Biomedical subjects

Robert Hawes

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Hawes.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for pancreas divisum by using a needle-knife or standard pull-type technique: safety and reintervention rates.

BACKGROUND: Technical options for pancreatic sphincterotomy of the minor papilla for pancreas divisum include a needle-knife cut over a plastic stent and a standard pull-type cut with a sphincterotome. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the frequency, safety, and intermediate-term efficacy of these 2 techniques at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of the GI-Trac database from July 1994 to July 2004 for patients with pancreas divisum undergoing an initial minor papilla sphincterotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were separated into 2 groups on the basis of the endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy technique used, either a needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) or standard pull-type sphincterotomy (PTS). The groups were compared on the basis of need for any reintervention, restenosis rates, and complication rates with use of Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: There were 133 patients (72%) in the NKS group and 51 (28%) in the PTS group. Clinical presentations were similar in the 2 groups. At a median follow-up of 5 years, additional endoscopic therapy including repeat endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy, endoscopic balloon dilation, stone extraction, or stenting was necessary in 29% of patients after NKS and in 26% after PTS. Papillary restenosis rates were 24% over a median follow-up of 6 years after NKS and 20% over a median follow-up of 5 years after PTS. Overall complication rates were similar in those undergoing NKS and PTS (8.3% vs 7.8%). Age less than 40 years independently predicted reintervention (hazard ratio 2.21) and restenosis (hazard ratio 2.41) (both P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: NKS is used more than PTS for minor papilla sphincterotomy at our institution, but the 2 techniques appear equally safe and effective. Younger age may be associated with higher reintervention rates.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2006

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The GI Mentor is a virtual reality simulator that uses force feedback technology to create a realistic training experience. OBJECTIVE: To define the benefit of training on the GI Mentor on competency acquisition in colonoscopy. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter trial. SETTING: Academic medical centers with accredited gastroenterology training programs. PATIENTS: First-year GI fellows. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to receive 10 hours of unsupervised training on the GI Mentor or no simulator experience during the first 8 weeks of fellowship. After this period, both groups began performing real colonoscopies. The first 200 colonoscopies performed by each fellow were graded by proctors to measure technical and cognitive success, and patient comfort level during the procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: A mixed-effects model comparison between the 2 groups of objective and subjective competency scores and patient discomfort in the performance of real colonoscopies over time. RESULTS: Forty-five fellows were randomized from 16 hospitals over 2 years. Fellows in the simulator group had significantly higher objective competency rates during the first 100 cases. A mixed-effects model demonstrated a higher objective competence overall in the simulator group (P < .0001), with the difference between groups being significantly greater during the first 80 cases performed. The median number of cases needed to reach 90% competency was 160 in both groups. The patient comfort level was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Fellows who underwent GI Mentor training performed significantly better during the early phase of real colonoscopy training.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2005

Accurate discrimination of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma using a quantitative three-tiered algorithm and multimarker real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasing faster than any other cancer in the U.S. In this report, we first show that EA can be distinguished from normal esophagus (NE) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by plotting expression values for EpCam, TFF1, and SBEM in three-dimensional Euclidean space. For monitoring progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE) to EA, we developed a highly sensitive assay for limited quantities of tissue whereby 50 ng of RNA are first converted to cDNA using 16 gene-specific primers. Using a set of training tissues, we developed a novel quantitative three-tiered algorithm that allows for accurate (overall accuracy = 61/63, 97%) discrimination of BE versus EA tissues using only three genes. The gene used in the first tier of the algorithm is TSPAN: samples not diagnosed as BE or EA by TSPAN in the first tier are then subjected to a second-tier analysis using ECGF1, followed by a third-tier analysis using SPARC. Addition of TFF1 and SBEM to the first tier (i.e., a five-gene marker panel) increases the overall accuracy of the assay to 98% (62/63) and results in mean molecular diagnostic scores (+/- SD) that are significantly different between EA and BE samples (3.19 +/- 1.07 versus -2.74 +/- 1.73, respectively). Our results suggest that relatively few genes can be used to monitor progression of BE to EA.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: 12-month follow-up for the North American open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the intermediate-term (12-month) safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness plication in patients with symptomatic GERD. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with chronic heartburn that required maintenance antisecretory therapy received a single, endoscopically placed, full-thickness plication in the gastric cardia 1 cm distal to the gastroesophageal junction. At baseline and 12 months after plication, patients completed the GERD Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and SF-36 Health Survey, as well as a medication use diary. Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and esophageal manometry were obtained at baseline and 3 months after plication. At 6 months after plication, the 24-hour pH study was repeated. RESULTS: Of the 57 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up, 40 (70%) were no longer taking a proton pump inhibitor. Median GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores were improved compared with baseline while taking medication (19.0 vs. 5.0; p < 0.0001) and while not taking medication (13.0 vs. 5.0; p < 0.002). At 6 months after the procedure, an improvement in distal esophageal acid exposure was demonstrated in 40 of 51 patients (80%), with a decrease of 39% in the median percentage of time the pH was less than 4 (p < 0.0001). Normal pH scores were observed in 30% of patients. All procedure-related adverse events occurred acutely, as previously reported, and no new adverse event was observed during extended follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Full-thickness plication at the gastroesophageal junction is an effective endoscopic procedure for treatment of patients with symptoms caused by GERD. It reduces reflux symptoms and antisecretory medication use over at least a 1-year period.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Evaluation of a screening instrument for developmental coordination disorder.

PURPOSE: To validate the Children's Self-Perceptions of Adequacy in, and Predilection for Physical Activity (CSAPPA) scale as a proxy for the BOTMP test in diagnosing DCD. METHODS: A sample of 209 children (M = 121; F = 87) consented to the BOTMP test, CSAPPA scale, Participation Questionnaire, Léger 20-meter Shuttle Run, and body fat using bioelectric impedance. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Kappa statistic were used to validate the CSAPPA scale as a predictor for significant clumsiness on the BOTMP test. RESULTS: Prevalence of DCD was.09 +/-.03 of both males and females, all previously undiagnosed. A positive cutoff of < 47 and < 53 for DCD on the CSAPPA scale was identified in male and females, respectively. Both gender cut-offs demonstrated significant agreement (p <.01) with a positive BOTMP test. Males' results indicated a sensitivity and specificity values of.90 (CI =.18) and.89 (CI =.22). Likewise, the female subject cutoff demonstrated high sensitivity [.88 (CI =.05)] and specificity [75 (CI =.09)]. Gender specific analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that students identified as clumsy were not significantly different in age or height from their peers, but demonstrated significantly (p <.01) lower self-efficacy, aerobic fitness, and had significantly (p <.01) higher relative body fat. These results held true for both genders. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the characteristics of children with DCD. These results suggest that the CSAPPA scale is a promising instrument for use in screening children for developmental coordination disorder.

Body Mass Index↗

PubMed2004

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: a multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: A novel endoscopic full-thickness plication device has been designed to inhibit gastroesophageal reflux by placing a transmural plication near the gastroesophageal junction under direct endoscopic visualization. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic full-thickness plication in the treatment of patients with symptoms caused by GERD. METHODS: Patients with chronic heartburn requiring maintenance therapy with antisecretory medication were recruited. Exclusion criteria were the following: hiatal hernia (>2 cm), grade III and IV esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. The following were assessed over a follow-up period of 6 months: GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and SF-36 Health Survey, medication use, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophageal manometry. Patients underwent a single, full-thickness plication in the gastric cardia just distal to the gastroesophageal junction. Re-treatment was not permitted. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 46.3 years, range 23-71 years) underwent endoscopic full-thickness plication (mean procedure time 17.2 minutes). At 6 months after plication, proton pump inhibitor therapy had been eliminated in 74% of previously medication-dependent patients. Median GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life scores improved 67% (19.0 vs. 5.0; p<0.001). Improvements also were observed in median Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and SF-36 Health Survey mental and physical composite scores. Median esophageal acid exposure improved significantly (10 vs. 8; p<0.008) with normalization of pH noted in 30% of patients. No significant change in esophageal manometry was noted. One gastric perforation occurred and was managed conservatively without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a single full-thickness plication placed at the gastroesophageal junction reduced symptoms, medication use, and esophageal acid exposure associated with GERD.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Key issues in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

SOD is a challenging condition that is difficult to diagnose and treat. The high failure rate of endoscopic and surgical treatment reflects the difficulties in establishing accurate diagnosis and the lack of specific objective criteria by which appropriate therapy could be determined. In general, sphincter ablation should be offered for type I patients. An initial trial of medical therapy is appropriate for type II patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms and for all type III patients. SOM is highly recommended for type II patients and is mandatory for all type III patients if sphincter ablation is contemplated. Other causes of abdominal pain such as chronic pancreatitis or functional disorders should be considered in patients not benefiting from sphincter ablation. All procedures on the sphincter should be undertaken with caution after meticulous investigation, and patient selection should be based on strict objective criteria.

Common Bile Duct Diseases↗

PubMed2002

A resource utilization projection study of EUS.

BACKGROUND: EUS has emerged as standard practice with respect to the diagnosis and staging of GI malignancies. Whether currently available resources are sufficient to meet the potential need for EUS is uncertain. This study examines the hypothetical demand for EUS in the United States. METHODS: EUS cases performed at 3 centers with well-established expertise in EUS in 1997 were retrospectively reviewed and trends were extrapolated to national cancer statistics. Indications for EUS fell into 3 categories: (1) diagnosis/staging of esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, or rectal cancers (established indications); (2) suspected GI malignancy (obligate "rule out"); and (3) "other" (emerging indications). Hypothetical total numbers of cases in which EUS could be performed in the United States were calculated taking into consideration the expected number of GI malignancies for which EUS would be appropriate (based on cancer statistics for 2000), the fraction unresectable by CT, the fraction of elderly nonsurgical candidates, proportionate "rule out" cases, as well as "other" emerging indications. RESULTS: The calculated hypothetical number of cases (United States) in which EUS would be indicated is 79,568 per year (10,287 esophagus, 10,666 stomach, 23,069 pancreas, and 35,546 rectal). If "other" indications remained constant at 12%, there would potentially be 89,116 EUS procedures performed per year, with a conservative estimate of 79,572 per year. CONCLUSIONS: This model suggests that currently available EUS resources are not sufficient to meet hypothetical demand. Future considerations include the number of endoscopy units in which EUS is performed, the capacity of individual units, and the implications for training programs in the United States.

Digestive System Neoplasms↗