PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ruth M Saecker

Publications and source records attributed to Ruth M Saecker.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Synthesis-mediated release of a small RNA inhibitor of RNA polymerase.

Noncoding small RNAs regulate gene expression in all organisms, in some cases through direct association with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Here we report that the mechanism of 6S RNA inhibition of transcription is through specific, stable interactions with the active site of Escherichia coli RNAP that exclude promoter DNA binding. In fact, the DNA-dependent RNAP uses bound 6S RNA as a template for RNA synthesis, producing 14-to 20-nucleotide RNA products (pRNA). These results demonstrate that 6S RNA is functionally engaged in the active site of RNAP. Synthesis of pRNA destabilizes 6S RNA-RNAP complexes leading to release of the pRNA-6S RNA hybrid. In vivo, 6S RNA-directed RNA synthesis occurs during outgrowth from the stationary phase and likely is responsible for liberating RNAP from 6S RNA in response to nutrient availability.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Do sigma factors need help with a meltdown?

In this issue of Cell, Hsu et al. (2006) report on the binding activity of a variant of the bacterial transcriptional specificity factor sigma (sigma) to promoter DNA. This study demonstrates that the sigma variant induces a large distortion in the transcriptional start site in the absence of core RNA polymerase, raising intriguing new questions about the roles of sigma and core RNA polymerase in transcription initiation.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed2006

Solute probes of conformational changes in open complex (RPo) formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the lambdaPR promoter: evidence for unmasking of the active site in the isomerization step and for large-scale coupled folding in the subsequent conversion to RPo.

Transcription initiation is a multistep process involving a series of requisite conformational changes in RNA polymerase (R) and promoter DNA (P) that create the open complex (RP(o)). Here, we use the small solutes urea and glycine betaine (GB) to probe the extent and type of surface area changes in the formation of RP(o) between Esigma(70) RNA polymerase and lambdaP(R) promoter DNA. Effects of urea quantitatively reflect changes in amide surface and are particularly well-suited to detect coupled protein folding events. GB provides a qualitative probe for the exposure or burial of anionic surface. Kinetics of formation and dissociation of RP(o) reveal strikingly large effects of the solutes on the final steps of RP(o) formation: urea dramatically increases the dissociation rate constant k(d), whereas GB decreases the rate of dissociation. Formation of the first kinetically significant intermediate I(1) is disfavored in urea, and moderately favored by GB. GB slows the rate-determining step that converts I(1) to the second kinetically significant intermediate I(2); urea has no effect on this step. The most direct interpretation of these data is that recognition of promoter DNA in I(1) involves only limited conformational changes. Notably, the data support the following hypotheses: (1) the negatively charged N-terminal domain of sigma(70) remains bound in the "jaws" of polymerase in I(1); (2) the subsequent rate-determining isomerization step involves ejecting this domain from the jaws, thereby unmasking the active site; and (3) final conversion to RP(o) involves coupled folding of the mobile downstream clamp of polymerase.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed2005

Use of urea and glycine betaine to quantify coupled folding and probe the burial of DNA phosphates in lac repressor-lac operator binding.

Thermodynamic analysis of urea-biopolymer interactions and effects of urea on folding of proteins and alpha-helical peptides shows that urea interacts primarily with polar amide surface. Urea is therefore predicted to be a quantitative probe of coupled folding, remodeling, and other large-scale changes in the amount of water-accessible polar amide surface in protein processes. A parallel analysis indicates that glycine betaine [N,N,N-trimethylglycine (GB)] can be used to detect burial or exposure of anionic (carboxylate, phosphate) biopolymer surface. To test these predictions, we have investigated the effects of these solutes (0-3 m) on the formation of 1:1 complexes between lac repressor (LacI) and its symmetric operator site (SymL) at a constant KCl molality. Urea reduces the binding constant K(TO) [initial slope dlnK(TO)/dm(urea) = -1.7 +/- 0.2], and GB increases K(TO) [initial slope dlnK(TO)/dm(GB) = 2.1 +/- 0.2]. For both solutes, this derivative decreases with an increase in solute concentration. Analysis of these initial slopes predicts that (1.5 +/- 0.3) x 10(3) A2 of polar amide surface and (4.5 +/- 1.0) x 10(2) A2 of anionic surface are buried in the association process. Analysis of published structural data, together with modeling of unfolded regions of free LacI as extended chains, indicates that 1.5 x 10(3) A2 of polar amide surface and 6.3 x 10(2) A2 of anionic surface are buried in complexation. Quantitative agreement between structural and thermodynamic results is obtained for amide surface (urea); for anionic surface (GB), the experimental value is approximately 70% of the structural value. For LacI-SymL binding, two-thirds of the structurally predicted change in amide surface (1.0 x 10(3) A2) occurs outside the protein-DNA interface in protein-protein interfaces formed by folding of the hinge helices and interactions of the DNA binding domain (DBD) with the core of the repressor. Since urea interacts principally with amide surface, it is particularly well-suited to detect and quantify the extent of coupled folding and other large-scale remodeling events in the steps of protein-nucleic acid interactions and other protein associations.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2004

The effects of upstream DNA on open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Binding of activators to upstream DNA sequences regulates transcription initiation by affecting the stability of the initial RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter complex and/or the rate of subsequent conformational changes required to form the open complex (RP(O)). Here we observe that the presence of nonspecific upstream DNA profoundly affects an early step in formation of the transcription bubble. Kinetic studies with the lambdaP(R) promoter and Escherichia coli RNAP reveal that the presence of DNA upstream of base pair -47 greatly increases the rate of forming RP(O), without significantly affecting its rate of dissociation. We find that this increase is largely due to an acceleration of the rate-limiting step (isomerization) in RP(O) formation, a step that occurs after polymerase binds. Footprinting experiments reveal striking structural differences downstream of the transcription start site (+1) in the first kinetically significant intermediate when upstream DNA is present. On the template strand, the DNase I downstream boundary of this early intermediate is +20 when upstream DNA is present but is shortened by approximately two helical turns when upstream DNA beyond -47 is removed. KMnO(4) footprinting reveals an identical initiation bubble (-11 to +2), but unusual reactivity of template strand upstream cytosines (-12, -14, and -15) on the truncated promoter. Based on this work, we propose that early wrapping interactions between upstream DNA and the polymerase exterior strongly affect the events that control entry and subsequent unwinding of the DNA start site in the jaws of polymerase.

DNA↗
PubMed2004

Preferential interactions of glycine betaine and of urea with DNA: implications for DNA hydration and for effects of these solutes on DNA stability.

Interactions of the solutes glycine betaine (GB) and urea with mononucleosomal calf thymus DNA in aqueous salt solutions are characterized by vapor pressure osmometry (VPO). Analysis of osmolality as a function of solute and DNA concentration yields the effect of the solute on the chemical potential, mu(2), of the DNA. Although both GB and urea generally are nucleic acid denaturants and therefore must interact favorably with the nucleic acid surface exposed upon melting, VPO demonstrates that neither interacts favorably with duplex DNA. Addition of GB greatly increases mu(2) of DNA, indicating that the average local concentration of GB in the vicinity of the double helix is much less than its bulk concentration. By contrast, addition of urea has almost no effect on mu(2) of duplex DNA, indicating that the average local concentration of urea in the vicinity of duplex DNA is almost the same as in bulk solution. Qualitatively, we conclude that the nonuniform distribution of GB occurs primarily because duplex DNA and GB prefer to interact with water rather than with each other. Comparison with thermodynamic data for the interaction of GB with various protein surfaces (Felitsky et al., Biochemistry, 43, 14732-14743) shows that GB is excluded primarily from anionic DNA surface and that the hydration of anionic DNA phosphate oxygen surface (>or approximately 17 H(2)O per nucleotide or >or approximately 0.22 H(2)O A(-)(2)) involves at least two layers of water. From analysis of literature data for effects of urea and of GB on DNA melting, we propose that urea is an effective nonspecific nucleic acid denaturant because of its favorable interactions with the polar amide-like surface of G, C, and especially T or U bases exposed in denaturation, whereas GB is a specific GC denaturant because of its favorable interaction with G and/or C surface in the single-stranded state.

Betaine↗
PubMed2002

Kinetic studies and structural models of the association of E. coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase with the lambdaP(R) promoter: large scale conformational changes in forming the kinetically significant intermediates.

The kinetics of interaction of Esigma(70) RNA polymerase (R) with the lambdaP(R) promoter (P) were investigated by filter binding over a broad range of temperatures (7.3-42 degrees C) and concentrations of RNA polymerase (1-123 nM) in large excess over promoter DNA. Under all conditions examined, the kinetics of formation of competitor-resistant complexes (I(2), RP(o)) are single-exponential with first order rate constant beta(CR). Interpretation of the polymerase concentration dependence of beta(CR) in terms of the three step mechanism of open complex formation yields the equilibrium constant K(1) for formation of the first kinetically significant intermediate (I(1)) and the forward rate constant (k(2)) for the conformational change converting I(1) to the second kinetically significant intermediate I(2): R + P-->(K(1))<--I(1)(k(2))-->I(2). Use of rapid quench mixing allows K(1) and k(2) to be individually determined over the entire temperature range investigated, previously not possible at this promoter using manual mixing. Given the large (>60 bp) interface formed in I(1), its relatively small binding constant K(1) at 37 degrees C at this [salt] (approximately 6 x 10(6) M(-1)) strongly argues that binding free energy is used to drive large-scale structural changes in polymerase and/or promoter DNA or other coupled processes. Evidence for coupling of protein folding is provided by the large and negative activation heat capacity of k(a)[DeltaC(o,++)(a)= -1.5(+/-0.2)kcal K(-1)], now shown to originate directly from formation of I(1) [DeltaC(o)(1)= -1.4(+/-0.3)kcal K(-1)] rather than from the formation of I(2) as previously proposed. The isomerization I(1)-->I(2) exhibits relatively slow kinetics and has a very large temperature-independent Arrhenius activation energy [E(act)(2)= 34(+/-2)kcal]. This kinetic signature suggests that formation of the transition state (I(1)-I(2)++ involves large conformational changes dominated by changes in the exposure of polar and/or charged surface to water. Structural and biochemical data lead to the following hypotheses to interpret these results. We propose that formation of I(1) involves coupled folding of unstructured regions of polymerase (beta, beta' and sigma(70)) and bending of promoter DNA (in the -10 region). We propose that interactions with region 2 of sigma(70) and possibly domain 1 of beta induce a kink at the -11/-12 base pairs of the lambdaP(R) promoter which places the downstream DNA (-5 to +20) in the jaws of the beta and beta' subunits of polymerase in I(1). These early interactions of beta and beta' with the DNA downstream of position -5 trigger jaw closing (with coupled folding) and subsequent steps of DNA opening.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed2002

Protein surface salt bridges and paths for DNA wrapping.

The organization of large regions of DNA on the surface of proteins is critical to many DNA 'transactions', including replication, transcription, recombination and repair, as well as the packaging of chromosomal DNA. Recent thermodynamic and structural studies of DNA binding by integration host factor indicate that the disruption of protein surface salt bridges (dehydrated ion pairs) dominates the observed thermodynamics of integration host factor binding and, more generally, allows the wrapping of DNA on protein surfaces. The proposed thermodynamic signature of wrapping with coupled salt bridge disruption includes large negative salt-concentration-dependent enthalpy, entropy and heat capacity changes and smaller than expected magnitudes of the observed binding constant and its power dependence on salt concentration. Examination of the free structures of proteins recently shown to wrap DNA leads us to hypothesize that a pattern of surface salt bridges interspersed with cationic sidechains provides a structural signature for wrapping and that the number and organization of salt bridges and cationic groups dictate the thermodynamics and topology of DNA wrapping, which in turn are critical to function.

Bacterial Proteins↗