PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sally Land

Publications and source records attributed to Sally Land.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Underestimation of HIV type 1 drug resistance mutations: results from the ENVA-2 genotyping proficiency program.

Current recommendations indicate the use of HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping in the treatment of HIV-1 infection, primarily on treatment failure, and in specific instances also before the initiation of therapy. As such, HIV-1 genotyping is becoming a standard of care parameter in HIV-1 treatment monitoring and a rapidly increasing number of laboratories now use this technology routinely. A study of proficiency, using the ENVA-2 panel, was performed to evaluate the current HIV-1 resistance genotyping quality in 34 laboratories from different parts of the world. The results demonstrated extensive interlaboratory variation in the quality of genotyping and a significant underestimation of resistance mutations, even in samples expressing pure mutant genotype. The level of variation could not be attributed to the sequencing technology used and was therefore considered to be laboratory associated. The direct clinical consequences of this may be inadequate treatment of HIV-1-infected individuals and a more rapid exhaustion of therapeutic options for the patients. Drug resistance mutations are frequently missed. Therefore, quality control programs are urgently needed. Until these are widely implemented, clinicians must consider this issue and interpret the reported genotyping results with caution.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.

We report the results from 57 Australian diagnostic laboratories testing two external quality assessment panels using either the Roche Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test (R-PCR) or the Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay (A-ligase chain reaction [LCR]). Panel samples were either normal urine spiked with Chlamydia trachomatis antigen or clinical urine specimens. There was no significant difference between laboratories or between assays in detection of C. trachomatis-positive clinical samples. Only at the lower limit of detection of the assays did the R-PCR demonstrate increased sensitivity over the A-LCR in the detection of C. trachomatis antigen. However, it was found that single-sample testing could lead to decreased test sensitivity. Detection of the presence of inhibitors of nucleic acid amplification differed between laboratories.

Australia↗