PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Adhya

Publications and source records attributed to S Adhya.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Genomic analysis of bacteriophages SP6 and K1-5, an estranged subgroup of the T7 supergroup.

We have determined the genome sequences of two closely related lytic bacteriophages, SP6 and K1-5, which infect Salmonella typhimurium LT2 and Escherichia coli serotypes K1 and K5, respectively. The genome organization of these phages is almost identical with the notable exception of the tail fiber genes that confer the different host specificities. The two phages have diverged extensively at the nucleotide level but they are still more closely related to each other than either is to any other phage currently characterized. The SP6 and K1-5 genomes contain, respectively, 43,769 bp and 44,385 bp, with 174 bp and 234 bp direct terminal repeats. About half of the 105 putative open reading frames in the two genomes combined show no significant similarity to database proteins with a known or predicted function that is obviously beneficial for growth of a bacteriophage. The overall genome organization of SP6 and K1-5 is comparable to that of the T7 group of phages, although the specific order of genes coding for DNA metabolism functions has not been conserved. Low levels of nucleotide similarity between genomes in the T7 and SP6 groups suggest that they diverged a long time ago but, on the basis of this conservation of genome organization, they are expected to have retained similar developmental strategies.

Bacteriophage T7↗

A "master" in base unpairing during isomerization of a promoter upon RNA polymerase binding.

Isomerization of a closed to open complex of a promoter upon RNA polymerase binding involves base unpairing at the -10 region. After potassium permanganate sensitivity of unpaired thymine residues, we studied base unpairing at the -10 region during isomerization upon RNA polymerase binding at the P1 and P3 promoters of the gal operon. Substitution of adenine by 2-amino purine (2-AP) at the invariable A small middle dotT base pair at the -11 position of P1 and P3 prevented unpairing not only at that position but also at the other downstream positions, suggesting a "master" role of the adenine base at -11 of the template strand in overall base unpairing. 2-AP at -11 did not inhibit the formation of RNA polymerase small middle dotpromoter complex and subsequent isomerization of the polymerase. Substitution of adenine by 2-AP at several other positions did not affect thymine unpairing. Changing the position of the amino group from C6 in adenine to C2 in 2-AP is mutational only at the master switch position, -11.

Base Pairing↗

Recruitment of HU by piggyback: a special role of GalR in repressosome assembly.

In Gal repressosome assembly, a DNA loop is formed by the interaction of two GalR, bound to two distal operators, and the binding of the histone-like protein, HU, to an architecturally critical position on DNA to facilitate the GalR-GalR interaction. We show that GalR piggybacks HU to the critical position on the DNA through a specific GalR-HU interaction. This is the first example of HU making a specific contact with another protein. The GalR-HU contact that results in cooperative binding of the two proteins to DNA may be transient and absent in the final repressosome structure. A sequence-independent DNA-binding protein being recruited to an architectural site on DNA through a specific association with a regulatory protein may be a common mode for assembly of complex nucleoprotein structures.

Amino Acids↗

Gal repressosome contains an antiparallel DNA loop.

Gal repressosome assembly and repression of the gal operon in Escherichia coli occurs when two dimeric GalR proteins and the histone-like HU protein bind to cognate sites causing DNA looping. Structure-based genetic analysis defined the GalR surfaces interacting to form a stacked, V-shaped, tetrameric structure. Stereochemical models of the four possible DNA loops compatible with the GalR tetramer configuration were constructed using the sequence-dependent structural parameters of the interoperator DNA and conformation changes caused by GalR and asymmetric HU binding. Evaluation of their DNA elastic energies gave unambiguous preference to a loop structure in which the two gal operators adopt an antiparallel orientation causing undertwisting of DNA.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Bacteriophage K1-5 encodes two different tail fiber proteins, allowing it to infect and replicate on both K1 and K5 strains of Escherichia coli.

A virulent double-stranded DNA bacteriophage, Phi K1-5, has been isolated and found to be capable of infecting Escherichia coli strains that possess either the K1 or the K5 polysaccharide capsule. Electron micrographs show that the virion consists of a small icosohedral head with short tail spikes, similar to members of the Podoviridae family. DNA sequence analysis of the region encoding the tail fiber protein showed two open reading frames encoding previously characterized hydrolytic phage tail fiber proteins. The first is the K5 lyase protein gene of Phi K5, which allows this phage to specifically infect K5 E. coli strains. A second open reading frame encodes a protein almost identical in amino acid sequence to the N-acetylneuraminidase (endosialidase) protein of Phi K1E, which allows this phage to specifically infect K1 strains of E. coli. We provide experimental evidence that mature phage particles contain both tail fiber proteins, and mutational analysis indicates that each protein can be independently inactivated. A comparison of the tail gene regions of Phi K5, Phi K1E, and Phi K1-5 shows that the genes are arranged in a modular or cassette configuration and suggests that this family of phages can broaden host range by horizontal gene transfer.

Antigens, Bacterial↗

Mutations in a tRNA import signal define distinct receptors at the two membranes of Leishmania mitochondria.

Nucleus-encoded tRNAs are selectively imported into the mitochondrion of Leishmania, a kinetoplastid protozoan. An oligoribonucleotide constituting the D stem-loop import signal of tRNA(Tyr)(GUA) was efficiently transported into the mitochondrial matrix in organello as well as in vivo. Transfer through the inner membrane could be uncoupled from that through the outer membrane and was resistant to antibody against the outer membrane receptor TAB. A number of mutations in the import signal had differential effects on outer and inner membrane transfer. Some mutants which efficiently traversed the outer membrane were unable to enter the matrix. Conversely, restoration of the loop-closing GC pair in reverse resulted in reversion of transfer through the inner, but not the outer, membrane, and binding of the RNA to the inner membrane was restored. These experiments indicate the presence at the two membranes of receptors with distinct specificities which mediate stepwise transfer into the mitochondrial matrix. The combination of oligonucleotide mutagenesis and biochemical fractionation may provide a general tool for the identification of tRNA transport factors.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Stepwise transfer of tRNA through the double membrane of Leishmania mitochondria.

Import of tRNA into Leishmania mitochondria involves transfer through a double membrane barrier. To examine whether specific sorting mechanisms for individual tRNAs direct them to different mitochondrial compartments, the distribution of tRNA transcripts, internalized in vitro, was examined by suborganellar fractionation. Significant amounts of tRNA(Tyr) were localized in the matrix and on the outer face of the inner mitochondrial membrane. With time, the matrix:membrane ratio increased. Translocation through the inner membrane apparently required the presence of a specific signal in the D arm of tRNA(Tyr), and tRNA(Gln)(CUG), lacking this sequence, was excluded. Hydrolysis of ATP was necessary at both the outer and inner membranes. However, the protonophores carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone and nigericin, the K(+) ionophore valinomycin, and the F(1)F(0) ATPase inhibitor oligomycin had only marginal effects on uptake through the outer membrane but severely inhibited inner membrane translocation, indicating the unusual requirement of both the electrical and chemical components of the electromotive force generated across the inner membrane. The results are consistent with a mechanism involving stepwise transfer of tRNA through distinct outer and inner membrane channels.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Cationic liposome-encapsulated antisense oligonucleotide mediates efficient killing of intracellular Leishmania.

Antisense oligonucleotides have been considered as inhibitors of growth of intracellular parasites such as Leishmania, but only limited inhibition has been observed in vitro. We have encapsulated an antisense oligonucleotide, complementary to the Leishmania universal miniexon sequence, in cationic liposomes. Low concentrations (4 microM) of encapsulated oligonucleotides specifically reduced the amastigote burden within cultured macrophages by 80%. This result illustrates the importance of effective delivery for efficient antiparasitic activity of antisense oligonucleotides.

Animals↗

GalR mutants defective in repressosome formation.

Transcription repression of the galactose operon of Escherichia coli requires (1) the binding of the GalR repressor to tandem operators flanking the promoters, (2) the binding of histone-like protein, HU, to a site between the GalR-binding sites, and (3) negatively supercoiled DNA. Under these conditions, protein-protein interactions mediate the formation of a nucleoprotein complex in the form of a DNA loop, which we have termed a repressosome. To analyze the structure of the repressosome, we have screened and isolated galR mutants in which single amino acid substitutions in GalR lead to defects in loop formation while the protein's operator-binding activity is retained. The mutant proteins were purified and their properties confirmed in vitro. We verified that in the case of the two stronger mutations, the proteins had secondary structures that were identical to that of wild-type GalR as reflected by circular dichroism spectroscopy. Homology-based modeling of GalR by use of the crystal structures of PurR and LacI has enabled us to place the three sites of mutation in a structural context. They occur in the carboxy-terminal subdomain of the GalR core, are surface exposed, and, therefore, may be involved in protein-protein interactions. On the basis of our model of GalR and its structural alignment with LacI and PurR, we have identified additional residues, the substitution of which leads to a specific defect in repression by looping. The effects of the mutations are the same in the presence of HMG-17, a eukaryotic protein unrelated to HU, which can also mediate GalR-dependent repression of the gal promoter. This observation suggests that the mutations define sites of GalR-GalR interaction rather than HU-GalR interaction in the repressosome.

Bacteriophages↗

Role of HU and DNA supercoiling in transcription repression: specialized nucleoprotein repression complex at gal promoters in Escherichia coli.

Efficient repression of the two promoters P1 and P2 of the gal operon requires the formation of a DNA loop encompassing the promoters. In vitro, DNA looping-mediated repression involves binding of the Gal repressor (GalR) to two gal operators (OE and OI) and binding of the histone-like protein HU to a specific locus (hbs) about the midpoint between OE and OI, and supercoiled DNA. Without DNA looping, GalR binding to OE partially represses P1 and stimulates P2. We investigated the requirement for DNA supercoiling and HU in repression of the gal promoters in vivo in strains containing a fusion of a reporter gene, gusA or lacZ, to each promoter individually. While the P1 promoter was found to be repressible in the absence of DNA supercoiling and HU, the repression of P2 was entirely dependent upon DNA supercoiling in vivo. The P2 promoter was fully derepressed when supercoiling was inhibited by the addition of coumermycin in cells. P2, but not P1, was also totally derepressed by the absence of HU or the OI operator. From these results, we propose that the repression of the gal promoters in vivo is mediated by the formation of a higher order DNA-multiprotein complex containing GalR, HU and supercoiled DNA. In the absence of this complex, P1 but not P2 is still repressed by GalR binding to OE. The specific nucleoprotein complexes involving histone-like proteins, which repress promoter activity while remaining sensitive to inducing signals, as discussed, may occur more generally in bacterial nucleoids.

Aminocoumarins↗

GalR-mediated repression and activation of hybrid lacUV5 promoter: differential contacts with RNA polymerase.

The GalR repressor regulates expression of genes of the gal regulon in Escherichia coli. We studied the regulatory effect of GalR in vitro on a heterologous promoter, lacUV5, by placing the GalR-binding site, OE, at different locations upstream of this promoter. Despite the fact that the lacUV5 promoter is transcribed efficiently by RNA polymerase (RNP) alone, GalR modulated transcription from many of the PlacUV5 variants. Depending on the location of OE and the neighboring DNA sequence, GalR repressed, activated or had no effect on the promoter. Both repression and activation involved formation of GalR-RNP-DNA ternary complexes and required an intact c-domain of the alpha subunit of the holoenzyme. These results support the differential contact model of a regulator action, in which a regulator differentially binds to, and lowers the energy of, intermediates of transcription initiation either to hinder or to facilitate a step of initiation. The nature of the contacts depends upon the context, i.e. the geometry of the ternary complex. The observed repression and activation effect of GalR on a heterologous promoter also underscores the point that a regulator is not a dedicated protein for repression or for activation.

Binding Sites↗

The D arm of tRNATyr is necessary and sufficient for import into Leishmania mitochondria in vitro.

Transfer RNAs are selectively imported from the cytoplasm into mitochondria of kinetoplastid protozoa such as Leishmania . The specific structural features of tRNA which determine selectivity are largely unknown. Using an in organello system from Leishmania , the import signals on tRNATyrand on a synthetic transcript which binds to the same receptor, were studied by deletion and reconstruction analyses. In both cases, short oligoribonucleotides (minihelices) containing the sequence UGGYAGAG were imported with high efficiency in the presence of ATP. This motif is present in the D arm of tRNATyr, as well as in the majority of imported Leishmania tRNAs. Deletion of the D arm, or a point mutation in the conserved motif, reduces importability. The import signal coincides with the binding site for the mitochondrial receptor TAB. tRNAGln, which is not imported, forms non-productive, TAB-independent complexes with the mitochondrial surface. However, the observation that the imported:bound ratio of the D arm minihelix is higher than that of the entire molecule suggests that the post-binding translocation step is constrained in terms of size or structural flexibility. Kinetic studies of minihelix import indicate stepwise insertion of the molecule into import channels.

Animals↗

Transcription regulation by repressosome and by RNA polymerase contact.

The original model of repression of transcription initiation is steric interference of RNA polymerase binding to a promoter by its repressor protein bound to a DNA site that overlaps the promoter. From the results described here, we propose two other mechanisms of repressor action, both of which involve formation of higher-order DNA-multiprotein complexes. These models also explain the problem of RNA polymerase gaining access to a promoter in the condensed nucleoid in response to an inducing signal to initiate transcription.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Fluorescence-based protein footprinting using histidine-tagged protein.

We describe a procedure for protein footprinting to identify the region(s) of a protein that interacts with a ligand. The method utilized the affinity of a stretch of histidine residues cloned into the protein to metal-chelated resin. After limited protease digestion, the histidine-tagged end fragments were separated by the resin and labeled with a fluorescein derivative. Resolving the labeled digestion products on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel and visualizing the peptides using a FluorImager provided a way to identify the protease target sites that were protected from digestion because of interaction with DNA. The protection experiments would be applicable not only to detect direct contact sites but also sites allosterically altered by ligand binding.

Chromatography, Affinity↗

Serology and immunoglobulin profile in rheumatoid arthritis.

One hundred and twenty cases of clinically diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, 80 non-rheumatoid cases suffering from various other diseases and 40 healthy individuals were investigated for the presence of rheumatoid factor, quantitation of serum immunoglobulin, demonstration of ANA and LE cell phenomenon. Microlatex agglutination test of serum for rheumatoid factor showed 56.6% positivity in rheumatoid group and 3.7% positivity in non-rheumatoid group. All three serum immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, IgA) were raised in serum in significant titre in cases of rheumatoid arthritis, whereas only IgA lever was elevated in the group of non-rheumatoid diseases. ANA and LE cell phenomenon were observed in 11.7% and 4.4% cases of rheumatoid arthritis who had severe underlying disease. In non-rheumatoid group, only one of 6 cases of systemic lupus erythematosus showed rheumatoid factor and that too in an insignificant titre (less than 1:20). Synovium and synovial fluid contained plenty of plasma cells and lymphocytes. It has been observed that RF appears first in synovial fluid and it may take several months to a year to attain detectable level in serum.

Adolescent↗

Repression and activation of promoter-bound RNA polymerase activity by Gal repressor.

By binding to the DNA site OE at position -60.5 in the gal operon, the GalR protein activates transcription from the P2 promoter located on the opposite face of DNA (position -5) and represses transcription from the P1 promoter located on the same face (position +1). GalR increases RNA polymerase binding at P2 and inhibits isomerization at P1 by forming a GalR-DNA-RNA polymerase ternary complex in each case. The specific effect of GalR at one promoter is independent of the presence of the other promoter. The enhancement or repression is also not the intrinsic property of a promoter; the regulation can be reversed by switching the angular orientation of the promoters relative to OE. Both enhancement and repression appear to require the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and GalR and/or the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and DNA in the ternary complexes. We have discussed how GalR might exert opposite effects in the steps involved in the formation of the open complex from free RNA polymerase and DNA.

Binding Sites↗