Biomedical subjects

Rose Richter

Publications and source records attributed to Rose Richter.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Clinical evaluation of the anti-plaque effect of a commercial chewing gum.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to evaluate the dental plaque control effect of a chewing gum versus brushing with a dentifrice via four clinical studies. METHODOLOGY: Study 1 compared a commercial chewing gum (Colgate Dental Gum, CDG) with a water control after 24 hours post-brushing; Studies 2 and 3 compared CDG to two different brands of commercially available fluoride dentifrices after 24 hours post-brushing; Study 4 examined the anti-plaque effect of CDG plus a regular fluoride dentifrice (Colgate Winterfresh Gel, CWG) versus brushing with CWG alone for five days. The 24-hour clinical tests employed the Modified Gingival Margin Plaque Index (MGMPI), while the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (QHPI) was used for the five-day study. All studies utilized a randomized, crossover design with a one-week washout period, and were single-blinded to the clinical evaluator. RESULTS: In Study 1, the mean MGMPI score for CDG was significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared to the water control. In Studies 2 and 3, while brushing with regular fluoride dentifrices provided improved plaque control compared to CDG, the chewing gum alone with no tooth brushing delivered a plaque reduction 60% as effective as brushing with a fluoride dentifrice. In Study 4, the group using the combination of chewing with CDG and brushing with CWG provided a significantly lower (p < 0.05) mean QHPI score compared to the group using the dentifrice only, particularly on the hard-to-brush lingual surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: Four clinical studies demonstrated that CDG provides a plaque control benefit. The results suggest that chewing gum may serve as an effective oral hygiene device when brushing may not be possible and, additionally, that chewing gum may serve as an effective adjunct to brushing for enhanced oral health.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Clinical evaluations of sustained calculus control by Colgate Simply White dentifrice using an in-situ appliance.

OBJECTIVE: Two clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the dental calculus control efficacy of Colgate Simply White dentifrice versus a positive and a negative control dentifrice, using a published intra-oral appliance and monitoring the prevention of calcium deposition, an indicator of early dental calculus formation. METHODOLOGY: Healthy human volunteers entered into the two double-blind, cross-over studies. An intra-oral appliance was custom-made for each subject. After brushing with an assigned dentifrice, each subject wore his or her appliance for four daytime hours (study 1) or 12 overnight hours (study 2). When the appliance was removed, it was washed, suspended in 0.1 M HCl to release Ca++ from deposits, and analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) for deposited calcium. The three dentifrices studied were Colgate Simply White (CSW), Colgate Regular dentifrice (CR), and Colgate Tartar Control Whitening (CTW). There was a one-week wash-out period between each product use. RESULTS: There were no side effects observed or reported in either study. In both the four- and 12-hour studies, CSW and CTW had significantly lower calcium uptake compared to CR (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between CSW and CTW in efficacy. CONCLUSION: The results of this research demonstrate that Colgate Simply White dentifrice provides four- and 12-hour calculus control efficacy, superior to a standard dentifrice and comparable to a commercial anti-tartar dentifrice.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2005

Analysis of the antibacterial activity and plaque control benefit of colgate total dentifrice via clinical evaluation and real-time polymerase chain reaction.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed, from a combined clinical and molecular biologic perspective, the antibacterial and antiplaque efficacy of Colgate Total dentifrice (CTD). METHODOLOGY: A single-blind crossover study design utilized 11 healthy human subjects. After a one-week washout period, subjects donated dental plaque, received a dental prophylaxis, and subsequently brushed with a test product. Twenty-four hours postbrushing, dental plaque was collected and a clinical plaque score determined. Dental plaque was submitted for Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (Real-time PCR) analysis. The same procedure was repeated in accordance with a crossover design for the use of the second test product. Following a one-week washout, a plaque donation, prophylaxis, and brushing with the test product ensued for each subject. Twenty-four hours post-brushing, the subjects returned for a plaque score and plaque donation. RESULTS: Twenty-four hours after brushing, dental plaque coverage increased 17.88% +/- 8.27% with CTD, compared to 30.42% +/- 9.97% with Colgate Cavity Protection (CCP; p = 0.005). Real-time PCR found plaque collected 24 hours after brushing with CTD exhibited, on average, fewer representative periodontal pathogens (Fusobacterium nucleatum, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythensis, and Porphyromonas gingivalis) and fewer early colonizers (Actinomyces naeslundii) than plaque collected before brushing, whereas CCP showed a moderate effect on oral bacteria. CONCLUSION: The study provides clinical and molecular biological evidence to substantiate the antibacterial and plaque control benefits of Colgate Total, and suggests the value of combining a molecular biological method with clinical research to corroborate clinical benefits.

Actinomyces↗

PubMed2004

The technology behind Colgate Simply White Toothpaste.

Colgate Simply White Toothpaste is a new advanced tooth whitening dentifrice that can be used every day. The synergy of abrasive stain removal with activated hydrogen peroxide delivers excellent performance in the removal of extrinsic and intrinsic tooth stain. Colgate Simply White Toothpaste provides other oral health benefits that have become the cost-of-entry into the toothpaste market: caries protection, tartar control, fresh breath, and a preferred flavor.

Biological Availability↗

PubMed2003

A new appliance to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dental calculus control agents.

OBJECTIVE: A new intra-oral appliance was developed to measure the inhibition of early calcium deposition by anti-calculus agents in dentifrice products. Four clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the application of this appliance for short-term (4 or 12 hrs) prevention of calcium deposition after panelists brushed with assigned dentifrices. METHODOLOGY: Residual Ca2+ on the appliance was determined by inductively coupled plasma analysis. In two 4-hour studies, the appliance was utilized to compare the calculus inhibiting properties of Colgate Tartar Control plus Whitening (CTCW) versus Crest Regular (CR), or CTCW versus Crest Tartar Control (CTC) dentifrice. In the third and fourth studies, where early calculus deposits were collected 12 hours (daytime and nighttime) after product use, CR was compared to Colgate Total Toothpaste (CT). RESULTS: In the first study, there was a mean 48.2% inhibition (p < 0.0215) of early calculus formation by CTCW versus CR, which contains no known tartar control agents. In the second 4-hour study, CTCW provided 33.5% more inhibition (p < 0.0264) of early calculus formation than CTC. The results from both 4-hour studies are in agreement with in vitro and long-term clinical studies which utilized the same dentifrices. There was a significant (p < 0.04), 23.0% inhibition by CT compared to CR after 12 hours daytime post-brushing, and a 20.4% decrease in 12-hour nighttime post-brushing by CT compared to CR, which was significant at p < 0.05. The results are in agreement with both laboratory and clinical studies documenting the efficacy of CT over a 12-hour time period. CONCLUSION: The intra-oral appliance, developed, tested and reported here, appears useful to assess and predict the long-term clinical efficacy of anti-calculus agents in dentifrices.

Acrylic Resins↗