PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas Lenarz

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Lenarz.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation.

HYPOTHESIS: High-resolution imaging, as provided by flat-panel-based volume computed tomography (fpVCT), could increase navigation accuracy and could therefore improve image-guided procedures or make novel navigated surgery concepts possible. BACKGROUND: Intraoperative navigation is an accepted tool in head and neck surgery. However, its use is limited in the lateral cranial base because of its low surgical accuracy. Surgical accuracy is substantially influenced by the resolution of the underlying data set. The fpVCT offers a resolution of nearly two times higher than multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Target registration error (TRE), as a measurement for surgical navigation accuracy, should decrease when navigation is based on fpVCT data sets. METHODS: An acrylic glass phantom with 37 fiducial points was scanned in a current MSCT and in an experimental fpVCT. Both data sets were imported in an optical navigation system. Five fiducial points were used for registration, and seven points were used for measuring TRE. The distance between the indicated pointer tip and the corresponding fiducial point in data set was measured as TRE. Registration and TRE measurement were repeated five times for each computed tomographic data set. Average TREs were calculated, and results were compared using t-test. RESULTS: The average TRE using MSCT (0.82 mm [standard deviation, 0.35 mm]) was significantly higher than that using fpVCT (0.46 mm [standard deviation, 0.22 mm]) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Submillimeter surgical navigation accuracy is possible using high-resolution fpVCT. This could be highly beneficial in cranial base surgery navigation.

Humans↗

Auditory midbrain implant: a combined approach for vestibular schwannoma surgery and device implantation.

HYPOTHESIS: The lateral suboccipital approach is a well-established route for safe removal of vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) patients. The goal of this study was to assess if this approach can be extended to a lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach to enable insertion of an auditory midbrain implant (AMI) penetrating array along the tonotopic gradient of the inferior colliculus central nucleus (ICC). BACKGROUND: The AMI is a new auditory prosthesis designed for penetrating stimulation of the ICC in patients with neural deafness. The initial candidates are NF2 patients who, because of the growth and/or surgical removal of bilateral acoustic neuromas, develop neural deafness and are unable to benefit from cochlear implants. The ideal surgical approach in NF2 patients must first enable safe removal of vestibular schwannomas and then provide sufficient exposure of the midbrain for AMI implantation. METHODS: This study was performed on formalin-fixed and fresh cadaver specimens. Computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging were used to study the heads of the specimens and for surgical navigation. RESULTS: The lateral suboccipital craniotomy enabled sufficient exposure of the cerebellopontine angle and internal auditory canal for tumor removal. It could then be extended to a lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach that provided good exposure of the dorsolateral aspect of the tentorial hiatus and mesencephalon for implantation of the AMI along the tonotopic gradient of the ICC. This approach did not endanger the trochlear nerve or any major midline venous structures in the quadrigeminal cistern. CONCLUSION: This modified lateral suboccipital approach ensures safe removal of large vestibular schwannomas and provides sufficient exposure of the inferior colliculus for ideal AMI implantation.

Auditory Brain Stem Implants↗

Electrophysiological validation of a human prototype auditory midbrain implant in a guinea pig model.

The auditory midbrain implant (AMI) is a new treatment for hearing restoration in patients with neural deafness or surgically inaccessible cochleae who cannot benefit from cochlear implants (CI). This includes neurofibromatosis type II (NF2) patients who, due to development and/or removal of vestibular schwannomas, usually experience complete damage of their auditory nerves. Although the auditory brainstem implant (ABI) provides sound awareness and aids lip-reading capabilities for these NF2 patients, it generally only achieves hearing performance levels comparable with a single-channel CI. In collaboration with Cochlear Ltd. (Lane Cove, Australia), we developed a human prototype AMI, which is designed for electrical stimulation along the well-defined tonotopic gradient of the inferior colliculus central nucleus (ICC). Considering that better speech perception and hearing performance has been correlated with a greater number of discriminable frequency channels of information available, the ability of the AMI to effectively activate discrete frequency regions within the ICC may enable better hearing performance than achieved by the ABI. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate if our AMI array could achieve low-threshold, frequency-specific activation within the ICC, and whether the levels for ICC activation via AMI stimulation were within safe limits for human application. We electrically stimulated different frequency regions within the ICC via the AMI array and recorded the corresponding neural activity in the primary auditory cortex (A1) using a multisite silicon probe in ketamine-anesthetized guinea pigs. Based on our results, AMI stimulation achieves lower thresholds and more localized, frequency-specific activation than CI stimulation. Furthermore, AMI stimulation achieves cortical activation with current levels that are within safe limits for central nervous system stimulation. This study confirms that our AMI design is sufficient for ensuring safe and effective activation of the ICC, and warrants further studies to translate the AMI into clinical application.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Due to improved technology, cochlear implant (CI) candidacy has been widened towards patients with usable residual hearing in the low frequency range. These patients might benefit from additional acoustic amplification provided that residual hearing can be preserved with cochlear implantation. To provide a high probability of hearing preservation, a new electrode array was designed and developed at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. This 'Hybrid-L' electrode array has 22 electrodes spread over 15 mm with an overall insertion depth of 16 mm. The straight electrode with modiolus facing contacts is designed for a round window insertion. It shall provide the full range of the currently most advanced Nucleus CI system. A temporal bone study demonstrated the favorable insertion characteristics and minimized trauma to intracochlear structures. Compared to standard CI electrodes especially no basilar membrane perforation could be found. So far, 4 patients have been implanted and residual hearing could be preserved. One patient was fitted and showed a marked additional benefit from the electroacoustic stimulation compared to either acoustic or electrical stimulation alone. These results are very encouraging towards a concept of reliable hearing preservation with cochlear implantation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.

INTRODUCTION: Preservation of residual hearing in cochlear implant recipients has been demonstrated to be possible and provides the potential benefit of combined electric and acoustic auditory stimulation. A prototype 16-mm multichannel array has been designed to facilitate placement of 22 electrodes without damage to intracochlear structures. The electrode array is suitable for insertion via the round window membrane (RWM) or a small cochleostomy. AIM: To evaluate the insertion trajectory and the presence of trauma to intracochlear structures with the prototype electrode inserted by either the RWM or a scala tympani cochleostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen fresh frozen human temporal bones were prepared for cochlear implantation using a standard transmastoid facial recess technique. Twelve electrodes were implanted at the University of Melbourne and 6 at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. In Melbourne fluoroscopy was used to monitor the insertions. Twelve prototype electrodes were inserted via the RWM. A further 6 electrodes were inserted via a small scala tympani cochleostomy. The cochleostomy was sited inferior to the RWM to avoid trauma to the basilar membrane and spiral ligament. Specimens were embedded and fixed with acrylic resin and the cochleae then examined histologically at 200-mum intervals using a grinding and polishing technique. RESULTS: Full insertion of the electrode was achieved without significant resistance in all RWM and cochleostomy specimens. In two RWM specimens fold-over of the electrode tip occurred, and in one specimen the electrode penetrated the spiral ligament to lie in an 'endosteal 'position. In one cochleostomy specimen the electrode was rotated within the cochlea to face laterally rather than towards the modiolus. The final electrode position differed for the two groups, with the electrodes inserted via the RWM lying in a more perimodiolar position along the first part of the basal turn. The average depth of insertion was 240 degrees for the RWM electrodes and 255 degrees for the cochleostomy electrodes. Histologic examination showed no damage in any specimen to the modiolus, osseous spiral lamina or basilar membrane. CONCLUSIONS: A prototype hearing preservation electrode array was inserted by either a RWM or a scala tympani cochleostomy without evidence of significant intracochlear trauma.

Basilar Membrane↗

Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To report on combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation in a subset of conventional candidates for cochlear implantation where preoperative pure tone thresholds were </=60 dB HL for 250 and 500 Hz. METHODS: Subjects were 10 adults implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance perimodiolar electrode array. Soft surgical procedures were strictly observed: </=1.5-mm cochleostomy hole placed anterior and inferior to the round window, a Healon bubble placed over the opening to prevent entry of foreign bodies, and no suction applied. The electrode array was inserted 17 mm to the first marker rib using the recommended 'advance-off-stylet' technique. Pure tone hearing threshold levels were recorded pre-, and postoperatively at 1-2 and 6-12 months. Speech recognition was tested for cochlear implant (CI) alone and combined with ipsilateral hearing aid for 7 subjects who retained significant residual hearing in the implanted ear at 1-2 months after operation. RESULTS: There were 3/10 cases where 1-2 months after operation low-frequency responses were considered vibrotactile only (>85-110 dB HL, 250-500 Hz). In the remaining 7 cases, residual hearing was maintained up to at least 6 months after operation with minor changes. Insertion depth angles in these cases ranged from 285 to 420 degrees . For these subjects, the mean preoperative score for words presented at 65 dB SPL was 22%. Mean postoperative scores were 56% for CI alone, and 68% for CI plus ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.05, paired t). For sentences presented in multitalker babble noise at 5 dB SNR, mean scores were 61% CI alone, and 75% CI+IpsiHA (p < 0.01, paired t). CONCLUSIONS: Hearing was conserved during surgery and over time in 70% of conventional candidates implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance CI who had significant levels of preoperative low-frequency residual hearing (</=60 dB HL). These conventional candidates for CI also benefited from improved speech recognition in noise when using combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Differential brain-derived neurotrophic factor and transforming growth factor-beta expression in the rat cochlea following deafness.

Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) subtypes have demonstrated their importance in cochlear functions. The aim of this study was to determine gene and protein expression patterns of BDNF, TGFbeta1/2 and their main receptors trkB and TGFbetaR1/R2 in the auditory nerve and inferior colliculus of normal hearing and deafened rats by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Deafening was performed by cochlear injection of neomycin (10%). Significant gene expression changes were not found in the inferior colliculus after deafness; however, in the auditory nerve, BDNF, TGFbeta1 and TGFbetaR1 mRNA in particular were upregulated. Additionally, BDNF protein and the cytokines were found to be expressed in the auditory nerve after hair cell loss. These data indicate the importance of BDNF and TGFbeta1 as endogenous survival factors.

Animals↗

Upregulation of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and artemin mRNA in the auditory nerve of deafened rats.

Nerve growth factors play key roles in spiral ganglion cells survival and excitability. Our aim was to determine gene expression patterns of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family (GDNF) members and their receptors in the auditory nerve and inferior colliculus of deafened rats. The gene expression of GDNF, persephin, artemin and neurturin, and their receptors GFRalpha1, GFRalpha2, GFRalpha3 and Ret, was determined by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction using GAPDH expression as an internal standard. Following deafness, no significant changes in expression of GDNF family genes were found in inferior colliculus. In contrast, artemin, GDNF, GFRalpha1-3 and Ret RNA expression were strongly upregulated in the auditory nerve following deafness, indicating their importance in protecting the auditory nerve against cell damage.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Determination of the clinical growth index in unilateral vestibular schwannoma.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze factors associated with the clinical growth index of sporadic unilateral vestibular schwannoma and to evaluate the validity of the index as an indicator of tumor growth. DESIGN: A retrospective case review study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 118 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas. Clinical growth index was calculated by dividing tumor size by the length of clinical history. Clinical growth index, tumor size, symptoms, and symptom duration were tested for a relationship with tumor location, patient sex, and age. All tests were performed for the total group and separately for three subgroups: intrameatal tumors (IT group, n = 46), intrameatal and extrameatal tumors (IET group, n = 60), and extrameatal tumors (ET group, n = 12). RESULTS: Vestibular schwannoma diameter ranged from 3 to 40 mm (mean size, 14.3 +/- 7.6 mm). The maximum tumor diameter was significantly greater for the IET group (17.9 +/- 6.5 mm) and the ET group (19.3 +/- 8.5 mm) than for the IT group (8.5 +/- 4.3 mm) (p < 0.001). The mean clinical growth index was determined as being 31.3 +/- 55.7 mm/yr for the total group. A significantly lower clinical growth index was found for the IT group (14.7 +/- 25.3 mm/yr) compared with the IET group (41.9 +/- 69.2 mm/yr) and the ET group (43.3 +/- 52.4 mm/yr) (p = 0.031). A significantly negative correlation between the clinical growth index and the age of the patients was noted for both the total group (p = 0.010) and the IET group (p = 0.017). A significantly negative correlation between the tumor size and the age of the patients was determined for the ET group (p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a lower clinical growth index and smaller tumors in the older population, supporting data previously presented by extensive radiological studies. Our findings might provide a rationale for the consideration of the clinical growth index to estimate vestibular schwannoma growth rate.

Journal Article↗

Evaluation of Advanced Bionics high resolution mode.

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the advantages of the Advanced Bionic high resolution mode for speech perception, through a retrospective analysis. Forty-five adult subjects were selected who had a minimum experience of three months' standard mode (mean of 10 months) before switching to high resolution mode. Speech perception was tested in standard mode immediately before fitting with high resolution mode, and again after a maximum of six months high resolution mode usage (mean of two months). A significant improvement was found, between 11 and 17%, depending on the test material. The standard mode preference does not give any indication about the improvement when switching to high resolution. Users who are converted within any study achieve a higher performance improvement than those converted in the clinical routine. This analysis proves the significant benefits of high resolution mode for users, and also indicates the need for guidelines for individual optimization of parameter settings in a high resolution mode program.

Adolescent↗

Flat-panel volume computed tomography for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens.

HYPOTHESIS: Flat-panel based volume computed tomography could improve cochlear implant electrode evaluation in comparison with multislice computed tomography. BACKGROUND: Flat-panel based volume computed tomography offers higher spatial resolution and less metal artifacts than multislice computed tomography. Both characteristics could improve the evaluation of challenging but important questions in cochlear implantation assessment, such as an exact imaging of cochlea, osseous spiral lamina, electrode array position, and single electrode contacts. These questions are not currently fully answered by multislice computed tomography. METHODS: Four isolated temporal bone specimens were scanned in a current multislice computed tomography scanner and in two experimental flat-panel based volume computed tomography scanners before and after cochlea implantation. To compare flat-panel based volume computed tomography and multislice computed tomography, four features were rated according to the following criteria: 1) visibility of the cochlea; 2) visibility of the osseous spiral lamina; 3) discernibility of individual electrode contacts; and 4) the ability to determine the electrode array position relative to scala tympani and scala vestibuli. Layer-by-layer microgrinding pictures were used as the ground truth for verification of imaging findings. RESULTS: Flat-panel based volume computed tomography was superior to multislice computed tomography in all four features rated. The cochlea and facial nerve canal were much better delineated in flat-panel based volume computed tomography. The osseous spiral lamina and single electrode contacts were only visible in flat-panel based volume computed tomography. Assessment of implant position with regard to the cochlear spaces was considerably improved by flat-panel based volume computed tomography. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation assessment could be improved by flat-panel based volume computed tomography and, therefore, would be highly beneficial for cochlea implantation research and for clinical evaluation. However, these first results were shown by scanning isolated temporal bone specimens; scanning whole human skull bases might be more challenging.

Artifacts↗

Clinical results after stapedotomy: a comparison between the erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and the conventional technique.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether the use of the erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser has negative effects on inner ear function and to compare the short- and long-term hearing outcome of patients undergoing conventional stapedotomy versus laser stapedotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected audiometric data of patients with otosclerosis operated on by one experienced surgeon. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 266 stapes surgeries were evaluated for intraoperative findings, of which 209 patients were evaluated for preoperative and postoperative hearing thresholds after a 6- to 452-week (mean, 22 wk) audiological follow-up. INTERVENTION: One hundred fifteen (43%) of the operations were performed conventionally, using manual perforators for stapedotomy (Group A); in 115 (43%) surgeries, the perforators were used in combination with the Er:YAG laser (Group B), and in 36 (14%) operations, the Er:YAG was used exclusively for footplate perforation (Group C). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure-tone audiometry was performed before surgery, 2 days postoperatively (bone conduction only) and at 5, 26, and 57 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: A postoperative temporary threshold shift of the bone conduction could be found in all groups. In Group C, where the laser was used exclusively for footplate perforation, this threshold shift was not only the most significant, but also-in contrast to the other groups-not totally reversible. In all techniques, a satisfactory air-bone gap closure could be achieved. The best long-term results (96% of the patients had <or=20 dB air-bone gap after 57 wk) could be found in Group B. CONCLUSION: If certain rules to minimize inner ear trauma are followed, the Er:YAG laser is a safe tool in middle ear surgery. Combining both the laser and the conventional technique, instead of the separate use of either technique, leads to superior postoperative hearing results.

Adolescent↗

Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the conservation of residual hearing in recipients of the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant (CI) and the benefits of combined electrical and acoustic stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. SETTING: CI clinics in Western Europe. PATIENTS: Adult candidates for conventional cochlear implantation with a minimum preoperative word recognition score of 10% in the ear to be implanted. INTERVENTION: "Soft-surgery" protocol, including a 1- to 1.2-mm anterior and inferior cochleostomy hole with the electrode array, inserted 17 mm using the "advance-off-stylet" technique. Patients with postoperative pure-tone hearing threshold levels (HTLs) of 80 dB hearing loss or less at 125 and 250 Hz and 90 dB hearing loss or less at 500 Hz were refitted with an in-the-ear hearing aid for combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic (El-Ac) stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A questionnaire to collect information regarding surgery. Pure-tone HTLs measured at intervals. Word recognition tested in quiet and sentence recognition tested in noise at 10 and 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). HEARING CONSERVATION RESULTS: HTL data were available for 27 patients. HTLs were conserved within 20 dB of preoperative levels for 33, 26, and 19% of patients for 125, 250, and 500 Hz, respectively. However, the recommended soft-surgery protocol was strictly followed in only 12 of 27 patients. For these 12 patients, hearing thresholds were conserved within 20 dB for 50, 50, and 33% of patients. Median threshold increases were 40 dB (range, 250-500 Hz) for the whole group and 23 dB for the strict surgery group. Ten patients retained sufficient HTLs to enter the El-Ac user group. SPEECH RECOGNITION RESULTS: Group mean recognition scores for nine El-Ac users for words presented at 65 dB sound pressure level were 45% for CI alone and 55% for CI + ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.05, paired t). For sentences presented in noise at 5 dB SNR, mean word scores were 46% CI alone and 56% CI + ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.01, paired t). CONCLUSION: Hearing was conserved for conventional candidates for cochlear implantation where the recommended soft-surgery protocol was strictly adhered. Combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation provided considerable benefits for speech recognition in noise, equivalent to between 3 and 5 dB SNR, compared with CI alone.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of intraoperative application of steroid suspension and coating of the electrode contacts with a thin film of iridium oxide on the short-term, time-dependent development of the intracochlear impedance in adults implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour electrode. STUDY DESIGN: The time-dependent development of intracochlear impedances was investigated in four different groups of adult patients at daily and later weekly intervals until the first fitting. The four groups were as follows: 1) standard Nucleus 24 Contour (control, n = 7); 2) standard Nucleus 24 Contour with intraoperative application of steroids (Group S, n = 6); 3) iridium-coated Nucleus 24 Contour control (Group I, n = 8); and 4) iridium-coated Nucleus 24 Contour with intraoperative application of steroids (Group I + S, n = 5). All patients had postlinguistic onset of severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and no or little benefit of conventional hearing aids. Absence of ossification or any other cochlear anomaly and also absence of signs of retrocochlear or central origin to the hearing impairment bilaterally had to be confirmed preoperatively. RESULTS: Steroid application reduced impedances significantly (Groups S and I + S), whereas iridium coating lowered variance of the impedance among patients but did not reduce the impedance significantly. The steroid-induced reduction is more pronounced at basal electrode contacts. Furthermore, there is some indication that the tissue growth could be faster in patients having the iridium-coated Contour electrode. CONCLUSION: Provided that the reduction of electrode impedances with application of steroids is persisting, intracochlear application of steroids can be considered on a regular basis. Iridium coating of the electrode contacts seems not to be justified to be included as standard procedure.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

The auditory midbrain implant: a new auditory prosthesis for neural deafness-concept and device description.

The auditory midbrain implant (AMI) is a new central auditory prosthesis designed for penetrating stimulation of the human inferior colliculus. The major group of candidates for the AMI consists of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients who develop neural deafness because of growth and/or surgical removal of bilateral acoustic neuromas. Because of the absence of a viable auditory nerve, these patients cannot benefit from cochlear implants. An alternative solution has been the auditory brainstem implant (ABI), which stimulates the cochlear nucleus. However, speech perception performance in NF2 ABI patients has been limited. The fact that the ABI is able to produce high levels of speech perception in nontumor patients (with inaccessible cochleae or posttraumatic damage to the cochlear nerve) suggests that limitations in ABI performance in NF2 patients may be associated with cochlear nucleus damage caused by the tumors or the tumor removal process. Thus, stimulation of the auditory midbrain proximal to the damaged cochlear nucleus may be a better alternative for hearing restoration in NF2 patients. We propose the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) as the potential site. A penetrating electrode array aligned along the well-defined tonotopic gradient of the ICC should selectively activate different frequency regions, which is an important elementfor supporting good speech understanding. The goal of this article is to present the ICC as an alternative site for an auditory implant for NF2 patients and to describe the design of the first human prototype AMI. Practical considerations for implementation of the AMI will also be discussed.

Algorithms↗

Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.

HYPOTHESIS: Perimodiolar intracochlear electrodes with contacts facing towards the modiolus have limited current flow towards the outer wall of the cochlea and therefore, may reduce the occurrence of facial nerve stimulation (FN) in cochlear implant subjects. BACKGROUND: Facial nerve stimulation is a well-known complication in cochlear implant treatment especially in the group of subjects with otosclerosis. The possible explanation of this side effect is a change of the electrical properties of the otosclerotic bone leading to leakage current and resulting in facial nerve stimulation. METHODS: Four CI subjects who had been implanted with a Nucleus Mini22 device with a Nucleus Straight electrode between 9 to 12 years ago suffered from severe FN stimulation. Electrode contacts had to be switched off so that they could only use 4, 11, 13, and 15 electrodes of their usual set of 22. The switch off resulted in deteriorating speech understanding over time. Therefore, all subjects were reimplanted with a Nucleus 24R device with a Contour electrode. Preoperatively, the threshold of FN stimulation was obtained on all electrodes subjectively. Intraoperatively, FN stimulation thresholds were measured objectively with both, the old and the new device and were compared. NRT and SRT thresholds were also obtained with the reimplanted device to assure effective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. RESULTS: In all four cases the postoperative fitting demonstrated no FN stimulation on all electrodes up to maximum comfortable level. The insertion of the Contour electrode array was complete in three cases, in one case the array could only be inserted partially similarly to the situation before the reimplantation. Speech perception tests showed a significant improvement in all subjects with the new device. CONCLUSION: Electrodes with modiolar facing contacts and perimodiolar position like the Nucleus Contour electrode reduce the possibility of facial nerve stimulation significantly due to more focused electrical stimulation.

Adult↗

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor/glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor survival effects on auditory neurons are not limited by dexamethasone.

Cochlear implant performance depends on the number of surviving excitable auditory neurons and prevention of degradation of nerve-electrode interaction caused by adverse tissue reactions. Glucocorticoids and neurotrophic factors are promising options for a possible therapeutic intervention. Neurons dissociated from the spiral ganglion of rats (3-5 days old) were cultivated with addition of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and the corticosteroid dexamethasone in various concentrations (25, 50, 100 ng/ml) and in combination with each other (100 ng/ml). The results suggest that a combination of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor does not enhance spiral ganglion cell survival significantly when compared with single brain-derived neurotrophic factor treatment (100 ng/ml). In addition, dexamethasone application did not interfere with the survival-promoting effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor or glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor.

Animals↗