PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Carron

Publications and source records attributed to R Carron.

30 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[Non specific immunity of children with selective IgA deficiency. Aggravating role of abnormal phenotype of alpha-1-antitrypsin (author's transl)].

Among 998 children with recurrent respiratory diseases 26 children with selective IgA deficiency were found. Three groups were considered according to IgA level in serum: group I with IgA under 0.05 g per litre; group II with IgA between 0.05 and 0.3 g per litre; group III with IgA above 0.3 and under 1 g per litre. Non specific immunity was studied in these patients including immunoglobulin levels, alpha-1-antitrypsin (A.A.T.) phenotypes, phagocytosis of staphylococcus aureus by PMN, lysozyme level, complement system. Cellular immunity was evaluated by IDR tests and rosette forming cells (RE). Only non specific immune systems were disturbed in some patients and appeared as aggravating factors in IgA deficient patients. We found: Abnormal phenotypes of ATT in 11 cases; deficiencies of engulfment in 6 cases, of bactericidal activities of PMN in 7 cases out of 16 studied; decrease of lysozyme level in 4 cases out of 17 studied; increase of IgE level in 9 cases with atopic symptoms in 7 patients. In our experience the chief aggravating factor in IgA deficient patients is abnormal phenotype of AAT.

Adolescent↗

[Maprotiline versus fluvoxamine: comparison of their effects on the hypothalamo-hypophyseal-thyroid axis].

The TRH test has been used in psychiatry these last 20 years. One of the most promising results is that concerning the possibility to use it to identify the best moment to stop a treatment after clinical recovery of the depressive episode. For that it is necessary to demonstrate an absence of intrinsic action of antidepressants on the HPT axis physiology. This overt, randomized study has compared the actions on T3, T4, basal TSH and its response to the TRH test after 75 mg/day of maprotiline and 100 mg/day of fluvoxamine, both administrated in depressed patients during 28 days. Forty patients (20 men and 20 women) were studied, 20 patients per treatment. The inclusion criteria were those of DSM III-R for major depression and dysthymia as well a minimum score of 25 at MADRS scale. Blood samples for T3, T4 and basal TSH dosages were made before TRH intranasal administration (2 mg) at days 1 and 28 of the treatment. We haven't observed any difference before treatment between the 2 groups for clinical and biological studied parameters. After treatment both antidepressants produced equivalent improvement of depression evaluated by MADRS (fluvoxamine:dMADRS = 16.95 +/- 7.11; maprotiline: dMADRS = 17.10 +/- 6.84. t = 0.07, NS). T3 and T4 variations between the beginning and the end of the study weren't also significantly different between the 2 groups. Basal TSH was increased in the maprotiline group but decreased in the fluvoxamine group resulting in a significant difference (fluvoxamine: dTSH = 0.31 +/- 0.76 mUI/l. Maprotiline : dTSH = -0.23 +/- 0.66 mUI/l. t = 2.40, p < 0.02). The TSH response to TRH was decreased in the fluvoxamine group (ddTSH = 0.24 +/- 6.65 mUI/l. dAUC = 103.98 +/- 596.84 mUI/l) while it was increased in the maprotiline group (ddTSH = -3.59 +/- 5.88 mUI/l. dAUC = -355.80 +/- 505.67 mUI.min/l). The difference between the 2 treatments was not significant when evaluated by ddTSH (t = 1.53, NS) but it became significant if evaluated by dAUC (t = 2.63, p < 0.01). As we could demonstrate an absence of influence of the clinical evolution between both groups in the hormonal variations observed, we concluded to a intrinsic difference action on HPT axis between fluvoxamine and maprotiline. This difference could be linked to the different aminergic action of these 2 antidepressants.

Adult↗