PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Verschoore

Publications and source records attributed to M Verschoore.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

An epidemiological study of acne in female adults: results of a survey conducted in France.

BACKGROUND: Acne is usually perceived as a disease of teenagers, and most epidemiological studies have focused on adolescents. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to investigate the prevalence of acne in a representative sample of French females. Information about skin type, life-style factors influencing acne and quality of life were also recorded. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 4,000 adult women aged 25-40 years, after a validation test by three dermatologists. A definition of acne severity, according to questionnaire answers, was established before the questionnaire was sent out. RESULTS: A total of 3394 women completed the questionnaire of which 3,305 were useable. The data showed a prevalence of acne in 17% of the population, and physiological acne in 24%. Thus, the total acne prevalence was 41%. Forty-nine per cent of the acne patients had acne sequelae (scars and/or pigmented macules). Forty-one per cent of adult acne patients had not experienced acne during their adolescence. A premenstrual flare and stress was recorded as causing acne in 78% and 50%, respectively. Twenty-two per cent of acne subjects were currently receiving therapy. For most patients, acne did not severely impair their quality of life. CONCLUSION: This study shows a prevalence of acne in 41% of women in the general population. A high proportion of these acne cases are late onset acne.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1998

Adapalene 0.1% gel has low skin irritation potential even when applied immediately after washing.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference, if any, in facial skin tolerance of adapalene 0.1% gel applied immediately after washing, compared to delayed application as recommended for the other topical retinoids: tretinoin and isotretinoin. Twenty-five acne patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris were included in this intra individual randomized comparison study where adapalene 0.1% gel was applied immediately after washing on one half of the face and 20-30 min after washing on the contralateral half-face, for 22 consecutive days. No difference between the two regimens was detected by the investigator or by 21 of the 22 patients who completed the study. It was concluded that application of adapalene gel 0.1% is well tolerated even when applied immediately after washing.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1% gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris, with particular reference to the onset of action and impact on quality of life.

A randomized, multicentre, investigator-masked study was conducted in 105 patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris to compare the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1% gel with tretinoin 0.025% gel after three months of treatment, with particular emphasis on reduction in inflammatory lesion counts after one week of treatment and impact on quality of life. In terms of efficacy, adapalene gel was found to be superior to tretinoin gel after one week of treatment, with respect to reduction in inflammatory lesion counts (32% vs. 17%, respectively; P = 0.001), total lesion counts (28% vs. 22%, respectively; P = 0.042) and global severity grade (28% vs. 16%, respectively; P = 0.001). No significant difference between the two treatments was found after 12 weeks of treatment for any of these variables. Evaluation of facial skin tolerance parameters showed significant differences between the two treatments in favour of adapalene for dryness, erythema, immediate and persistent burning and pruritus for at least one time point. One patient in the adapalene group and three patients in the tretinoin group experienced medical events which lead to discontinuation of treatment (skin irritation; NS). Quality of life scores improved more rapidly in the adapalene group than in the tretinoin group, with significant differences (P < 0.05) appearing at week 1 for questions related to problems with partners, close friends or relatives and to skin symptoms. There was also a significantly greater improvement in social and leisure activity in the adapalene group at week 12. Adapalene 0.1% gel reduced inflammatory and total lesion counts more rapidly than tretinoin 0.025% gel, and was also better tolerated. These differences appear to result in an earlier and greater quality of life improvement for the patients receiving adapalene.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of adapalene 0.1% solution and tretinoin 0.025% gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris.

A multicentre study was conducted to compare clinical safety and efficacy of adapalene 0.1% solution and tretinoin 0.025% gel, both topical treatments for acne, in a once-daily dosage regimen for 12 weeks. A total of 297 patients were enrolled by eight investigators in this randomized, investigator-masked study in a parallel group design. An open label period using adapalene followed this study to assess the long-term safety of adapalene solution. Adapalene and tretinoin proved to be clinically and statistically effective in treating acne by reducing inflammatory (47% and 50%, respectively) and non-inflammatory lesions (57% and 54%) as compared to baseline. When comparing patients who had 75% or greater improvement in open comedones, adapalene was shown to be significantly more effective than tretinoin. No serious adverse event was reported during this study, including during the long-term period. The reactions that occurred were similar between treatments, i.e. burning, pruritus, scaling, dryness and erythema.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1% gel versus tretinoin 0.025% gel in patients with acne vulgaris: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials.

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine if adapalene 0.1% gel (Differin) provided superior efficacy and better tolerability than tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. All comparative studies, both published and unpublished, from the United States and Europe, that fulfilled rigorous protocol criteria (multicentre, randomized, investigator-blind) were used. Five comparative studies met these criteria. In total, the meta-analysis evaluated 900 patients (450 treated with adapalene 0.1% gel, 450 treated with tretinoin 0.025% gel) with mild-to-moderate acne from the combined clinical trials. To avoid study bias, the meta-analysis used an intention-to-treat analysis. Statistical methodology for the meta-analysis included analysis of covariance, analysis of variance and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. All statistical tests were two-sided, with the 0.05 probability level used to establish statistical significance, and 95% confidence intervals used to assess equivalence. Adapalene demonstrated equivalent efficacy to tretinoin in terms of reducing total lesion count. Adapalene demonstrated more rapid efficacy, as evidenced by a significant difference in the reduction of inflammatory and total lesions at week 1. Adapalene also demonstrated considerably greater local tolerability at all evaluation periods. The findings from this meta-analysis suggest that adapalene 0.1% gel constitutes a pharmacologic advance over such classic retinoids as tretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1997

Adapalene 0.1% gel has low skin-irritation potential.

BACKGROUND: Adapalene is a new naphthoic acid derivative with potent retinoid and antiinflammatory properties, developed for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. OBJECTIVE: We compare the cutaneous safety of adapalene in different gel vehicles with tretinoin 0.025% gel. METHODS: A total of 42 healthy human subjects were enrolled in two randomized, double-blind, controlled, intraindividual studies. In the first study (study A), adapalene aqueous 0.03% and 0.1% gels were evaluated for their 21-day cumulative irritation potential compared with vehicle alone, patch alone, and tretinoin 0.025% gel under occlusion. In the second study (study B), adapalene aqueous (0.03% and 0.1%) gels and adapalene alcoholic (0.03% and 0.1%) gels were evaluated for their 5-day cumulative irritation potential compared with their respective vehicles and tretinoin 0.025% gel. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured daily at each visit. RESULTS: In study A, adapalene had a slight irritation potential that was in the same range as the gel vehicle and the patch alone, whereas tretinoin 0.025% gel was a severe irritant. In study B, no irritation was seen with either adapalene aqueous gels or adapalene gel vehicles or patch alone. The adapalene alcoholic gels were slightly irritating, and tretinoin gel produced intense irritation reactions in the majority of subjects. TEWL increased fourfold at the tretinoin site but remained unchanged at all adapalene sites. CONCLUSION: Adapalene 0.1% gel was significantly less irritating than tretinoin 0.025% gel.

Adapalene↗
PubMed1997

Skin tolerance of adapalene 0.1% gel in combination with other topical antiacne treatments.

BACKGROUND: Adapalene (Differin gel) is a new naphthoic acid derivative developed for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. OBJECTIVE: We assessed, in healthy volunteers, the skin irritancy potential of three combinations, each including adapalene 0.1% gel and one topical marketed antiacne product. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy volunteers were enrolled in a 21-day cumulative irritancy study performed in a double-blind, randomized, controlled, intraindividual design. Five days a week, the three materials (benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin phosphate, and erythromycin) were applied in a nonocclusive manner either alone or in combination with adapalene gel on seven cutaneous sites on the upper back. Adapalene was applied in the evening whereas the three other materials were applied in the morning. Irritation was evaluated and scored daily except on weekends. RESULTS: All materials were well-tolerated when tested alone. The combinations of adapalene 0.1% gel and either benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin phosphate, or erythromycin were also well-tolerated. The mean cumulative irritancy indices indicated that all three combinations were nonirritating. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of the study, all tested treatments alone or in combination appeared nonirritating.

Adapalene↗
PubMed1997

Adapalene 0.1% gel is better tolerated than tretinoin 0.025% gel in acne patients.

BACKGROUND: Adapalene is a new naphthoic acid derivative developed for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. OBJECTIVE: We describe the results of a combined safety analysis of two multicenter trials conducted in the U.S. and Europe in which adapalene 0.1% gel was compared with tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris. METHODS: A total of 591 acne patients were enrolled in these investigator-masked, randomized, controlled, parallel group studies. In the two studies, each patient was randomly assigned to receive topical adapalene 0.1% gel or tretinoin 0.025% gel once daily at bedtime, for 12 weeks. In addition to assessments of efficacy and facial skin tolerance, data on adverse events were recorded at each visit or at any other time the patient reported problems. We extracted data concerning adverse reactions (i.e., adverse events judged to be related to the study treatment) from both studies and combined the results to obtain a global comparison of safety of the two products. RESULTS: A total of 15 of 296 patients (5.1%) reported 19 adverse reactions in the adapalene-treated groups, compared with 27 of 295 patients (9.1%) reporting 39 adverse reactions in the tretinoin-treated groups (p < 0.05). The number of patients discontinuing the study because of adverse events was approximately twice as low with adapalene (1.3% compared with 2.4%). Most adverse reactions for both products were related to skin irritation. No systemic adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: The results of these two multicenter clinical studies indicate that adapalene gel is better tolerated than tretinoin gel.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1997

Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of adapalene gel and tretinoin gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris: Europe and U.S. multicenter trials.

BACKGROUND: Adapalene is a new chemical entity that exhibits tretinoin-like activities in the terminal differentiation process. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated a dose range effect of two concentrations of adapalene gel as acne treatment and compared adapalene 0.1% gel with tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne patients in two large multicenter studies. METHODS: Multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel group studies including 89 acne patients in the dose range study and 591 patients in the concurrent controlled studies were conducted. RESULTS: Adapalene gel 0.1% was significantly more effective in treating acne lesions than 0.03% adapalene gel. Adapalene gel 0.1% was significantly more effective than 0.025% or tretinoin gel in one study and of the same effectiveness in the other study. Adapalene gel was always better tolerated than tretinoin gel. CONCLUSION: Adapalene 0.1% gel is a safe and effective treatment of acne vulgaris.

Adapalene↗
PubMed1996

[Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of 0.1 and 0.03 p.100 adapalene gel and 0.025 p.100 tretinoin gel in the treatment of acne].

INTRODUCTION: Adapalene is a new chemical entity with retinoid activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 0.1 p. 100 adapalene gel (Différine gel), 0.03 p. 100 adapalene gel and a commercially available 0.025 p. 100 tretinoin gel (Aberel gel) were compared in 89 male and female patients with acne. RESULTS: Inflammatory, non inflammatory, total lesion counts, and the global facial acne grade regularly decreased as a function of time in the three treatment groups. No statistically or clinicaly significant differences were observed for these parameters between 0.1 p. 100 adapalene gel and 0.025 p. 100 tretinoin gel following a 12-week treatment. Conversely, both of these gels were significantly more effective than 0.03 p. 100 adapalene gel with regards to inflammatory and total lesion counts, and the global facial acne grade. The differences of efficacy seen between both adapalene gels demonstrate a dose-dependent activity of the drug in the topical treatment of acne. The three products induced retinoid-like skin irritation with significant differences in intensity in favour of adapalene for erythema, dryness, scaling and burning after application and in favour of tretinoin for persistent burning. No treatment-related medical events were reported and adapalene plasma levels were lower than 0.15 ng/ml (limit of detection of the analytical method). CONCLUSIONS: The topical treatment of acne with adapalene gels was found to be safe and effective, with a dose-related response. The efficacy of 0.1 p. 100 adapalene gel and of 0.025 p. 100 tretinoin gel are not different but skin tolerance of 0.1 p. 100 adapalene gel is superior.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1994

Chronic topical application of all-trans-retinoic acid in man does not affect corneocyte surface area.

The potential therapeutic activity of topically applied novel analogues of retinoic acid is currently measured in many different animal models. In most cases, the technique used is invasive and biopsy specimens are required. Furthermore, efficacy in these models is not a guarantee of success in treatment of humans. Therefore, predictive human pharmacology tests are required in order to quantify a retinoid effect on human skin before conducting large clinical trials. The aim of this study was to determine whether changes in corneocyte surface area could be used as a predictive measure for the efficacy of topical retinoids in man. Topical applications of all-trans retinoic acid gel (Aberel), salicylic acid gel and the gel vehicle were made once daily for 4 weeks to skin of the lumbar region of healthy human volunteers. Corneocytes were recovered from these three treated zones as well as from one zone of untreated skin, and their surface areas were measured by image analysis using a MOP-Videoplan. The results showed that at no point during the 4 weeks of daily application to healthy human skin was there a statistically significant difference in the surface area of corneocytes recovered from Aberel, salicylic acid-, vehicle-treated or untreated sites. No specific effect of retinoic acid could be detected. However, although no between-treatment differences were found, significant cyclical changes in the mean surface areas with respect to baseline were observed.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1993

[Hyperandrogenism and pilosebaceous follicles].

The characteristic of skin is that it is both a site of the metabolism and the target-organ of the androgens which it receives or produces. In the skin, so called "weak" androgens are transformed into more powerful ones, such as androstenedione, testosterone and 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone. Hyperandrogeny is often found in association with the three main androgenodependent dermatoses: acne, androgenic alopecia and hirsutism. However, the problem of the receptivity of the target-organ, the pilosebaceous follicle, is highlighted in diseases without symptoms of hyperandrogeny. The androgen receptors have been identified in the basal cells of the sebaceous gland and in the hair shaft. The presence of androgen receptors in the keratinocytes and in the cutaneous fibroblasts arises the problem, unresolved to date, of the interactions between the different cutaneous structures.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1993

The vellus hair follicle in acne: hair growth and sebum excretion.

In this study we investigated the activity of the vellus hair follicle in acne. Hair growth and sebum excretion in vellus hair follicles were measured on the forehead and back of men, and on the forehead, cheek, and back of women with acne. Hair growth was assessed by computerized image analysis (phototrichogram), and sebum excretion by computer analysis using Sebutape. In patients with acne, marked differences were revealed when results were compared with recent data from healthy persons. In particular, the mean growth rate of vellus hairs was higher, whereas the percentage of anagen hairs was lower, and the duration of the anagen phase shorter in patients with acne than in healthy individuals. Hair growth and sebum excretion depended significantly (P < 0.01) on the anatomical site (forehead 414 hairs/cm2, 0.053 mm/day, 34%; back 93 hairs/cm2, 0.16 mm/day, 21%). In addition, analysis of hair growth revealed significantly higher values in females than in males for (i) percentage of anagen hairs (P > 0.01), (ii) for vellus hair length (P < 0.05), and (iii) for the duration of the anagen phase (P < 0.01). The present study demonstrates that the activity of the vellus hair follicle is influenced by acne, and vice versa, and therefore its role in the aetiopathogenesis of acne should be reconsidered.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1993

Circadian variations in the number of actively secreting sebaceous follicles and androgen circadian rhythms.

Sebum excretion has been shown to demonstrate a circadian rhythm using a gravimetric method (cigarette paper). With the newly introduced method of Sebutape, we confirmed this periodicity and showed that the elevation in sebum excretion is correlated with an increase in the number of secreting follicles. We found, furthermore, that the number of secreting follicles on the forehead showed a distinct and statistically significant circadian rhythmicity, in contrast to those of the chest, which remained almost constant. The quantification in plasma levels of cortisol, melatonin, delta-4-androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, and free testosterone showed no correlation with sebum excretion at either site. These observations suggest that local factors are involved in control of sebum secretion.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Topical retinoids. Their uses in dermatology.

The retinoids provide an important new way of treating dermatologic disorders. They have also proved to have a role in the prevention of new lesion formation. New retinoids, of which adapalene is one, have recently been synthesized in order to obtain similar or better efficacy while reducing skin irritation potential. These new molecules are currently under clinical investigation. Preliminary results are encouraging. In the near future, an expanded range of topical retinoids should be available.

Adapalene↗
PubMed1991

Efficacy and safety of CD 271 alcoholic gels in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris.

CD 271, a naphthoic acid, is a powerful modulator of epidermal differentiation. This double-blind, randomized study compared the efficacy and safety of two concentrations (0.03% w/w and 0.1% w/w) of CD 271 alcoholic gel, with 0.025% w/w tretinoin gel in 72 male patients with acne vulgaris over a period of 12 weeks. Efficacy was measured by counting facial inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions and by grading the severity of the acne at each visit. Skin tolerance was assessed with subjective symptoms, such as burning and pruritus, as well as clinical assessment of erythema, dryness and scaling on the treated areas. The alcoholic 0.1% CD 271 gel was as effective as 0.025% tretinoin gel in reducing total comedone counts (83% reduction for both products after 12 weeks' treatment). The reduction in the number of inflammatory lesions and the total number of acne lesions were significantly greater with 0.1% CD 271 gel than with tretinoin gel (69% and 79% for 0.1% CD 271, 50% and 73% for tretinoin gel, respectively, P less than 0.05). All three treatments were well tolerated and there were no changes in any major blood parameters. No CD 271 could be detected in blood plasma at the end of the study (detection limit = 1 ng/ml).

Acne Vulgaris↗