whether pretreatment with an inhibitor of this system, liarozole, could attenuate this phenomenon. A total of 20 patients with solid tumors completed a 4-week course of all-trans RA therapy. On days 1, 2, 28, and 29, serial plasma samples were obtained from these patients after ingestion of a single oral dose (45 mg/m2) of all-trans RA. On days 2 and 29, liarozole was given 1 h prior to ingestion of all-trans RA at single doses ranging from 75 to 300 mg. The areas under the plasma RA concentration x time curves (AUCs) were then compared in the presence and absence of pretreatment. Following continuous oral treatment, the mean day-28 AUC of all-trans RA was significantly lower than the group mean level on day 1 (504 vs 132 ng h-1 ml-1; P = 0.05). This decline in plasma concentrations on day 28 was partially reversed by liarozole, which increased the mean plasma all-trans RA AUC on day 29 to 243 ng h-1 ml-1 (P = 0.004). The lowest dose of liarozole that reliably produced this effect was 300 mg. No enhanced toxicity was associated with liarozole administration. We conclude that liarozole at a dose of 300 mg effectively attenuates the induced decline in all-trans RA plasma concentrations that occurs with continuous treatment. This combination may be useful in attenuating or reversing retinoid resistance.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Randomized phase II trial comparing two versus three doses of ondansetron when used in combination with dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2.

Ondansetron controls cisplatin-induced emesis when given in three 0.15 mg/kg doses, and preliminary data suggest that control may be maintained when fewer doses are employed. Prior trials have further shown improved antiemetic effects and fewer adverse effects of cisplatin treatment when neurotransmitter receptor blockers are combined with dexamethasone. This trial was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of the combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron and to see if equivalent results could be obtained with only two doses of ondansetron. There were 44 patients receiving initial cisplatin at a dose > or = 100 mg/m2, each given dexamethasone 20 mg and randomized to receive either two or three 0.15 mg/kg doses of ondansetron. Vomiting prevention was identical (35%) whether two or three doses were given. No new adverse effects were noted and cisplatin-induced diarrhea, usually seen in up to 60% of patients given this dose of cisplatin, was noted in only 5%. Although this trial did not demonstrate enhanced antiemetic effects with the combination, other investigators have done so and all agree that the regimen is safe and reduces adverse effects. Further exploration and use of the combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone, and studies testing fewer doses of ondansetron in this regimen are warranted.

Adult↗

Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonist dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin.

PURPOSE: This dose-ranging trial of intravenous dolasetron mesylate (MDL73,147EF) was performed to determine its adverse and antiemetic effects in patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients treated with initial cisplatin received a single intravenous dose of dolasetron mesylate administered over 20 minutes beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. The following four dose levels were studied: 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, and 5.0 mg/kg. Emesis and adverse effects were measured for 24 hours after cisplatin. RESULTS: All adverse effects were mild and transient including loose stools, headache, serum AST/ALT elevations, and asymptomatic prolongation of ECG intervals. Among the dose levels, no-emesis rates from 24% to 52% were observed, and the percentage of patients having zero, one, or two emetic episodes ranged from 48% to 82%. Complete control of vomiting increased as the dose was escalated to 2.4 mg/kg, but did not improve further with higher doses. CONCLUSION: Dolasetron mesylate can be administered safely at doses up to 5.0 mg/kg, with comparable complete protection rates and increased adverse effects at doses greater than 2.4 mg/kg. Antiemetic activity was seen after cisplatin. Trials comparing single infusions of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron are under way.

Adult↗

Phase II trial of docetaxel in patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel was administered to 29 patients with unresectable stage III and IV NSCLC at a dose of 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over 1 hour every 21 days. No premedication was given to the first 16 patients. Premedication with diphenhydramine was instituted for the remainder. No patient had previously received chemotherapy. Seven patients had undergone prior radiation therapy. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Eleven of 29 patients (38%) had a major objective response (95% confidence interval, 21% to 58%). The median duration of response was 5.3 months. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 41% of patients and in 11% of 134 courses of docetaxel. Nonhematologic toxicities included infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions, fluid retention, rash, alopecia, and sensory neuropathy. Premedication with diphenhydramine did not decrease the incidence of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSION: At this dose and schedule, docetaxel demonstrates significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC. Further investigations of this agent in NSCLC are indicated.

Adult↗