PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R I MacKay

Publications and source records attributed to R I MacKay.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Use of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for multileaf collimator quality control and calibration.

Multileaf collimator (MLC) calibration and quality control is a time-consuming procedure typically involving the processing, scanning and analysis of films to measure leaf and collimator positions. Faster and more reliable calibration procedures are required for these tasks, especially with the introduction of intensity modulated radiotherapy which requires more frequent checking and finer positional leaf tolerances than previously. A routine quality control (QC) technique to measure MLC leaf bank gain and offset, as well as minor offsets (individual leaf position relative to a reference leaf), using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) has been developed. The technique also tests the calibration of the primary and back-up collimators. A detailed comparison between film and EPID measurements has been performed for six linear accelerators (linacs) equipped with MLC and amorphous silicon EPIDs. Measurements of field size from 4 to 24 cm with the EPID were systematically smaller than film measurements over all field sizes by 0.4 mm for leaves/back-up collimators and by 0.2 mm for conventional collimators. This effect is due to the gain calibration correction applied by the EPID, resulting in a 'flattening' of primary beam profiles. Linac dependent systematic differences of up to 0.5 mm in individual leaf/collimator positions were also found between EPID and film measurements due to the difference between the mechanical and radiation axes of rotation. When corrections for these systematic differences were applied, the residual random differences between EPID and film were 0.23 mm and 0.26 mm (1 standard deviation) for field size and individual leaf/back-up collimator position, respectively. Measured gains (over a distance of 220 mm) always agreed within 0.4 mm with a standard deviation of 0.17 mm. Minor offset measurements gave a mean agreement between EPID and film of 0.01+/-0.10 mm (1 standard deviation) after correction for the tilt of the EPID and small rotational misalignments between leaf banks and the back-up collimators used as a reference straight edge. Reproducibility of EPID measurements was found to be very high, with a standard deviation of <0.05 mm for field size and <0.1 mm for individual leaf/collimator positions for a 10x10 cm2 field. A standard set of QC images (three field sizes defined both by leaves only and collimators only) can be acquired in less than 20 min and analysed in 5 min.

Calibration↗
PubMed2002

Indexing artefacts using a tertiary collimator and a method to avoid them.

A tertiary, slotted grid collimator has been proposed as a method by which the spatial resolution of radiation fields shaped using a multileaf collimator (MLC) may be improved. The prototype device previously reported in the literature allowed each slot in the grid to be aligned with each pair of opposing leaves in the MLC. Irradiation through the collimator resulted in a regular pattern of high dose strips, with the width of each strip defined by the width of the slot and the length by the relative separation of the MLC leaf pair. To complete the field, the patient must be indexed relative to the collimator, with the number of sub-fields required determined by the width of the slots and the spacing between them. This indexing is achieved by rotation of the collimator along a radius centred on the radiation source, thus avoiding the effects of beam divergence on the uniformity of delivered composite beams. However, rotation of the tertiary collimator has been shown to result in artefacts in field definition. The source of such artefacts is the proximity of the long edge of a slot to the junction between two MLC leaves, if one leaf is withdrawn with respect to the next. A simple cause for such artefacts was identified as a small misalignment between the slot edge and the leaf junction. Another source of such effects is the finite size of the radiation source, which allows for partial shielding effects beyond the leaf edge. Finally, the effect of the leaf edge penumbra was identified as the cause of potential areas of underdose within the field boundary. Measurements were performed using a mini-diode of the potential magnitude of the last two effects for slot widths of 2.5 and 5.0 mm beneath a single open MLC leaf. For both slot widths, the unwanted overdose due to partial shielding by neighbouring leaves did not exceed 8% of the dose with the slot at the centre of the single open leaf. The potential for underdose within the field was a much more significant effect, especially for the narrower slot, with the peak intensity through the 2.5 mm slot positioned just inside the open leaf only reaching 41% of that measured with it positioned centrally. Such an arrangement of slots and leaves is unavoidable if the separation between neighbouring slots is identical to that of the MLC leaves (1 cm at isocentre). An alternative arrangement is proposed, and has been demonstrated to avoid the generation of the artefacts detailed above.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2001

Patient positioning using detailed three-dimensional surface data for patients undergoing conformal radiation therapy for carcinoma of the prostate: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The increasing complexity of radiotherapy highlights the need for accurate setup. This paper assesses the potential of position corrections, derived from the three-dimensional (3D) surface of the patient, in reducing positioning errors in patients undergoing conformal radiation therapy of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients undergoing conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer had planning computed tomography (CT) scans and then weekly treatment CT scans over the course of their treatment. Patients were positioned on the CT table using three coplanar tattoo marks used for patient setup on the accelerator. Surfaces were computed from the planning CT (planning surface), and the treatment CT (treatment surfaces). Using a surface matching utility, the planning and treatment 3D surfaces were compared. The prostate was implicitly localized based on surface matching of the external contour and by matching the bony anatomy. The resultant prostate displacement after correction was assessed for the two localization methods. RESULTS: Correcting patient position via the surface comparisons reduced the standard deviation of prostate displacement with respect to the patient isocenter in the lateral and anterior/posterior directions. In the lateral direction, prostate and surface motion was highly correlated (r = 0.96). In the anterior/posterior direction the corrections from the surface data were as effective as those derived from the bony anatomy. CONCLUSION: Detailed surface data can aid the positioning of patients receiving conformal radiation therapy to the prostate by reducing the displacement of the target from the intended treatment position. This study shows that surface corrections can be as effective as those derived from bony anatomy, and may be exploited where definition of bony anatomy is difficult.

Feasibility Studies↗
PubMed2001

Optimizing the indexing of a resolution-enhancing tertiary collimator for radiotherapy.

A method for improving the resolution of multileaf collimator (MLC) defined radiotherapy fields using a tertiary, slotted grid collimator has been investigated and developed further. The original concept was for each slot to be aligned with each leaf pair of opposing MLC leaves. The total treated area is composed of a series of sub-fields, a pattern of irradiated strips, with the width of each strip defined by the width of the slot and the length by the relative separation of the MLC leaf pair. To complete the field, the patient must be indexed relative to the collimator, with the number of sub-fields required determined by the width of the slots and the spacing between them. Two methods were considered by which this indexing could be achieved: movement of the patient while holding the tertiary collimator fixed, or rotating the grid with the point of rotation defined as the radiation source. Consideration of the movement resolution and precision required for the patient support system for non-cardinal gantry, collimator and table angles cast doubt on the practicality of the use of such a strategy. To assess the effect of divergence on the abutting sub-fields, measurements were also performed to assess the uniformity of single fields generated by the tertiary collimator in planes above and below the isocentre using both methods of indexing. As expected, rotation of the collimator resulted in a similar degree of non-uniformity for any plane chosen, whereas significant dose heterogeneities were introduced to treatment planes within 5 cm above and below the isocentre if the patient support system was used. Therefore, the rotation strategy will be implemented with all future versions of the device.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Animation and radiobiological analysis of 3D motion in conformal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To allow treatment plans to be evaluated against the range of expected organ motion and set up error anticipated during treatment. METHODS: Planning tools have been developed to allow concurrent animation and radiobiological analysis of three dimensional (3D) target and organ motion in conformal radiotherapy. Surfaces fitted to structures outlined on CT studies are projected onto pre-treatment images or onto megavoltage images collected during the patient treatment. Visual simulation of tumour and normal tissue movement is then performed by the application of three dimensional affine transformations, to the selected surface. Concurrent registration of the surface motion with the 3D dose distribution allows calculation of the change in dose to the volume. Realistic patterns of motion can be applied to the structure to simulate inter-fraction motion and set-up error. The biologically effective dose for the structure is calculated for each fraction as the surface moves over the course of the treatment and is used to calculate the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) or tumour control probability (TCP) for the moving structure. The tool has been used to evaluate conformal therapy plans against set up measurements recorded during patient treatments. NTCP and TCP were calculated for a patient whose set up had been corrected after systematic deviations from plan geometry were measured during treatment, the effect of not making the correction were also assessed. RESULTS: TCP for the moving tumour was reduced if inadequate margins were set for the treatment. Modelling suggests that smaller margins could have been set for the set up corrected during the course of the treatment. The NTCP for the rectum was also higher for the uncorrected set up due to a more rectal tissue falling in the high dose region. CONCLUSION: This approach provides a simple way for clinical users to utilise information incrementally collected throughout the whole of a patient's treatment. In particular it is possible to test the robustness of a patient plan against a range of possible motion patterns. The methods described represent a move from the inspection of static pre-treatment plans to a review of the dynamic treatment.

Computer Graphics↗
PubMed1997

Predicting late rectal complications following prostate conformal radiotherapy using biologically effective doses and normalized dose-surface histograms.

A model to predict the late normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the rectum following conformal therapy is described. The model evaluates the biological consequence of inhomogeneities in the physical dose by computing dose histograms of the biologically effective dose to the surface of the rectum for a given fractionation scheme. A method of normalizing the surface area of the rectum is employed so that the predicted NTCP is independent of the differing cross-sectional size of sections of the rectum, ensuring the NTCP is dependent only on the dose delivered to sensitive rectal tissues. The model has been used to assess severe late rectal complications and the milder RTOG grades 2 and 3 reactions. This model was found to predict severe toxicity levels of 1.7 +/- 0.6% for an accelerated treatment of 50 Gy in 16 fractions commonly employed at this centre. This result lies between the severe toxicities predicted for 60 and 62 Gy delivered in 2 Gy fractions. The model predicts that the average NTCP for severe late effects for nine prostate patients becomes greater than 5% with a fractionation scheme of 70 Gy in 35 fractions, for the four fields treatment. The effects of not treating all fields at each therapy session on rectal toxicity were also investigated. Biologically effective dose-surface histograms show that the dose to the lower surface of the rectum is increased by not treating all fields at each therapy session, but the predicted differences in rectal NTCP are negligible.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗