PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Martin Fahy

Publications and source records attributed to Martin Fahy.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Outcomes of optimal or "stent-like"balloon angioplasty in acutemyocardial infarction: the CADILLAC trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare outcomes between patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with an optimal or "stent-like" result versus patients who underwent routine stent placement. BACKGROUND: Recent studies in patients with AMI undergoing stent implantation have suggested that PTCA may no longer be a relevant treatment modality for stent eligible lesions. However, whether routine stent placement is superior or necessary when an optimal PTCA or "stent-like" result is achieved is unknown. METHODS: In the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial, 2,082 patients with AMI were randomly assigned to undergo PTCA alone, PTCA + abciximab, stenting alone, or stenting + abciximab. Outcomes were compared in patients achieving an optimal acute PTCA result (residual core laboratory diameter stenosis <30% without significant dissection) versus those assigned to routine stenting. RESULTS: Optimal PTCA was achieved in 40.7% of patients randomized to balloon angioplasty, including 38.5% and 42.7% assigned to PTCA alone and PTCA + abciximab, respectively. Ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days occurred more frequently after optimal PTCA than routine stenting (5.1% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.007). The one-year composite adverse event rate (death, reinfarction, disabling stroke, or TVR) was greater after optimal PTCA than routine stenting (21.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.001), driven largely by increased rates of ischemic TVR (19.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001); no significant differences were present in the rates of death, reinfarction, or disabling stroke between the two groups. Angiographic restenosis also was more common with optimal PTCA than routine stenting (36.2% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.003). Even a post-PTCA diameter stenosis of <20% (realized in 12% of patients) did not result in outcomes equivalent to stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Even if an optimal result is achieved after primary PTCA in AMI, early and late outcomes can be further improved with routine stent implantation.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Benefits and risks of abciximab use in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial.

BACKGROUND: Trials of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (MI) have shown improved early clinical and angiographic outcomes with treatment. However, variations in trial designs, modest sample sizes, and limited long-term follow-up have precluded these studies from being definitive. METHODS AND RESULTS: As a prespecified secondary analysis of the CADILLAC trial, we compared early and late outcomes by abciximab assignment among 2082 patients randomized in an open-label, 2x2 factorial-design trial of primary stenting versus angioplasty and abciximab treatment (n=1052) versus no abciximab treatment (n=1030). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Abciximab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the composite end point of death, MI, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR), or disabling stroke at 30 days (4.6% versus 7.0%; relative risk, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93; P=0.01). Subacute thrombosis also was significantly reduced with abciximab treatment. At 12 months, however, rates of the composite end point did not differ significantly (18.4% for controls versus 16.9% for abciximab-treated patients; relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P=0.29), reflecting a decrease in the relative difference in TVR rates (ie, no effect of abciximab on reducing restenosis). In an angiographic substudy (n=656), myocardial salvage, restenosis, and infarct-artery reocclusion at 7 months were unaffected by abciximab treatment. There was no significant interaction between stenting and abciximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive abciximab treatment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention significantly enhanced 30-day event-free survival, predominantly by reducing ischemia-driven TVR. Abciximab treatment did not affect the composite end point at 1 year, reflecting a lack of effect on restenosis.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2003

Intravascular brachytherapy for native coronary ostial in-stent restenotic lesions.

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the effects of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) on ostial in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis has a high recurrence rate after percutaneous reintervention. The recurrence rate of ostial ISR lesions and the impact of VBT remain unknown. METHODS: We evaluated 133 patients with native coronary ostial ISR from a pooled database of 990 patients enrolled in randomized VBT trials. Independent quantitative angiography was performed at baseline and follow-up in 45 gamma, 27 beta, and 61 placebo patients. RESULTS: Binary restenosis was significantly higher in placebo than radiated patients (75.4% vs. 17.8% in gamma vs. 22.2% in beta, p < 0.0001). The treatment effect of both gamma (odds ratio [OR] 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 to 0.17) and beta VBT (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.31) was maintained after controlling for differences in baseline lesion length. Proximal and distal radiation edge restenosis rates were similar among the groups. Vascular brachytherapy of true aorto-ostial lesions (n = 34) was similarly beneficial: restenosis rates of placebo versus gamma or beta patients of 83.3% versus 6.7% versus 28.6%, p = 0.0002. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional treatment of ostial ISR is associated with a recurrence rate of over 75%. Vascular brachytherapy with either gamma or beta sources results in significant and similar reductions in restenosis compared with placebo. Similar benefits after VBT prevail in true aorto-ostial lesions.

Aorta↗
PubMed2003

What to tell dementia caregivers--the rule of threes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine and prioritise what information dementia caregivers wish to know at the time of diagnosis and later on in the illness, and in what form this information should be presented. METHOD: 100 carers were recruited from community mental health teams (CMHT) and a memory clinic (MC). A semi-structured Carer Interview was administered covering possible symptoms and management. RESULTS: Carers requested as much information as possible. There was no significant difference between CMHTs and the MC. After carers prioritised the information they wished to receive, we proposed a 'rule of threes'. At diagnosis, carers want information about what dementia is, medications available and behavioural and psychiatric symptoms of dementia. In an early follow-up appointment, they want information about services, the course of the illness and what to do in a crisis. In a later follow-up appointment, they want information about support groups, benefits, and financial and legal issues. At a later stage, they want information about psychological therapies, the effects of the illness on carers and complementary treatments. Most carers wish to receive information from a health professional, backed up by written information. CONCLUSIONS: The 'rule of threes' enables health professionals to make informed decisions about primacy of information and strategies to prevent carers becoming overloaded. Information should also be provided in written form and from support groups.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Secrets and lies: the dilemma of disclosing the diagnosis to an adult with dementia.

Guidelines state that doctors should reveal the diagnosis to the carer and the person with dementia. Carers may, however, not wish the diagnosis to be disclosed. We investigated carer and patient characteristics associated with the wish for disclosure. Fifty-four per cent of 100 carers wished the diagnosis to be revealed. The only significant predictor of wish for diagnosis to be hidden was a lower Mini Mental State Examination <17. Clinicians should strive for earlier diagnosis and to address carer concerns, disclose the diagnosis and thus avoid the need for secrets and lies.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Impact of gender on the incidence and outcome of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a recognized complication after percutaneous interventions (PCI). We sought to determine the impact of gender on incidence and clinical outcome of CIN. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of a total 8,628 patients who underwent PCI, there were 1,431 (16.5%) who developed CIN (defined as > 25% rise in creatinine after PCI). Patients were followed clinically for one year. CIN was present in 23.6% of female versus 17.4% of male patients (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that female gender (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.25 1.60; p < 0.0001), pre-PCI chronic renal failure (CRF) (OR= 1.8, 95% CI = 1.53 2.10, p < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.34 1.70; p < 0.0001), age (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01 1.02, p < 0.0001), and hypertension (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.06 1.36, p = 0.0035) were independent predictors of CIN. Clinical outcomes after CIN were examined in patients with or without CRF. Among patients without CRF who developed CIN, females (n = 465) had higher rates of one-year mortality, and MACE comparing to males (n = 710) without CRF (14% vs. 10% mortality, 36% vs. 30% MACE; p = 0.05 and 0.06, respectively). In patients with CRF who developed CIN, we found no significant gender differences in one-year clinical events (37% vs. 36% mortality, 42% vs. 45% MACE; p = 0.8 and 0.6, respectively). By multivariate analysis only baseline CRF, diabetes, age, functional NYHA IV class were identified as independent predictors of one-year mortality in patients with CIN after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender is an independent predictor of CIN development after PCI and a marker of worse 1-year mortality after CIN in patients without baseline CRF. After CIN is developed, pre-PCI CRF, diabetes mellitus, age, severe heart failure (not gender) are independent predictors of one-year mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Quantitative angiographic methods for appropriate end-point analysis, edge-effect evaluation, and prediction of recurrent restenosis after coronary brachytherapy with gamma irradiation.

OBJECTIVES: The study was done to investigate the relationship between clinical restenosis and the relative angiographic location of the recurrent restenotic lesion, after treatment of in-stent restenosis with vascular brachytherapy in the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial (WRIST). BACKGROUND: Intracoronary radiation therapy reduces recurrence of in-stent restenosis. We investigated the above objective in patients enrolled in WRIST. METHODS: The WRIST study randomized 130 patients to double-blinded therapy with gamma irradiation (iridium-192 [(192)Ir]) versus placebo after interventional treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis. After the intervention and at follow-up, three vessel segments were individually analyzed with quantitative coronary angiography: 1) the "stent," 2) the "radiation ribbon," and 3) the "ribbon+margin" segment (including 5 mm on either end of the injured or radiation-ribbon segment). Receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to assess the value of the follow-up percent diameter stenosis (DS) for each of the three analyzed segments in predicting target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: (192)Ir reduced recurrent restenosis (23.7% vs. 60.7%, p < 0.001) and the length of recurrent restenosis (8.99 +/- 4.34 mm vs. 17.54 +/- 10.48 mm, p < 0.001) at follow-up compared to placebo. Isolated stent edge (3.4%) and ribbon edge (1.7%) restenoses were infrequent in both groups. The best angiographic surrogate of TVR was the 50% follow-up DS obtained from the ribbon+margin analysis (ROC area 0.806). CONCLUSIONS: In WRIST, not only was (192)Ir therapy effective in reducing restenosis, but it also reduced the lesion length of treatment failures by 50%, and it was not associated with edge proliferation. The restenosis rate obtained from the vessel segment inclusive of the dose fall-off zones was the best correlate of TVR and should become a standard analysis site in all vascular brachytherapy trials.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

How patients and staff view the use of seclusion.

Some patients have found seclusion helpful and it is regarded as an assertive treatment by its advocates. Others see it as a highly invasive and abusive experience. This study, which was carried out on a unit for people with challenging behaviours, explored this contentious issue from the perspective of both staff and patients. Areas of agreement and disagreement were identified with a view to exploring the impact of seclusion on nurse-patient relationships. A key conclusion was that the quality of the relationship was maintained and not damaged by the act of secluding a patient, which may merit a wider study.

Adult↗