Biomedical subjects

Michael J Jurmann

Publications and source records attributed to Michael J Jurmann.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Patients supported for over 4 years with left ventricular assist devices.

Ventricular assist device implantation has become an established therapy in adults and children for bridging to heart transplantation or to aid myocardial recovery. Recently, implantation of left ventricular assist devices as definitive therapy has been recognized as a better option than pharmacological treatment in patients who are not candidates for heart transplantation. This study presents our institution's experience with five patients successfully supported by two different left ventricular assist devices for over 4 years. This unique experience shows that left ventricular assist device support can be extended beyond 4 years with good quality of life and low risk, making it a good alternative for non-transplant candidates.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Initial experience with miniature axial flow ventricular assist devices for postcardiotomy heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The recently introduced Impella Recover (Impella CardioSystems AG, Aachen, Germany) microaxial flow left and right ventricular assist devices (LVAD/RVAD) were evaluated as they provide circulatory support in the setting of postcardiotomy heart failure refractory to high-dose inotropic and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support. METHODS: Between May 2002 and November 2002, the Recover LVAD was implanted in six patients (64 +/- 11 years) with acute left heart failure following coronary artery bypass procedures. Preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was compromised (28% +/- 12%, 12% to 45%). Three patients presented with unstable circulation or cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction, with a predicted mortality rate of 44% +/- 11% (EuroSCORE). Intraoperatively, severe heart failure was present with a more than 70% mortality rate predicted by the IABP score. The Recover RVAD and LVAD were combined to provide biventricular assist device (BVAD) support in one case of post-transplant graft failure. RESULTS: The Recover LVAD delivered blood flows of up to 5 L/min. A moderate degree of hemolysis and a reduction in platelet count were noted. Four patients were weaned from the LVAD after 169 +/- 34 hours, two of whom remain long-term survivors. Full recovery of graft function allowed weaning of the patient from BVAD support after six days. CONCLUSIONS: The initial experience with the Impella Recover VADs proved the new systems to be advantageous regarding the ease of implantation and device removal, low anticoagulation requirements, and advanced weaning features. In cases of severe heart failure, survival was improved by using LVADs when compared to that predicted by solely continuing IABP and drug support.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age.

OBJECTIVE: This study details our initial results of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in patients suffering from catecholamine-dependent end-stage heart failure or cardiogenic shock with age above 65 years or age above 60 and contraindications to cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Between September 2000 and July 2002, 27 patients received implantation of left ventricular assist devices (Micromed DeBakey (n=15), Berlin Heart Excor (n=6), Arrow Lion Heart (n=4) and Novacor N100 (n=2)). The mean age of this group was 66.2+/-4.1 (60-77) years. The patients presented with the following features by the time of LVAD implantation: failure of weaning from inotropic support (78%), either profound cardiogenic shock (37%) or instable hemodynamic status (22%), high-dose inotropic (52%) or intraaortic balloon pump support (11%), dialysis (15%), artificial ventilation (15%), and at least one previous cardiac procedure (44%). RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate for the whole group was 63% at 30 days, 30% at 180 days, and 22% at 2 years. The presence of preoperative cardiogenic shock was associated with a higher perioperative mortality rate. Late complications (n=7) included replacement of two thrombosed DeBakey LVADs and five late deaths secondary to thrombembolism/intracranial hemorrhage (DeBakey LVAD, n=3) or septicemia (n=2). As of May 15, 2003, six patients remain on LVAD support for an average of 653 (339-953) days, three patients now for more than 2 years. Ten patients were discharged home to spend 73% of their life span on out-of-hospital long-term LVAD support. CONCLUSION: This study reports the first single-center experience of permanent LVAD support in patients of advanced age. For this initial experience, many patients with critical circulatory status and previous cardiac operations were included and a high postoperative mortality rate was encountered among them. Older age and associated multimorbidity are the key determinants rendering the conditions of LVAD therapy for this patient cohort to be different from the bridge-to-transplant experience. The LVADs employed in this study showed different capabilities with regard to long-term support. Our experience shows that permanent mechanical circulatory support does have the potential to evolve as a treatment option in selected elderly patients with end-stage heart failure.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Outpatients on mechanical circulatory support.

BACKGROUND: As waiting periods for heart transplantation have lengthened, the application of long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has become more common in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock. Anticipating increased long-term MCS, a policy to discharge patients home has been instituted. This study compares the results of outpatient on MCS to a group of patients remaining hospitalized. METHODS: We report our 10-year experience with 108 patients on MCS, who were supported for more than 3 months. Group A consisted of 38 patients (25 Novacor, 13 Berlin Heart) who underwent assist implantation from 1996 to 2001. They had a mean support time of 454 days (range 100 to 1074 days) and spent a mean of 326 days (range 20 to 769 days) at home. Group B consisted of 70 patients (24 Novacor, 46 Berlin Heart) who underwent assist implantation between 1991 and 2000. They had a mean support time of 234 days (range 95 to 795 days) and were not discharged. The patients were monitored for complications, hospital readmissions, and causes of death including infections and thromboembolic and bleeding events during the MCS time. RESULTS: Group A total mortality was 16% (6/38). Two patients died from cerebral embolism, one from cerebral hemorrhage, two from systemic infection, and one from multiorgan failure. Thirty-two patients (84%) required 95 readmissions to the hospital due to cerebral embolism (n = 9), bleeding (n = 1), wound infections (n = 23), coagulation disorder (n = 13) for heart transplantation (n = 5), and (n = 44). In group B the mortality was 43% (30/70) for noncardiac reasons and thus significant higher (p = 0.004, chi2 test). Causes of death were cerebral embolism (n = 5), cerebral hemorrhage (n = 7), systemic infection (n = 14, significantly higher, p = 0.04, chi2 test), and multiorgan failure (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates that MCS can be used in outpatients without increased mortality and with an acceptable rate of readmissions (2.8/patient). It ensures the survival of the patient, enables recovery from multiorgan failure, and offers an acceptable quality of life.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

[Heart assist systems--current status].

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is the leading cause of death in the developed countries. Organ-preserving operative procedures on the failing heart like coronary artery bypass procedures or resection of left ventricular aneurysms are part of the routine care in cardiac surgery today. Terminal heart failure refractory to optimized drug therapy, however, will require a heart transplantation or the implantation of artificial blood pumps. While heart transplantation has proven to provide excellent long-term results with 10-year survival rates at 50%, it will remain a casuistic therapy, limited by the comparatively small number of procedures which can be performed. ARTIFICIAL BLOOD PUMPS: The current status of development of artificial blood pumps is represented by the broad availability of partially-implantable electric motor-driven left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), which still require a percutaneous cable for energy supply and device control from external sources while the blood pump itself resides inside the body. The recently introduced axial-flow devices (DeBakey, Jarvik 2000 and HeartMate II LVADs) deliver a continuous blood flow and obviously provide distinct advantages with regard to a reduction in size, weight and energy demands, simplified implantation technique and device control when compared to the previously available partially-implantable electric motor-driven pulsatile blood pumps (Novacor N100, TCl Heart Mate LVADs). The first systems designed for long-term or permanent use (Lion Heart LVAD, AbioCor replacement heart) are completely implantable devices featuring percutaneous energy transmission and device control. However, the latter are more complex devices and their clinical application is still limited to a small number of cases, which precludes a judgment about their potential at this time. INDICATIONS: The use of paracorporeal pneumatically accentuated blood pump systems is still indicated in cases of most severe biventricular heart failure and multiorgan failure or if only short- to mid-term circulatory support is anticipated. Well established indications for utilization of artificial blood pumps are the bridge-to-transplant procedure, which yields results comparable to primary heart transplantation, and acute cardiac failure following myocardial infarction or cardiac surgical procedures. In newborns and children, encouraging results were obtained when miniaturized blood pumps of the Berlin Heart System were utilized for heart failure in myocarditis or dilative cardiomyopathy. With advanced reliability of artificial blood pumps and in face of the high incidence of heart failure, especially in the older age group, the long-term application of artificial bloods pump appears to be justified.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2002

Implantation of a left ventricular assist device in situs inversus.

A 42-year-old man with situs inversus was referred to our institution because of end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy. Cardiac arrest occurred after admission, and the patient underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An extracorporeal left ventricular assist device (Berlin Heart) was implanted as a bridge to transplantation. This is one of the first reports of left ventricular assist device implantation in a patient with situs inversus and ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Adult↗