Biomedical subjects

S Kjølstad

Publications and source records attributed to S Kjølstad.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

[Norwegian tourists' use of medical services abroad].

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that one in three holidaymakers experienced illness on their trip abroad. We wanted to find out what happens to Norwegian tourists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have collected data from the Association of Norwegian Tour/Operators on travel patterns, and from a travel insurance company on illness and expenses. RESULTS: Between 1.5% and 5% of travellers get so ill that they need medical assistance. The number of consultations that results in hospitalisation vary from less than 5% in one country to more than 30% in neighbouring territories. Average cost of hospitalisation differ considerably from one country to another. INTERPRETATION: It appears that cultural differences, differing treatment facilities, and varying required rates of return are decisive for whether or not a patient is referred to hospital.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

PubMed1991

[Focus groups--presentation of a qualitative research method].

The Focus Group is a qualitative research method based on group dynamics. The group participants are chosen by random sampling from the study population. They all have something in common in regard to the question being focused on. Well planned discussions provide knowledge on a specific topic. The method is not very expensive, and does not take too much time. Focus Groups have been used in marketing, and in sociological and psychological research. The authors conclude that the method is of interest for medical research.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

PubMed1991

Use of focus groups to study absenteeism due to illness.

Reasons for sick leaves are often complex and influenced by nonmedical factors. We have used focus groups, a qualitative research method, to study the relationship between working conditions and absenteeism due to illness in both an industrial company and an insurance company. We organized 10 focus groups within each company, with participants randomly selected from departments having similar work tasks within each company. According to the groups, the most important working conditions that influenced absenteeism were (a) feeling of well-being at work (mainly defined as security in social relations), (b) the organization of the work, and (c) the department leader. Factors considered to be less important included: number of employees, male/female ratios, group norms for absenteeism, age distribution, work-related illness, substance abuse, and work loads. There was substantial agreement between the groups, indicating that our findings may be relevant to other companies.

Absenteeism↗