PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R D Gelber

Publications and source records attributed to R D Gelber.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to ascertain whether immunohistochemical methods could improve the detection of metastases in primary breast-cancer patients whose axillary lymph nodes were classified, by conventional methods, as disease free. METHODS: Ipsilateral lymph nodes (negative for metastases by routine histology) from 736 patients (participants in Trial V of the International [Ludwig] Breast Cancer Study) were examined by serial sectioning and staining with haematoxylin and eosin (two sections from each of six levels) and by immunohistochemistry of a single section (with two anticytokeratins AE-1 and CAM 5.2). After median follow-up of 12 years, disease-free and overall survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. FINDINGS: Occult nodal metastases were detected by serial sectioning and haematoxylin and eosin in 52 (7%) of 736 patients and by immunohistochemistry in 148 (20%). Only two (3%) of 64 invasive lobular or mixed invasive lobular and ductal cancers had node micrometastases, detected by haematoxylin and eosin, compared with 25 (39%) by immunohistochemistry. Occult metastases, detected by either method, were associated with significantly poor disease-free and overall survival in postmenopausal but not in premenopausal patients. Immunohistochemically detected occult lymph-node metastases remained an independent and highly significant predictor of recurrence even after control for tumour grade, tumour size, oestrogen-receptor status, vascular invasion, and treatment assignment (hazard ratio 1.79 [95% CI 1.17-2.74], p=0.007). INTERPRETATION: The immunohistochemical examination of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes is a reliable, prognostically valuable, and simple method for the detection of occult nodal metastases. Immunohistochemistry is recommended as a standard method of node examination in postmenopausal patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Induction failure in acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood.

BACKGROUND: Although it is widely accepted that failure to achieve complete remission (CR) portends a poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), there is variability in the precise definition of induction failure and, to the authors' knowledge, few published data exist regarding the outcome of patients who are slow to achieve CR. METHODS: Between 1987-1995, 774 children with ALL were treated on 2 consecutive protocols and were evaluable to assess the time required to attain CR. The authors compared presenting characteristics and outcomes of patients based on their remission status after 1 month of induction chemotherapy: CR (n = 656), protracted hypoplasia (low peripheral blood counts and/or hypocellular marrow) (n = 95), and persistent leukemia (M2 or M3 bone marrow and/or evidence of extramedullary leukemia) (n = 23). The median follow-up was 5.2 years. RESULTS: Presenting features that predicted persistent leukemia included a leukocyte count > 100,000/mm3 and T-cell phenotype. Approximately 91% of patients with persistent leukemia and 100% with protracted hypoplasia eventually achieved CR. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) (95% confidence intervals [95% CI] in parentheses) for patients with persistent leukemia after 1 month was 16% (95% CI, 0%, 31%), which was significantly worse (P < 0.001) than that for those who achieved CR within 1 month (5-year EFS, 82%; 95% CI, 79%, 86%) and that for those with protracted hypoplasia (5-year EFS, 79%; 95% CI, 70%, 87%). For patients with persistent leukemia, there was no significant difference in survival based on bone marrow status (M2 or M3) after 1 month or on the number of induction cycles received before achieving CR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent leukemia at the end of 1 month of therapy have a dismal prognosis, regardless of when they subsequently achieve CR. More intensive and/or novel therapies should be considered for this subset of patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Quality-adjusted survival after treatment for acute myeloid leukemia in childhood: A Q-TWiST analysis of the Pediatric Oncology Group Study 8821.

PURPOSE: To describe quality-of-life considerations in post-remission therapies for children with acute myelogenous leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A quality-adjusted survival analysis, using the quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) method, was applied to Pediatric Oncology Group Trial 8821, which compared randomized assignment with intensive consolidation chemotherapy (CC) or autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Nonrandomized assignment to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo BMT) on the basis of availability of a matched related donor was also evaluated. A 25-patient cohort provided data for modeling chronic graft-versus-host disease. The Q-TWiST analysis was performed based on the intent-to-treat principle. RESULTS: As previously reported, the 3-year event-free survival was not significantly different between the randomized arms (CC v ABMT). At a median follow-up of 5 years (of the censoring distribution), the CC group had less time in toxicity (TOX) and more time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST), relapse-free time, and alive time than patients assigned to ABMT (none of these were statistically significant). Compared with the CC group, allo BMT patients spent more time in TOX (P <.001), more time in TWiST (P =.06), and had more relapse-free time (P =.03) and time alive (P =.07). Allo BMT was superior to ABMT with greater time in TWiST (P =.02), relapse-free time (P =.01), and time alive P =.002). CONCLUSION: The Q-TWiST analysis is a powerful decision aid in choosing among alternative therapies. Prospective information on patient preferences will facilitate future trials evaluating treatment outcomes. Refinements in the Q-TWiST method could be included to further enhance the power of this patient care decision-making tool.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

The importance of the histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Histologic grade is well recognized for its prognostic significance in cases of primary operable invasive breast carcinoma; however, the majority of studies in which grade has been assessed have been based on single-center trials. In addition, the role of grade in predicting response to chemotherapy has not been examined in many previous studies. METHODS: The authors assessed the value of Nottingham histologic grade (NHG) in a group of 465 patients enrolled in a multicenter, randomized International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with lymph node (LN) positive and LN negative primary breast carcinoma (formerly named Ludwig Trial V). RESULTS: NHG was a predictor of overall survival for both LN negative and LN positive patients (P=0.045 and P < 0.001, respectively). NHG was associated with a poorer prognosis for both LN positive and LN negative patients, with hazard ratios of 1.651 (P < 0.001) and 1.437 (P=0.045), respectively, for an increase of one grade. Among LN negative patients, this survival disadvantage was observed only for those who received perioperative chemotherapy. For LN positive patients, an increase of one grade resulted in a significant overall survival disadvantage regardless of whether prolonged or perioperative chemotherapy was given. For LN negative patients grouped by grade, there was no observed difference in overall or disease free survival according to whether perioperative chemotherapy or no adjuvant therapy was given. However, LN positive patients with Grade 3 tumors had a significantly greater overall and disease free survival benefit from prolonged chemotherapy than from perioperative chemotherapy (P=0.016 and P=0.013, respectively); LN positive patients with Grade 1 or 2 disease in both treatment arms had comparable overall and disease free survival. A strong correlation between the previously utilized Bloom-Richardson grading system (BRG) and NHG was observed (P < 0.001 and kappa=82%) and no apparent differences in overall and disease free survival were observed between the two systems. NHG did, however, identify a greater proportion of tumors as Grade 1, and BRG identified a greater proportion of breast carcinomas as Grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter clinical study confirms the value of histologic grade, and the authors propose that this technique be used to identify Grade 3, LN positive patients who will benefit from prolonged rather than perioperative chemotherapy.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1998

Quality adjusted survival analysis with repeated quality of life measures.

One way of examining trade-offs between quantity and quality of life (QOL) is to combine them into a single measure such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY). If censoring occurs, then estimation presents some difficulties. One approach, known as Q-TWiST, is to define a series of health states, use a 'partitioned' survival analysis to calculate the average time in each state, and then weight each state according to its quality of life to calculate QALYs. Such health-state models, however, are unhelpful when the transitions between health states are unclear or if they do not adequately reflect variations in quality of life. We therefore examine an alternative analysis to be used when repeated measures of quality of life are available from individual patients in a clinical trial. The method proceeds by separating quality of life and survival, that is, dQALY/dt = S(t)Q(t), where S(t) is the survival curve, estimated from the standard Kaplan-Meier method, and Q(t) is the quality of life function, derived from individual repeated measures of quality of life. We derive single health-state (QALY) and multiple health-state (Q-TWiST) models and illustrate the approach by comparing different durations of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Quality of life assessment in the adjuvant setting: is it relevant? International Breast Cancer Study Group.

In the breast cancer adjuvant therapy setting, the critical issue to consider in treatment decision-making is the tradeoff between quality and quantity of life. The toxicities of adjuvant therapies, both acute and late, must be balanced against the potential benefits of delayed recurrence and improved survival. The question should be addressed concerning when quality-of-life assessment is relevant in the adjuvant setting. Such assessments can inform patients about what to expect from their treatment, describe quality-of-life differences between treatments, provide an additional baseline measure with potential prognostic significance, inform clinicians about their patients' experiences with toxicities, indicate situations in which psychosocial interventions might be useful, and document patient adaptation to diagnosis and treatment. The relevance of quality-of-life assessment in the adjuvant setting can be illustrated by investigating one of the most controversial questions of today: When should chemotherapy be added to tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients? Data from the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VII showed that adding 3 months of CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1-14; methotrexate 40 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 8; fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 8; repeated every 28 days) to tamoxifen significantly improved disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen alone. The Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease or Toxicity of treatment (QTWiST) method was used to compare the adjuvant therapies with respect to quality-adjusted survival. The analysis indicated that the decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting should be based on patient preferences concerning the relative importance of treatment toxicity versus disease recurrence.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1998

Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI.

Adjuvant chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea has been shown to be associated with reduced relapses and improved survival for premenopausal breast cancer patients. Amenorrhoea was, therefore, studied to define features of chemotherapy (i.e. duration and timing) and disease-related factors which are associated with its treatment effects. We reviewed data from IBCSG Trial VI, in which accrual was between July 1986 and April 1993. 1196 of the 1475 eligible patients (81%) were evaluable for this analysis. The median follow-up was 60 months. Women who experienced amenorrhoea had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) than those who did not (P = 0.0004), although the magnitude of the effect was reduced when adjusted for other prognostic factors (P = 0.09). The largest treatment effect associated with amenorrhoea was seen in patients assigned to receive only three initial CMF courses (5-yr DFS: 67% versus 49%, no amenorrhoea; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P = 0.002). DFS differences between amenorrhoea categories were larger for patients with ER/PR positive tumours (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, patients whose menses returned after brief amenorrhoea had a DFS similar to those whose menses ceased and did not recover (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.62; P = 0.63). The effects associated with a permanent or temporary chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea are especially significant for node-positive breast cancer patients who receive a suboptimal duration of CMF chemotherapy. Cessation of menses, even for a limited time period after diagnosis of breast cancer, might be beneficial and should be prospectively investigated, especially in patients with oestrogen receptor-positive primaries.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

There is evidence in the literature of a relationship between dose and response to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, although published results are conflicting. We therefore retrospectively analysed the role of dose response in patients included in four adjuvant trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG, formerly the Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group (trials I, II, III and V), all using 'classical' cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). A total of 1385 node-positive patients were treated with oral cyclophosphamide, and intravenous methotrexate plus 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for at least six 4 week courses. 1350 of these were included in 6 month landmark treatment outcome analyses. A total of 1029 patients were premenopausal, 321 were postmenopausal; 800 had one to three and 550 more than three involved axillary nodes at surgery. The median follow-up ranged from 12 years for trial V to 15 years for trials I-III. Patients were grouped according to three prospectively defined dose levels based on the percentage of the protocol prescribed dose that was actually administered (level I > or = 85%, level II 65-84%, level III < 65%). Patients who received dose level II had a higher disease-free (P = 0.07) and overall survival (P = 0.03) than those who received a higher (level I) or lower (level III) percentage. The 10 year overall survival was 60% for dose level II, 56% for dose level I, 51% for dose level III. The results were generally consistent within trial, menopausal status, and oestrogen receptor status groups. The results within nodal groups showed a large difference among the dose levels for the group with one to three positive nodes (P = 0.02), but no difference for the group with four or more positive nodes. Our results indicate that the dose-response effect remains a crucial factor in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Reductions larger than 35% in the dose administered of oral CMF adversely influenced the outcome of breast cancer patients and should be avoided. The better outcome of the intermediate dose group indicates the need to investigate other aspects involved in the cytotoxicity of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Adding adjuvant CMF chemotherapy to either radiotherapy or tamoxifen: are all CMFs alike? The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG).

The first reported effective adjuvant combination regimen for patients with operable breast cancer comprised oral cyclophosphamide (C) days 1-14 with intravenous methotrexate (M) and fluorouracil (F) on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days ('classical' CMF). These drugs have since been extensively used with or without endocrine therapies and/or other cytotoxics, as well as with radiation therapy to the chest wall yielding conflicting results. Although doses and schedules have varied widely, the combination of these three drugs has been generically referred to as CMF. Evidence exists that reducing the dose and/or altering the schedule of CMF ('modified' CMF) have compromised its efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. Reduction below standard dose of a similar regimen also gave inferior results in the adjuvant setting. In fact, the recently reported improved outcome of adding radiation therapy to CMF was only demonstrated in comparisons with a 'modified' CMF. Furthermore, trials in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, which did not demonstrate any significant benefit for the addition of adjuvant CMF to tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone, also used 'modified' CMF. Therefore, adherence to the 'classical' dose and schedule is recommended when CMF is used in adjuvant therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1998

New treatments for breast cancer: breakthroughs for patient care or just steps in the right direction?

Three areas of clinical research in breast cancer treatment led to news breaking presentations at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, 1998, in Los Angeles. All three subjects represent important advances in cancer medicine. PREVENTION: Two related drugs, tamoxifen and raloxifene, were found in placebo controlled trials to significantly reduce the incidence of breast cancer for women at increased risk of developing the disease. Patterns of relapse showed that the reduced rate of breast cancer was exclusively observed for tumors expressing estrogen receptors, while the rate of tumors classified as estrogen-receptor negative was similar for the treatment and the control groups. This may indicate that the observed reduction in breast cancer incidence is due to a treatment effect on occult disease rather than its prevention. We certainly have no adequate information on mortality prevention. ADJUVANT THERAPIES: Taxol given every three weeks for four courses following an adjuvant treatment with four courses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) combination was found to be superior to not adding treatment after the four courses of AC in a trial involving 3170 patients. At 22 months of median follow-up, the quoted P-values were P = 0.0077 for disease-free survival and P = 0.039 for overall survival, but these did not cross the prospectively defined interim analysis boundaries for statistical significance at the 0.05 level. The difference was observed early during follow-up, and was exclusively seen in the 40% of patients who had ER-negative primaries and, therefore, did not receive tamoxifen following chemotherapy. One may thus argue that the early difference observed was primarily due to differences in the duration of the treatment regimens in the two groups and the early entry into the trial of patients with particularly aggressive neoplasia (e.g., ER-negative primaries) who would have benefited from a longer duration treatment. TREATMENT OF ADVANCED DISEASE: The use of monoclonal antibodies to c-erb-B2 was found to induce responses in metastatic breast cancer. Patients with tumors expressing c-erb-B2 responded to weekly infusions of this biological agent. It was particularly impressive that the response rate for patients receiving infusion of the monoclonal antibodies together with the cytotoxics was superior to that with chemotherapy alone in a randomized trial. It is important to note that only patients with tumors overexpressing c-erbB-2 (the overall incidence is about 20%) were tested. It must still be demonstrated that the effect of these monoclonal antibodies is indeed confined to cells overexpressing c-erbB-2. Treatment related cardiac toxicity remains a problem, and the effects of treatment in various subsets of patients need to be defined before starting investigations in the adjuvant setting, which is a clear further objective of this specific research. The significant findings from clinical research opened several new questions, which must be answered before allowing them to be employed in routine patient care.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Factors affecting baseline quality of life in two international adjuvant breast cancer trials. International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG).

Quality of life (QL) is used to assess treatments in clinical trials but may be influenced by other factors. We analysed the impact of biomedical, sociodemographic and cultural factors on baseline QL indicators in two International Breast Cancer Study Group trials. Patients with stage II breast cancer were randomized within 6 weeks of primary surgery to various adjuvant treatments. They were asked to assess five indicators of QL at baseline. QL forms were available for 1231 (83%) of the 1475 premenopausal and 989 (82%) of the 1212 post-menopausal patients, who were from nine countries and spoke seven languages. Culture (defined as language/country groups) had a statistically significant impact on baseline QL measures. Premenopausal patients with poor prognostic factors showed a tendency to report worse QL, with oestrogen receptor status as an independent predictor for mood (P = 0.0005). Older post-menopausal patients reported better emotional wellbeing (P = 0.002), mood (P = 0.002), and less effort to cope (P = 0.0009) compared with younger post-menopausal patients. Co-morbidity, type of surgery, treatment assignment and sociodemographic factors showed a statistically significant impact in post-menopausal patients only. Cultural and biomedical factors influenced baseline QL and should be considered when evaluating the impact of treatment on QL in international breast cancer clinical trials.

Adult↗