PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Marsoni

Publications and source records attributed to S Marsoni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Concerted escalation of dose and dosing duration in a phase I study of the oral camptothecin gimatecan (ST1481) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gimatecan is an orally bioavailable camptothecin analogue with preclinical findings of promising antitumor activity. A phase I design of concerted dose escalation and dosing duration was implemented to assess the potential schedule dependency of tolerability that emerged from animal studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gimatecan was given daily for five consecutive days per week for 1, 2 or 3 weeks every 28 days. Plasma levels of total gimatecan were measured on the first and the last day of treatment in each schedule. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients were treated with 0.8-7.2 mg/m(2) of gimatecan per cycle. The main toxicity was myelosuppression with dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. In the 1-, 2- and 3-week schedule, the maximum tolerated doses were 4.5, 5.6 and 6.4 mg/m(2). Diarrhea and asthenia were of low grade and of minor clinical relevance, while the higher incidence of nausea and vomiting in the 1-week schedule required the use of antiemetic prophylaxis. Due to the prolonged half-life (approximately 77 h), the plasma concentration of gimatecan increased from the first to the last day of dosing. Six partial responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerability of gimatecan was schedule dependent. Further testing with schedules taking into account its long persistence in human plasma is worthwhile.

Administration, Oral↗

Phase IB and pharmacological study of the novel taxane BMS-184476 in combination with doxorubicin.

The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the pharmacological profile of the paclitaxel analogue BMS-184476 given once every 3 weeks, or on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (d1&8), in combination with a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2) of Doxorubicin (Doxo) administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Adult patients with advanced solid malignancies received escalating doses of BMS-184476 infused over 1 h after bolus Doxo. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of BMS-184476, Doxo and metabolites were investigated. The effect of BMS-184476 on doxorubicinol formation was studied in the cytosol from human myocardium. The MTD of 3-weekly BMS-184476 was 30 mg/m(2). The MTD/recommended Phase II dose was 35 mg/m(2)/week (70 mg/m(2) per cycle) in the d1&8 schedule. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia for both schedules. Other toxicities were loss of appetite, asthenia, and mild, cumulative peripheral neuropathy. The objective response rate in 17 previously untreated or minimally pretreated patients with breast cancer treated at 35 mg/m(2)/week of BMS-184476 was 59% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 33-82%). Two of the 7 patients not responding to the study regimen later responded to Doxo and paclitaxel. Plasma disposition of BMS-184476 at 30, 35 and 40 mg/m(2) was linear without evidence of a PK interaction with Doxo. In studies with cytosol from human myocardium, the formation of cardiotoxic doxorubicinol was not enhanced by BMS-184476. Dosing of BMS-184476 for 2 consecutive weeks allowed the administration of larger doses of the taxane with a promising antitumour activity in patients with untreated or minimally pretreated breast cancer. The higher than expected myelotoxicity of the 3-weekly schedule is unexplained by the investigated interactions. Lack of enhanced doxorubicinol formation in human myocardium is consistent with the cardiac safety of the regimen.

Aged↗

Cancer drug development in Europe: a selection of new agents under development at the European Drug Development Network.

From may 99, three european leaders in anti-cancer drug development (EORTC, Cancer Research UK, SENDO) have got together to form a network of collaborating groups: the European Drug Development Network. The member organisations have all agreed to join their efforts in developing new drugs. They have acquired a great and efficient expertise in anticancer drug development covering all aspects from drug screening to refinement of trial methodology and translational research. In this paper, the most interesting drugs under development in each of the three organisations are being described and discussed.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗

Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage B2 and C colon cancer. International Multicenter Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials Investigators.

The International Multicenter Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT) investigators have now completed two large systematic reviews of adjuvant therapy trials in colon cancer. The IMPACT 1 study pooled data from three separate trials each comparing the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin with observation alone as adjuvant treatment for 1,526 patients with Dukes' B or C colon cancer. The results showed that treatment with 5-FU/leucovorin significantly reduced mortality by 22% (P = .029) and events such as relapse, second tumor, or death by 35% (P < .0001) after 3 years of follow-up. The side effects associated with 5-FU/leucovorin were clinically acceptable. The IMPACT 1 study also showed a clear benefit of adjuvant treatment for patients with Dukes' C colon cancer, but not for stage-B patients. After up to 10 years of follow-up, 5-FU/leucovorin significantly reduced mortality by 30% for patients with Dukes' C disease (P = .003), but only reduced mortality by 8% in patients with Dukes' B colon cancer (P = .658). The aim of the IMPACT 2 study was to determine whether 5-FU/leucovorin is an effective adjuvant treatment for patients with Dukes' B2 colon cancer. Results were pooled from five separate trials that randomized 1,016 patients. After a median of 5.75 years of follow-up, B2 patients receiving 5-FU/leucovorin did not have a significant increase in overall survival or event-free survival. At 5 years, the hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.86 (90% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.07) and for event-free survival was 0.83 (90% confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.07). 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin was not recommended as a standard adjuvant treatment for all patients with Dukes' B2 colon cancer.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

Clinical and pharmacological phase I study with accelerated titration design of a daily times five schedule of BBR3464, a novel cationic triplatinum complex.

OBJECTIVES: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the toxicity and pharmacokinetic profile of BBR3464, a novel triplatinum complex. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced solid tumors not responsive to previous antitumor treatments received BBR 3464 on a daily x 5 schedule every twenty-eighth day. The drug was given as a one-hour infusion with pre-and post-treatment hydration (500 ml in one hour) and no antiemetic prophylaxis. The starting dose was 0.03 mg/m2/day. A modified accelerated titration escalation design was used. Total and free platinum (Pt) concentrations in plasma and urine were assessed by ICP-MS on days 1 and 5 of the first cycle. RESULTS: Dose was escalated four times up to 0.17 mg/m2/day. Short-lasting neutropenia and diarrhea of late onset were dose-limiting and defined the MTD at 0.12 mg/m2. Nausea and vomiting were rare, neither neuro- nor renal toxic effects were observed. BBR3464 showed a rapid distribution phase of 1 hour and a terminal half-life of several days. At 0.17 mg/m2 plasma Cmax and AUC on day 5 were higher than on day 1, indicating drug accumulation. Approximately 10% of the equivalent dose of BBR3464 (2.2%-13.4%) was recovered in a 24-hour urine collection. CONCLUSIONS: The higher than expected incidence of neutropenia and GI toxicity might be related to the prolonged half-life and accumulation of total and free Pt after daily administrations. Lack of nephrotoxicity and the low urinary excretion support the use of the drug without hydration. The single intermittent schedule has been selected for clinical development.

Adolescent↗

Adjuvant portal-vein infusion of fluorouracil and heparin in colorectal cancer: a randomised trial. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group, the Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia, and the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of regional adjuvant chemotherapy, via portal-vein infusion (PVI), after resection of colorectal cancer. We undertook a randomised controlled multicentre trial to investigate the efficacy of PVI (500 mg/m2 fluorouracil plus 5000 IU heparin daily for 7 days). METHODS: 1235 of about 1500 potentially eligible patients were randomly assigned surgery plus PVI or surgery alone (control). The patients were followed up for a median of 63 months, with yearly screening for recurrent disease. The primary endpoint was survival; analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 619 patients in the control group and 616 in the PVI group met eligibility criteria. 164 (26%) control-group patients and 173 (28%) PVI-group patients died. 5-year survival did not differ significantly between the groups (73 vs 72%; 95% Cl for difference -6 to 4). The control and PVI groups were also similar in terms of disease-free survival at 5 years (67 vs 65%) and the number of patients with liver metastases (79 vs 77%). INTERPRETATION: PVI of fluorouracil, at a dose of 500 mg/m2 for 7 days, cannot be recommended as the sole adjuvant treatment for high-risk colorectal cancer after complete surgical excision. However, these results cannot eliminate a small benefit when PVI is used at a higher dosage or in combination with mitomycin.

Aged↗

GIVIO-SITAC 01: A randomized trial of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid administered to patients with colon carcinoma--long term results and evaluation of the indicators of health-related quality of life. Gruppo Italiano Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia. Studio Italiano Terapia Adiuvante Colon.

BACKGROUND: In 1989, the authors began a randomized trial to determine whether 5-fluorouracil and high dose folinic acid (HD-FUFA) would increase the event free and overall survival of patients with resectable Dukes B and C (AJCC/UICC Stage II and Stage III) colon carcinoma, and to assess the toxicity of the treatment and its impact on selected health-related quality-of-life indicators. Early results were published as a part of an international multicenter pooled analysis (IMPACT) in 1995. The purpose of this report is to update the survival data for patients enrolled in the trial and describe their reported perceptions of their own health and quality of life. METHODS: The trial involved multiple treatment centers, with a centralized randomization between surgery alone and surgery with chemotherapy. The HD-FUFA regimen employed consisted of 5-fluorouracil (370 mg/m2) plus folinic acid (200 mg/m2) administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients' perceptions of their own health status were obtained by means of 3 self-administered questionnaires, which were completed by patients at the time of discharge from the treatment center and at 6 and 24 months after randomization. RESULTS: Overall, 888 patients with resected Dukes B2 and C colon carcinoma were enrolled in the trial. HD-FUFA significantly reduced mortality by 25% (95% confidence interval, 5-41%; P=0.02) and events by 31% (95% confidence interval, 14-45%; P < or = 0.001). Compliance with treatment was good; more than 80% of patients completed the planned therapy. Toxicity was mild, and oral mucositis was the main side effect. None of the health-related quality-of-life parameters investigated (emotional status, worry about the future, changes in social life, impact of the disease, follow-up, and global quality of life) seemed to be affected by the treatment to which patients were allocated. A positive trend in the evolution of patients' psychologic status was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Long term results of this SITAC study confirm that HD-FUFA is a well-tolerated, effective 6-month adjuvant regimen for patients with colon carcinoma that has no detrimental effect on their quality of life.

Adult↗

A proposal for a new approach to intergroup cancer trials.

Currently, North American intergroup trials are conducted according to the Intergroup Guidelines, which require that a lead group take responsibility for data management. Intergroup studies conducted in this manner have been very successful in rapidly accruing large numbers of patients to trials addressing significant questions, but it has been difficult for group statistical centres to cope with the resultant peaks in data flow. Our groups recently succeeded in combining the data from three independently designed and conducted trials to carry out a planned pooled analysis. This experience has led us to employ the same approach to data management in designing a forthcoming intergroup trial. We will use a common protocol and capture the same data elements on our forms, but each group will be responsible for the collection and quality control of its own data. A common data set will be created and updated periodically during the study, and will be used for the final analysis. We suggest that this model has advantages over the current approach to data management on intergroup trials, but still retains the features which distinguish an intergroup study from meta-analysis.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Adjuvant treatment for early epithelial ovarian cancer: results of two randomised clinical trials comparing cisplatin to no further treatment or chromic phosphate (32P). G.I.C.O.G.: Gruppo Interregionale Collaborativo in Ginecologia Oncologica.

BACKGROUND: From 1983 to 1990, 271 consecutive patients with stage I ovarian cancer entered two randomised trials, aimed at assessing the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery in early stages of ovarian cancer. Trial I compared cisplatin (50 mg/m2 with repeated courses every 28 days for 6 cycles) to no further therapy in F.I.G.O. stage Ia & b Grade II-III patients; trial II compared cisplatin (same dose and schedule) to 32P in Iaii & bii and Ic patients. METHODS: Both studies were multicentric and centrally randomized. Treatment was allocated by phone and stratified by center. All patients satisfying major eligibility criteria (histological and grade, no previous neoplasms) were analysed according to treatment allocated by randomisation. RESULTS: With a median observation time of 76 months, cisplatin significantly reduced the relapse rate by 65% (HR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.14-0.89, p = 0.028; Cox Model) in trial I and 61% (HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.19-0.77, p = 0.007; Cox Model) in trial II. Survival was not significantly different (trial I - Kaplan-Meier overall 5-year survival: cisplatin = 88%, control = 82%, HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.44-2.98; p = 0.773; Cox Model); trial II - overall 5-year survival: cisplatin = 81%, 32P = 79%, HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.37-1.43; p = 0.354; Cox model). In both studies the risk of dying after relapse increased for patients originally randomized to the cisplatin arms: in trial I, 6 of 7 patients in the cisplatin relapsed arm and died of tumor compared with 8 of 14 patients in the control arm. In trial II 11 of 12 patients on cisplatin, and 18 of 26 on 32P succumbed to tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant cisplatin treatment in early ovarian cancer significantly prevents relapse in comparison to 32P in stage IC patients or to no immediate treatment in earlier stage women. The impact of cisplatin adjuvant treatment on survival remains, however, unclear.

Adult↗

Patterns of care and survival in non small cell lung cancer: 15 years' experience in a general hospital.

BACKGROUND: Transferring results derived from clinical research into practice is particularly difficult in lung cancer where clear indications for treatment are defined only for selected subgroups of patients. Studies on hospital-based lung cancer population could provide data for quantifying this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a follow-up study of consecutive, first-diagnosis cases referred to the in-and outpatient cancer clinics of a large italian general hospital between January 1975 and December 1990. Data were collected from medical records and recorded on ad hoc standardized forms. Analysis focused on changes in distribution over time of patient-related characteristics, prevalence of specific treatment strategies and survival of the study population. RESULTS: 1345 primary non small cell lung cancer cases were reviewed and 1125 were fully evaluable. In early stages (510/1125, 45%) only 237 patients actually underwent surgery. In this group surgery increased from 36 to 69% whereas chemotherapy decreased from 58 to 15%. In the advanced group (615/1125, 55%) chemotherapy was the preferred treatment but combined modalities tripled over time (from 4 to 12%). No significant changes in survival were observed within each group over time. CONCLUSION: Despite changes in the therapeutic approaches, mortality from lung cancer does not seem reduced over time. Since the proportion of cases that could potentially benefit from "active" treatments is small, for the large majority of patients a switch in clinical research from a cure to a care-oriented strategy should be considered.

Aged↗

[Comorbidity and the physician's decision: the case of undertreatment in care of breast tumors].

When a physician has to come to a decision while caring for a given patient, he is supposed to take into account several kind of information related to the disease, illness or patients' personal characteristics. Although it is wellknown that the framework in which such decision has to be taken is complex, most of the scientific knowledge is based on pieces of evidence that derive from studies where complexity is avoided by applying restriction rules. The goal of this approach is to enhance the internal validity while preserving the generalizability of the findings. But in some cases this approach raises more doubts than certainty. It is the case of the process to assemble practice guidelines to reduce the gap between the best care and what is observed into practice using the available knowledge (i.e., available literature or experts' recommendations). As a variety of relevant clinical and patients' personal characteristics are not available at all or little is known on their impact on patients global health status, variables that actually do drive the practice are not included in guidelines that are intended to change it. This paper introduces the conceptual model of such debate and assesses the impact of co-morbidity--a variable seldom taken into account in effectiveness, quality and appropriateness studies- on the kind of medical care given to a sample of 1019 patients with early stage breast cancer. Empirical results and future implications are eventually discussed.

Adult↗

Breast cancer surgery in 30 Italian general hospitals.

The utilization of limited surgery in patients with breast cancer operated between September 1986 and July 1988 was assessed using information collected within a cohort subsequently enrolled in a randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of post-surgical follow up. Overall 30% had limited surgery, 61% had other more radical procedures and 9% are still undergoing an unnecessary Halsted mastectomy. Several factors were related to the lower likelihood of getting a conservative procedure: geographic distribution, age, level of education, quadrant and nodal state. The paper discusses the implications of these findings in view of the otherwise growing consensus that more radical surgery should be abandoned.

Breast Neoplasms↗