Biomedical subjects

Stuart C G Rison

Publications and source records attributed to Stuart C G Rison.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Gene3D: structural assignments for the biologist and bioinformaticist alike.

The Gene3D database (http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/bsm/cath_new/Gene3D/) provides structural assignments for genes within complete genomes. These are available via the internet from either the World Wide Web or FTP. Assignments are made using PSI-BLAST and subsequently processed using the DRange protocol. The DRange protocol is an empirically benchmarked method for assessing the validity of structural assignments made using sequence searching methods where appropriate assignment statistics are collected and made available. Gene3D links assignments to their appropriate entries in relevent structural and classification resources (PDBsum, CATH database and the Dictionary of Homologous Superfamilies). Release 2.0 of Gene3D includes 62 genomes, 2 eukaryotes, 10 archaea and 40 bacteria. Currently, structural assignments can be made for between 30 and 40 percent of any given genome. In any genome, around half of those genes assigned a structural domain are assigned a single domain and the other half of the genes are assigned multiple structural domains. Gene3D is linked to the CATH database and is updated with each new update of CATH.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Homology, pathway distance and chromosomal localization of the small molecule metabolism enzymes in Escherichia coli.

Here, we analyse Escherichia coli enzymes involved in small molecule metabolism (SMM). We introduce the concept of pathway distance as a measure of the number of distinct metabolic steps separating two SMM enzymes, and we consider protein homology (as determined by assigning enzymes to structural and sequence families) and gene interval (the number of genes separating two genes on the E. coli chromosome). The relationships between these three contexts (pathway distance, homology and chromosomal localisation) is investigated extensively. We make use of these relationships to suggest possible SMM evolution mechanisms. Homology between enzyme pairs close in the SMM was higher than expected by chance but was still rare. When observed, homologues usually conserved their reaction mechanism and/or co-factor binding rather than shared substrate binding. The correlation between pathway distance and gene intervals was clear. Enzymes catalysing nearby SMM reactions were usually encoded by genes close by on the E. coli chromosome. We found many co-regulated blocks of three to four genes (usually non-homologous) encoding enzymes occurring within four metabolic steps of one another; nearly all of these blocks formed part of known or predicted operons. The "inline reuse" of enzymes (i.e. the use of the same enzyme to catalyse two or more different steps of a metabolic pathway) is also discussed: of these enzymes, four were multifunctional (i.e. catalysed a different reaction in each instance), nine had multiple substrate specificity (i.e. catalysed the same reaction on different substrates in each instance) and one catalysed the same reaction on the same substrate but as part of two different complexes. We also identified 59 sets of isozymic proteins most commonly duplicated to function under different conditions, or with a different preferred substrate or minor substrate. In addition to transcriptional units, isozymes and inline reuse of enzymes provide mechanisms for controlling the SMM network. Our data suggest that several pathway evolution mechanisms may occur in concert, although chemistry-driven duplication/recruitment is favoured. SMM exploits regulatory strategies involving chromosomal location, isozymes and the reuse of enzymes.

Chromosomes, Bacterial↗

PubMed2002

Pathway evolution, structurally speaking.

Small-molecule metabolism forms the core of the metabolic processes of all living organisms. As early as 1945, possible mechanisms for the evolution of such a complex metabolic system were considered. The problem is to explain the appearance and development of a highly regulated complex network of interacting proteins and substrates from a limited structural and functional repertoire. By permitting the co-analysis of phylogeny and metabolism, the combined exploitation of pathway and structural databases, as well as the use of multiple-sequence alignment search algorithms, sheds light on this problem. Much of the current research suggests a chemistry-driven 'patchwork' model of pathway evolution, but other mechanisms may play a role. In the future, as metabolic structure and sequence space are further explored, it should become easier to trace the finer details of pathway development and understand how complexity has evolved.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Gene3D: structural assignment for whole genes and genomes using the CATH domain structure database.

We present a novel web-based resource, Gene3D, of precalculated structural assignments to gene sequences and whole genomes. This resource assigns structural domains from the CATH database to whole genes and links these to their curated functional and structural annotations within the CATH domain structure database, the functional Dictionary of Homologous Superfamilies (DHS) and PDBsum. Currently Gene3D provides annotation for 36 complete genomes (two eukaryotes, six archaea, and 28 bacteria). On average, between 30% and 40% of the genes of a given genome can be structurally annotated. Matches to structural domains are found using the profile-based method (PSI-BLAST). and a novel protocol, DRange, is used to resolve conflicts in matches involving different homologous superfamilies.

Animals↗