PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S M Zola

Publications and source records attributed to S M Zola.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia.

Episodic memory and semantic memory are two types of declarative memory. There have been two principal views about how this distinction might be reflected in the organization of memory functions in the brain. One view, that episodic memory and semantic memory are both dependent on the integrity of medial temporal lobe and midline diencephalic structures, predicts that amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe/diencephalic damage should be proportionately impaired in both episodic and semantic memory. An alternative view is that the capacity for semantic memory is spared, or partially spared, in amnesia relative to episodic memory ability. This article reviews two kinds of relevant data: 1) case studies where amnesia has occurred early in childhood, before much of an individual's semantic knowledge has been acquired, and 2) experimental studies with amnesic patients of fact and event learning, remembering and knowing, and remote memory. The data provide no compelling support for the view that episodic and semantic memory are affected differently in medial temporal lobe/diencephalic amnesia. However, episodic and semantic memory may be dissociable in those amnesic patients who additionally have severe frontal lobe damage.

Amnesia↗
PubMed1998

Memory, amnesia, and the issue of recovered memory: neurobiological aspects.

The main thesis of this article is that the debate about the credibility of "recovered memories"--reports by adults of recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse and trauma that were allegedly repressed for many years--can be usefully informed by considering the biological and behavioral facts and ideas about how memory works. Accordingly, the first section of this review describes current facts and ideas about the neurobiology and neuropsychology of memory and amnesia, including what parts of the brain are important for memory, distinctions between different memory systems in the brain, and the phenomena of infantile amnesia and source amnesia. The second section takes into account the information about the biological and behavioral bases of memory and addresses two questions about memory that have become a focus of debate in the recovered memory controversy, that is, whether memories for traumatic events change over time, and whether memories can be created for traumatic events that did not actually happen.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A reexamination of the concurrent discrimination learning task: the importance of anterior inferotemporal cortex, area TE.

For 30 years, the concurrent discrimination learning task has figured prominently in studies used to determine the effects of medial temporal lobe damage in monkeys. However, the findings from these studies have been contradictory. We explored the contribution to concurrent discrimination performance of inadvertent damage to area TE by reexamining the behavioral data and histological material from monkeys with medial temporal lobe lesions previously tested in our laboratory. The amount of inadvertent damage to area TE was more predictive of impaired performance on the concurrent discrimination learning task than was the amount of damage to any medial temporal lobe structure, including the perirhinal cortex. These findings resolve earlier inconsistent findings regarding the concurrent discrimination learning task by demonstrating that performance on this task depends on area TE and not on perirhinal cortex or other medial temporal lobe structures.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Amnesia, memory and brain systems.

Bilateral damage to either the medial temporal lobe or the diencephalic midline causes an amnesic syndrome, i.e. a global impairment in the ability to acquire new memories regardless of sensory modality, and a loss of some memories, especially recent ones, from the period before amnesia began. The memory deficit can occur against a background of intact intellectual and perceptual functions. Two themes have been prominent in recent work. First, the amnesic syndrome is narrower than once believed in the sense that a number of learning and memory abilities are preserved (e.g. skill and habit learning, simple forms of conditioning and the phenomenon of priming). Second, the brain system damaged in amnesia has only a temporary role in memory. As time passes after learning, memory is reorganized and consolidated within neocortex, such that eventually medial temporal lobe and diencephalic structures are not needed for storage or retrieval.

Amnesia↗
PubMed1997

The neurobiology of recovery memory.

The so-called recovery memory syndrome--reports by adults of recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse and trauma that were allegedly "repressed" for many years--has become an important issue in the field of mental health. In particular, there is debate about the credibility of recovered memories. The author describes findings in several fields of brain science about the way memory works and how memory is organized in the brain. These findings clarify aspects of normal memory function and the process of memory distortion, and they provide a neurobiological perspective from which to approach the topic of recovered memory.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems.

This article reviews recent studies of memory systems in humans and nonhuman primates. Three major conclusions from recent work are that (i) the capacity for nondeclarative (nonconscious) learning can now be studied in a broad array of tasks that assess classification learning, perceptuomotor skill learning, artificial grammar learning, and prototype abstraction; (ii) cortical areas adjacent to the hippocampal formation, including entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices, are an essential part of the medial temporal lobe memory system that supports declarative (conscious) memory; and (iii) in humans, bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation is nevertheless sufficient to produce severe anterograde amnesia and temporally graded retrograde amnesia covering as much as 25 years.

Amnesia↗
PubMed1996

Three cases of enduring memory impairment after bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation.

Patient RB (Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus, S. Zola-Morgan, L. R. Squire, and D. G. Amaral, 1986, J Neurosci 6:2950-2967) was the first reported case of human amnesia in which detailed neuropsychological analyses and detailed postmortem neuropathological analyses demonstrated that damage limited to the hippocampal formation was sufficient to produce anterograde memory impairment. Neuropsychological and postmortem neuropathological findings are described here for three additional amnesic patients with bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation. Findings from these patients, taken together with the findings from patient RB and other amnesic patients, make three important points about memory. (1) Bilateral damage limited primarily to the CA1 region of the hippocampal formation is sufficient to produce moderately severe anterograde memory impairment. (2) Bilateral damage beyond, the CA1 region, but still limited to the hippocampal formation, can produce more severe anterograde memory impairment. (3) Extensive, temporally graded retrograde amnesia covering 15 years or more can occur after damage limited to the hippocampal formation. Findings from studies with experimental animals are consistent with the findings from amnesic patients. The present results substantiate the idea that severity of memory impairment is dependent on locus and extent of damage within the hippocampal formation and that damage to the hippocampal formation can cause temporally graded retrograde amnesia.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Ischemic brain damage and memory impairment: a commentary.

Studies in humans and monkeys have identified structures in the medial temporal lobe essential for memory (the hippocampal region, i.e., the dentate gyrus, the hippocampus, and the subicular complex, and the adjacent perirhinal, entorhinal, and parahippocampal cortices). Additional work has revealed that for both species, damage limited to the hippocampal region produces less severe memory impairment than damage that includes additional structures within the medial temporal lobe. This work has been based on both neurosurgical lesions and on lesions produced by global ischemia or anoxia. An important issue about ischemic damage is whether the damage identifiable in histopathological examination provides an accurate estimate of direct neural damage or whether additional direct damage might be present that is sufficient to disrupt neuronal function in areas important for memory and sufficient to impair behavioral performance, but not sufficient to progress to cell death and to be detectable in conventional histopathology. This commentary explores the issue of ischemic damage and memory impairment. Although few studies have addressed this issue directly, the currently available data from global ischemia in rats, monkeys, and humans are consistent with the hypothesis that the detectable neuronal damage is responsible for the severity of the observed behavioral impairment. Yet it is also true that this hypothesis has not been the target of very much systematic work. We encourage additional experimental work, especially in rats, that could further illuminate how to evaluate the behavioral effects of ischemic lesions.

Amnesia↗
PubMed1996

Memory, memory impairment, and the medial temporal lobe.

The cognitive and neuroanatomical work described here should be viewed as a first step in analyzing how the brain has organized its memory functions, which can open the door to more detailed neurobiological analysis. With respect to declarative memory, it should soon be possible to study representations directly in neocortex with the technique of single-cell recording, to observe directly the development of neuronal plasticity important for declarative memory, and to determine how the medial temporal lobe interacts with neocortex during learning, consolidation, and retrieval. In this regard, the paradigms developed by Miyashita and his colleagues appear to hold particular promise (Sakai and Miyashita 1991; Higuchi and Miyashita 1996). With respect to nondeclarative memory, it is now possible to identify particular brain systems that are essential for particular kinds of memory. An important next step will be to determine whether these systems are essential for the acquisition, storage, or expression of memory, and to identify exactly where the synaptic changes occur that support each kind of memory.

Animals↗