PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Von Korff

Publications and source records attributed to M Von Korff.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Effects of practice style in managing back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a practice style of back pain management consistent with self-care (infrequent prescribing of pain medications and bed rest) on long-term functional outcomes, costs of care, and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental observational study in which primary care physicians (n = 44) were categorized according to one of three practice style groups defined by a low, moderate, or high frequency of prescribing pain medications and bed rest for many patients (average, 24 patients per physician). SETTING: Primary care practices of a large, staff model health maintenance organization, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with back or neck pain of participating primary care physicians. Patients were interviewed 1 month (n = 1071) and 1 year and 2 years (n = 911) after their index visits. RESULTS: Patients in the three practice style groups rated similarly the quality of medical care received for back pain. Patients treated by physicians who infrequently prescribed pain medications and bed rest were more satisfied with education about back pain. On a scale of 0 to 10, the mean rating of agreement with the statement, "After your visit the doctor, you fully understood how to take care of your back problem," was 5.6 +/- 3.6 among patients of physicians who frequently prescribed medication and rest and was 6.6 +/- 3.5) among those who infrequently prescribed medication and bed rest. At 1 month, 30% of patients of physicians who infrequently prescribed medications and bed rest were graded as having moderate to severe activity limitation because of back pain, whereas 37% of patients in the moderate group had this grading, and 46% of patients of physicians who frequently prescribed were graded as having moderate to severe activity limitation. Differences in activity limitation by practice style group were no longer evident at 1 or 2 years of follow-up. The total 1-year costs of back care were higher among patients seen by physicians who frequently prescribed bed rest and pain medications (cost, $768 +/- $1592) than among those seen by physicians who infrequently prescribed (cost, $428 +/- $665), due largely to differences in inpatient and specialty care costs. The adjusted difference in costs, after controlling for case-mix variables, was $277 (95% Cl, $85.50 to $471.32). CONCLUSIONS: A practice style consistent with back pain self-care yielded similar long-term pain and functional outcomes at lower cost and was associated with higher satisfaction with patient education compared with a practice style characterized by more frequent prescribing of pain medications and bed rest.

Adult↗

The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the importance and implications of placebo effects in pain treatment and research from the existing literature, with emphasis on their magnitude and duration, the conditions influencing them, and proposed explanations. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles and books identified through MEDLINE (1980 through 1993) and PsycLIT (1967 through 1993) database searching, bibliography review, and expert consultation. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they pertained to the review objectives. RESULTS: Placebo response rates vary greatly and are frequently much higher than the often-cited one third. Placebos have time-effect curves, and peak, cumulative, and carryover effects similar to those of active medications. As with medication, surgery can produce substantial placebo effects, and this possibility is commonly overlooked in case series reports on back surgery. Individuals are not consistent in their placebo responses, and a placebo-responder personality has not been identified. Models advanced to explain placebo effects emphasize the role of anxiety, expectations, and learning. CONCLUSIONS: Placebo effects influence patient outcomes after any treatment, including surgery, that the clinician and patient believe is effective. Placebo effects plus disease natural history and regression to the mean can result in high rates of good outcomes, which may be misattributed to specific treatment effects. The true causes of improvements in pain after treatment remain unknown in the absence of independently evaluated randomized controlled trials.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗

The diagnosis of headache in primary care: factors in the agreement of clinical and standardized diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of clinical headache diagnoses in primary care to algorithm diagnoses from a standardized headache interview. DESIGN: A sample of consecutive primary care headache patients (n = 779) at the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound were interviewed and medical records abstracted. MEASUREMENTS: The medical record provided 'chart' diagnoses while a structured interview and diagnostic algorithm yielded the 'algorithm diagnosis'. The patients were also administered the depression sub-scale from the SCL 90-R, in addition to answering questions about pain intensity and disability used to grade the severity of chronic pain. RESULTS: Among persons diagnosed by the primary care physician as having migraine, 78% received an algorithm diagnosis of migraine. However, study patients were more likely to receive a diagnosis of migraine by algorithm (57%) than by clinical diagnosis (33%). While clinicians infrequently recorded a diagnosis of migraine and tension-type headache in the same patients, tension-type headache was identified among half of the algorithm diagnosed migraineurs. Among patients with algorithm-diagnosed migraine, female gender, increased disability, and the presence of aura increased the likelihood that the clinician would also diagnose migraine. Conversely, the presence of tension-type headache features, high levels of depression, high number of headache days and age over 65 years reduced the likelihood of the clinician diagnosing migraine among algorithm-diagnosed cases. CONCLUSIONS: The co-occurrence of migraine and tension-type headache symptoms are commonly reported by patients, however, primary care physicians usually recorded a single diagnosis of either migraine or tension headache. Among patients reporting migrainous features, the presence of chronic headache, emotional distress and the absence of disability reduced the likelihood that the clinician would assign a diagnosis of migraine. These results suggest the need for diagnostic and management strategies appropriate for patients whose headaches combine tension-type and migrainous features.

Adolescent↗

The burden of migraine. A review of cost to society.

Migraine is a common episodic disorder with considerable impact on individuals and society. Migraine occurs with the highest prevalence between the ages of 25 and 55 years, potentially the most productive period of life. Severe migraine can lead to disruption of work, family and social life, the long term consequences of which may affect quality of life. The direct costs of migraine (due to medical care) are small compared with the indirect costs caused by absence from work and reduced productivity. Population-based studies are required to assess incidence, prevalence and distribution of the disease. These studies also reveal that migraine is currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. The cumulative impact of migraine on individuals produces the burden of illness on society. Measuring the severity of migraine is important in understanding the extent of the burden of migraine on the individual and on society. Measures of severity may be useful as predictors of disability and healthcare use. These measures may also be useful in assessing the need for patient care and treatment and help target those more disabled by migraine. Identifying and treating appropriate patients should reduce the impact of migraine on the individual and the burden of migraine on society.

Age Factors↗

Assessing headache severity. New directions.

Headache is a heterogeneous condition that varies widely in global severity and in severity of individual attacks. Whereas recent efforts have focused on improving the diagnostic criteria for classifying headache, less effort has been directed toward developing reliable, valid, and clinically useful methods of assessing the impact or severity of headache. Existing measures of severity include one or more of the following weaknesses: (1) only pain intensity is assessed or the measure is incomplete in other ways, (2) measures have little or no prognostic value for relevant outcomes, (3) the reliability or the validity of the measure has not been assessed, or (4) the measure is too cumbersome for clinical practice or field research. We describe a brief, simple method for grading the severity of headache, the Chronic Pain Index, which assumes that a continuum of pain intensity and disability is the underlying dimension of severity. Along this continuum, lower levels of severity are differentiated by pain intensity and higher levels by interference with function. The prognostic value of the results from a seven-item questionnaire for grading headache severity is compared with that of alternative measures. The Chronic Pain Index showed the strongest independent cross-sectional and prospective correlation with measures of headache impact, depression, and use of healthcare services. These results support the potential utility of brief methods of assessing headache severity and exemplify the importance of including measures of interference with function when assessing severity.

Headache↗

Back pain in primary care. Outcomes at 1 year.

Outcomes of primary care back pain patients (N = 1128) were studied at 1 year after seeking care. Changes in depression depending on outcome, and predictors of poor outcome were evaluated. Less than one back pain patient in five reported recent onset (first onset within the previous 6 months). One year after seeking care, the large majority of both recent and nonrecent-onset patients reported having back pain in the previous month (69% vs. 82%). A significant minority of both recent and nonrecent-onset patients had either a poor functional outcome (14% vs. 21%) or continuing high intensity pain without appreciable disability (10% vs. 16%). Predictors of poor outcome included pain-related disability, days in pain, lower educational attainment, and female gender. Among initially dysfunctional patients with persistent pain, one half were improved and one third had a good outcome at the 1-year follow-up. Among initially dysfunctional patients who experienced a good outcome, elevated depressive symptoms improved to normal levels at follow-up. The outcome of back pain was predicted by pain-related disability and days in pain rather than by recency of onset, so it may be more meaningful to distinguish characteristic levels of pain intensity, pain-related disability, and pain persistence than to classify patients as acute or chronic.

Adult↗

An international study of psychological problems in primary care. Preliminary report from the World Health Organization Collaborative Project on 'Psychological Problems in General Health Care'.

This article describes a large longitudinal multicenter collaborative study that investigated the form, frequency, course, and outcome of psychological problems that were seen in primary health care settings in 15 different sites around the world. The research employed a two-stage sampling design in which the 12-item General Health Questionnaire was administered to 26,422 persons aged 18 to 65 years who were consulting health care services. Of these persons, 5604 were selected for detailed examinations using standardized instruments and were followed up at 3 months and 1 year to provide information on course and outcome. All assessment instruments have been translated into 13 different languages. The project has produced a database that allows for the exploration of the nature of psychological disorders experienced by patients in general medical care and their association with physical illness, illness behavior, and disability over time.

Adolescent↗

Depression, anxiety, and social disability show synchrony of change in primary care patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to (1) characterize the social disability associated with the common psychiatric illnesses of primary care patients in terms of role dysfunction (self-care, family role, social role, occupational role) and (2) establish whether severity of psychiatric illness and disability level show synchrony of change. METHODS: A two-stage sample design was employed. In the first stage, 1994 consecutive attenders of 25 general practitioners were screened on psychiatric illness by their physicians and with the General Health Questionnaire. A stratified random sample (n = 285) with differing probabilities was selected for a second-stage interview. Patients with psychiatric symptoms were reinterviewed 1 and 3.5 years later (n = 143). RESULTS: (1) Disability level among patients was increased (moderately for depression, mildly for anxiety) and was associated with severity of psychiatric illness. (2) Most disability was found in occupational and social roles. (3) Change in severity of psychiatric illness was concordant with change in level of disability and was largely invariant across diagnosis (depression, anxiety, mixed anxiety/depression). At follow-up, disability among improved patients had returned to normal levels. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric illness in primary care patients is associated with mild to moderate disability, and severity of psychiatric illness and disability show synchrony of change.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Activating communities for health promotion: a process evaluation method.

OBJECTIVES: To date, evaluations of community-based prevention programs have focused on assessing outcomes, not the process of organizing communities for health promotion. An approach was developed to analyze community organization efforts aimed at advancing community health objectives. These organizational processes are referred to as community activation. METHODS: Information was gathered from 762 informants through a key informant survey conducted in 28 western communities. The data collected included informant ratings of community activation and information about interorganizational activities analyzed through network analytic techniques. RESULTS: Activation levels, as measured by informant ratings, varied across communities. Program coordination, as measured by network analysis, occurred, on average, approximately 30% of the time. Higher income communities tended to be more activated than lower income communities. CONCLUSIONS: There is a widely recognized need for improved information about health-related community organization activities. It appears possible to gather such information through key informant surveys and to develop measures of community organization status that can be used in the evaluation of community health promotion programs.

Community Participation↗

Multi-level analysis in epidemiologic research on health behaviors and outcomes.

Individual-level health behaviors and outcomes have multi-level determinants (individual and environmental). Multi-level analysis seeks to explain individual outcomes in terms of both individual and environmental or aggregate variables. Ecologic fallacy (improper inference about individual-level associations based on associations measured only at the aggregate level) can result from confusion about the level of inference that is of ultimate interest. The perspective of multi-level analysis acknowledges the importance of both individual and environmental variables in determining health behaviors and outcomes at the level of the indivisible unit--the individual. The authors review concepts and methods of multi-level analysis and their application to epidemiologic research on health behavior and health outcomes.

Chronic Disease↗

Panic disorder: relationship to high medical utilization.

The purpose of this review is to describe the relationship between panic disorder, somatization, functional disability, and high medical utilization. Data from community, primary-care, and specialty studies were reviewed to determine the prevalence of anxiety and panic disorder in these populations. Data from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study were reviewed to emphasize the effect of panic disorder on health-care utilization and health perception in a community population. Data on the prevalence of panic disorder in primary care and mode of presentation of primary-care patients with panic disorder were also reviewed. Finally, the epidemiologic psychiatric findings from our recent study of distressed high utilizers of primary care were presented. Panic disorder was found to occur in 1-3% of people in the study community and 1.4-8% of primary-care patients. Of people with or without psychiatric disorder, people with panic disorder in the community had the highest risk of having multiple medically unexplained symptoms and of being high utilizers of medical ambulatory services. People with panic disorder in the community compared to both community psychiatric and nonpsychiatric controls tend to perceive themselves as having poor physical health and to be high users of emergency and hospital inpatient services, as well as ambulatory services. Most patients with panic disorder present to their primary-care physician with somatic complaints, especially cardiac (tachycardia, chest pain), gastrointestinal (epigastric pain or irritable bowel syndrome), or neurologic complaints (headaches, dizziness, or presyncope). Patients who were distressed high utilizers of primary care had an extremely high prevalence of current panic disorder (12%) and lifetime panic disorder (30%), which supported the association between panic disorder and high medical utilization found in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study.

Ambulatory Care↗

Disability and depression among high utilizers of health care. A longitudinal analysis.

We evaluated, among depressed medical patients who are high utilizers of health care, whether improved vs unimproved depression is associated with differences in the course of functional disability. At baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, depression and disability were assessed among a sample of enrollees in health maintenance organizations (N = 145) in the top decile of users of ambulatory health care who exceeded the 70th percentile of health maintenance organization population norms for depression. Improved depression was defined as a reduction of at least one third in depressive symptoms averaged across the two follow-up times. At the 12-month follow-up, persons with severe-improved depression experienced a 36% reduction in disability days (79 days per year to 51 days per year) and a 45% reduction in disability score. Persons with moderate-improved depression experienced a 72% reduction in disability days (62 days per year to 18 days per year) and a 40% reduction in disability score. In contrast, persons with severe-unimproved depression reported 134 disability days per year at baseline, while persons with moderate-unimproved depression reported 77 disability days per year at baseline. Neither group with unimproved depression showed improvement in either disability days or disability score during the 1-year follow-up period. High utilizers of health care with severe-unimproved depression were more likely to have current major depression and to be unemployed. Improved (relative to unimproved) depression was associated with borderline differences in the severity of physical disease and in the percent married. We conclude that depression and disability showed synchrony in change over time. However, depression and disability may show synchrony in change with disability because both depression and disability are controlled by some other factor that influences the chronicity of depression (eg, chronic disease or personality disorder). The finding of synchronous change of depression and disability provides a rationale for randomized controlled trials of depression treatments among depressed and disabled medical patients to determine whether psychiatric intervention might improve functional status in such patients. Such research is needed to determine whether there is a causal relationship between depression offset and reductions in functional disability.

Activities of Daily Living↗

A randomized trial of psychiatric consultation with distressed high utilizers.

This study reports the results of a randomized trial of a psychiatric consultation intervention with distressed, high utilizing patients of 18 physicians in two primary care clinics. Psychiatric consultation was associated with a significant increase in the use of antidepressants in intervention patients compared with controls in the first 6 months after intervention. Intervention patients were also significantly more likely to continue antidepressant treatment than control patients. The primary care physicians receiving psychiatric consultations increased the rate of prescribing antidepressant medications in their practice from 32 prescriptions filled per 1,000 visits before their participation in four consultations to 44 new prescriptions per 1,000 visits in the 12-month period after. There were no significant differences between intervention patients and controls at 6 and 12 months after randomization in psychiatric distress, functional disability, or utilization of health care (ambulatory visits, radiographic and laboratory testing services, admissions to inpatient medical care).

Ambulatory Care↗

A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data.

Using population-based automated pharmacy data, patterns of use of selected prescription medications during a 1 year time period identified by a consensus judgement process were used to construct a measure of chronic disease status (Chronic Disease Score). This score was evaluated in terms of its stability over time and its association with other health status measures. In a pilot test sample of high utilizers of ambulatory health care well known to their physicians (n = 219), Chronic Disease Score (CDS) was correlated with physician ratings of physical disease severity (r = 0.57). In a second random sample of patients (n = 722), its correlation with physician-rated disease severity was 0.46. In a total population analysis (n = 122,911), it was found to predict hospitalization and mortality in the following year after controlling for age, gender and health care visits. In a population sample (n = 790), CDS showed high year to year stability (r = 0.74). Based on health survey data, CDS showed a moderate association with self rated health status and self reported disability. Unlike self-rated health status and health care utilization, CDS was not associated with depression or anxiety. We conclude that scoring automated pharmacy data can provide a stable measure of chronic disease status that, after controlling for health care utilization, is associated with physician-rated disease severity, patient-rated health status, and predicts subsequent mortality and hospitalization rates. Specific methods of scoring automated pharmacy data to measure global chronic disease status may require adaptation to local prescribing practices. Scoring might be improved by empirical estimation of weighting factors to optimize prediction of mortality and other health status measures.

Adolescent↗

High cost HMO enrollees. Analysis of one physician's panel.

This report examines health care costs in the panel of one HMO physician in relation to enrollee health status. High cost enrollees, 15% of the practice panel, accounted for 64% of total costs. For all 722 patients included in the study, the components of costs were: ambulatory visits, 40% of total costs; impatient care, 31%; pharmacy services, 10%; radiology services, 5%; and laboratory services, 4%. Patients with severe physical disease (8% of all enrollees) accounted for about one-third of total costs, while those with moderate physical disease (27% of all enrollees) accounted for an additional one-third. Patients treated for 12 chronic conditions accounted for almost two-thirds of total costs. These conditions were (in order of the contribution of patients with each condition to total costs): hypertension, cancer, abdominal pain, heart disease, diabetes, back pain, headache, depression, arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fatigue, and anxiety. Enrollees treated for one or more of these 12 conditions (37% of the practice panel) accounted for 61% of the high cost enrollees and 63% of total costs. Controlling health care costs will require cost effective systems of care for these common chronic conditions. At present, HMOs typically rely on individual providers to manage these common chronic conditions on a case by case basis, rather than organizing clinic-and HMO-wide systems of care. HMO research and quality improvement programs aimed at improving cost effectiveness might productively focus on how practice teams, clinics and the delivery system as a whole could improve the management of the common chronic conditions which affect high cost enrollees.

Chronic Disease↗

The evaluation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: design.

The Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program (CHPGP) provides funding and technical assistance in support of community-based efforts to prevent major health problems. The first phase of the program was implemented in 11 communities in the western United States. This paper describes the evaluation design of the CHPGP in the West, the methods of data collection, and the baseline comparability of intervention and control communities. Major features of the evaluation design include: (1) the randomization of qualified communities making application into funded and unfunded comparison groups; (2) a second set of matched control communities for some intervention sites; (3) data gathering through repeated surveys of community residents (probability samples of adults and adolescents) and institutions (health-related organizations and randomly sampled grocery stores and restaurants); and (4) the use of secondary data to monitor health events. Selected baseline data show that intervention and control communities differ in racial/ethnic composition, but relevant health behaviors and ratings of community activation for health promotion appear comparable.

Adolescent↗