PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R D Gelber

Publications and source records attributed to R D Gelber.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil dose and schedule may make a difference. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant cytotoxics prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with operable breast cancer. The first reported effective adjuvant combination regimen consisted of oral cyclophosphamide on days 1 to 14 with intravenous methotrexate and fluorouracil on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days (classical CMF). These drugs have since been extensively used with or without endocrine therapies and/or other cytotoxic agents. Although doses and schedules have varied widely, the combination of these three drugs is generically referred to as CMF. RESULTS: Reducing the dose and/or altering the schedule of CMF have compromised its efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. Reduction below standard dose of a similar regimen also gave inferior results in the adjuvant setting. CONCLUSION: Details of dose and schedule may therefore explain part of the heterogeneity of results observed with CMF. Particular controversy surrounds the contribution of CMF in postmenopausal women who are also receiving tamoxifen (TAM). However, the trials that demonstrated a significant benefit for the addition of CMF to TAM, even in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, used classical CMF. Therefore, adherence to the classical dose and schedule is recommended when CMF is used in adjuvant therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis of interferon alfa-2b treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma: an aid to clinical decision making.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the trade-off of toxicity versus improved clinical outcome with interferon alfa-2b (IFN) administered concomitantly with a doxorubicin-containing regimen for the treatment of advanced follicular lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis (Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity [Q-TWiST]) was applied to the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) trial 86, which compared a regimen of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, teniposide, and prednisone (CHVP) versus CHVP plus IFN in 242 patients with confirmed follicular lymphoma. CHVP was administered monthly for 6 months then every other month for 12 months. The IFN dosage was 5 x 10(6) U three times weekly for 18 months. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 72 months, the IFN group gained a mean of 12.3 months of progression-free survival (PFS) and 7.4 months of overall survival (OS), but also experienced additional time with grade 3 or worse toxicity compared with the CHVP group. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that CHVP plus IFN provided a greater amount of quality-adjusted survival regardless of the relative quality-of-life valuations placed on time with toxicity due to CVHP alone, time with toxicity due to CHVP plus IFN, and time following disease progression. This gain was significant (P < .05) in all cases except for patients who consider time with toxicity to have a low relative value and time following disease progression to have a high relative value. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced follicular lymphoma, the clinical benefits of concomitant IFN can significantly offset the associated grade 3 or worse toxic effects. The magnitude of this clinical benefit depends on an individual patient's relative quality-of-life valuations for time with toxicity and time following disease progression.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Second malignancies in patients treated for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: Second malignant neoplasms (SMN) are devastating late complications of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and its treatment. We evaluated the incidence and type of SMN diagnosed before leukemic relapse in a large series of patients with ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the outcome of all patients treated for childhood ALL between 1972 and 1995 on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and DFCI ALL Consortium protocols. The follow-up time from diagnosis of ALL to induction failure, relapse, remission death, or SMN, whichever occurred first, ranged from 0 to 24.0 years (median, 7.6 years; mean, 6.7 years). RESULTS: Thirteen SMNs were diagnosed among 1,597 patients. Eight tumors occurred in a radiation field (five in the CNS and three in the head and neck), two occurred outside of a radiation field (one adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon and one epithelioid sarcoma of the chest wall), and three were hematopoietic malignancies. The median time to occurrence was 6.7 years (range, 1.0 to 17.2 years) and the cumulative incidence of second malignancy before another first event was 2.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 4.7). The risk of a first event, which included induction failure, relapse, or remission death, was 31.0% (95% confidence interval, 28.5 to 33.5). CONCLUSION: We found a more than 10-fold risk of other first events when compared with SMN. Thus, we conclude that SMN before first relapse is a relatively uncommon occurrence among survivors of childhood ALL. Future therapeutic regimens must focus on reducing leukemia relapse and enhancing quality of life, as well as preventing SMNs.

Child↗
PubMed1997

Intensified therapy for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a very poor prognosis. Since 1985, we have intensified therapy for infants with ALL by including a month of high dose multiagent chemotherapy after remission induction. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1995, we treated 23 infants (age < 12 months). We compared the presenting characteristics and outcomes of these infants with the 11 infants treated on our protocols between 1973 and 1985, an era prior to the intensification of therapy. Available bone marrow samples from infants treated since 1985 were analyzed for the presence of MLL gene rearrangements by Southern blot analyses and for TEL-AML1 gene fusion by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.6 years, the 50-month event free survival (EFS) (+/- standard error) for the 23 infants was 54 +/- 11%, a significant improvement (P = 0.001) compared with the outcome for the 11 infants treated on our protocols prior to 1985 (EFS = 9 +/- 9%). Of the seven infants found to have a rearranged MLL gene, three (43%) remained in first complete remission. None of the nine infant bone marrow specimens tested had evidence of TEL-AML1 gene fusion. The intensified therapy was complicated by a high incidence of infections, including septicemia in 52% of patients and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis in 22% of patients. Late effects identified in the 13 long term survivors (median age, 6 years) included developmental delay and learning disabilities of varying severity (82% of evaluable patients), asymptomatic cataracts (67%), asymptomatic echocardiographic abnormalities (30%), obesity (27%), and short stature (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Intensification of therapy significantly improved the EFS of infants with ALL compared with previous, less intensive regimens and with the experience of other investigators. Future treatment for infants should attempt to improve efficacy while minimizing toxicity.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Retreating recurrent breast cancer with the same CMF-containing regimen used as adjuvant therapy. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Breast cancer metastases appearing soon after adjuvant chemotherapy (within 12 months of its completion) are usually resistant to retreatment with the same cytotoxic agents, while relapses occurring later (beyond 12 months) regress when rechallenged with the same agents, showing similar response rates observed in non-pretreated patients with advanced disease. The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) prospectively explored the efficacy of retreatment for patients upon relapse using the same therapy administered during the adjuvant programme. 87 patients previously treated with an adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) combination chemotherapy (with or without the addition of low-dose prednisone and tamoxifen), who had measurable first breast cancer relapse, usually after at least 6 months of completion of the adjuvant treatment, were treated with CMF. Pretreatment consisted of 1-3 CMF courses in 27 patients and 4 or more courses in 60 patients. 17 patients were retreated with additional tamoxifen or had tamoxifen stopped at relapse. The data of these patients are shown separately. 47 of the 86 fully evaluable patients (55%) had an objective response, which was complete in 25 (29%). The dominant metastatic type and the number of involved sites were the most important factors influencing response to retreatment. Patients with soft tissue metastases had a high response rate (36/52, 69%) compared with those who had visceral involvement (9/24, 38%) or those with bony disease (2/10, 20%) (P = 0.002). In conclusion, response rates to retreatment with CMF were similar to those expected in a non-pretreated population. The patterns of relapse and the number of metastatic sites were the most important factors predicting response to retreatment, while treatment-free interval (usually longer than 6 months due to the study design) did not influence response rates. This study supports the hypothetic effectiveness of late reintroduction of adjuvant cytotoxic therapy (prior to evidence of systemic relapse), upon which several current trials are based.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Menstrual cycle and timing of breast surgery in premenopausal node-positive breast cancer: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI.

PURPOSE: It has been postulated that breast cancer surgery performed during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle is associated with poorer outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested this hypothesis by evaluating disease-free survival (DFS) for 1033 premenopausal patients who received definitive surgery either during the follicular phase (n = 358) or the luteal phase (n = 675). All patients were enrolled in a randomized trial conducted between July 1986 and April 1993. All had node positive breast cancer and randomization was stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status. All patients received at least three cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). The median follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: Patients who underwent definitive surgery for breast cancer in the follicular phase had a slightly worse disease-free survival than those operated on during the luteal phase (five-year DFS percentage: 53% versus 58%; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.38; P = 0.20). The effect was significantly greater for the subpopulation of 300 patients with ER-negative primaries (P = 0.02 interaction effect; five-year DFS percentages 42% vs. 59%; hazard ratio 1.60; 95% CI, 1.12-2.25; P = 0.008). The effect of timing of surgery diminished for analyses based on lesser surgical procedures, e.g., excisional biopsies. In particular, no effect of timing was observed for fine needle aspiration procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical procedures which are more extensive than a fine needle aspiration biopsy might be associated with worse prognosis if conducted during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. This phenomenon was seen predominantly for high risk breast cancer with low levels or no estrogen receptors in the primary tumor.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the IBCSG approach. The International Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) has developed and approach for assessing the impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life (QL) within the framework of international, multilingual clinical trials. The major steps are summarized. Conceptual, methodological and practical issues are discussed with reference to results of two trials closed to accrual (IBCSG VI, VII) and one subsequent ongoing trial (IBCSG IX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: QL was assessed in pre- and post-menopausal patients with operable breast cancer. Various single-item linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) scales were used as indicators of components of QL, including global indicators of well-being, functioning and health perception, and specific indicators of symptoms of disease and treatment. In trials VI and VII, QL was assessed at baseline, during adjuvant treatment and follow-up, and at recurrence. Based on this experience, the QL form was revised for subsequent trials and further investigated in a subsample of patients randomized into trial IX. RESULTS: In trials VI and VII, the QL indicators were responsive to the impact of biomedical factors at baseline, various adjuvant treatments, changes over the first 18 months, and recurrence. In trial IX, the revised QL form was well accepted by patients and staff. Completing this form did not exceed five minutes. QL differences between on and off cytotoxic treatment strengthen the claim that these measures are responsive. Correlations and logistic regression analyses show the expected relationship among the various global and specific indicators. CONCLUSION: Results from two trials closed to accrual and an ongoing trial confirm the feasibility, validity and clinical relevance of the IBCSG approach for studying the impact of adjuvant breast cancer therapy on QL in international clinical trials.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Prognostic importance of thymidylate synthase expression in early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic importance of thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in breast tumors of patients with early-stage breast cancer, and to determine whether the benefit of chemotherapy (CT) is associated with TS expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The level of TS expression was evaluated in 210 node-negative and 278 node-positive patients enrolled onto Trial V of the International Breast Cancer Study Group ([IBCSG] formerly the Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group) with a median follow-up time of 8.5 years. TS expression was assessed using the immunohistochemical method with the monoclonal antibody TS 106 on paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. RESULTS: High TS expression was associated with a significantly worse prognosis in node-positive but not in node-negative breast cancer patients. Twenty-seven percent of node-positive patients with high TS expression were disease-free at 10 years, compared with 44% of node-positive patients with low TS expression (P = .03). Forty-one percent of patients with node-positive high-TS-expressing tumors were alive after 10 years, compared with 49% of those with low TS expression (P = .06). The association between TS and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was independent of other prognostic factors such as tumor size, tumor grade, nodal status, vessel invasion, estrogen receptor (ER)/ progestin receptor (PR) status, c-erb B-2, or Ki-67 expression. In node-positive patients, six cycles of standard adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil ([5-FU] CMF) CT improved DFS and OS compared with one cycle of perioperative CMF therapy. The magnitude of this benefit was greatest in patients whose tumors had high TS expression (P < .01 for DFS; P < .01 for OS). Node-negative patients demonstrated no difference in outcome to CT based on TS expression; however, the power to detect differences was limited by the small number of events in this group. CONCLUSION: In early-stage breast cancer, high TS expression is associated with a significantly worse prognosis in node-positive patients. Node-positive patients with high TS levels demonstrate the most significant improvement in DFS and OS when treated with six cycles of conventional adjuvant CMF therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

A quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy after surgery, compared with postsurgical radiation therapy alone, has been shown to improve disease-free survival and overall survival significantly among patients with poor-prognosis (i.e., advanced stage disease or metastasis to regional lymph nodes) resectable rectal cancer. However, the combined therapy is associated with more toxic effects, raising the question of whether the benefits of the treatment justify its quality-of-life costs for the individual patient. PURPOSE: To assess the trade-offs between improved survival and increased treatment toxicity, we reanalyzed data from a randomized clinical trial that compared the efficacy of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy with adjuvant radiation therapy alone in the treatment of patients with poor-prognosis resectable rectal cancer. METHODS: The data were from a North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial in which 204 patients with poor-prognosis rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative radiation therapy alone or radiation therapy plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. A quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis was used to account for freedom from symptomatic disease and from early and late side effects of treatment. All reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: As reported previously, the combined therapy reduced the risk of relapse by 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12%-50%; P = .0016) and reduced the overall death rate by 29% (95% CI = 7%-45%; P = .025) in comparison with adjuvant radiation therapy alone. In the 5 years following assignment to treatment, patients who received the combined therapy had more time with toxicity (3.1 months; 95% CI = 2.0-4.1 months), shorter survival after relapse (3.6 months less; 95% CI = 0.9-6.3 months less), and more TWiST (6.1 months; 95% CI = 0.2-12.0 months) than patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy alone. Despite an increase in the amount of time that individuals spent with early and late toxic effects, the Q-TWiST analysis indicated that the combined therapy conferred significantly greater benefit for a wide range of patient preferences about living with the toxicity of treatment or the symptoms of overt disease. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Use of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy as an adjuvant to surgery for patients with poor-prognosis resectable rectal cancer is justified, since the improved outcome in terms of delayed recurrence and increased survival balances the time spent with early and late toxic effects. The Q-TWiST method is an excellent way to compare treatment outcomes that include quality-of-life considerations.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

Timing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for patients with node-positive breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: A controversy exists regarding whether it is safe to delay radiation therapy until the completion of chemotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for patients with node-positive breast cancer. Within the context of two concurrent randomized clinical trials we had the opportunity to evaluate outcomes for patients who received breast irradiation after completing different durations of chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From July 1986 to April 1993 the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI randomly assigned 1554 pre/perimenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for either three consecutive courses on months 1-3, or six consecutive courses on months 1-6, both with or without reintroduction CMF. IBCSG Trial VII randomly assigned 1266 postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients to receive tamoxifen for 5 years, or tamoxifen for 5 years with three early cycles of CMF, both with or without three courses of delayed CMF. Both trials allowed a choice of mastectomy, or breast-conserving surgery plus radiation therapy, and both were stratified by type of surgery. Radiotherapy was delayed until the initial block of CMF was completed; 4 or 7 months after surgery for pre/perimenopausal patients, and 2 or 4 months after surgery for postmenopausal patients. Over both trials, 718 eligible patients elected to receive breast-conserving surgery plus radiation therapy: 433 on Trial VI, and 285 on Trial VII. Four-year actuarial total failure rates (failure at any site), risks of developing distant metastases (DM at any time during observation), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To avoid potential bias due to competing causes of failure, only patients who could be followed for at least 4 years (enrolled prior to July 1, 1990) were used to evaluate the patterns of first relapse site. Crude percents of local failure with or without other sites (LF), distant metastases including regional nodal failure (DM/RNF), or other first events (second primaries/death without recurrence) were estimated for each treatment group. For this report, an intent to treat analysis was performed at a median follow-up of 48 months. RESULTS: No differences were found in the 4-year actuarial total failure rates, risk of developing distant metastases, and overall survival among the two radiotherapy groups of each study. The cumulative incidence of types of first failure and the 4-year crude rates showed no treatment differences in the patterns of site of first event. Estimates for the 4-year crude percent of local failures were 8 and 9% for pre/perimenopausal patients who had radiation therapy at 4 or 7 months after surgery, and 3 and 6% for postmenopausal patients who had radiation therapy at 2 months or 4 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: For node positive patients receiving breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy, the incidence of breast recurrence in the conserved ipsilateral breast within 4 years was between 8 and 9% for pre/perimenopausal patients and between 3 and 6% for postmenopausal patients. After 48 months of median follow-up, administering radiation therapy after three or six cycles of CMF for pre/perimenopausal women, or after no cycles or three cycles of CMF for postmenopausal women does not influence overall efficacy or local control in this series.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive operable breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer is effective but may be toxic. Our aim was to investigate the impact of the presence, timing, and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients' perceptions of their quality of life (QL). METHODS: International Breast Cancer Study Group trial VI assessed adjuvant chemotherapy in 1475 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients, and trial VII assessed adjuvant tamoxifen or chemoendocrine therapy in 1212 postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients were asked to complete a QL questionnaire-single-item linear analogue self-assessment scales measured physical wellbeing, mood, appetite, and perceived adjustment/coping. QL was assessed in this way at the beginning of treatment, 2 months after the start of treatment, every 3 months, and at 1 and 6 months after recurrence. FINDINGS: Baseline QL scores decreased as the number of involved axillary nodes increased (for example, mean mood score: 66.1 for women with one positive node, 66.4 for two to four positive nodes, 61.3 for five to nine positive nodes, and 59.1 for ten or more positive nodes; p = 0.008 for trends), and were lower in patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative than in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours (61.4 vs 66.3, p = 0.0009). All treatment groups showed substantial improvement in QL scores during adjuvant therapy. Patterns of QL scores reflected presence, duration, and timing of cytotoxic treatment. Longer initial cytotoxic therapy delayed improvement in QL scores. Later cytotoxic therapy had transient adverse effects. Anticipation of future therapy also affected QL scores. INTERPRETATION: Overall, chemotherapy had a measurable adverse effect on QL, but this effect was transient and minor compared with patients' adaptation/coping after diagnosis and surgery. This finding should encourage patients and doctors to choose appropriate adjuvant therapy with less concern for initial toxicity.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1996

Adjuvant chemotherapy plus tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone for postmenopausal breast cancer: meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant tamoxifen for early breast cancer provides an improvement in relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS), especially for older women. We carried out a meta-analysis to find out whether the benefit of adding chemotherapy to tamoxifen outweighs its costs in terms of toxic effects for postmenopausal patients. METHODS: The meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival was based on data from 3920 patients aged 50 years or older with node-positive breast cancer randomly assigned in nine trials that compared combination chemotherapy plus tamoxifen with tamoxifen alone. The nine trials were included in the worldwide overview conducted by the early breast cancer trialists' collaborative group (EBCTCG). The quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) method was used to provide treatment comparisons incorporating differences in quality of life associated with subjective toxic effects of treatment and symptoms of disease relapse. FINDINGS: Within 7 years of follow-up the modest benefit of increased RFS and OS for patients who received chemotherapy just balanced the costs in terms of acute toxic side-effects. Chemotherapy-treated patients gained an average of 5.4 months of RFS and 2 months of OS (neither statistically significant), but had to receive cytotoxic treatment for between 2 and 24 months to achieve these gains. No values of preference weights for time spent undergoing chemotherapy and time after relapse gave significantly more Q-TWiST with chemotherapy plus tamoxifen than with tamoxifen alone. INTERPRETATION: Within 7 years of follow-up, adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy did not provide more quality-adjusted survival time than tamoxifen alone for women aged 50 years or older with node-positive breast cancer. Better selection and administration of chemotherapy regimen, different scheduling of chemotherapy and tamoxifen, and appropriate use of patient and tumour characteristics may increase the therapeutic advantage of the combination.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1996

The effect of adjuvant prednisone combined with CMF on patterns of relapse and occurrence of second malignancies in patients with breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The addition of low-dose prednisone (p) to the adjuvant regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) allowed patients to receive a larger dose of cytotoxics when compared with those on CMF alone. However, disease-free survival and overall survival were similar for the two groups. To test the hypothesis that low-dose prednisone might influence the efficacy of the cytotoxic regimen used, the toxicity profiles of the two treatment regimens and the patterns of treatment failure (relapse, second malignancy, or death) were examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 491 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes included in International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial I from 1978 to 1981 and randomized to receive CMF or CMFp were analyzed for differences in long-term outcome and toxic events. The 250 patients assigned to CMF and prednisone received on the average 12% more cytotoxic drugs than those who received CMF alone. RESULTS: The 13-year DFS for the CMFp group was 49% as compared to 52% for CMF alone, and the respective OS percents were 59% and 65%. Several toxic effects such as leukopenia, alopecia, mucositis and induced amenorrhea were reported at a similar incidence in the two treatment groups. Using cumulative incidence methodology for competing risks, we detected a statistically significant increase in first relapse in the skeleton for the CMFp group at 13 years follow-up with a relative risk (RR) of 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23 to 3.46; P = 0.004]. Patients with larger tumors in the CMFp regimen were especially subject to this increase with a RR for failure in the skeleton of 3.32 (95% CI, 1.57 to 7.02; P = 0.0005). CMFp-treated patients also had a larger proportion of second malignancies (not breast cancer), with RR of 3.34 (95% CI, 0.91 to 12.31; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose continuous prednisone added to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy enabled the use of higher doses of cytotoxics. This increased dose had no beneficial effect on treatment outcome, but was associated with an increased risk for bone relapses and a small, not statistically significant increased incidence of second malignancies. The effects of steroids, which are widely used as antiemetics (oral or pulse injection) together with cytotoxics, should be investigated to identify their influence upon treatment outcome.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1996

Responsiveness of a single-item indicator versus a multi-item scale: assessment of emotional well-being in an international adjuvant breast cancer trial.

A single-item linear analogue self-assessment scale for mood was compared with a 28-item adjective checklist for emotional well-being. To confirm its concurrent validity and responsiveness to treatment and recurrence in patients with breast cancer, emotional well-being was assessed every 3 months for 2 years and at 1 and 6 months after recurrence in 1,169 patients who were premenopausal and 960 patients who were postmenopausal. These patients were enrolled in two International Breast Cancer Study Group randomized clinical trials in operable breast cancer conducted from 1986 to 1993. To assess concurrent validity, Pearson's correlation between the linear analogue self-assessment scale and the adjective checklist were calculated for each time-point within each treatment group and for the two assessments after recurrence. Responsiveness to treatment and recurrence were analyzed using paired t tests and the squared ratio of these t tests, an estimate of relative efficiency. Concurrent validity of the mood linear analogue self-assessment was consistently confirmed across four language groups. Both measures were responsive; out of 24 changes over time, 19 were in the expected direction for the linear analogue self-assessment scale (p < or = 0.05 for 9 of 19) and 17 for the adjective checklist (p < or = 0.05 for 10 of 17). The linear analogue self-assessment scale was less but significantly efficient for detection of treatment effects, with relative efficiency estimates ranging from 0.16 to 2.45 and a median of 0.66 among the comparisons with relatively stable estimates (/t/ > or = 1.0) and more efficient for recurrence than the adjective checklist. The mood linear analogue self-assessment scale is a valid indicator of emotional well-being in patients with breast cancer in large multicenter, multicultural trials in which comprehensive scales are less feasible. This investigation supports the clinical relevance of linear analogue self-assessment scales as indicators of components of quality of life in cancer clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis of interferon alfa-2b adjuvant treatment of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality-of-life effects of adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFN alpha 2b) treatment of high-risk melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis (Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms, and Toxicity [Q-TWiST]) was applied to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E1684, which compared high-dose IFN alpha 2b treatment for 1 year versus observation in 280 high-risk patients. IFN alpha 2b was administered at a dosage of 20 mU/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days per week for 4 weeks, and then three times weekly at 10 mU/m2 subcutaneously for 48 weeks. RESULTS: After 84 months of median follow-up time, the IFN alpha 2b group gained a mean of 8.9 months without disease relapse (P = .03) and 7.0 months of overall survival (P = .07) as compared with the observation group, but had severe treatment-related toxicity for 5.8 months, on average. The IFN alpha 2b group had more quality-of-life-adjusted time than the observation group regardless of the relative valuations placed on time with toxicity (Tox) and time with relapse (Rel). This gain was significant (P < .05) for patients who consider Tox to have a high relative value and Rel to have a low relative value. In contrast, for patients who value Tox about the same as Rel, the quality-adjusted gain for IFN alpha 2b was not statistically significant. An analysis stratified according to tumor burden indicated that the benefit of IFN alpha 2b was greatest in the node-positive strata. CONCLUSION: For patients with high-risk melanoma, the clinical benefits of high-dose IFN alpha 2b can offset the toxic effects. The optimal treatment for an individual patient depends on the patient's tumor burden and preferences regarding toxicity and disease relapse.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Endocrine therapies of breast cancer.

Endocrine therapies for breast cancer have been used for more than a century. The concept that changing the hormonal balance of the patient with breast cancer could lead to changes in tumor growth and regression of metastatic disease was recognized even before hormones and endocrine agents were available. Ablation of ovaries, adrenals, or hypophysis was used in advanced disease to obtain tumor regression and control of symptoms. Ovarian ablation was also tested for operable breast cancer showing a significant beneficial treatment effect. Several endocrine agents have been developed in recent years: estrogens, androgens, progestins, antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs, antiprogestins, and antiandrogens. The use of some of these agents in advanced disease led to investigations in early breast cancer: tamoxifen was the drug which was most extensively tested, showing a significant long-term benefit for treated patients. Progestins (medroxyprogesterone acetate) and aromatase inhibitors (aminoglutethimide) were also tested in a few clinical trials, but no conclusive recommendations for their use in patients with operable disease may be formulated. The most important current challenges for the appropriate use of endocrine therapies in breast cancer include (1) understanding the effect of endocrine therapies and the mechanisms of resistance associated with their use; (2) developing new agents with novel endocrine antitumor effect; (3) defining the best way to combine endocrine agents with cytotoxics or with other endocrine manipulations; and (4) identifying long-term effects of endocrine agents in terms of disease control and prevention, as well as desirable and undesirable side effects.

Aminoglutethimide↗