PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Nathan C Shaner

Publications and source records attributed to Nathan C Shaner.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Novel chromophores and buried charges control color in mFruits.

mFruits are second-generation monomeric red fluorescent proteins (mRFPs) that have improved brightness and photostability compared to the first-generation mRFP1. The emission and excitation maxima are distributed over the remarkably large ranges of about 550-650 and 540-590 nm, respectively; however, the variations in the spectra can be traced to a few key amino acids. Spectroscopic and atomic resolution crystallographic analyses of three representatives, mOrange, mStrawberry, and mCherry, reveal that different mechanisms operate to establish the excitation and emission maxima. Evidently, they all undergo the second oxidation step to produce an acylimine linkage in the polypeptide backbone. In comparison to the progenitor DsRed, direct covalent modification to this linkage (mOrange) and indirect modification of the chromophore environment (mStrawberry and mCherry) produce strong blue- and red-shifted variants. The blue shift of mOrange is induced by an unprecedented covalent modification of the protein backbone. The electron-density map indicates the formation of a third heterocycle, 2-hydroxy-dihydrooxazole, upon the reaction of Thr 66 Ogamma with the polypeptide backbone, which in turn reduces the conjugation of the carbonyl at position 65 with the rest of the chromophore. In mStrawberry and mCherry, the movement of charged Lys 70 and protonation of Glu 215 are proposed to modify the chromophore electron-density distribution, inducing the red shift. pH-dependent spectral shifts of mCherry and mStrawberry appear to result from the titration of Glu 215, although, for mStrawberry, partial cyclization of Thr 66 may contribute at high pH.

Animals↗

Actin and alpha-actinin dynamics in the adhesion and motility of EPEC and EHEC on host cells.

Two pathogenic Escherichia coli, Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), adhere to the outside of host cells and induce cytoskeletal rearrangements leading to the formation of membrane-encased pedestals comprised of actin filaments and other associated proteins beneath the bacteria. The structure of the pedestals induced by the two pathogens appears similar, although those induced by EHEC are shorter in length. Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) was used to determine potential differences of actin polymerization in EPEC and EHEC induced pedestals in cultured PtK2 cells expressing either Green or Yellow Fluorescent Protein (GFP or YFP) fused to actin or alpha-actinin. When all the fluorescent actin in a pedestal on EPEC-infected cells was photobleached, fluorescence recovery first occurred directly beneath the bacterium in a band that grew wider at a rate of one micron/minute. Consistently observed in all EPEC-induced pedestals, whether they were stationary, lengthening, or translocating, the rate of actin polymerization that occurred at the pedestal tip was approximately 1 mum/min. Overall, a much slower rate of actin polymerization was measured in long EHEC-induced pedestals. In contrast to the dynamics of GFP-actin, recovery of GFP-alpha-actinin fluorescence was not polarized, with the actin cross-linking protein exchanging all the length of the EPEC/EHEC induced pedestals. Surprisingly, the depolymerization and retrograde flow of pedestal actin, as well as pedestal translocations, were inhibited reversibly by either 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) or by a combination of sodium azide and 2-deoxy D-glucose, leading to an increase in the lengths of the pedestals. A simple physical model was developed to describe elongation and translocation of EPEC/EHEC pedestals in terms of actin polymerization and depolymerization dynamics.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins.

The recent explosion in the diversity of available fluorescent proteins (FPs) promises a wide variety of new tools for biological imaging. With no unified standard for assessing these tools, however, a researcher is faced with difficult questions. Which FPs are best for general use? Which are the brightest? What additional factors determine which are best for a given experiment? Although in many cases, a trial-and-error approach may still be necessary in determining the answers to these questions, a unified characterization of the best available FPs provides a useful guide in narrowing down the options.

Animals↗

Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein.

Fluorescent proteins are genetically encoded, easily imaged reporters crucial in biology and biotechnology. When a protein is tagged by fusion to a fluorescent protein, interactions between fluorescent proteins can undesirably disturb targeting or function. Unfortunately, all wild-type yellow-to-red fluorescent proteins reported so far are obligately tetrameric and often toxic or disruptive. The first true monomer was mRFP1, derived from the Discosoma sp. fluorescent protein "DsRed" by directed evolution first to increase the speed of maturation, then to break each subunit interface while restoring fluorescence, which cumulatively required 33 substitutions. Although mRFP1 has already proven widely useful, several properties could bear improvement and more colors would be welcome. We report the next generation of monomers. The latest red version matures more completely, is more tolerant of N-terminal fusions and is over tenfold more photostable than mRFP1. Three monomers with distinguishable hues from yellow-orange to red-orange have higher quantum efficiencies.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Myofibrillogenesis in skeletal muscle cells.

How are myofibrils assembled in skeletal muscles? The current authors present evidence that myofibrils assemble through a three-step model: premyofibrils to nascent myofibrils to mature myofibrils. This three-step sequence was based initially on studies of living and fixed cultured cells from cardiac muscle. Data from avian primary muscle cells and from a transgenic skeletal mouse cell line indicate that a premyofibril model for myofibrillogenesis also holds for skeletal muscle cells. Premyofibrils are characterized by minisarcomeres bounded by Z-bodies composed of the muscle isoform of alpha-actinin. Actin filaments are connected to these Z-bodies and to the mini-A-bands composed of nonmuscle myosin II filaments. Nascent myofibrils are formed when premyofibrils align and are modified by the addition of titin and muscle myosin II filaments. Mature myofibrils result when nonmuscle myosin II is eliminated from the myofibrils and the alpha-actinin rich Z-bodies fuse as the distance between them increases from 0.5 microm in premyofibrils to 2 to 2.5 microm in the mature myofibrils.

Actins↗