Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S Marsoni.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The impact of a national education program based on the dissemination of written guidelines for the treatment of breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer was investigated in Italy. Through a survey of 770 physicians exploring their knowledge and attitudes and a review of medical records of 1,483 patients assessing current clinical practice, this study examined whether 1) the guidelines reached the target population of physicians, 2) they were effective in shaping doctors' opinions, and 3) care patterns conformed with the guidelines. Overall, the net effect of the intervention appeared to be limited in terms of actual diffusion, attributable influence, and impact. As for diffusion, only 60%, 47%, and 44% of doctors were aware of breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer guidelines, respectively. Although doctors who were aware of the guidelines had more appropriate opinions than those who were not, overall agreement with recommendations was often unsatisfactory. With reference to guidelines recommendations, quality of care was far from optimal, especially in relation to diagnosis and staging. Marked variations in compliance with recommendations emerged with values ranging from 37% to 89%, from 48% to 82%, and from 10% to 97% for breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer, respectively, and this held true even in hospitals where the larger awareness of the guidelines might have been expected to result in better quality care. It was concluded that any thorough assessment of the impact of educational interventions should include a careful analysis of the strategy and process of dissemination. The availability of clinically relevant messages must also be realistically considered before deciding whether the "guidelines approach" is the strategy most likely to succeed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Over the last ten years the Italian National Research Council (C.N.R.) has launched an educational program aimed at favoring the delivery of the most up to date care for cancer patients in community hospitals. Among various tumors for which this effort was undertaken, management guidelines for colorectal cancer were developed in 1978 by a multidisciplinary team of national experts and reported in booklets distributed nationwide under the aegis of the Colorectal Cancer Task Force. In 1988, the C.N.R. funded an evaluation to learn whether: a) the guidelines were widely diffused in the target physician populations; b) their content was accepted by those who received them and, c) practice patterns were consistent with the recommendations in the guidelines. Overall results indicate only a limited effect. Despite clear evidence of a positive self-selection in the physicians' survey, guidelines were familiar to only 47% of responders. Although acceptance of at least some specific recommendations was good among doctors aware of the guidelines (greater than or equal to 60% responders), this finding loses relevance since a not negligible proportion of those not aware of them had the same convictions. Finally, analysis of practice patterns showed serious deficiencies (mostly in terms of thoroughness of operative staging) even in centers where more widespread knowledge of the guidelines should have led to better quality of care. The paper also discusses the comparability of our findings to results of a similar evaluation carried out in the U.S.A. Our results underscore the importance of analyzing the process of diffusion in any assessment of interventions based on knowledge dissemination.
We reviewed care delivered to about 2,500 breast cancer patients in general hospitals over the period 1979-1987 using data from three surveys. The most important and consistent failure was in diagnostic timeliness: about one out of four patients was diagnosed six or more months after the first symptom leading to an almost doubled probability of being diagnosed with more advanced disease. Acceptance of treatment recommendations seemed less satisfactory for surgery than for adjuvant treatments. Conservative surgery still appeared to have limited acceptance for patients with small primary tumor (21 and 23% in 1983 and 1987, respectively) although, starting 1983, there was a shift from the Halsted to the Patey type of radical mastectomy. Follow-up was routine in most node-negative patients and adjuvant chemotherapy was already well established treatment for most pre-menopausal node-positive women (64, 79 and 76% in 1979, 1983 and 1987, respectively). Some form of adjuvant treatment in post-menopausal node-positive women was already present in 1983 but became more widespread in 1987 (82%): this being mostly accounted for by the increase in the use of tamoxifen (delivered alone or in combination with chemotherapy to 53% of women). Overall, our results suggest that areas of care more dependent on organization or doctors' and patients' education (i.e. diagnostic timeliness and accessibility) are those where deficiencies seen to be least amenable to change in the absence of concerted intervention. Among more narrowly defined clinical issues, there appeared to be some dissonance between the rapid acceptance of adjuvant treatments and the still slow pace of acceptance of less aggressive procedures by surgeons.
The data on 914 patients enrolled in four randomised trials in advanced ovarian cancer, consecutively conducted by the same cooperative group between 1978 and 1986, were analysed with the aims of: (1) determining the impact of selected prognostic variables on survival; (2) finding, from the interaction of favourable prognostic factors and treatment, an approximate estimate of the magnitude of the survival advantage associated with the use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy. The overall 3-year survival in this series of patients is twice that reported historically (22%; 95% CL 18.7-25.4). The proportional hazard regression model was used to perform the analysis on survival. Residual tumour size, age, FIGO stage and cell type were all independent determinants of survival. Differences in survival from the various prognostic groups were impressive with 5-year survival rates ranging from 7 to 62%. However, these differences were not qualitative (i.e. the kinetics of survival were similar for the best and the worst groups) suggesting that current prognostic factors are of little use for selecting 'biologically' different sub-populations. Platinum-based regimens were associated to an overall prolonged median survival, but this benefit was not observable in the subgroup with most favourable prognosis (less than 2 cm residual tumour size). The implications of these observations for clinical research and ovarian cancer patients care are discussed.
Over the past ten years the Italian National Research Council (C.N.R.) has carried out an educational program based on the preparation and dissemination of guidelines to facilitate delivery in community hospitals of the most up-to-date care to patients with ovarian cancer. In 1988 an assessment was begun to determine (a) whether the guidelines reached the target physician population; (b) whether they were accepted by those they reached, and (c) whether treatment patterns thereafter conformed to the guidelines. Overall results of this evaluation provide no evidence of clinically relevant effects of the program. The guidelines were not widely disseminated: only 44% of responders were aware of them. Moreover, analysis of practice patterns showed serious deficiencies in diagnostic procedure and surgical staging (information on grading and residual tumour was available only in 30% and 45% of cases, respectively, and only 10% of the patients had random biopsies as part of their surgical staging). The only observation supporting some effect of this educational intervention in terms of knowledge modification was of certain therapeutic preferences among those aware of the guidelines. This finding, however, is highly susceptible to confounding by other factors (e.g. physicians' greater expertise, spillover effect of the program) not entirely avoidable in an observational study. We conclude that any assessment of procedures based on dissemination of information must include a careful analysis of the method of dissemination. The availability of clinically applicable information must also be realistically appraised before the guidelines approach can be accepted as the most effective.
Trials on chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer published between 1975-88 were systematically reviewed for quality (according to the method of Chalmers) and consistency of tested hypotheses with a view to a meta-analysis of all published studies in the field. Median overall, internal and external validity scores were 47%, 43% and 53%, respectively. No association was found between scores and key features of trials, such as percentage studies with significant results in response or survival or percentage studies with high or low follow-up retention (withdrawal rates less than or greater than or equal to 15%). Only 21% of trials reported a fully blind randomization procedure and only in 13% were drop-outs accounted for by the intent-to-treat method. Only 4 trials entered more than 150 patients per arm, a sample size consistent with detection of an absolute difference of 11% in mortality. The majority of trials (58%) investigated the role of combination regimens versus a single-agent control arm. The remaining trials tested different polychemotherapies. However, within these two general issues, treatment options were quite heterogeneous: seven subgroups were identified by whether cisplatin was present in either the treatment or the control arm. We conclude that the internal coherence and development of randomized clinical trials in advanced ovarian cancer and their methodologic soundness are quite poor. In this situation meta-analysis cannot go beyond a systematic attempt to answer a very general "treatment effectiveness" question.
Between 1976 and 1986, 2,093 children with ALL were enrolled in three consecutive generations of trials conducted by the Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP). A 50% event-free survival at 5 years was achieved overall in this population, approximately accounting for more than 50% of the entire childhood ALL population in Italy. Participation in the group protocols increased from the original seven founding centers to the current 37 institutions. Results in the standard population (non-T immunophenotype, non-FAB L3, and less than 50,000 white blood cells (WBC/ml) were considerably better with more recent, more aggressive protocols. The two major results in this population (N = 540) were a relatively low incidence (8% at 5 years) of central nervous system (CNS) relapse in the "good"-risk population (less than 10,000 WBC, ages 3-6 years, and FAB L1), without the use of cranial irradiation, and a projected 4-year disease-free interval for bone-marrow relapse of 80% in the "average"-risk group, where a three-drug reinduction program was adopted after consolidation. Overall, the event-free survival of the most recent generation (protocol 82, median follow-up time of 38 months) is 66% at 4 years (95% confidence limits [CL] 61-71). Based on these 10 years of experience, the general strategy of the group for the 90s is outlined and discussed.
A total of 155 samples from 101 patients with ovarian cancer were investigated using flow cytometry to evaluate the DNA index and the percentage of cells in the various cell cycle phases. Thirty-four samples were DNA diploid tumours, while the other 121 were DNA aneuploid tumours. The DNA index was very stable in different sites and over time in the same patient. Tumour stage and ploidy were significantly associated: stages III and IV tumour stage were more likely to be DNA aneuploid. Patients with residual tumour size at first surgery greater than 2 cm had a significantly larger number of DNA aneuploid than DNA diploid tumours. The DNA index was also related to the degree of differentiation of the tumours. The percentage of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle was significantly higher in DNA aneuploid and in poorly differentiated tumours than DNA diploid and well differentiated tumours. Multivariate analysis using the Cox model showed that the DNA index and the percentage of cells in S phase were not independent prognostic variables in this study. Prospectively collected data should be accumulated before assigning the DNA index an important role as a biological prognostic factor in ovarian cancer.
Estrogen receptor (ER) and progestin receptor were measured in samples of tumors obtained at first laparotomy from 97 previously untreated patients suffering with a primary ovarian epithelial tumor, for whom a 3-year follow-up was available. The presence or absence of steroid receptors (threshold arbitrarily fixed at 10 fmol/mg of cytoplasmic protein) was determined by the dextran coated charcoal method and related to a number of patient characteristics such as the residual disease (cutoff, 2 cm), histological type, International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians grade and stage, and age. Results were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods. (a) The tumor ER positivity was associated with better survival; progestin receptor showed a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance. (b) After stratification for residual tumor the association ER positivity/better survival was still statistically significant in the subset of patients with residual tumor greater than 2 cm. (c) When the median survival times were considered it became apparent that progestin receptor absence nullified the effect associated with positive ER. (d) Multivariate analysis confirmed that among the variables considered the main determinants of prognosis were the size of the residual tumor, serous histological type, and positive ER.
We examined the activity reported in phase II trials for all cytotoxic drugs introduced into clinical trial by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) since 1970. For each drug in each tested tumor type we derived a response rate from the pooled data of all trials reported either in the literature or to the NCI. We rated a drug active if the lower 80% confidence bound of the response rate was greater than 10%. Of the 83 drugs developed and introduced by the NCI, there are 47 which we considered evaluable. Of these drugs, 24 were rated active in at least one cancer type, of which ten were analogs of drugs in wide clinical use. Diseases most commonly responsive include lymphoma (74% of the tested drugs rated active), leukemia (35%), urothelial cancer (29%), small cell lung cancer (29%), ovarian cancer (22%), cervical cancer (22%), and breast cancer (18%). For colon cancer and melanoma, only one of 42 and two of 30 tested drugs rated active, respectively. We also examined the completeness of clinical testing: among the 47 drugs there were 20 tested in greater than or equal to 14 patients with leukemia, 23 tested in patients with lymphoma, and 18 tested in patients with small cell lung cancer; whereas 34 drugs for breast cancer, 42 for colon cancer, and 33 for non-small cell lung cancer were more completely evaluated. Considering the "clinical panel" of seven cancer types (breast, non-small cell lung, small cell lung, colon, melanoma, leukemia, and lymphoma), drugs were tested in greater than or equal to 30 patients in a median of four tumor types. Testing in this panel failed to detect activity in only one drug found active in another tumor, although testing in diseases other than this clinical panel was even less complete. Phase II testing should emphasize completion of minimum accrual goals, testing in patient populations with minimum prior therapy, and evaluation in a minimum set of tumor types.
Amsacrine is an antileukemia drug being widely used in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. In the initial clinical trials, patients treated with amsacrine developed occasional instances of acute cardiac arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy. We review and analyze the features of cardiac abnormalities associated with amsacrine in 82 patients, 27 of whom have not been previously reported. The rest have been reported in the literature, but we have included a large amount of additional information about these patients in our analysis. We conclude that amsacrine-related cardiac events are less common than those related to anthracycline chemotherapeutic agents. Manifestations of such toxicity include ECG abnormalities, ventricular and atrial arrhythmias, sudden death, and congestive heart failure. There is little or no cumulative dose effect. Hypokalemia may be a risk factor for development of serious tachyarrhythmias, but such problems can occur despite a normal serum potassium level. Amsacrine appears to affect depolarization and repolarization of the heart, but the mechanism is unknown.
Hexamethylmelamine (HMM) was selected for development as an antineoplastic agent because it demonstrated activity in a variety of preclinical tumor models. Its mechanism of action is unknown. It has been used in clinical trials since 1964. The clinical toxic effects have consisted of signs and symptoms involving the following systems: gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, anorexia), hematologic (leukopenia, mild anemia), and neurologic (critical depression, hallucinations, peripheral motor and sensory deficits). Antitumor activity against advanced ovarian cancer was demonstrated in phase I trials and the drug was quickly incorporated into trials which utilized drug combinations. The majority of these have consisted of phase II trials without an identified control population. As might be predicted, all of the HMM-containing combinations are active. However, the contribution of HMM to the antitumor activity of the combination remains conjectural. Thus, in spite of greater than 15 years of clinical trials with a drug that has single-agent activity, the questions regarding the role of HMM in the treatment of ovarian cancer remain unanswered.
Pentostatin (dCF), an inhibitor of adenosine deaminase, has shown activity in the treatment of several lymphoid malignancies, even in the earliest phase I trials. An analysis of the first 300 patients treated in such trials shows a high incidence of severe infection (8%) during the relatively brief period of treatment. Of 24 patients in whom infection was diagnosed, 17 had no evidence of myelosuppression. The causative organisms included viruses, fungi, and bacteria of both high and low pathogenicity. Two-thirds of the infections were fatal. It is suggested that dCF may cause a syndrome similar to severe combined immunodeficiency during the course of treatment. Patients treated with dCF who show evidence of infection, even in the absence of neutropenia, should receive vigorous and rapid diagnostic evaluation to establish the cause of their infection, and aggressive treatment of suspected organisms.
We analyzed the therapeutic effect reported in 187 phase I trials of 54 anticancer drugs introduced into National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trial from 1974 to 1982. An additional 12 drugs entering clinical trial prior to 1974 were also examined. Objective responses (partial and complete) were reported in 271 of the 6447 patients (4.2%). Thirty-nine percent of the patients were treated at an initial dose level greater than or equal to the dose ultimately recommended for phase II trials. Patients in phase I trials generally had adequate performance status (Karnofsky scale greater than 80% or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0, 1, or 2). More than 90% of the patients had received prior chemotherapy. We next examined the therapeutic effect observed in phase II trials for each of the drugs. Thirty-eight of the 54 drugs had completed at least one phase II trial. Twenty-one drugs were rated active, and nine were rated inactive. For the drugs entering clinical trial since 1974, the median phase I response rate for those active in phase II was 4.3%, compared to 2.7% for the drugs not found active in phase II. This difference was not statistically significant. The tabulated response rate in phase I trials reported here should be interpreted cautiously. There are many factors which may contribute to significant variability in the reported response rates, including the heterogeneity of patient population with respect to prior therapy and tumor type, lack of requirement for measurable/evaluable disease on entry into many studies, and variations in the rigor with which tumor sites are followed for response. These factors may lead to either an overestimate or underestimate of the true response rate in phase I. Although little therapeutic effect is produced in phase I, we discuss several measures which might increase patient benefit during these trials.
The evolution of the Division of Cancer Treatment's preclinical toxicology protocols over the last decade, a description of the current protocol, and the progress of this protocol regarding quantitative and qualitative relationships to current clinical findings are presented in this report. Data are reviewed for seven experimental antineoplastic drugs. Preliminarily, the following conclusions can be made from preclinical and clinical toxicology experience with these first seven drugs. The 1/10 MELD10 establishes a safe human starting dose. Six of seven drugs could have started at 1/10 MELD10 with no adverse effects. Toxicity data from the beagle dog did not effectively predict whether the 1/10 MELD10 dose level represents a hazard to humans. Clinical dose escalation procedures can not be efficiently predicted from currently acquired preclinical information. Toxicity studies in dogs were effective in disclosing the human dose-limiting toxic effects and approximated the maximally tolerated dose for six of seven drugs. In the exceptional case, the dose level predicted for human toxicity was grossly underestimated in both experimental species. We conclude that the preclinical toxicity data from the beagle dog are valuable in predicting the potential risk to humans, even though the safety of the entry-level doses is occasionally underpredicted.