PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Rotter

Publications and source records attributed to M Rotter.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

[Comparative investigations on the efficacy of tap water, some detergents and ethanol on the transient flora of the hands (author's transl)].

The germ reducing efficacy of tap water, soap, pHisoHex, pHisoDerm and 70% ethanol was compared using the model of hands artificially contaminated with E. coli. Each of ten persons washed 1, 2 or 4 minutes. Reduction factors were calculated from pre- and post-values and were compared for each individual. After one minute the logarithms of the geometric means of the reduction factors amounted to 2,99, 3,23, 3,28, 3,61, 4,25 in the above used sequence (Table 2). After one minute the reductions came off more slowly and the slopes were linear and parallel as far as the mechanical germ reducing procedures are concerned (Fig. 2). In contrast, ethanol caused a steeper slope even after one minute wash. The strong reduction achieved by mechanical procedures (even with water for one minute 3 powers of ten were observed) demonstrates the high hygienic importance of hand washings for removal of the transient flora. Detergents like pHisoDerm produce further significantly higher reductions and seem to be more suitable than aggressive disinfectants for application in fields where bactericidal action is not imperative. The proposals for procedures aiming at disinfecting of the transient flora issued by the Austrian Society for Hygiene, Microbiology and Preventive Medicine require a reduction factor of at least 10(5) after two minutes hand wash. The results of this investigation show that this is practicable with ethanol and necessary, otherwise the bactericidal action would not be different from a mechanical removal of the transient flora.

Austria↗

[Comparative investigation on recovering bacteria from the artificially contaminated hand (author's tranls)].

A modification of the basin-procedure (PRICE), the plastic-bag-(GASCHEN), the fingertip-(SCHUMBURG) and the glass-cup-method (STORY) were compared in order to evaluate their efficiency to recover bacteria from the artificially contaminated hand. With all 4 methods there was a linear relation between the bacterial content of the contamination and the rinsing fluid in which the germs were collected from the hands (FIG. 1, Tab. 9). The number of recovered bacteria per ml, however, differed greatly with the method used. Without regard to the volumes of rinsing fluid and the size of the offered skin area, both differing with the metheod, the finger-tip-procedure yieleded the highest counts followed by the plastic-bag-, basin- and glass-cup-method (Fig. 1). Compensating the influence of the volume the three procedures first mentioned appeared equally effective (Fig. 2 and Tab. 11). It, however, has to be noticed that the finger-tip-method uses a skin area considerably smaller than the other two methods. The glass-cup-method was the least effective but used on the palm the recovery was still 10 times that of the yield of the back (Fig. 2). Because of its high efficacy, the better exploitation of the subungual spaces and because of its simplicity, the finger-tip-method seems to be the procedure best suited for recovering bacteria from the artificially contaminated hand.

Bacteria↗

[Thoughts upon the construction of requirements of disinfection procedures concerning contaminated hands - an analysis (author's transl)].

The construction of detailed test methods for the evaluation of disinfection procedures has primarily to be based upon requirements which have to be formulated in advance. A recently proposed test model is being discussed on the basis of 5 conceivable formulations of possible requirements. Essentially, they may be allotted to two types: the one implies the comparison of the disinfection procedure to be tested as against an hypothetical procedure. The other makes use of the simple comparison with a concrete standard procedure and is preferable to the first possibility for several reasons. The presented, mathematical formulations of the structure describing the proposed model represents a first approximation in order to permit the comparison of disinfection effects on the hands under assistance of probabilistic methods and eliminating other effects inherent ot a test method.

Disinfection↗