Biomedical subjects

M Von Korff

Publications and source records attributed to M Von Korff.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings.

To identify predictors of back-related long-term functional limitations, 1213 adult enrollees of a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) in Washington state were interviewed about a month after a consultation for back pain in a primary care setting in 1989-1990, and followed each year thereafter. Out of 100 factors documented at the one-month assessment, measures of somatization, depression, functional limitations, and pain were the strongest predictors of two-year modified Roland-Morris score among a random subsample of 569 subjects. A multiple regression model containing the Symptom Checklist Depression and Somatization scores, the one-month modified Roland-Morris score and the number of pain days in the past six months explained about 30% of the variance in the outcome. Using recursive partitioning, a very simple model was developed to identify patients at high risk of sustaining long-term significant functional limitations. The regression model and the recursive partitioning model were successfully tested in a fresh sample of patients (n = 644). Clinical application of the recursive partitioning model and methodological aspects of this study are discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Achieving guidelines for the treatment of depression in primary care: is physician education enough?

OBJECTIVES: The authors examine whether physician education has enduring effects on treatment of depression. METHODS: Depressed primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment from primary care clinics of a staff-model health maintenance organization were studied. Quasi-experimental and before-and-after comparisons of physician practices, supplemented with patient surveys, were used to compare the process of care and depression outcomes. Intervention consisted of extensive physician education that spanned a 12-month period. This included case-by-case consultations, didactics, academic detailing (eg, clearly stating the educational and behavioral objectives to individual physicians), and role-play of optimal treatment. Main outcome measures were divided into two groups. Quasi-experimental samples included: (1) antidepressant medication selection and (2) adequacy (dosage and duration) of pharmacotherapy. Survey samples included: (3) intensity of follow-up; (4) physician delivered educational messages regarding depression treatment; (5) patient satisfaction; and (6) depression outcomes. RESULTS: No lasting educational effect was observed consistently in any of the outcomes measured. CONCLUSIONS: There was no enduring improvement in the treatment of depression for primary care patients. Depression treatment guidelines were achieved contemporaneously, however, for intervention patients enrolled in a multifaceted program of collaborative care during the training period. These results suggest that continuing programs of reorganized service delivery to support the role of a primary care physician (eg, on-site mental health personnel, close monitoring of patient progress and adherence), in addition to physician training, are essential for the success of guideline implementation.

Depressive Disorder↗

PubMed1997

Collaborative management to achieve depression treatment guidelines.

Two models that integrate the psychiatrist into treatment of depression in primary care have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. In the psychiatrist/primary care model, a psychiatrist alternated visits with a primary care physician to assist in the education and pharmacologic treatment of the patient. In the psychiatrist/psychologist team model, the psychiatrist worked with a team of psychologists to improve adherence to and effectiveness of antidepressant treatment, with psychologists also providing brief behavioral treatment in the primary care clinic. Findings with the psychiatry/primary care model are reported. It was found that the collaborative model was associated with improved adherence to treatment, increased patient satisfaction with depression care, and improved depression outcome compared with usual care by primary care physicians alone. Similar results were found in the study of the psychiatrist/psychologist collaborative care model. The success of these models indicates the appropriateness of a novel role for the psychiatrist and psychologist, i.e., that of collaboration with primary care physicians in care of the depressed patient in the primary care setting.

Antidepressive Agents↗

PubMed1997

The education of depressed primary care patients: what do patients think of interactive booklets and a video?

BACKGROUND: Clinicians, policy makers, and health care administrators are attempting to improve depression outcomes in the primary care setting. Despite positive evidence about the efficacy of self-help materials and psychoeducational interventions, use of educational materials designed for the primary care patient are receiving little attention in present depression initiatives. The present study describes the use and evaluation of three educational materials by depressed primary care patients. METHODS: As a part of a randomized control trial, depressed primary care patients were identified by primary care physicians and randomized to a clinical trial exploring a new method of treating depression. Patients assigned to the new method of treatment received a package of educational materials at the time of the baseline interview. These materials included two brief interactive booklets (medication booklet, behavioral health booklet) and a short video. The present analysis concerns data obtained from 108 intervention patients in a telephone survey conducted 1 week after they received the package of educational materials. RESULTS: Approximately three quarters of the subjects reported that they read or viewed all of the educational products. The majority rated the products as somewhat to significantly helpful: medication booklet 81%; behavioral health booklet 82%; and video 69%. Previously reported results include findings of significantly better medication adherence and improved clinical outcomes by patients with major depression who received a primary care intervention that included the educational products discussed in this paper. CONCLUSIONS: Educational materials may play a significant role in improving depression treatment outcomes in the primary care setting.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1996

The course of back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN: Review paper of outcome studies among primary care back pain patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term and long-term pain and functional outcomes of patients with back pain who are seeking treatment in primary care settings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain has been viewed as running either an acute or a chronic course, but most patients experience recurrent back pain. This review summarizes outcome studies in light of the episodic course of back pain. METHODS: Studies reporting pain and functional outcome data for consecutive primary care patients with back pain were reviewed. RESULTS: Back pain among primary care patients typically is a recurrent condition for which definitions of acute and chronic pain based on a single episode are inadequate. Because a majority of patients experience recurrences, describing only the outcome of the initial back pain episode may convey a more favorable picture of long-term outcome than warranted. For the short-term follow-up evaluation, most patients improve considerably during the first 4 weeks after seeking treatment. Sixty-six percent to 75% continue to experience at least mild back pain 1 month after seeking care. At 1 month, approximately 33% report continuing pain of at least moderate intensity, whereas 20-25% report substantial activity limitations. For the long-term follow-up (1 year or more) period, approximately 33% report intermittent or persistent pain of at least moderate intensity, one in seven continue to report back pain of severe intensity, and one in five report substantial activity limitations. CONCLUSION: Results from existing studies suggest that back pain among primary care patients typically runs a recurrent course characterized by variation and change, rather than an acute, self-limiting course.

Back Pain↗

PubMed1996

A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care.

BACKGROUND: This research study evaluates the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention program to improve the management of depression in primary care. METHODS: One hundred fifty-three primary care patients with current depression were entered into a randomized controlled trial. Intervention patients received a structured depression treatment program in the primary care setting that included both behavioral treatment to increase use of adaptive coping strategies and counseling to improve medication adherence. Control patients received "usual" care by their primary care physicians. Outcome measures included adherence to antidepressant medication, satisfaction with care of depression and with antidepressant treatment, and reduction of depressive symptoms over time. RESULTS: At 4-month follow-up, significantly more intervention patients with major and minor depression than usual care patients adhered to antidepressant medication and rated the quality of care they received for depression as good to excellent. Intervention patients with major depression demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in depression severity over time compared with usual care patients on all 4 outcome analyses. Intervention patients with minor depression were found to have a significant decrease over time in depression severity on only 1 of 4 study outcome analyses compared with usual care patients. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted primary care intervention improved adherence to antidepressant regimens and satisfaction with care in patients with major and minor depression. The intervention consistently resulted in more favorable depression outcomes among patients with major depression, while outcome effects were ambiguous among patients with minor depression.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Self-report disability in an international primary care study of psychological illness.

We assessed the replicability of reliability and validity of a brief self-report disability scale, adapted from the Medical Outcomes Survey (short form), in a 15-center, cross-national, multilingual study of psychological illness among primary care patients (n = 5438). Across all 15 centers in the World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Psychological Problems in General Health Care, the reliability of the disability scale was high and individual items were responsive at similar levels of disability. Self-report disability was consistently correlated with disability in work role (including housework) as rated by interviewers according to the Groningen Social Disability Schedule, a semistructured method taking local norms into account. Disability as measured by the self-report questionnaire was also consistently correlated with depressive symptoms as measured by the General Health Questionnaire. At each center, the disability items formed a moderately to strongly hierarchical (Guttman-like) scale. These findings support the feasibility of using self-report disability scales in cross-national primary care research.

Depression↗

PubMed1996

Improving outcomes in chronic illness.

Usual medical care often fails to meet the needs of chronically ill patients, even in managed, integrated delivery systems. The medical literature suggests strategies to improve outcomes in these patients. Effective interventions tend to fall into one of five areas: the use of a protocol, reorganization of practice systems and provider roles, improved patient education, increased access to expertise, and greater availability of clinical information. The challenge is to organize these components into an integrated system of chronic illness care.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed1996

The prevalence and impact of psychological disorders in primary care: HMO research needed to improve care.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and impacts of psychological disorders among primary care patients. SETTING: Primary care clinics at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound participating in a multi-center, international World Health Organization study. DESIGN: Prevalence survey of a stratified sample of consecutive primary care patients. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Psychiatric diagnosis, work disability, and health care costs. RESULTS: Depression, anxiety and somatoform disorders were common among primary care patients. They were associated with significant disability, unfavorable health perceptions and increased health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological disorders are common among primary care patients and these disorders have significant societal impacts including work disability and increased health care costs. HMOs with integrated delivery systems that have developed public domain research capabilities have a critical role to play in efforts to reduce the burden of these disorders by evaluating innovations in health care services for psychological disorders.

Health Maintenance Organizations↗

PubMed1996

The relationship between pain and depression.

Empirical results from epidemiological studies on pain-depression comorbidity in primary care and population samples have shown that: (a) pain is as strongly associated with anxiety as with depressive disorders; (b) characteristics that most strongly predict depression are diffuseness of pain and the extent to which pain interferes with activities; (c) certain psychological symptoms (low energy, disturbed sleep, worry) are prominent among pain patients, while others (guilt, loneliness) are not; (d) depression and pain dysfunction are evident early in the natural history of pain, but dysfunction and distress are often transient; and (e) among initially dysfunctional pain patients whose dysfunction is chronic, depression levels do not improve but neither do they increase over time with chronicity alone. These results seem consistent with these mechanisms of pain-depression comorbidity; (1) a trait of susceptibility to both dysphoric physical symptoms (including pain) and psychological symptoms (including depression), and a state of somatosensory amplification in which psychological distress amplifies dysphoric physical sensations (including pain); (2) psychological illness and behavioural dysfunction being interrelated features of a maladaptive response to pain evident early in the natural history of the condition, and often resolving during an early recovery phase; (3) pain constituting a significant physical and psychological stressor that may induce or exacerbate psychological distress. Thus, pain and psychological illness should be viewed as having reciprocal psychological and behavioural effects involving both processes of illness expression and adaption, as well as pain having specific effects on emotional state and behavioural function.

Anxiety Disorders↗

PubMed1996

Organizing care for patients with chronic illness.

Usual medical care often fails to meet the needs of chronically ill patients, even in managed, integrated delivery systems. The medical literature suggests strategies to improve outcomes in these patients. Effective interventions tend to fall into one of five areas: the use of evidence-based, planned care; reorganization of practice systems and provider roles; improved patient self-management support; increased access to expertise; and greater availability of clinical information. The challenge is to organize these components into an integrated system of chronic illness care. Whether this can be done most efficiently and effectively in primary care practice rather than requiring specialized systems of care remains unanswered.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed1995

Formal education and back-related disability. In search of an explanation.

STUDY DESIGN: The present study is a 2-year prospective study with repeated measurements. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of education with back-related disability along with four sets of variables that might explain this relationship: clinical, behavioral, and environmental factors; occupational variables; health care use; and interactions between stressful events and coping strategies. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although education has been found to be associated with back-related disability in previous reports, this relationship remains to be explained. Examination of this association may yield a better understanding of the causes and natural history of disability resulting from back pain. METHODS: Subjects were 1213 enrollees of a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) who consulted a primary care physician for back pain in 1989-1990, completed a baseline telephone interview, and had a follow-up evaluation after 1 and 2 years, using a modified version of the Roland-Morris Scale to measure disability. RESULTS: Subjects who completed 13 years or more of schooling had less disability and a greater decline in their disability over time than those who completed less schooling. Occupational characteristics and somatization were among the strongest explanatory factors. Cigarette smoking contributed to the explanation of the cross-sectional association. CONCLUSIONS: Education is associated cross-sectionally and longitudinally with disability resulting from back pain. A wide range of variables may mediate the education-back-related disability association, including a propensity to report diffuse physical symptoms (somatization), lifestyle (e.g., cigarette smoking), and occupational factors.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention in patients with depression in primary care with the effectiveness of "usual care" by the primary care physician. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial among primary care patients with major depression or minor depression. PATIENTS: Over a 12-month period a total of 217 primary care patients who were recognized as depressed by their primary care physicians and were willing to take antidepressant medication were randomized, with 91 patients meeting criteria for major depression and 126 for minor depression. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention patients received increased intensity and frequency of visits over the first 4 to 6 weeks of treatment (visits 1 and 3 with a primary care physician, visits 2 and 4 with a psychiatrist) and continued surveillance of adherence to medication regimens during the continuation and maintenance phases of treatment. Patient education in these visits was supplemented by videotaped and written materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included short-term (30-day) and long-term (90-day) use of antidepressant medication at guideline dosage levels, satisfaction with overall care for depression and antidepressant medication, and reduction in depressive symptoms. RESULTS: In patients with major depression, the intervention group had greater adherence than the usual care controls to adequate dosage of antidepressant medication for 90 days or more (75.5% vs 50.0%; P < .01), were more likely to rate the quality of the care they received for depression as good to excellent (93.0% vs 75.0%; P < .03), and were more likely to rate antidepressant medications as helping somewhat to helping a great deal (88.1% vs 63.3%; P < .01). Seventy-four percent of intervention patients with major depression showed 50% or more improvement on the Symptom Checklist-90 Depressive Symptom Scale compared with 43.8% of controls (P < .01), and the intervention patients also demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in depression severity over time compared with controls (P < .004). In patients with minor depression, the intervention group had significantly greater adherence than controls to adequate dosage of antidepressant medication for 90 days or more (79.7% vs 40.3%; P < .001) and more often rated antidepressant medication as helping somewhat to helping a great deal (81.8% vs 61.4%; P < .02). However, no significant differences were found between the intervention and control groups in the percentage of patients who were satisfied with the care they received for depression (94.4% vs 89.3%), in the percentage who experienced a 50% or more decrease in depressive symptoms, or in the decrease of depressive symptoms over time. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted intervention consisting of collaborative management by the primary care physician and a consulting psychiatrist, intensive patient education, and surveillance of continued refills of antidepressant medication improved adherence to antidepressant regimens in patients with major and with minor depression. It improved satisfaction with care and resulted in more favorable depressive outcomes in patients with major, but not minor, depression.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

The role of the primary care physician in patients' adherence to antidepressant therapy.

In this study, the authors attempted to determine predictors of adherence to antidepressant therapy and to identify specific educational messages, side effects, and features of doctor-patient collaboration that influence adherence. Patients newly prescribed antidepressants for depression at a health maintenance organization were identified by using automated pharmacy data and medical records review. Patients (n = 155) were interviewed 1 and 4 months after starting antidepressant medication. Approximately 28% of patients stopped taking antidepressants during the first month of therapy, and 44% had stopped taking them by the third month of therapy. Patients who received the following five specific educational messages--1) take the medication daily; 2) antidepressants must be taken for 2 to 4 weeks for a noticeable effect; 3) continue to take medicine even if feeling better; 4) do not stop taking antidepressant without checking with the physician; and 5) specific instructions regarding what to do to resolve questions regarding antidepressants--were more likely to comply during the first month of antidepressant therapy. Asking about prior experience with antidepressants and discussions about scheduling pleasant activities also were related to early adherence. Side effects, only at severe levels, were associated with early noncompliance. Neuroticism, depression severity, and other patient characteristics did not predict adherence. Primary care physicians may be able to enhance adherence to antidepressant therapy by simple and specific educational messages easily integrated into primary care visits.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

A chronic disease score with empirically derived weights.

Different types of medication prescribed during a 6-month period for the treatment and management of chronic conditions were utilized in the refinement and validation of a chronic disease score. Prescription data, in addition to age and sex, were utilized to develop a chronic disease score based on empirically derived weights for each of three outcomes: total cost, outpatient cost, and primary care visits. The ability of the revised chronic disease score to predict health care utilization, costs, hospitalization, and mortality was compared to an earlier version of the chronic disease score (original) that was derived through clinical judgments of disease severity. The predictive validity of the chronic disease score is also compared to ambulatory care groups, which utilize outpatient diagnoses to form mutually exclusive diagnostic categories. Models based on a concurrent 6-month period and a 6-month prospective period (ie, the 6-month period after the chronic disease score or ambulatory care group derivation period) were estimated using a random one half sample of 250,000 managed-care enrollees aged 18 and older. The remaining one half of the enrollee population was used as a validation sample. The revised chronic disease score showed improved estimation and prediction over the original chronic disease score. The difference in variance explained prospectively by the revised chronic disease score versus the ambulatory care groups, conversely, was small. The revised chronic disease score was a better predictor of mortality than the ambulatory care groups. The combination of revised chronic disease score and ambulatory care groups showed only marginally greater predictive power than either one alone. These results suggest that the revised chronic disease score and ambulatory care groups with empirically derived weights provide improved prediction of health care utilization and costs, as well as hospitalization and mortality, over age and sex alone. We recommend the revised chronic disease score with total cost weights for general use as a severity measure because of its relative advantage in predicting mortality compared to the outpatient cost and primary care visit weights.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Migraine impact and functional disability.

This article reviews the substantial impact of migraine on individual headache sufferers and on society. While the individual impact of migraine is determined by pain and role dysfunction, the societal impact is primarily determined by work loss and disability in the work place and at home. Epidemiologic studies demonstrate that migraine is very common, substantially under diagnosed and often inadequately treated. Improving health care delivery to persons with migraine could substantially reduce the individual and societal impact of the illness. Migraine ranges in severity, with mild headache and no disability on one extreme and excruciating pain and complete disability on the other. Because of this spectrum of severity, diagnosis alone does not provide enough information to permit the selection of optimal therapy. A headache grading system might help headache sufferers and clinicians match the therapy not only to the diagnosis but to the overall severity of illness; such a system provides the best hope for cost effective health care interventions.

Absenteeism↗

PubMed1995

Primary care physician use of cognitive behavioral techniques with depressed patients.

BACKGROUND: Although researchers are paying more attention to the treatment of depression in the primary care setting, little is known about the nature of psychotherapeutic interactions that occur between primary care physicians and their patients in the context of a visit for depression. In recent years, brief cognitive behavioral therapy has been demonstrated to be efficacious, and the public has become more familiar with these techniques through media exposure and self-help books. METHODS: Depressed primary care patients were surveyed regarding the extent to which cognitive behavioral (CB) techniques were suggested during the primary care visit in which antidepressant medication was initially prescribed. One hundred fifty-five patients completed responses to phone surveys 1 month and 4 months after the visit. Patients were also surveyed regarding the recommendation of counseling by the primary care physician. RESULTS: The majority of patients (61%) reported that their physician advised them to identify activities they were already doing that helped them feel better. Physician recommendations regarding planning pleasurable activities, problem solving, challenging depressive thoughts, and planning activities that boost confidence were reported by 22% to 40% of study patients. Older patients reported fewer interactions about CB strategies. Primary care physicians' suggestion of CB strategies was associated with both patient use of CB strategies in the months following the visit and better adherence to recommended medication therapy during the first month of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients seem to recognize the occurrence of psychotherapeutic interactions during visits to their primary care physician in which an antidepressant medication was prescribed, and patients' recognition of these interactions is associated with increased adherence to the recommended course of antidepressant prescriptions.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1994

Studying the natural history of back pain.

Improved information on the natural history of back pain is needed to enable doctors and their patients to understand the likely course of back pain and to evaluate whether alternative interventions are preferred over self care or watchful waiting. The course of back pain is highly variable, occurring in transient, recurrent, and chronic phases. Recent longitudinal studies suggest that back pain is typically a recurrent condition and that chronic phases of back pain occur more often than previously believed. New methods of studying the course of back pain, standardized definitions of phases in the natural history of back pain, and improved outcomes data are needed to better understand the short-term and long-term course of back pain.

Back Pain↗