[Value of endoscopic color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of gastric varices and follow-up of therapeutic cyanoacrylate obliteration].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Blood Flow Velocity↗
Biomedical subjects
M Sackmann
Publications and source records attributed to M Sackmann.
Gallbladder emptying determines early gallstone clearance after shock-wave lithotripsy.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Disappearance of gallbladder stones after shock-wave lithotripsy combined with bile acid therapy depends on mechanical evacuation and dissolution of fragments. Many patients with gallstones have impaired gallbladder emptying and may show delayed stone clearance after lithotripsy. METHODS: The effect of gallbladder emptying on gallstone clearance after lithotripsy was prospectively studied in 57 patients with one radiolucent gallbladder stone < or = 20 mm. Gallbladder emptying was assessed sonographically before and after 2 weeks of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. RESULTS: UDCA increased gallbladder fasting and residual volume and decreased ejection rate but did not affect ejection fraction. Patients with an ejection fraction > 60% achieved complete gallstone clearance after lithotripsy in a higher percentage than patients with smaller ejection fractions (1 month, 31% vs. 7%, P = 0.022; 2 months, 55% vs. 18%, P = 0.003; 3 months, 66% vs. 29%, P = 0.005). Patients who became stone-free within 1 month showed larger ejection fractions than patients with retained fragments (67% +/- 4% vs. 56% +/- 3% before UDCA, P = 0.032; 65% +/- 4% vs. 53% +/- 3% with UDCA, P = 0.017). Further, ejection rate during UDCA therapy was larger in patients with complete gallstone disappearance within 1 month than in patients with delayed fragment clearance (1.57%/min +/- 0.36%/min vs. 0.76%/min +/- 0.09%/min; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Gallbladder emptying is a major determinant of early gallstone clearance after lithotripsy.
Adult↗
Gallstone recurrence after shock-wave therapy.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The long-term outcome of nonoperative gallstone therapy depends on both absence of stones and absence of biliary pain. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of stone recurrence and the rate of symptoms within 5 years after successful shock wave lithotripsy combined with bile acid therapy. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (single stones, n = 89; 2 or 3 stones, n = 11) were followed up for a median of 4.3 years after stone disappearance and discontinuation of bile acids. RESULTS: Twenty-three of the 100 patients developed recurrent stones. Calculated by actuarial analysis, the recurrence rate was 7% +/- 3%, 11% +/- 3%, 13% +/- 4%, 20% +/- 5%, and 31% +/- 7% (mean +/- SD) at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. The recurrent stones were small (6 +/- 5 mm) and were associated with recurrent biliary pain in 14 (61%) of the 23 patients. Repeated shock wave lithotripsy and/or bile acid medication resulted in stone disappearance in only 10 of 20 patients with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term rate of stone recurrence after lithotripsy of primarily solitary gallbladder calculi is lower than expected from post-bile acid dissolution trials. Recurrence of stones frequently is associated with recurrence of biliary pain.
Adult↗
Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment of cholesterol gallstone disease.
Bile acid dissolution therapy alone or in combination with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy continues to be a safe and effective non-surgical treatment for highly selected patients with cholesterol gallstone disease. Its disadvantages are the duration of drug treatment and potential stone recurrence. Its advantages, however, are non-invasiveness, low rate of morbidity, and lack of mortality. Considering the variety of options in modern gallstone therapy, the careful selection of treatment should be tailored to the individual patient's clinical and personal situation. This will involve the patient in the decision-making process.
Cholelithiasis↗
Three-dimensional ultrasonography in hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases.
Three-dimensional reconstruction of ultrasonographic images was used to visualize hepatobiliary and pancreatic lesions and stones, and to measure gallbladder emptying. The initial experience shows that these reconstructions may be of some help in the identification of the extension of tumors and the invasion into surrounding tissues. Stones and stone fragments in the pancreas and in the gallbladder as well as the wall of the gallbladder were visualized well. If further studies will reveal a benefit for the patient, three-dimensional ultrasonography may be added to the noninvasive methods used in the diagnosis of several hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases.
Biliary Tract Diseases↗
Combination of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and dissolution of gallbladder stones with methyl tert-butyl ether: a randomized study.
We conducted a prospective randomized study in gallstone patients to determine whether a combination of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and subsequent dissolution with methyl tert-butyl ether increases the success rate of methyl tert-butyl ether dissolution and shortens treatment time compared with monotherapy with methyl tert-butyl ether. Fifty patients were randomized into two groups. Twenty-five patients underwent extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy before contact dissolution with methyl tert-butyl ether, and 25 patients were treated with methyl tert-butyl ether alone. All patients had at least three stones or stones larger than 30 mm that were radiolucent on x-ray and had densities of less than 140 Hounsfield Units (HU) on computed tomography. Overall, the combined approach neither shortened the treatment time significantly vs. monotherapy with methyl tert-butyl ether nor reduced the time of hospitalization. The success rate was slightly but not significantly increased compared with that of methyl tert-butyl ether therapy alone. The recurrence rate was similar in the two groups after a median follow-up of 1 yr. However, when subgroups of patients with at least one stone larger than 15 mm or with stones with densities of more than 60 HU were analyzed, the clearance rate after 5 mo was significantly higher (p < 0.005 and p < 0.025, respectively) in patients subjected to a combination of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and methyl tert-butyl ether dissolution. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and methyl tert-butyl ether did not expose patients to more adverse effects than did treatment with methyl tert-butyl ether alone.
Adult↗
Gallbladder emptying is an important factor in fragment disappearance after shock wave lithotripsy.
The role of gallbladder emptying in fragment disappearance following shock wave lithotripsy of gallstones is poorly understood. We studied gallbladder motility in two groups of patients who had been treated by electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy and bile acid dissolution therapy. Group I (n = 20) consisted of patients with fragment disappearance within 18 months after lithotripsy, while patients in group II (n = 20) still harboured fragments in the gallbladder 18 months after lithotripsy. Fasting gallbladder volume was 19 +/- 10 ml (mean +/- S.D.) in group I, and 24 +/- 12 ml in group II (not significant). The residual volume was 8 +/- 9 ml in group I, but 18 +/- 14 ml in group II (p < 0.005). Thus, patients in group I ejected nearly twice as much of the fasting gallbladder volume as patients in group II. This difference in gallbladder emptying was still present if only the patients with single stones were compared in both groups. From the results of this retrospective study we conclude that gallbladder emptying is an important factor for complete fragment disappearance after gallstone disintegration by extracorporeally generated shock waves. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.
Adult↗
[Shockwave therapy of gallstones].
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a helpful adjunct for those bile duct stones which cannot be extracted by routine endoscopic measures including mechanical lithotripsy. For very large or impacted stones in the bile duct or stones in the intrahepatic biliary tree, and also for stones located in proximity to a bile duct stenosis, shock-wave therapy has proven to be safe and successful. More than 85% of the patients become free of stones after this therapy; they otherwise would have had to undergo high-risk open bile duct surgery. For gallbladder calculi, the pivotal factor for complete fragment disappearance after shock-wave therapy is sufficient stone disintegration. Only if fragments not larger than 3 mm are achieved, complete expulsion and/or dissolution of these fragments may be expected in a high percentage of the patients. Optimal candidates include patients with a single, radiolucent stone in a well-contracting gallbladder. For this group, ESWL is a safe and effective noninvasive therapeutic alternative.
Cholelithiasis↗
Fragmentation of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a five-year experience.
Over 5 yr, 103 elderly patients (mean age = 70 yr) with bile duct stones (mainly not amenable to endoscopic extraction) underwent adjuvant extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using a first-generation kidney lithotripter. Disintegration of stones was achieved after a mean of 1.4 sessions in 92% of the patients. Spontaneous passage of fragments into the duodenum occurred in one fourth of the patients, and endoscopic extraction of fragments was necessary in 75% of the patients, resulting in complete clearance of the bile duct stones in 91 (88%) of 103 patients. The most important adverse effect was septic disease after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in 4% of the patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 1% (one patient), and another 15 patients died during a mean follow-up of 26 +/- 14 mo (mainly of causes unrelated to biliary tract disease). Two of 91 patients who had been rendered stone free were readmitted because of recurrent stone disease during the follow-up period. Of the 43 patients who still had their gallbladders during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, 14% subsequently underwent cholecystectomy. These data show that extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones is a useful and safe adjunct to nonsurgical procedures for the removal of calculi in the biliary tree.
Aged↗
Noninvasive therapy of gallbladder calculi with a radiopaque rim.
Safety and efficacy of shock-wave lithotripsy and bile acid dissolution therapy of patients with gallbladder calculi with a radiopaque rim were evaluated. Eighty-six patients with symptomatic solitary stones were treated by this noninvasive therapy and were followed up to 18 months. Three different lithotripsy treatment modalities were used. Up to 1600 shock wave discharges were applied. Patients in group A (n = 20) were treated with an electrohydraulic water-bath lithotripter at a discharge voltage of 18 +/- 1 kV (mean +/- SD), group B patients (n = 25) were treated with an electrohydraulic water-cushion lithotripter at 19 +/- 2 kV, and group C patients were treated (n = 41) with the same lithotripter at 22 +/- 2 kV. Five to eight months after lithotripsy, 15% in group A were free of fragments compared with only 4% in group B (NS vs. group A), and 38% in group C had no stones (NS vs. group A; P = 0.007 vs. B). Thirteen to eighteen months after lithotripsy, the respective results were 59% in group A, 37% in group B (NS vs. group A), and 68% in group C (NS vs. group A; P = 0.05 vs. group B). Patients with fragments of less than or equal to 3 mm in diameter showed significantly better fragment clearance than those with larger fragments. The frequency of adverse effects was not significantly different between the three groups. Biliary colic occurred in 43% of the patients and mild biliary pancreatitis in 3 patients. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was required in 1 patient, and elective cholecystectomy was performed in 6 patients. Using a water-cushion lithotripter at high-power setting, selected patients with solitary gallbladder stones with a radiopaque rim may be treated safely and successfully by shock-wave lithotripsy combined with bile acid dissolution therapy.
Administration, Oral↗
Deterioration of cholestasis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in advanced primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography specific to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis have not yet been reported. We observed transient rises of serum bilirubin after diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in five of 15 patients and persistent rises in three of 15 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis examined consecutively by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography from 1985 to 1990. Deterioration of cholestasis was particularly associated with advanced disease. Seven of eight patients with deterioration after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography had septal fibrosis (stage III) or cirrhosis (stage IV) and a priori elevated serum bilirubin levels. In contrast, all patients with no deterioration of cholestasis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiography had early histological changes (stage I-II), and all but one patient had normal serum bilirubin levels. We conclude that the potentially harmful effects on biliary excretion must be taken into account when the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is being considered in patients with advanced primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Adult↗
Gallbladder stones: shockwave therapy.
Within the past 7 years, gallbladder lithotripsy by shockwaves has been proven to be a safe and effective non-invasive therapy for selected patients with gallstone disease. While regulatory decisions prevent shockwave therapy from being used more frequently in the USA, the number of patients treated in Europe and Asia is increasing constantly. At our institution, a relatively constant number of about 250 new patients per year have been treated since 1988 (Figure 4). About 20% of patients with gallstones are suitable for shockwave therapy according to present criteria. The rate of evacuation of all fragments is determined by the initial stone number and stone size, the success at stone fragmentation, adjuvant bile acid dissolution therapy, and gallbladder contractility. In contrast to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Dubois et al, 1989; Perissat et al, 1989; Southern Surgeons Club, 1991), shockwave therapy does not require general anaesthesia. And in contrast to direct contact dissolution therapy of gallbladder stones using MTBE (Thistle et al, 1989), lithotripsy is non-invasive. In the majority of patients, complete fragment disappearance takes several months. Preliminary analyses of the cost-effectiveness of lithotripsy have revealed that lithotripsy, including retreatments and bile acid medication for recurrent stones, costs about as much as open cholecystectomy (Rothschild et al, 1990; Bass et al, 1991). The ideal patient for gallbladder lithotripsy has a single radiolucent stone < or = 20-25 mm in diameter in a functioning gallbladder (Figure 1). In patients with such stones, nearly all studies have confirmed a favourable outcome with rapid clearance of all fragments and a relatively low rate of stone recurrence. For carefully selected patients, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is therefore an attractive non-invasive therapy.
Cholelithiasis↗
Extracorporeal lithotripsy of pancreatic stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pain: a prospective follow up study.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic duct stones (largest stone 12 (SD) 6 mm) was performed in 24 patients with abdominal pain and a dilated duct system (main pancreatic duct 10 (3) mm). The procedure was well tolerated in all but two patients, who had a mild pancreatitic attack immediately after lithotripsy. Disintegration of the stones was achieved in 21 patients. This allowed complete clearance of the duct system by an endoscopic approach in 10 (42%) patients and partial clearance in 7 (29%) patients. Within a mean follow up period of 24 (14) months half of the patients showed complete or considerable relief of pain and alleviation of symptoms was achieved in seven patients. Relief of pain occurred more often after complete ductal clearance. There were no fatalities within the follow up period. These findings underline the value of a combined non-surgical approach, using endoscopy and adjuvant shock wave lithotripsy to patients with large pancreatic calculi and pain attacks.
Abdominal Pain↗
Does computed tomography improve patients selection for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of radiolucent gallbladder stones?
In 97 patients with radiolucent solitary gallbladder stones, the density of the calculi was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Sixty-three percent of the stones were isodense to bile (mean 48 +/- SD 11 HU), and 37% could be identified on CT-sections (maximal density 105 +/- 46 HU, mean density at the largest cross-section 53 +/- 31 HU). There was a slight trend toward better stone fragmentation and higher clearance rate in patients with isodense stones. However, the probability of complete fragment clearance was not significantly different in stones with a high or low CT-density. From these data we conclude that stone selection for ESWL and adjuvant bile acid therapy in patients with radiolucent solitary stones as assessed by oral cholecystography is only marginally improved by computed tomography.
Adult↗
[Therapy of cholelithiasis].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Administration, Oral↗
The Munich Gallbladder Lithotripsy Study. Results of the first 5 years with 711 patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of three types of shock wave treatment in patients with radiolucent gallbladder stones. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Single-center trial. PATIENTS: Of 5824 patients with gallstones, 19% were eligible; 711 patients were treated. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as well as adjuvant therapy with bile acids. RESULTS: Lithotripsy was done in three ways, using a water-tank lithotriptor (group A), a water-cushion lithotriptor at low energy levels (group B), and a water-cushion lithotriptor at high energy levels (group C). The rate of complete fragment clearance 9 to 12 months after lithotripsy was done differed significantly among the three groups: Among patients with single stones of 20 mm or less in diameter, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 76%; for group B, it was 60%; and for group C, it was 83% (P = 0.03). Among patients with single stones of 21 to 30 mm, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 63%; for group B, it was 32%; and for group C, it was 58% (P less than 0.005). Among patients with two or three stones, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 38%; for group B, it was 16%; and for group C, it was 46% (P = 0.01). Patients with fragments of 3 mm or less 24 hours after lithotripsy was done showed a higher probability of fragment disappearance than did those with larger fragments (P less than 0.001). The clearance rate was higher in patients who were compliant than in those who were noncompliant with bile acid therapy (P less than 0.001). Adverse effects included liver hematoma in 1 patients, biliary pain attacks in 253 patients (36%), mild biliary pancreatitis in 13 patients (2%), and cholestasis in 7 patients (1%). Elective cholecystectomy was done in 16 patients (2%), and endoscopic sphincterotomy was done in 4 patients (1%). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complete disappearance of stones after shock wave therapy depends on the size and the number of the initial stones, the diameter of the largest fragment, and the mode of shock wave treatment. Adjuvant therapy with bile acids appears to be important for complete fragment clearance.
Actuarial Analysis↗
Gallstone ileus successfully treated by shock-wave lithotripsy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Combined treatment of symptomatic gallbladder stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and instillation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE).
Twenty-four patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones (12 radiolucent and 12 calcified) were treated by a combined approach of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and subsequent instillation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE). The patients received a mean of 1500 +/- 185 shock-wave discharges. The mean instillation time of MTBE was 13 +/- 4.2 hr. Treatment was tolerated without major adverse effects. Within a time period of three to five days eight of 12 patients with pure radiolucent stones and four of 12 with calcified stones became stone-free. After a median follow-up of five months (range: one week to 26 months), a total of 11 patients (92%) with radiolucent stones and of eight patients (66%) of those with calcified stones were free of stones, fragments, or debris. These clearance rates appear high when compared with reports on monotherapy with ESWL or MTBE, suggesting a positive effect of a combined approach in selected patients. Two patients exhibited recurrent stones after six and seven months, respectively.
Cholelithiasis↗