PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marco Foiani

Publications and source records attributed to Marco Foiani.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The DNA damage response during DNA replication.

Eukaryotic chromosome replication is mediated by multiple replicons and is coordinated with sister chromatid cohesion, DNA recombination, transcription and cell cycle progression. Replication forks stall or collapse at DNA lesions or problematic genomic regions, and these events have often been associated with recombination and chromosomal rearrangements. Stalled forks generate single-stranded DNA that activates the replication checkpoint, which in turn functions to protect the stability of the fork until the replication can resume. Recombination-mediated and damage-bypass processes are the main mechanisms responsible for replication restart. New findings have helped to unmask the molecular mechanisms that sense replication stress, control the stability of replication forks, and regulate the mechanisms that promote replication restart, thereby giving us a better understanding of how genome integrity is preserved during replication.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2005

Signal transduction: how rad53 kinase is activated.

Recent studies have elucidated the activation mechanism of the Rad53 checkpoint kinase and the role of Rad9-like adaptor proteins in mediating signal transduction from PIKK sensor kinases that detect DNA damage to the effector kinases that play a part in mending that damage.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2005

Recombination at collapsed replication forks: the payoff for survival.

Recombination is believed to assist replication when forks collapse. By using an elegant system, Lambert et al. (2005) address the consequences of recombination at blocked forks. They show that chromosomal rearrangements are the price to pay for cell viability when forks collapse.

DNA Replication↗
PubMed2005

Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase.

S-phase cells overcome chromosome lesions through replication-coupled recombination processes that seem to be assisted by recombination-dependent DNA structures and/or replication-related sister chromatid junctions. RecQ helicases, including yeast Sgs1 and human BLM, have been implicated in both replication and recombination and protect genome integrity by preventing unscheduled mitotic recombination events. We have studied the RecQ helicase-mediated mechanisms controlling genome stability by analyzing replication forks encountering a damaged template in sgs1 cells. We show that, in sgs1 mutants, recombination-dependent cruciform structures accumulate at damaged forks. Their accumulation requires Rad51 protein, is counteracted by Srs2 DNA helicase, and does not prevent fork movement. Sgs1, but not Srs2, promotes resolution of these recombination intermediates. A functional Rad53 checkpoint kinase that is known to protect the integrity of the sister chromatid junctions is required for the accumulation of recombination intermediates in sgs1 mutants. Finally, top3 and top3 sgs1 mutants accumulate the same structures as sgs1 cells. We suggest that, in sgs1 cells, the unscheduled accumulation of Rad51-dependent cruciform structures at damaged forks result from defective maturation of recombination-dependent intermediates that originate from the replication-related sister chromatid junctions. Our findings might contribute to explaining some of the recombination defects of BLM cells.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2005

Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells.

The replication checkpoint coordinates the cell cycle with DNA replication and recombination, preventing genome instability and cancer. The budding yeast Rad53 checkpoint kinase stabilizes stalled forks and replisome-fork complexes, thus preventing the accumulation of ss-DNA regions and reversed forks at collapsed forks. We searched for factors involved in the processing of stalled forks in HU-treated rad53 cells. Using the neutral-neutral two-dimensional electrophoresis technique (2D gel) and psoralen crosslinking combined with electron microscopy (EM), we found that the Exo1 exonuclease is recruited to stalled forks and, in rad53 mutants, counteracts reversed fork accumulation by generating ss-DNA intermediates. Hence, Exo1-mediated fork processing resembles the action of E. coli RecJ nuclease at damaged forks. Fork stability and replication restart are influenced by both DNA polymerase-fork association and Exo1-mediated processing. We suggest that Exo1 counteracts fork reversal by resecting newly synthesized chains and resolving the sister chromatid junctions that cause regression of collapsed forks.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed2005

Srs2 and Sgs1 DNA helicases associate with Mre11 in different subcomplexes following checkpoint activation and CDK1-mediated Srs2 phosphorylation.

Mutations in the genes encoding the BLM and WRN RecQ DNA helicases and the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex lead to genome instability and cancer predisposition syndromes. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sgs1 RecQ helicase and the Mre11 protein, together with the Srs2 DNA helicase, prevent chromosome rearrangements and are implicated in the DNA damage checkpoint response and in DNA recombination. By searching for Srs2 physical interactors, we have identified Sgs1 and Mre11. We show that Srs2, Sgs1, and Mre11 form a large complex, likely together with yet unidentified proteins. This complex reorganizes into Srs2-Mre11 and Sgs1-Mre11 subcomplexes following DNA damage-induced activation of the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases. The defects in subcomplex formation observed in mec1 and tel1 cells can be recapitulated in srs2-7AV mutants that are hypersensitive to intra-S DNA damage and are altered in the DNA damage-induced and Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation of Srs2. Altogether our observations indicate that Mec1- and Tel1-dependent checkpoint pathways modulate the functional interactions between Srs2, Sgs1, and Mre11 and that the Srs2 DNA helicase represents an important target of the Cdk1-mediated cellular response induced by DNA damage.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2004

DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1.

A single double-strand break (DSB) induced by HO endonuclease triggers both repair by homologous recombination and activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. Here we report that DNA damage checkpoint activation by a DSB requires the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 (Cdc28) in budding yeast. CDK1 is also required for DSB-induced homologous recombination at any cell cycle stage. Inhibition of homologous recombination by using an analogue-sensitive CDK1 protein results in a compensatory increase in non-homologous end joining. CDK1 is required for efficient 5' to 3' resection of DSB ends and for the recruitment of both the single-stranded DNA-binding complex, RPA, and the Rad51 recombination protein. In contrast, Mre11 protein, part of the MRX complex, accumulates at unresected DSB ends. CDK1 is not required when the DNA damage checkpoint is initiated by lesions that are processed by nucleotide excision repair. Maintenance of the DSB-induced checkpoint requires continuing CDK1 activity that ensures continuing end resection. CDK1 is also important for a later step in homologous recombination, after strand invasion and before the initiation of new DNA synthesis.

CDC2 Protein Kinase↗
PubMed2004

Characterization of the BUD31 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

A number of genes have been identified in the fully sequenced genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that appear to be conserved throughout evolution and the function of which remains poorly understood. In this manuscript we describe the initial characterization of yeast BUD31 gene. cDNA sequences highly related to BUD31 have been identified in human, Xenopus laevis, and Caenorhabditis elegans. With the aim of further understanding its function, we generated a BUD31-null yeast strain and characterized its phenotype: bud31l mutant cells showed severe cytoskeletal abnormalities, with dramatic effects on actin distribution and bud formation. We also proceeded to identify interacting proteins using the tandem affinity-purification method, coupled to mass spectrometry: Bud3lp was found in complex with proteins involved in mRNA splicing. We propose that the observed phenotypes for bud31-null strain could be the result of defective splicing and indicate a first functional role for Bud3lp and its homologs.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing.

The replication checkpoint controls the integrity of replicating chromosomes by stabilizing stalled forks, thus preventing the accumulation of abnormal replication and recombination intermediates that contribute to genome instability. Checkpoint-defective cells are susceptible to rearrangements at chromosome fragile sites when replication pauses, and certain human cancer prone diseases suffer checkpoint abnormalities. It is unclear as to how the checkpoint stabilizes stalled forks and how cells sense replication blocks. We have analysed the checkpoint contribution in controlling replisome-fork association when replication pauses. We show that in yeast wild-type cells, stalled forks exhibit stable replisome complexes and the checkpoint sensors Ddc1 and Ddc2, thus activating Rad53 checkpoint kinase. Ddc1/Ddc2 recruitment on stalled forks and Rad53 activation are influenced by the single-strand-binding protein replication factor A (RFA). rad53 forks exhibit a defective association with DNA polymerases alpha, epsilon and delta. Further, in rad53 mutants, stalled forks progressively generate abnormal structures that turn into checkpoint signals by accumulating RFA, Ddc1 and Ddc2. We suggest that, following replication blocks, checkpoint activation mediated by RFA-ssDNA filaments stabilizes stalled forks by controlling replisome-fork association, thus preventing unscheduled recruitment of recombination enzymes that could otherwise cause the pathological processing of the forks.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2004

Initiation of DNA replication: a new hint from archaea.

In this issue, Robinson and coworkers provide new insights into the mechanisms of initiation of chromosome replication in Archea. This and other studies, focused on model organisms, will certainly help to understand how the replication process has evolved in Eukaryotes.

Archaea↗
PubMed2003

Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast.

Very few gene conversions in mitotic cells are associated with crossovers, suggesting that these events are regulated. This may be important for the maintenance of genetic stability. We have analyzed the relationship between homologous recombination and crossing-over in haploid budding yeast and identified factors involved in the regulation of crossover outcomes. Gene conversions unaccompanied by a crossover appear 30 min before conversions accompanied by exchange, indicating that there are two different repair mechanisms in mitotic cells. Crossovers are rare (5%), but deleting the BLM/WRN homolog, SGS1, or the SRS2 helicase increases crossovers 2- to 3-fold. Overexpressing SRS2 nearly eliminates crossovers, whereas overexpression of RAD51 in srs2Delta cells almost completely eliminates the noncrossover recombination pathway. We suggest Sgs1 and its associated topoisomerase Top3 remove double Holliday junction intermediates from a crossover-producing repair pathway, thereby reducing crossovers. Srs2 promotes the noncrossover synthesis-dependent strand-annealing (SDSA) pathway, apparently by regulating Rad51 binding during strand exchange.

Crossing Over, Genetic↗
PubMed2003

The DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex: multiple functions and interactions.

DNA polymerase alpha (pol alpha) holds a special position among the growing family of eukaryotic DNA polymerases. In fact, pol alpha is associated with DNA primase to form a four subunit complex and, as a consequence, is the only enzyme able to start DNA synthesis de novo. Because of this peculiarity the major role of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex (pol-prim) is in the initiation of DNA replication at chromosomal origins and in the discontinuous synthesis of Okazaki fragments on the lagging strand of the replication fork. However, pol-prim seems to play additional roles in other complex cellular processes, such as the response to DNA damage, telomere maintenance, and the epigenetic control of higher order chromatin assembly.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms.

Cells overcome intra-S DNA damage and replication impediments by coupling chromosome replication to sister chromatid-mediated recombination and replication-bypass processes. Further, molecular junctions between replicated molecules have been suggested to assist sister chromatid cohesion until anaphase. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, we have identified, in yeast cells, replication-dependent X-shaped molecules that appear during origin activation, branch migrate, and distribute along the replicon through a mechanism influenced by the rate of fork progression. Their formation is independent of Rad51- and Rad52-mediated homologous recombination events and is not affected by DNA damage or replication blocks. Further, in hydroxyurea-treated rad53 mutants, altered in the replication checkpoint, the branched molecules progressively degenerate and likely contribute to generate pathological structures. We suggest that cells couple sister chromatid tethering with replication initiation by generating specialized joint molecules resembling hemicatenanes: this process might prime cohesion and assist sister chromatid-mediated recombination and replication events.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2003

Yeast Rad52 and Rad51 recombination proteins define a second pathway of DNA damage assessment in response to a single double-strand break.

Saccharomyces cells with a single unrepaired double-strand break adapt after checkpoint-mediated G(2)/M arrest. We have found that both Rad51 and Rad52 recombination proteins play key roles in adaptation. Cells lacking Rad51p fail to adapt, but deleting RAD52 suppresses rad51Delta. rad52Delta also suppresses adaptation defects of srs2Delta mutants but not those of yku70Delta or tid1Delta mutants. Neither rad54Delta nor rad55Delta affects adaptation. A Rad51 mutant that fails to interact with Rad52p is adaptation defective; conversely, a C-terminal truncation mutant of Rad52p, impaired in interaction with Rad51p, is also adaptation defective. In contrast, rad51-K191A, a mutation that abolishes recombination and results in a protein that does not bind to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), supports adaptation, as do Rad51 mutants impaired in interaction with Rad54p or Rad55p. An rfa1-t11 mutation in the ssDNA binding complex RPA partially restores adaptation in rad51Delta mutants and fully restores adaptation in yku70Delta and tid1Delta mutants. Surprisingly, although neither rfa1-t11 nor rad52Delta mutants are adaptation defective, the rad52Delta rfa1-t11 double mutant fails to adapt and exhibits the persistent hyperphosphorylation of the DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad53 after HO induction. We suggest that monitoring of the extent of DNA damage depends on independent binding of RPA and Rad52p to ssDNA, with Rad52p's activity modulated by Rad51p whereas RPA's action depends on Tid1p.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

A dominant-negative MEC3 mutant uncovers new functions for the Rad17 complex and Tel1.

The Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1 complex is essential for the cellular response to genotoxic agents and is thought to be important for sensing DNA lesions. Deletion of any of the RAD17, MEC3 or DDC1 genes abolishes the G(1) and G(2) and impairs the intra-S DNA-damage checkpoints. We characterize a dominant-negative mec3-dn mutation that has an unexpected phenotype. It inactivates the G(1) checkpoint while it leaves the G(2) response functional, thus revealing a difference in the requirements of the DNA-damage response in different phases of the cell cycle. In an attempt to identify the molecular defect imparted by the mutation, we dissected step-by-step the signaling cascade, which is triggered by DNA lesions and requires the activity of Mec1 and Rad53 kinases. The analysis of the phosphorylation state of checkpoint factors and critical protein interactions showed that, in mec3-dn cells, the signal transduction cascade is triggered normally, and the central kinase Mec1 can be activated. In G(1) cells expressing the mutation, the signaling cannot proceed any further along the pathway, indicating that the Rad17 complex acts after the activation of Mec1, possibly recruiting targets for the kinase. We also show that the function of the G(2) checkpoint in mutant cells is maintained by an uncharacterized activity of Tel1, the yeast homologue of ATM. This work thus reports a previously undiscovered role for Tel1 in checkpoint control.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed2002

Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

Checkpoint-mediated control of replicating chromosomes is essential for preventing cancer. In yeast, Rad53 kinase protects stalled replication forks from pathological rearrangements. To characterize the mechanisms controlling fork integrity, we analyzed replication intermediates formed in response to replication blocks using electron microscopy. At the forks, wild-type cells accumulate short single-stranded regions, which likely causes checkpoint activation, whereas rad53 mutants exhibit extensive single-stranded gaps and hemi-replicated intermediates, consistent with a lagging-strand synthesis defect. Further, rad53 cells accumulate Holliday junctions through fork reversal. We speculate that, in checkpoint mutants, abnormal replication intermediates begin to form because of uncoordinated replication and are further processed by unscheduled recombination pathways, causing genome instability.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗