PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12442707

Bonding to dentin achieved by general practitioners.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the effect of operator variability on the shear bond strength of adhesives to dentin and (2) to determine the effectiveness of education on bonding performance for different types of adhesives. Thirty general practitioners were recruited for a CE course by a regional mailing. They used bovine dentin as a substrate for bonding the adhesive system they routinely used in practice and two other materials (no previous experience). Each adhesive OptiBond FL, ScotchBond Multipurpose Plus, ScotchBond 1 and Clearfil SE was applied according to manufacturer's instructions and immediately tested using a shear bond strength test. Shear bond strengths between adhesives and dentin were compared before and after a 90 min lecture on bonding principles and materials. For dentists with and without previous experience with a material, there were no statistically significant differences seen before and after the lecture (paired t-tests, p < or = 0.05). However, in every case, the bond strengths after the lecture were higher than those before (range of improvement from 15 to 150%). For dentists with routine experience with a particular material, all materials were statistically equivalent after the lecture, although the OptiBond FL was the highest. For dentists who had no previous experience with a material, the ScotchBond 1 had lower bond strengths than the other materials after the lecture. There was a large range in the ability of dentists to manipulate adhesive systems correctly. However, if a dentist has sufficient experience and receives sufficient education, any of these materials can give reasonable results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Serge Bouillaguet, Michel Degrange, Maria Cattani, Chantal Godin, Jean-Marc Meyer. 2002. Bonding to dentin achieved by general practitioners.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12442707/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗