Biomedical subjects

Mathilde C Peters

Publications and source records attributed to Mathilde C Peters.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Chemomechanical caries removal in children: an operator's and pediatric patients' responses.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated an operator's and pediatric patients' responses to chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) versus the traditional method (TM) of caries removal using a handpiece and a round bur when treating dentinal-depth occlusal lesions with minimal enamel access in primary molars. METHODS: Data were collected from 50 children at baseline and before, during and after caries removal using CMCR or TM. The subjects in the CMCR group were on average younger than the subjects in the TM group and had more deep lesions. RESULTS: The operator rated CMCR as needing more clinical and technical effort and more total effort than TM. He was less satisfied with CMCR than with TM. Subjects in the CMCR group perceived the time needed for treatment as significantly longer than did the subjects in the TM group. Fear of the dentist decreased in subjects in the TM group from before to after the operative appointment, while it increased in subjects in the CMCR group. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found no direct advantage in using CMCR over using TM. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CMCR cannot be recommended as an alternative to TM when treating dentinal depth occlusal lesions with minimal access in primary molars.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2006

Chemomechanical caries removal in children: efficacy and efficiency.

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) compared with the traditional method (TM) of caries removal using a round bur when treating dentinal-depth occlusal lesions with minimal enamel access in primary molars. The authors also compare CMCR with TM to determine if it had a higher efficacy and could be used more frequently without the subject's having to undergo local anesthesia. METHODS: The authors collected data from 50 children during operative appointments at which caries was removed using one of the two methods. RESULTS: Complete caries removal within 15 minutes was achieved in only 57.7 percent of the CMCR-treated teeth. In 42.3 percent of these teeth, residual caries was removed using TM. CMCR was almost eight times more time-consuming than was TM when used to excavate dentinal-depth occlusal lesions with minimal cavitation. There was no significant difference between CMCR and TM in the number of subjects who needed to undergo local anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found no direct clinical advantage in using CMCR over using TM for treating occlusal dentinal lesions with minimal cavitation in pediatric patients.

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate↗

PubMed2005

In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of a commercially available self-etching adhesive system, Clearfil Protect Bond, which contains antibacterial monomer 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB). METHODS: Inhibitory effects against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei, or Actinomyces naeslundii were examined by an agar-disc diffusion method using the Clearfil Protect Bond primer containing 5% MDPB and an acidic adhesion-promoting monomer MDP, the primer only with MDP, and the primer with 1% cetylpyridinium chloride. The minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentrations (MIC/MBC) of each primer for the three bacterial species were determined by serial microdilution assays. For testing the bactericidal effects seen in dentin, the primer was applied to demineralized dentin blocks in which S. mutans had been impregnated, and numbers of viable bacteria were counted. RESULTS: For all three bacteria, the sizes of the inhibition zones produced by Clearfil Protect Bond primer were significantly greater than for the other primers (p<0.05, ANOVA and Scheffe's F-test). The MIC/MBC values of Clearfil Protect Bond primer were less than those of the primer without MDPB, and comparable to those of the primer containing cetylpyridinium chloride. No bacterial recovery was obtained after application of Clearfil Protect Bond primer to the bacteria-impregnated dentin, although the primer without MDPB showed some bactericidal effect. SIGNIFICANCE: Clearfil Protect Bond primer has strong antibacterial activity based upon MDPB against S. mutans, L. casei and A. naeslundii, and the capability to disinfect cavities containing residual bacteria.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

PubMed2002

The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review.

Direct post-and-core restorations with prefabricated posts are becoming increasingly popular. A literature review was conducted to compare the clinical and in vitro performance of cast posts and cores to that of direct cores with prefabricated posts in single-rooted teeth. Research on the restoration of endodontically treated teeth was identified through a search of electronic databases. The search yielded a total of 1773 references. After these references were subjected to strict inclusion criteria, 10 in vitro and 6 in vivo studies remained and critically reviewed. A comparison of fracture loads in the in vitro studies revealed no significant difference between cast and direct posts and cores. Meta-analysis of the data suggested that there is no difference in fracture behavior associated with the 2 treatment modalities. An overall survival analysis was not possible for the in vivo studies. The survival for cast posts and cores in 2 studies ranged from 87.2% to 88.1% and in a third study reached 86.4% for direct cores after 72 months. Randomized clinical trials on this topic were not available but should be conducted to verify published findings.

Dental Prosthesis Design↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Adhesive permeability affects composite coupling to dentin treated with a self-etch adhesive.

Dentin bonded with one-step self-etch adhesives does not couple well to chemically-cured composites despite the presence of ternary catalysts in some systems. To determine whether additional factors are responsible for the poor coupling of dentin bonded with these adhesives, the authors used a one-step self-adhesive in which the ternary catalyst is incorporated separately in the brush applicator for activating the adhesive. The activated adhesive was bonded to dentin or prepolymerized composites. For microtensile bond strength evaluation, a dual-cured hybrid composite was used for coupling to the bonded substrates and activated using: (1) the light-cured mode (LC), (2) delayed light-activation (DL) and (3) the chemical-cured mode (CC). In addition, the composite polymerized in the CC mode was coupled to the two substrates bonded with (4) additional experimental adhesive versions without the ternary catalyst and (5) without the ternary catalyst and tertiary amine. Silver tracer penetration into bonded interfaces was examined using TEM by replacing the dual-cured composite with a light-cured or a chemically-cured microfilled composite. In the CC mode, the composites coupled poorly to both substrates bonded with the unactivated adhesive (5). The use of activated adhesives allowed for good coupling of the composites polymerized in all curing modes to bonded composite, but only in the LC mode to bonded dentin. Water-filled channels in the form of water trees and water blisters were present in the adhesive layer under all composite-curing modes in bonded dentin. These features were completely absent in the bonded composites, showing that the source of the water was from dentin. Water blisters were also observed along the adhesive-composite interfaces in bonded dentin when the coupling composites were polymerized using the CC or DL modes.

Adhesives↗