PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R J Van Oers

Publications and source records attributed to R J Van Oers.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Laboratory services utilization: a survey of repeat investigations in ambulatory care.

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have shown that repeat investigations are a common cause of unnecessary duplication of laboratory test procedures. Most of the interventions aimed at reducing the number of repeat investigations have not resulted in long-term improvements. None of these studies, however, assessed utilization of laboratory services by physicians, simultaneously treating the same patient. METHODS: For a random sample of 1500 patients, we examined laboratory services utilization by physicians during an 8-month period. We counted the number of patients for whom more than one physician ordered laboratory test procedures simultaneously, and to what extent these procedures overlapped. RESULTS: For 28% of the patients more than one physician had ordered tests. Of all 41,655 tests, 5536 (13%) were repeated by a physician other than the physician who ordered the initial test: 1527 (4%) of the tests were repeated within 5 days. Patients between 70 and 90 years had the highest average number of tests, the highest number of involved physicians, and the smallest mean time between similar tests. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for better coordination of care. Improved communication among physicians simultaneously treating a patient may lead to a reduction of repeat investigations.

Adolescent↗

Nine rheumatoid factor assays compared.

In this study we have investigated five quantitative and three semi-quantitative rheumatoid factor assays and the Rose-Waaler assay in 120 patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and in 76 with other systemic diseases. All tests measure the IgM anti-IgG antibodies. The correlations between the quantitative tests were all higher than 0.86 and much better than between the quantitative and semi-quantitative tests and the semi-quantitative tests themselves (r between 0.22 and 0.85). The within run and between run precision studies for the quantitative tests showed CV values lower than 16%. In spite of the standardisation on the WHO and the Center of Disease Control Reference Preparation we found important differences in patient results. From an analytical point of view, the quantitative assays for rheumatoid factors show certain advantages over the traditional haemagglutination tests.

Agglutination Tests↗