Biomedical subjects

Sean Jurgens

Publications and source records attributed to Sean Jurgens.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

An Updated Evidence Assessment of the Genetic Causes of Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the diverse genetic architecture of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) continues to emerge and requires reassessment of the clinical relevance of implicated disease genes. Building on the 2019-2020 Clinical Genome Resource evaluation, the DCM gene curation expert panel reconvened in 2024-2025 to conduct a reassessment of genes in DCM. METHODS: The Clinical Genome Resource semiquantitative clinical validity classification framework was applied with specifications to DCM to classify genes into categories on the basis of strength of published evidence for a DCM phenotype. Previously curated genes were reassessed, and newly reported gene-disease-mode of inheritance (MOI) relationships, termed "curations," were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-eight genes were evaluated, inclusive of 72 unique gene-disease-MOI relationships across 51 previously evaluated and 17 newly assessed genes. Thirty-five curations were classified as high evidence (16 Definitive, 10 Strong, 9 Moderate), increasing by 16 from the prior assessment. Nine newly assessed genes were classified as high evidence: BAG5, FLII, LMOD2, MYLK3, MYZAP, NRAP, PPA2, PPP1R13L, and RPL3L. Twelve genes (11 newly appraised) were rated as high evidence with an autosomal recessive (AR) MOI. Five reevaluated genes from 2019-2020 had clinically significant changes in classification. Except for JPH2, for which curation was modified to separate autosomal dominant and AR MOI curations, clinically significant changes involved upgrades from low- to high-evidence categories (PLEKHM2, PRDM16, TBX20, TNNI3K), demonstrating the robustness of the Clinical Genome Resource gene curation process over time. An additional 29 gene-disease-MOI curations were classified as Limited, including 6 newly evaluated genes and 1 new MOI for a previously evaluated gene, MYBPC3-AR; 4 were classified as No Known Disease Relationship, and remained Disputed. Four previously evaluated genes were curated for both AD and AR MOIs: JPH2 (AD-Strong, AR-Limited), LDB3 (AD-Limited, AR-Strong), MYBPC3 (AD-Limited, AR-Limited), and TNNI3 (AD- and AR- Strong). CONCLUSIONS: With substantial new evidence, the genetic architecture of DCM has rapidly expanded. This updated assessment of genes reported in DCM yielded 35 high-evidence curations, an increase from 19 only 5 years ago. The results of this evidence-based evaluation process inform clinical interpretation of genetic information in the care of DCM patients and families.

dilated cardiomyopathy↗

PubMed2026

A Common CD36 Variant and the Genetic Landscape of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Individuals of African Ancestry.

IMPORTANCE: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major cause of heart failure that disproportionately affects individuals of African genetic ancestry (AFR), among whom familial clustering of disease is also more pronounced relative to those of European ancestry (EUR). However, established monogenic DCM genes, identified primarily in EUR populations, explain a smaller proportion of DCM cases in AFR populations. A recent study identified a common AFR-specific nonsense variant in CD36 that accounts for a substantial burden of DCM in AFR. How the risk and population impact of this variant compare with those of established genetic causes of DCM is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the contribution of a CD36 nonsense variant to DCM risk with that of truncating variants in TTN and pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in other established DCM genes. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicohort genetic association study including AFR and EUR participants with exome or genome sequence and DCM case status from four datasets: All of Us, Million Veteran Program, Penn Medicine Biobank, and the DCM Precision Medicine Study. EXPOSURE: Carrier status for TTN truncating variants, P/LP variants in 11 high confidence DCM genes, and the CD36 nonsense variant (Y325*; 0, 1, or 2 copies). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Odds of DCM; prevalence of risk-variant carriers among DCM cases; and population attributable fraction (PAF) for DCM. RESULTS: Among 82,623 AFR individuals across four studies, the mean age was 53.4 years and 1,625 had DCM. CD36 Y325* risk-allele homozygotes had 4.8-fold (95% CI, 3.1-7.3) increased odds of DCM, and CD36 Y325* heterozygotes had 1.4-fold (95% CI, 1.2-1.7) increased odds. TTN truncating variants also conferred elevated risk of DCM in AFR participants (OR, 8.46; 95% CI, 5.3-12.3). Among AFR DCM cases, 2.5% were CD36 homozygotes, second only to TTN truncating variants (4.3%) and exceeding all other high-confidence DCM genes combined (1.5%). In population-level analyses incorporating both heterozygous and homozygous CD36 Y325* carriers, the population-attributable fraction for CD36 (9.0%) surpassed that of TTN truncating variants (3.6%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: An ancestry-specific CD36 variant contributes more to DCM burden in AFR ancestry than established DCM genes, including TTN truncating variants, typically considered the most common genetic cause of DCM. These findings reshape the known genetic architecture of DCM in individuals of African ancestry and highlight the importance of representation in genomic research.

Journal Article↗