Biomedical subjects

Paola Vagli

Publications and source records attributed to Paola Vagli.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization.

We aimed to compare the time efficiency of three visualization methods in CT colonography and to identify the colonic factors influencing the time for interpretation. Twenty CT colonographic examinations were prospectively analysed. Three reading methods were adopted: method 1, primary 2D analysis with the use of virtual endoscopy as problem solver, method 2, primary standard virtual endoscopy with semiautomatic navigation through the colon and use of 2D images as problem solver; method 3, primary virtual endoscopy with automatic navigation and the use of 2D images as problem solver. In method 1, time for 2D analysis ranged between 6 and 18min (mean 12) for evaluation of both supine and prone decubitus with a synchronization method. In method 2, time for 3D manual navigation in supine plus prone ranged between 9 and 24min (mean 17). In method 3, time for automated navigation ranged between 6 and 20min (mean 12) for evaluation of both supine and prone decubitus. A statistically significant difference was found between time efficiency of methods 1 and 2 (p=0.009, t-test, unequal variances). Methods 2 and 3 showed a tendency to significant differences (p=0.054, t-test, unequal variances). Faecal or fluid residuals were reported as major drawbacks in 3D navigations, requiring constant correlation with 2D images; tortuous folds influenced mostly the 2D analysis; diverticula were reported as influencing factor in all three methods. No differences in sensitivity and specificity were observed between the three viewing methods. The 3D semiautomatic navigation method* tended to increase the time for interpretation in almost all cases. There is, in particular, greatest time efficiency for 2D analysis as compared with 3D manual analysis. Two-dimensional and automated 3D navigation reading have comparable time efficiencies in a routine clinical setting.

Colonography, Computed Tomographic↗

PubMed2006

Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting.

The extent measurement error on CT colonography influences polyp categorisation according to established management guidelines is studied using twenty-eight observers of varying experience to classify polyps seen at CT colonography as either 'medium' (maximal diameter 6-9 mm) or 'large' (maximal diameter 10 mm or larger). Comparison was then made with the reference diameter obtained in each patient via colonoscopy. The Bland-Altman method was used to assess agreement between observer measurements and colonoscopy, and differences in measurement and categorisation was assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared test statistics respectively. Observer measurements on average underestimated the diameter of polyps when compared to the reference value, by approximately 2-3 mm, irrespective of observer experience. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement were relatively wide for all observer groups, and had sufficient span to encompass different size categories for polyps. There were 167 polyp observations and 135 (81%) were correctly categorised. Of the 32 observations that were miscategorised, 5 (16%) were overestimations and 27 (84%) were underestimations (i.e. large polyps misclassified as medium). Caution should be exercised for polyps whose colonographic diameter is below but close to the 1-cm boundary threshold in order to avoid potential miscategorisation of advanced adenomas.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

PubMed2006

CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting.

Our purpose was to assess the effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings on interpretation time for CT colonography. Nine radiologists (experienced in CT colonography); nine radiologists and ten technicians (both groups trained using 50 validated examinations) read 40 cases (50% abnormal) under controlled conditions. Individual interpretation times for each case were recorded, and differences between groups determined. Multi-level linear regression was used to investigate effect of scan category (normal or abnormal) and observer fatigue on interpretation times. Experienced radiologists (mean time 10.9 min, SD 5.2) reported significantly faster than less experienced radiologists and technicians; odds ratios of reporting times 1.4 (CI 1.1, 1.8) and 1.6 (1.3, 2.0), respectively (P<or=0.001). Experienced and less-experienced radiologists took longer to report abnormal cases; ratio 1.2 (CI 1.1,1.4, P<0.001) and 1.2 (1.0, 1.3, P=0.03), respectively. All groups took 70% as long to report the final five cases as they did with an initial five; ratio 0.7 (CI 0.6 to 0.8), P<0.001. For technicians only, accuracy increased with longer reporting times (P=0.04). Experienced radiologists report faster than do less-experienced observers and proportionally spend less time interpreting normal cases. Technicians who report more slowly are more accurate. All groups reported faster as the study period progressed.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2004

CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: long-term results.

The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of osteoid osteoma (OO). From 1997 to 2001, RF ablation was performed on 38 patients with OO, diagnosed clinically and by radiography, scintigraphy, contrast-enhanced MRI, and CT. Treatment was performed via percutaneous (n=29) or surgical (n=9) access, under CT guidance in all cases, with an 18-gauge straight electrode. Patients were discharged within 24 h and followed up clinically (at 1 week and every 6-12 months) and with MRI (at 6 months) and scintigraphy (after 1 year). The technical success rate was 100%. Complications occurred in two patients, consisting in local skin burns. The follow-up range was 12-66 months (mean +/- SD, 35.5+/-7.5 months). Prompt pain relief and return to normal activities were observed in 30 of 38 patients. Persistent pain occurred in eight patients; two patients refused further RF ablation and were treated surgically; RF ablation was repeated in six cases achieving successful results in five. One patient reported residual pain and is being evaluated for surgical excision. Primary and secondary clinical success rates were 78.9 (30/38 patients) and 97% (35/36 patients), respectively. CT-guided RF ablation of OO is safe and effective. Persistent lesions can be effectively re-treated. Several imaging modalities are needed for the diagnosis of OO and for the follow-up after treatment, particularly in patients with persistent symptoms.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Double-contrast MR colonography: in vivo experimental study in an animal model.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of double-contrast MR colonography in detecting colorectal tumors experimentally induced by chemical substances in the large bowel of the rat. MATERIAL/METHODS: Eight Sprague-Dawley rats developed 67 chemically induced tumors of the large bowel. The animals were imaged with a double-contrast MR technique at 0.5T, using a head coil for both signal transmission and reception. Prior to MR acquisition, room air was insufflated into the rats' large bowel. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1, proton-density and T2 sequences were obtained in the axial and coronal planes. Autopsy was performed immediately after MR examination. MR images were interpreted by consensus of two observers, and the results were compared with post-mortem data. RESULTS: Sensitivity (60% vs. 93%), specificity (63% vs. 81%), positive (85% vs. 93%) and negative (30% vs. 81%) predictability, and global diagnostic accuracy (60% vs. 89%) were obtained for all tumors (n=67) and for the group of tumors larger than 1.5 cm (n=43), respectively. No tumors less than 1.5 cm were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Double-contrast MR colonography is a promising modality in detecting colorectal neoplasms larger than 1.5 cm in an animal tumor model.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate computed tomographic (CT) colonography in patients with clinical suspicion of colorectal cancer and in whom colonoscopy was incomplete. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After incomplete colonoscopy, 34 patients underwent CT colonography before and after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast agent, in supine and prone positions. Twenty patients with no evidence of colon cancer after complete colonoscopy were included as a control group. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography were determined for detection of cancers, polyps, and metastases to liver. RESULTS: In 29 patients, surgery revealed 30 colorectal cancers (three synchronous cancers) and two ischemic lesions of the descending colon. Colonoscopy missed 10 colorectal cancers and three synchronous cancers; all were detected with CT colonography. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of colorectal cancer were 56% and 92%, respectively, for incomplete colonoscopy and 100% and 96%, respectively, for CT colonography (P <.01). Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography in detection of polyps were 86% and 70%, respectively, for diameters of 5 mm or less; 100% and 80%, respectively, for 5-10-mm diameters; and 100% for diameters greater than 10 mm. Spiral CT of the liver revealed four metastases (2-5 cm); sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 43% for nonenhanced scans and 100% for contrast-enhanced scans (P <.01). CONCLUSION: In this selected group of patients, CT colonography provided complete information to properly address surgery of colorectal cancer and treatment of liver metastases.

Adult↗