PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Sackmann

Publications and source records attributed to M Sackmann.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gall stones: an in vitro comparison between an electrohydraulic and a piezoceramic device.

A comparative study of the effectiveness of two types of lithotripter in fragmenting gall bladder stones is reported. The machines used were a Piezolith 2300, which generates shock waves by the piezoceramic principle, and a Dornier MPL 9000, which produces the shock waves by underwater spark discharge. With each machine, corresponding stones of 45 pairs of weight and volume matched calculi (median volume 0.5 cm3, median diameter 10.5 mm) obtained at cholecystectomy were treated. All stones were successfully disintegrated (fragments smaller than 2 mm) with up to 5400 (median 628) shocks with the Piezolith and 3450 (median 428) shocks with the MPL 9000 lithotripters. With the Piezolith, operating at the highest power setting, a 1.65 fold median higher number of shocks was required for stone fragmentation than with the MPL 9000 at a medium power setting. Stone volume seemed to be the only determinant which affected ease of fragmentation; composition and density of the stones as assessed by computed tomography did not seem to be governing factors.

Cholelithiasis↗
PubMed1991

Efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid for dissolution of gallstone fragments: comparison with the combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid.

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, single-center study was conducted to compare ursodeoxycholic acid alone with the combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid for dissolution therapy of gallstone fragments after shock wave lithotripsy. Patients with single radiolucent gallstones up to 30 mm in diameter or up to three stones of similar total volume received either 750 mg ursodeoxycholic acid alone (group A, n = 138) or the combination of 500 mg ursodeoxycholic acid and 500 mg chenodeoxycholic acid (group B, n = 144) in a single bedtime dose. The bile acids were administered from 2 wk before electrohydraulic lithotripsy until 3 mo beyond complete disappearance of all fragments. Patient's characteristics, stones (group A, 82% single stones, maximum diameter 19 +/- 5 mm, mean +/- S.D.; group B, 82% single stones, 18 +/- 5 mm), lithotripsy treatment and follow-up period were not different between the two groups. Between the two groups, no statistically significant difference was found in the time required for complete clearance of the fragments (group A, median time = 15 mo; group B, median time = 13 mo; p = 0.7). At 12 mo after lithotripsy, the probability of complete clearance was 46% +/- 5% in group A and 49% +/- 5% in group B. Diarrhea occurred significantly more often in group B than in group A (p less than 0.001) and was the main reason for withdrawal of randomized medication. Severe adverse effects of the bile acids were not observed. It is concluded that monotherapy with ursodeoxycholic acid is as efficient as the combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid for fragment dissolution after lithotripsy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1990

Early gallstone recurrence rate after successful shock-wave therapy.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy combined with adjuvant bile-acid dissolution therapy results in complete clearance of stone fragments in a high percentage of selected patients with radiolucent gallbladder calculi. With the gallbladder in situ, these patients are at risk of stone recurrence. Therefore, the early rate of stone recurrence after successful lithotripsy was evaluated. Fifty-eight of the first 60 consecutive patients who became stone free underwent follow-up examinations at least 1 yr (range, 12-37 mo; mean +/- SD, 18 +/- 6) after discontinuation of adjuvant bile-acid therapy. Five patients reported recurrent biliary pain within 1 yr after lithotripsy, and recurrent gallstones were detected. Fifty-three patients were asymptomatic during the first yr, and no recurrence was detected. Thus, the rate of gallstone recurrence was 9% within 1 yr. The rate of gallstone recurrence up to 3 yr was estimated by actuarial analysis. The probability of stone recurrence was 11% (+/- 4%) at 1.5 yr, and no further increase was observed up to 3 yr. Gallstone recurrence within 1 yr after successful shock-wave therapy has to be expected in approximately the same percentage of patients as has been reported in earlier postdissolution trials. It causes recurrent biliary pain in most cases.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The place of lithotripsy and surgery in the management of gallstone disease.

In summary, 10% to 20% of all symptomatic and uncomplicated gallbladder stones can be treated by ESWL under the current entry criteria. Further, ESWL is suitable for patients with bile duct stones in whom the primary endoscopic approach is not successful (about 10%). The algorithm in Figure 7 shows the therapeutic modalities that may be employed if the least invasive therapy is chosen. The different methods shown in this diagram are usually carried out by different specialists including surgeons, gastroenterologists, or radiologists. Therefore, an interdisciplinary approach is desirable. The technology of shock wave therapy of gallbladder stones will be improved in the future, for example the efficacy of stone fragmentation while maintaining a low level of discomfort for the patient. Moreover, repeated shock wave treatments may increase the success rate in patients with multiple stones and possibly in those with slightly calcified stones as well. Repeated procedures for recurrent stones appear feasible. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to define the place of ESWL in the management of gallstone disease. Surgery of the gallbladder remains the "gold standard" of curative therapy of gallbladder stones, against which ESWL and other nonsurgical techniques have to be evaluated. For the therapy of bile duct stones, ESWL is a helpful and effective nonsurgical adjunct.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Shock-wave therapy of gastric outlet syndrome caused by a gallstone.

A patient with gastric outlet syndrome (Bouveret's syndrome) caused by a large gallstone impacted in the duodenal bulb was successfully treated by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Thus, open abdominal surgery could be avoided. For disintegration of the stone, three consecutive lithotripsy procedures were necessary. Thereafter, stone fragments could be extracted endoscopically. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy could become a non-surgical alternative in patients with obstruction of the duodenum caused by a gallstone.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic stones.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic stones was performed in eight patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dilated duct system harbouring stones 5 to 20 mm (means 10 (SD) 5 mm) in diameter. After endoscopic sphincterotomy of the pancreatic orifice the stones were disintegrated by shock waves under fluoroscopic control using a kidney lithotripter (Dornier HM3). The procedure was well tolerated by all but one patient, who had a mild pancreatitic attack immediately after lithotripsy. Clearance of the pancreatic duct systems from the larger stones was achieved in seven of eight patients. Half of the patients showed no improvement in the intensity and frequency of pain. The other patients had a marked amelioration of symptoms, however, both immediately and during a mean follow up interval of 11 (eight) months. A selective combined approach by endoscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of pancreatic stones seems promising.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Opioid analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones].

Gallstone lithotripsy is a new and noninvasive therapeutic option for approximately 20% of patients who harbor cholesterol gallstones. Technologically advanced second-generation lithotripters such as the Dornier MPL 9000 device have greatly simplified biliary lithotripsy with a consecutive reduction in anesthetic requirements. Despite these technical improvements, patients still can experience considerable pain and discomfort during biliary ESWL. Due to its relatively predictable pharmacokinetic profile and its short duration of action, alfentanil appeared to be a suitable drug for pain relief during stone fragmentation. In order to analyze the degree and distribution of pain during gallstone lithotripsy and to evaluate pain control by alfentanil, 44 consecutive patients (ASA I-II) with no previous ESWL therapy were studied. Pain intensity and degree of opioid-induced sedation during shock wave application were evaluated according to 5-point verbal scales that ranged from 0 = no pain to 4 = unbearable pain and 0 = patient awake to 4 = patient asleep. All patients were treated while in the prone position and received oxygen at 6 l/min. After stone focusing, an alfentanil infusion at an initial rate of 2.5 micrograms/kg min was started. Single shock waves were released as test shocks after approximately 2 min. If they were well tolerated, stone fragmentation was begun. If not, more alfentanil was allowed to accumulate until continuous treatment was tolerated. Further in- or decreases of the infusion rate were titrated according to patient response. Registered variables included the required alfentanil loading dose, maintenance and total doses, and the applied shock wave energy approximated by multiplication of shock wave number and voltage squared.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Interdisciplinary treatment of gallstones: surgery, endoscopy, lithotripsy. Report of experiences after 4 years].

Today, several methods of treatment for gall stone disease exist besides standard surgical procedures: endoscopy, lithotripsy, litholysis or a combination of the above. During the last four years 1786 patients were treated using an interdisciplinary approach. Cholecystectomy was still the most frequent method of treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis (n = 1369) with low morbidity (4.3%) and lethality (0.28%). Probably less than 20% of all cases fulfill the strict selection criteria for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). All alternative methods of treatment in which the gallbladder is preserved have an increased risk for gall stone recurrence. Only after the long-term follow-up results of ESWL are known, the recurrence rate can be assessed. In most cases, bile duct stones (n = 417) were removed by endoscopy, if necessary in combination with ESWL (n = 310, stone removal: 95%, lethality: 0.3%). However, in low risk patients with concurrent cholecystolithiasis surgery was still the method of choice (n = 107, stone removal: 96%, lethality: 0/107). It seems not so important as to who performs the non-surgical procedures in the treatment of gall stones - the surgeon, internist or radiologist. Moreover, an interdisciplinary approach should be sought.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Gallbladder motility before and after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

To determine whether extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones alters gallbladder motility, gallbladder contraction in response to intravenous cholecystokinin was investigated by ultrasound. Twenty-one patients with symptomatic gallstones were studied before and after shock-wave lithotripsy, 12 with and 9 without concomitant litholytic therapy (combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid). Gallbladder emptying was significantly delayed and less complete in both groups of patients before shock-wave treatment (with bile salts: residual volume, 51% +/- 10% and half-ejection time, 40 +/- 5 min; without bile salts: residual volume, 46% +/- 7%; half-ejection time, 30 +/- 4 min) compared with healthy controls (residual volume, 15% +/- 4%; half-ejection time, 18 +/- 2 min). Gallbladder motility was not altered in either group 1 day and 1 yr after lithotripsy. The findings indicate (a) that extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy has no immediate or long-term adverse effects on gallbladder motility and (b) that the defect of gallbladder motility associated with gallstone disease is not abolished by removal of the stone.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Shock-wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. The first 175 patients.

To substantiate the early results of extracorporeal shock-wave fragmentation of gallstones, we used this nonsurgical procedure to treat 175 patients with radiolucent gallbladder calculi. Chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid were administered as adjuvant litholytic therapy. The gallstones disintegrated in all patients except one and completely disappeared in 30 percent of all patients within 2 months after lithotripsy, in 48 percent at 2 to 4 months, in 63 percent at 4 to 8 months, in 78 percent at 8 to 12 months, and in 91 percent at 12 to 18 months. In patients with solitary stones up to 20 mm in diameter, the corresponding values were 45, 69, 78, 86, and 95 percent, respectively. Shock-wave therapy had no adverse effects except cutaneous petechiae (14 percent) and transient gross hematuria (3 percent). One third of the patients had one or more episodes of biliary colic before all the fragments disappeared. Two patients had mild pancreatitis, which necessitated endoscopic sphincterotomy in one. The patient with insufficient stone fragmentation underwent elective cholecystectomy; no additional operations were necessary. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy combined with medical therapy for stone dissolution is a safe and effective treatment in selected patients with radiolucent gallbladder calculi.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Biliary stones: treatment by shock-wave lithotripsy.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy has been introduced as a novel nonsurgical therapy for gallstone disease. To substantiate the initial results, more than 400 patients with biliary calculi have been treated. In selected patients with gallbladder stones, complete clearance of all stone fragments can be expected within 1 year in about 80%. In patients with bile-duct stones not amenable to endoscopic measures, sufficient stone fragmentation by extracorporeal shock waves was achieved in about 80%. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy is a safe and efficient therapy for selected patients with gallbladder calculi. For patients with bile-duct stones not amenable to endoscopic measures it offers a nonsurgical alternative.

Chenodeoxycholic Acid↗