PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Maria Cattani

Publications and source records attributed to Maria Cattani.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate, on ITI solid abutments, the retention values of single crowns fabricated using an alternative prosthetic solution: secondary cast superstructure luted to an electroformed primary coping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty standard 4.1 mm ITI implants and 5.5 mm high ITI machined abutments were assembled and mounted in acrylic resin. Implant/abutment assemblies were randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, primary galvanic caps were directly fabricated on implant abutments (A.G.C. Micro machine), and a secondary cast noble alloy superstructure was luted on each primary galvanic cap with a resin cement (Nimetic Cem). In the control group, prefabricated burn-out caps were used for casting the metal frameworks. Test and control crowns were cemented using a resin cement (Panavia 21). After storage at 37 degrees for 24 h, the specimens were subjected to a pull-out test using an Instron universal testing machine. The load required to dislodge each sample and the respective mode of failure were recorded. Means and standard deviations of loads at failure were analyzed using ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at P< or =0.05. RESULTS: The retention values (+/-SD) of loads at failure were 67.26 (+/-16.61) for the test group and 44.03 (+/-9.45) for the control group. In the test group no separation occurred between the electroformed (galvanic) primary cap and the secondary superstructure. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that this prosthetic solution is superior on retentive performance than the conventional cast framework. An added clinical advantage of this novel method is its potential to provide a totally passive fit. Further in vitro and in vivo studies involving multiple-unit restorations are needed in order to more generally validate this prosthetic concept.

Cementation↗

Bonding to dentin achieved by general practitioners.

The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the effect of operator variability on the shear bond strength of adhesives to dentin and (2) to determine the effectiveness of education on bonding performance for different types of adhesives. Thirty general practitioners were recruited for a CE course by a regional mailing. They used bovine dentin as a substrate for bonding the adhesive system they routinely used in practice and two other materials (no previous experience). Each adhesive OptiBond FL, ScotchBond Multipurpose Plus, ScotchBond 1 and Clearfil SE was applied according to manufacturer's instructions and immediately tested using a shear bond strength test. Shear bond strengths between adhesives and dentin were compared before and after a 90 min lecture on bonding principles and materials. For dentists with and without previous experience with a material, there were no statistically significant differences seen before and after the lecture (paired t-tests, p < or = 0.05). However, in every case, the bond strengths after the lecture were higher than those before (range of improvement from 15 to 150%). For dentists with routine experience with a particular material, all materials were statistically equivalent after the lecture, although the OptiBond FL was the highest. For dentists who had no previous experience with a material, the ScotchBond 1 had lower bond strengths than the other materials after the lecture. There was a large range in the ability of dentists to manipulate adhesive systems correctly. However, if a dentist has sufficient experience and receives sufficient education, any of these materials can give reasonable results.

Analysis of Variance↗