PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Adhya

Publications and source records attributed to S Adhya.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Role of an RNA-binding protein in import of tRNA into Leishmania mitochondria.

Nuclear-encoded cytoplasmic tRNAs are imported into the mitochondria of kinetoplastid protozoa by an unknown mechanism. In a Leishmania in organello system, ATP-dependent import of a cloned, unspliced tRNATyr(GUA) transcript was demonstrated by protection from ribonuclease, whereas import of a tRNAGln(CUG) transcript was much less efficient. Specific binding of tRNATyr to two mitochondrial surface proteins of 15 and 22 kilodaltons was observed. Tubulin antisense-binding protein (TAB), the 15-kilodaton species, was purified to apparent homogeneity by RNA affinity chromatography. TAB forms stable complexes with the D stem-loop region of tRNATyr. Immunocytochemical and cell fractionation experiments, combined with limited proteolysis, suggested the association of TAB with the outer mitochondrial membrane. Importantly, anti-TAB antibody specifically inhibited binding as well as import of tRNATyr and of a synthetic structural homolog. These results support the role of TAB as a membrane-bound receptor or carrier for RNA import into Leishmania mitochondria.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Repressor induced site-specific binding of HU for transcriptional regulation.

Transcription from two overlapping gal promoters is repressed by Gal repressor binding to bipartite gal operators, O(E) and O(I), which flank the promoters. Concurrent repression of the gal promoters also requires the bacterial histone-like protein HU which acts as a co-factor. Footprinting experiments using iron-EDTA-coupled HU show that HU binding to gal DNA is orientation specific and is specifically dependent upon binding of GalR to both O(E) and O(I). We propose that HU, in concert with GalR, forms a specific nucleoprotein higher order complex containing a DNA loop. This way, HU deforms the promoter to make the latter inactive for transcription initiation while remaining sensitive to inducer. The example of gal repression provides a model for studying how a 'condensed' DNA becomes available for transcription.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Interaction of Gal repressor with inducer and operator: induction of gal transcription from repressor-bound DNA.

Gal repressor inhibits transcription from the gal promoter (P1) when it binds to the cognate operator (O(E)). The repression is relieved by the presence of the inducer D-galactose. Compared with its interaction with free repressor, D-galactose binds to the repressor-operator complex with 10-fold reduced affinity as determined by fluorescence enhancement measurements. Thermodynamic analysis and fluorescence anisotropy showed that the stability of the repressor-operator complex is reduced by only 7-fold by the presence of the inducer in the complex. The formation of the inducer-repressor-operator ternary complex has been confirmed by CD spectral analysis. Fluorescence spectroscopy and energy transfer experiments suggest that individual allosteric effects of the two ligands, inducer and operator, on Gal repressor are responsible for the slightly weakened stability of the ternary complex compared with the stability of the inducer-repressor and repressor-operator complexes. In vitro transcription results demonstrated full derepression of transcription of the P1 promoter under conditions in which the concentrations of the inducer-repressor binary complex are severalfold higher than the dissociation constant of the inducer-repressor-operator ternary complex into inducer-repressor and free DNA. These results strongly suggest that the inducer binding to the repressor-operator complex does not lead to dissociation of the repressor from the operator during transcription induction. Because Gal repressor inhibits transcription by modulating the alpha subunit of the P1-bound RNA polymerase, we conclude that the inducer binding to the operator-bound repressor only allosterically relieves the inhibitory effect of repressor on RNA polymerase without dissociating the repressor from DNA.

Circular Dichroism↗
PubMed1997

Atomic force microscopic demonstration of DNA looping by GalR and HU.

Regulation of gene transcription in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes involves formation of various DNA-multiprotein complexes of higher order structure through communication between distant regions of DNA. The communication between distant DNA sites occurs by interaction between proteins bound to the sites by looping out the intervening DNA segments. The repression of transcription of two overlapping promoters of the gal operon in Escherichia coli requires Gal repressor (GalR) and the histone-like protein HU. Both in vivo and in vitro data support a proposed HU containing complex responsive to induction in which GalR molecules bound to two distant operator sites interact by looping out DNA. We successfully applied atomic force microscope (AFM) imaging to visualize galDNA complexes with proteins. We report GalR mediated DNA looping in which HU plays an obligatory role by helping GalR tetramerization. Supercoiling of DNA, which is also critical for GalR action, may stabilize the DNA loops by providing an energetically favorable geometry of the DNA.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1997

Functional characterization of roles of GalR and GalS as regulators of the gal regulon.

An isorepressor of the gal regulon in Escherichia coli, GalS, has been purified to homogeneity. In vitro DNase I protection experiments indicated that among operators of the gal regulon, GalS binds most strongly to the external operator of the mgl operon, which encodes the high-affinity beta-methylgalactoside galactose transport system, and with less affinity to the operators controlling expression of the gal operon, which codes for enzymes of galactose metabolism. GalS has even less affinity for the external operator of galP, which codes for galactose permease, the major low-affinity galactose transporter in the cell. This order of affinities is the reverse of that of GalR, which binds most strongly to the operator of galP and most weakly to that of mgl. Our results also show that GalS, like its homolog, GalR, is a dimeric protein which in binding to the bipartite operators of the gal operon selectively represses its P1 promoter. Consistent with the fact that GalR is the exclusive regulator of the low-affinity galactose transporter, galactose permease, and that the major role of GalS is in regulating expression of the high-affinity galactose transporter encoded by the mgl operon, we found that the DNA binding of GalS is 15-fold more sensitive than that of GalR to galactose.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Short report: Leishmania DNA in Phlebotomus and Sergentomyia species during a kala-azar epidemic.

The presence of Leishmania donovani DNA in sand flies caught in Indian kala-azar patients' dwellings during the epidemic of 1990-1992 was studied using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplification of miniexon-derived RNA genes and gpG3 mRNA was achieved in single Phlebotomus argentipes, P. papatasi, and Sergentomyia babu flies. The data suggest the possible involvement of multiple sandfly species in kala-azar transmission.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Import of RNA into Leishmania mitochondria occurs through direct interaction with membrane-bound receptors.

Cytoplasmic tRNAs are imported into the kinetoplast mitochondrion of Leishmania, but the mechanism of import is unknown, particularly whether RNA is transferred as a ribonucleoprotein complex through the protein import pathway or by a distinct receptor-mediated mechanism. Using isolated mitochondria, it was shown that a small, importable RNA, which is structurally homologous to tRNA, binds rapidly, specifically, and with high affinity to the mitochondrial surface in the absence of soluble protein factors to form an import intermediate. Two classes of binding site of apparent Kd 0.3 and 10 n, respectively, were distinguished. tRNA from Leishmania, but not yeast, competitively inhibited the binding. Northwestern blot analysis revealed the presence of a 15-kDa RNA binding protein on the mitochondrial surface. Whereas receptor binding was resistant to heparin and KCl, internalization was sensitive to both reagents. These results are consistent with the presence of a direct mechanism of receptor-mediated RNA import on Leishmania mitochondria.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1996

Analysis of genetic instability during mammary tumor progression using a novel selection-based assay for in vivo mutations in a bacteriophage lambda transgene target.

Genetic instability is thought to be responsible for the numerous genotypic changes that occur during neoplastic transformation and metastatic progression. To explore the role of genetic instability at the level of point mutations during mammary tumor development and malignant progression, we combined transgenic mouse models of mutagenesis detection and oncogenesis. Bitransgenic mice were generated that carried both a bacteriophage lambda transgene to assay mutagenesis and a polyomavirus middle T oncogene, mammary gland-targeted expression of which led to metastatic mammary adenocarcinomas. We developed a novel assay for the detection of mutations in the lambda transgene that selects for phage containing forward mutations only in the lambda cII gene, using an hfl- bacterial host. In addition to the relative ease of direct selection, the sensitivity of this assay for both spontaneous and chemically induced mutations was comparable to the widely used mutational target gene, lambda lacI, making the cII assay an attractive alternative for mutant phage recovery for any lambda-based mouse mutagenesis assay system. The frequencies of lambda cII- mutants were not significantly different in normal mammary epithelium, primary mammary adenocarcinomas, and pulmonary metastases. The cII mutational spectra in these tissues consisted mostly of G/C-->A/T transitions, a large fraction of which occurred at CpG dinucleotides. These data suggest that, in this middle T oncogene model of mammary tumor progression, a significant increase in mutagenesis is not required for tumor development or for metastatic progression.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Long-circulating bacteriophage as antibacterial agents.

The increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens motivated us to attempt to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of bacteriophages. The therapeutic application of phages as antibacterial agents was impeded by several factors: (i) the failure to recognize the relatively narrow host range of phages; (ii) the presence of toxins in crude phage lysates; and (iii) a lack of appreciation for the capacity of mammalian host defense systems, particularly the organs of the reticuloendothelial system, to remove phage particles from the circulatory system. In our studies involving bacteremic mice, the problem of the narrow host range of phage was dealt with by using selected bacterial strains and virulent phage specific for them. Toxin levels were diminished by purifying phage preparations. To reduce phage elimination by the host defense system, we developed a serial-passage technique in mice to select for phage mutants able to remain in the circulatory system for longer periods of time. By this approach we isolated long-circulating mutants of Escherichia coli phage lambda and of Salmonella typhimurium phage P22. We demonstrated that the long-circulating lambda mutants also have greater capability as antibacterial agents than the corresponding parental strain in animals infected with lethal doses of bacteria. Comparison of the parental and mutant lambda capsid proteins revealed that the relevant mutation altered the major phage head protein E. The use of toxin-free, bacteria-specific phage strains, combined with the serial-passage technique, may provide insights for developing phage into therapeutically effective antibacterial agents.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Histone-like protein HU as a specific transcriptional regulator: co-factor role in repression of gal transcription by GAL repressor.

BACKGROUND: Transcription initiation from the two overlapping promoters of the gal operon in Escherichia coli is negatively regulated by binding of Gal repressor (GalR) to bipartite operators, which encompass the promoters. Coordinated repression of the two promoters requires GalR binding to both operators. In a purified system, GalR, nevertheless, fails to show the coordinated repression, predicting the participation of an additional factor(s) in the regulation in vivo. RESULTS: We have purified a protein that restored the expected GalR-mediated repression for the in vitro system and have identified this factor to be the bacterial histone-like protein HU. In vitro transcription assays in the presence of GalR and HU show that, just as in vivo, the coordinated repression of the two gal promoters requires GalR binding to both operators and is sensitive to the inducer, D-galactose. The GalR and HU dependent repression also requires supercoiled DNA template and prevents open complex formation. CONCLUSION: We propose that HU, acting as a co-factor, brings about the GalR-mediated repression by forming a distinct nucleoprotein complex of higher order structure. Although how HU participates in the assembly process is unknown, there may be a cooperative effect in the formation of the repression complex.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1995

The non-inducible nature of super-repressors of the gal operon in Escherichia coli.

We isolated and characterized mutant repressors (GalR) of the gal operon in Escherichia coli. These repressors (super-repressors), called GalRs, have a non-inducible phenotype. Repression of the gal operon by super-repressors cannot be lifted by inducer. The mutant galR genes, galRs, have been cloned and the mutational changes determined. Two of them, galRuv7s and galR78s, were located in the proposed sugar binding domains of the repressor. The repressor from wild-type (galR+), as well as from mutant galRuv7s, was purified and characterized biochemically. The results showed that, like wild-type GalR+, GalRuv7s binds to DNA normally and represses transcription from the P1 promoter and stimulates that from the P2 promoter of the gal operon. Nevertheless, compared to GalR+, GalRuv7s is much less sensitive to the presence of the inducer, D-galactose. The affinity of D-galactose to GalRuv7s is 10 to 30-fold lower, as measured by the effect of the inducer on GalR tryptophan fluorescence; GalR complexes with DNA and on GalR repression of transcription. Our results suggest that the super-repressor phenotype of GalRuv7s is because of a defect in D-galactose binding rather than a defect in the ligand-induced allosteric change or increased affinity for the operator.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Repression and activation of transcription by Gal and Lac repressors: involvement of alpha subunit of RNA polymerase.

Gal or Lac repressor binding to an upstream DNA segment, in the absence of DNA looping, represses the P1 promoter located on the same face and activates the P2 promoter situated on the opposite face of the DNA helix in the gal operon. Both inhibition and stimulation of transcription requires the physical presence of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase although the latter is not required for transcription itself. We propose that Gal and Lac repressors inhibit or stimulate transcription initiation by disabling or stimulating RNA polymerase activity at a post-binding step by directly or indirectly altering the C-terminal alpha domain to an unfavorable state at P1 or a more favorable state at P2, respectively.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1995

Transcription regulation by inflexibility of promoter DNA in a looped complex.

The gal operon of Escherichia coli is negatively regulated by repressor binding to bipartite operators separated by 11 helical turns of DNA. Synergistic binding of repressor to separate sites on DNA results in looping, with the intervening DNA as a topologically closed domain containing the two promoters. A closed DNA loop of 11 helical turns, which is in-flexible to torsional changes, disables the promoters either by resisting DNA unwinding needed for open complex formation or by impeding the processive DNA contacts by an RNA polymerase in flux during transcription initiation. Interaction between two proteins bound to different sites on DNA modulating the activity of the intervening segment toward other proteins by allostery may be a common mechanism of regulation in DNA-multiprotein complexes.

Allosteric Regulation↗
PubMed1995

CRP-DNA complexes: inducing the A-like form in the binding sites with an extended central spacer.

The consensus DNA sequence for binding of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) has two symmetrically related inverted recognition elements TGTGA:TCACA, separated by a variable spacer, normally 6 bp long. We have shown that the CRP-cAMP complex, when bound to synthetic binding sites with an extended 8 bp spacer segment, induces an increase in the DNA circular dichroism (CD). The CD change at lambda > 275 nm agrees with the shift of approximately one helical turn of DNA into A-like form. The B-conformation is preserved for CRP binding sites similar to that in the lac and uxaCA promoters with 6 bp spacers. Another effect accompanying DNA binding is a dramatic increase of the negative CD magnitude in the spectral region of the ligand cAMP, at lambda < 272 nm. This effect is observed when CRP binds to specific sites with 6 or 8 bp spacers as well as to non-specific DNA. We reason that the A-like form arises by compressing and unwinding the DNA in CRP-DNA complexes having 8 bp central spacers. This serves to maintain a fixed length and twisting angle and is controlled by the protein's relatively rigid frame. This model is consistent with the observation that some binding sites with 6 bp spacers may also show the CD increase inherent to the sites with the extended 8 bp spacers. These 6 bp spacers are characterized by an increased twisting angle that requires their unwinding to bind to CRP. We propose that a mutual adaptation between CRP and binding sites by local untwisting and a B-->A-like transition in the DNA is of general importance and may occur in other protein-DNA complexes, such as the complex of RNA polymerase with promoter DNA.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1994

An arcane role of DNA in transcription activation.

The mechanism by which the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) activates transcription has been investigated using the lac promoter of Escherichia coli. For transcription activation, an interaction between DNA-bound CRP and RNA polymerase is not sufficient. CRP must bind to a site in the same DNA and close to the promoter. CRP action requires an intact spacer DNA to provide a rigid support in building a CRP-RNA polymerase protein bridge or to allow a conformational change in the DNA to be transmitted to the lac promoter using the protein bridge as a structural support.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Import of small RNAs into Leishmania mitochondria in vitro.

Using an in vitro ribonuclease protection assay, it was shown that synthetic antisense transcripts from the 5'-upstream region of the beta-tubulin gene are efficiently imported into isolated Leishmania mitochondria. Import occurred after a lag of about 30 min at 25 degrees C and was dependent on ATP. Preincubation experiments suggested that import consists of a slow interaction of mitochondria with RNA, followed by rapid ATP-dependent uptake. Import was saturable with antisense RNA at about 1 nM concentration, and sequence-specific, as shown by lack of import of other labelled transcripts. Deletion analysis demonstrated a correlation between efficiency of import and the number of oligopurine motifs on the antisense RNA. Several small ribosomal RNAs (srRNAs) and Leishmania tRNA competed with antisense RNA for import. Incubation of mitochondria with srRNAs and tRNA in the presence of radiolabelled UTP resulted in the ribonuclease-resistant labelling of these RNAs by the mitochondrial terminal uridylyl transferase. Extracts of isolated mitochondria contain a factor binding to antisense RNA, as shown by gel retardation assay. These observations indicate the presence of a receptor-mediated import pathway for srRNAs and tRNA in Leishmania mitochondria.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗