PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P M Seligman

Publications and source records attributed to P M Seligman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy.

The Speak speech-processing strategy, developed by the University of Melbourne and commercialized by Cochlear Pty Limited for use in the new Spectra 22 speech processor, has been shown to provide improved speech perception for adults in both quiet and noisy situations. The present study evaluated the ability of children experienced in the use of the Multipeak (Mpeak) speech-processing strategy (implemented in the Nucleus Minisystem-22 cochlear implant) to adapt to and benefit from the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy (implemented in the Nucleus Spectra 22 speech processor). Twelve children were assessed using Mpeak and Speak over a period of 8 months. All of the children had over 1 year's previous experience with Mpeak, and all were able to score significantly on open-set word and sentence tests using the cochlear implant alone. Children were assessed with both live-voice and recorded speech materials, including Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant monosyllabic words and Speech Intelligibility Test sentences. Assessments were made in both quiet and in noise. Assessments were made at 3-week intervals to investigate the ability of the children to adapt to the new speech-processing strategy. For most of the children, a significant advantage was evident when using the Speak strategy as compared with Mpeak. For 4 of the children, there was no decrement in speech perception scores immediately following fitting with Speak. Eight of the children showed a small (10% to 20%) decrement in speech perception scores for between 3 and 6 weeks following the changeover to Speak. After 24 weeks' experience with Speak, 11 of the children had shown a steady increase in speech perception scores, with final Speak scores higher than for Mpeak. Only 1 child showed a significant decrement in speech perception with Speak, which did not recover to original Mpeak levels.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Coding of voice source information in the Nucleus cochlear implant system.

Two studies are reported in which the effectiveness of explicitly coding voicing and fundamental frequency information for the Nucleus cochlear implant was investigated. In the first study, the voicing perception of a group of three experienced Multipeak users was evaluated when they were using Multipeak and a modified Multipeak in which the explicit fundamental frequency and voicing cues were eliminated and replaced with a 250-Hz constant rate of stimulation. The results of consonant and monosyllabic word tests showed that there was no significant difference in the subjects' ability to discriminate voicing. In the second study, the ability of a group of five experienced users of the constant rate spectral maxima sound processor (SMSP) strategy to discriminate suprasegmental contrasts was evaluated when they were using the SMSP strategy and a modified SMSP strategy that included a rate-encoded representation of the fundamental frequency on the most apical stimulation channel. The results of intonation, roving stress, and question-statement tests showed that there was no significant difference between the scores recorded with these strategies. Since the temporal voicing cue is not a primary cue to voicing discrimination for Multipeak users, and the provision of an additional rate cue to the SMSP strategy does not improve SMSP users' ability to discriminate suprasegmental contrasts, the results of these studies indicate that in the cases investigated, the coding of voice source information by rate of stimulation does not significantly augment the cues present in the spatially distributed constant rate stimulation pattern.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.

Sixty-three postlinguistically deaf adults from four English-speaking countries participated in a 17-week field study of performance with a new speech coding strategy, Spectral Peak (SPEAK), and the most widely used strategy, Multipeak (MPEAK), both of which are implemented on wearable speech processors of the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System; MPEAK is a feature-extraction strategy, whereas SPEAK is a filterbank strategy. Subjects' performance was evaluated with an experimental design in which use of each strategy was reversed and replicated (ABAB). Average scores for speech tests presented sound-only at 70 dB SPL were higher with the SPEAK strategy than with the MPEAK strategy. For tests in quiet, mean scores for medial vowels were 74.8 percent versus 70.1 percent; for medial consonants, 68.6 percent versus 56.6 percent; for monosyllabic words, 33.8 percent versus 24.6 percent; and for sentences, 77.5 percent versus 67.4 percent. For tests in noise, mean scores for Four-Choice Spondees at +10 and +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) were 88.5 percent versus 73.6 percent and 80.1 percent versus 62.3 percent, respectively; and for sentences at +15 dB, +10, and +5 dB S/N, 66.5 percent versus 43.4 percent, 61.5 percent versus 37.1 percent, and 60.4 percent versus 31.7 percent, respectively. Subjects showed marked improvement in recognition of sentences in noise with the new SPEAK filterbank strategy. These results agree closely with subjects' responses to a questionnaire on which approximately 80 percent reported they heard best with the SPEAK strategy for everyday listening situations.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal prosthesis.

A new device incorporating a cochlear implant speech processor and a speech-processing hearing aid for the unimplanted ear has been designed and tested with four severely hearing-impaired patients. The aim of the device is to provide a more acceptable and effective combination of electrical and acoustic signals to the two ears. When used monaurally, and binaurally in conjunction with the cochlear implant, the speech-processing hearing aid mean scores for open-set sentences, words, and consonants were as good as or better than the mean scores for the patients' own conventional hearing aids. Some patients improved much more than did others. Although not conclusive, these results are encouraging, especially as they were achieved with a laboratory prototype that did not allow the patients to become accustomed to the processor in everyday situations.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant.

Seven postlinguistically deaf adults implanted with the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant participated in an evaluation of speech perception performance with three speech processors: the Wearable Speech Process (WSP III), a prototype of the Mini Speech Processor, and the Mini Speech Processor. The first experiment was performed with the prototype and Wearable Speech Processor both programmed using the F0F1F2 speech coding strategy. The second experiment compared performance with the Mini Speech Processor programmed with the Multi-Peak speech coding strategy and the Wearable Speech Processor programmed with the F0F1F2 speech coding strategy. Performance was evaluated in the sound-only condition using recorded speech tests presented in quiet and in noise. Questionnaires and informal reports provided information about use in everyday life. In experiment I, there was no significant difference in performance using the Wearable Speech Processor and prototype on any of the tests. Nevertheless, six out of seven subjects preferred the prototype for use in everyday life. In experiment II, performance on open-set tests in quiet and noise was significantly higher with the Mini Speech Processor (Multi-Peak speech coding strategy) than with the Wearable Speech Processor. Subjects reported an increase in their ability to communicate with other people using the Mini Speech Processor (Multi-Peak speech coding strategy) compared with the Wearable Speech Processor in everyday life.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Multichannel cochlear implantation in children: a summary of current work at the University of Melbourne.

This paper summarizes research work relating to multichannel cochlear implantation in children at the University of Melbourne. Ongoing safety studies relating to the implantation of young children are discussed. Results of these studies suggest that special design considerations are necessary for a prosthesis to be implanted in children under the age of 2 years. Results of clinical assessment of implanted children and adolescents are also discussed in terms of speech perception, speech production, and language development, and some possible predictive factors are suggested. Preliminary data suggests that a high proportion of young children can achieve open-set speech perception with the cochlear implant given appropriate training and support. Initial results with adults using new speech processing hardware and a new coding scheme are also presented. These suggest that improved speech perception in quiet and competing noise is possible with the new system.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors.

Vowel and consonant confusion matrices were collected in the hearing alone (H), lipreading alone (L), and hearing plus lipreading (HL) conditions for 28 patients participating in the clinical trial of the multiple-channel cochlear implant. All patients were profound-to-totally deaf and "hearing" refers to the presentation of auditory information via the implant. The average scores were 49% for vowels and 37% for consonants in the H condition and the HL scores were significantly higher than the L scores. Information transmission and multidimensional scaling analyses showed that different speech features were conveyed at different levels in the H and L conditions. In the HL condition, the visual and auditory signals provided independent information sources for each feature. For vowels, the auditory signal was the major source of duration information, while the visual signal was the major source of first and second formant frequency information. The implant provided information about the amplitude envelope of the speech and the estimated frequency of the main spectral peak between 800 and 4000 Hz, which was useful for consonant recognition. A speech processor that coded the estimated frequency and amplitude of an additional peak between 300 and 1000 Hz was shown to increase the vowel and consonant recognition in the H condition by improving the transmission of first formant and voicing information.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed1987

Acoustic parameters measured by a formant-estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

In order to assess the limitations imposed on a cochlear implant system by a wearable speech processor, the parameters extracted from a set of 11 vowels and 24 consonants were examined. An estimate of the fundamental frequency EF 0 was derived from the zero crossings of the low-pass filtered envelope of the waveform. Estimates of the first and second formant frequencies EF 1 and EF 2 were derived from the zero crossings of the waveform, which was filtered in the ranges 300-1000 and 800-4000 Hz. Estimates of the formant amplitudes EA 1 and EA 2 were derived by peak detectors operating on the outputs of the same filters. For vowels, these parameters corresponded well to the first and second formants and gave sufficient information to identify each vowel. For consonants, the relative levels and onset times of EA 1 and EA 2 and the EF 0 values gave cues to voicing. The variation in time of EA 1, EA 2, EF 1, and EF 2 gave cues to the manner of articulation. Cues to the place of articulation were given by EF 1 and EF 2. When pink noise was added, the parameters were gradually degraded as the signal-to-noise ratio decreased. Consonants were affected more than vowels, and EF 2 was affected more than EF 1. Results for three good patients using a speech processor that coded EF 0 as an electric pulse rate, EF 1 and EF 2 as electrode positions, and EA 1 and EA 2 as electric current levels confirmed that the parameters were useful for recognition of vowels and consonants. Average scores were 76% for recognition of 11 vowels and 71% for 12 consonants in the hearing-alone condition. The error rates were 4% for voicing, 12% for manner, and 25% for place.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed1987

Recent developments with the nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant: a new two formant speech coding strategy and its performance in background noise.

A clinical evaluation of speech processing strategies for the Nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant showed improvements in understanding speech using the new FOF1F2 speech coding strategy instead of the F0F2 strategy. Significant improvement in closed-set speech recognition in the presence of background noise was an additional advantage of the new speech processing strategy.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed1985

Telephone use by a multi-channel cochlear implant patient. An evaluation using open-set CID sentences.

A totally deaf person with a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis obtained open-set speech discrimination using the telephone. CID Everyday Sentences were presented by telephone to the patient, who repeated an average of 21 per cent of key words correctly on the first presentation, and 47 per cent when a repeat of the sentences was permitted. This result is consistent with the patient's reports of telephone usage.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Clinical trial of a multi-channel cochlear prosthesis: results on 10 postlingually deaf patients.

The clinical trial of a multi-channel cochlear prosthesis has been carried out on 10 profoundly-totally deaf adult patients. Speech perception tests have shown that all the patients received significant benefit from the device. They obtained improvements in understanding running speech from 47% to 550% when using the device in conjunction with lipreading compared to lipreading alone. With an open-set CID sentence test, three patients obtained scores showing an ability to understand speech without the need to lipread, and a further three patients had scores indicating they could also receive useful information without lipreading. In two patients, very limited open-set scores for electrical stimulation alone were obtained. This was most probably due to the fact that only a few channels of stimulation were possible due to cochlear disease, and they were therefore receiving information more like a single-channel device. The prosthesis has also been found to provide considerable help in hearing and recognizing everyday sounds.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

The nucleus multi-channel implantable hearing prosthesis.

The Nucleus Multi-channel Implantable Hearing Prosthesis was developed in conjunction with the University of Melbourne. A 22 channel flexible electrode array is inserted into the cochlea through a round window opening. A cable leads from the electrode array to a demountable connector mounted on the Receiver-Stimulator unit (RSU). A custom CMOS integrated circuit is mounted inside the hermetically sealed titanium and ceramic RSU which is encased in silicone rubber and measures 34.5 mm diameter and 10.5 mm thick. Biphasic current pulse stimuli can be delivered to any selected electrode pairs at rates in excess of 1 kHz. A pocket-sized speech processor extracts spectral information from the incoming acoustic signal, and encodes stimulus information onto the single RF power/data signal transmitted to the RSU through the skin. The Speech Processor includes electronic memory circuits which are programmed with the information mapping acoustic parameters to stimulation parameters for each electrode for each patient. This MAP is established as a result of psychophysical experiments performed by the audiologist using the Diagnostic and Programming System based on a customized microcomputer.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed1984

A signal processor for a multiple-electrode hearing prosthesis.

A 22-electrode implantable hearing prosthesis uses a wearable speech processor which estimates three speech signal parameters. These are voice pitch, second formant frequency and flattened spectrum amplitude. The signal is monitored continuously for periodicity in the range 80-400 Hz and, if this is present, stimulation occurs at the same rate. Otherwise, as in the case of unvoiced sounds, it occurs at the random rate of fluctuation of the signal envelope. The second formant is obtained by filtering to extract the dominant peak in the midband region and by continuous measurement of the zero crossing rate. The amplitude measured is that of the whole speech spectrum, pre-emphasized by differentiation. The values that are presented to the patient are the parameter estimates immediately prior to the stimulation pulse. Second formant frequency is coded by selection of an appropriate electrode in the cochlea and amplitude by a suitably controlled current. Automatic gain control is used to keep the dynamic range of the amplitude estimate within the 30 dB range of the circuitry.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed1983

Clinical trial of a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis. An initial study in four patients with profound total hearing loss.

The clinical trial of a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis was undertaken in four patients with postlingual deafness and profound total hearing loss. The results of open-set speech tests confirmed that, using electrical stimulation alone, one patient could have a meaningful conversation without resorting to lipreading (for example, this patient uses the prosthesis to converse with her husband on the telephone). The results of closed-set speech tests also suggested that a multiple-channel stimulator is more effective than a single-channel one in conveying speech information. The cochlear prosthesis was especially effective in all four patients when it was used in conjunction with lipreading, and speech-tracking tests showed that the patients could combine the information obtained from both electrical stimulation and lipreading.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient.

A consonant confusion study was undertaken on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient using a wearable speech processing device. This patient suffered from total bilateral deafness acquired postlingually. The consonants /b/, /p/, /m/, /v/, /f/, /d/, /t/, /n/, /z/, /s/, /g/, /k/ were presented in a VCV context with the vowel /a/ as in father by a male and female speaker under three conditions: lipreading alone; electrical stimulation alone using the wearable speech processor and multiple-channel cochlear implant; lipreading in conjunction with electrical stimulation. No significant difference was detected between the results for the male and female speakers. The percentage correct scores for the pooled results of both speakers were lipreading alone--30%; electrical stimulation alone--48%; lipreading with electrical stimulation--70%. Performance was significantly better for lipreading with electrical stimulation than for lipreading alone and for electrical stimulation alone than for lipreading alone. An information transmission analysis demonstrated the effective integration of visual and auditory information for lipreading with electrical stimulation. There was a significant improvement in performance for the electrical stimulation alone condition over the 2 months of the study in contrast to no such improvement for lipreading alone.

Cochlear Implants↗